C1 Expression बहुत औपचारिक 6 मिनट पढ़ने का समय

The research was funded by

Research methodology and reporting expression

15 सेकंड में

  • Declares financial support for studies.
  • Ensures academic transparency and trust.
  • Standard in scientific and formal reports.
  • Crucial for avoiding conflicts of interest.

मतलब

यह वाक्यांश है कि कैसे शिक्षाविद् और वैज्ञानिक आपको विनम्रता से बताते हैं कि उनके कठिन काम का भुगतान किसने किया. यह पारदर्शिता के लिए बेहद महत्वपूर्ण है, यह सभी को दिखाता है कि पैसे ने गुप्त रूप से अध्ययन के परिणामों को प्रभावित नहीं किया. इसे एक सार्वजनिक धन्यवाद नोट के रूप में सोचें, लेकिन ईमानदारी के बयान के रूप में भी.

मुख्य उदाहरण

3 / 11
1

Reading a medical journal article

The study investigating the new cancer therapy was rigorous. The research was funded by a leading pharmaceutical company.

The study investigating the new cancer therapy was rigorous. The research was funded by a leading pharmaceutical company.

<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>
2

Presenting a scientific poster at a conference

Our preliminary findings are promising. As stated on the poster, the research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Our preliminary findings are promising. As stated on the poster, the research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>
3

University grant application report

This detailed report outlines our progress. The research was funded by the university's innovation grant, as per our agreement.

This detailed report outlines our progress. The research was funded by the university's innovation grant, as per our agreement.

<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>
🌍

सांस्कृतिक पृष्ठभूमि

Funding is highly competitive and often comes from federal agencies like the NIH (National Institutes of Health). Disclosing funding is a legal requirement for any research involving human subjects. The 'Wellcome Trust' is one of the world's largest providers of non-governmental funding. British researchers often emphasize 'public benefit' in their funding disclosures. The 'Horizon Europe' program is a massive funding source. Research funded by the EU must often be 'Open Access,' meaning anyone can read it for free. The 'Kakenhi' (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research) is the primary source. Funding is often seen as a mark of high social and academic status.

🎯

Use the Passive Voice

In academic writing, always use 'The research was funded by' instead of 'The NSF funded the research.' It sounds more objective.

⚠️

Don't Forget the 'By'

Using 'from' or 'with' is a common mistake. Stick to 'by' for the funding source.

15 सेकंड में

  • Declares financial support for studies.
  • Ensures academic transparency and trust.
  • Standard in scientific and formal reports.
  • Crucial for avoiding conflicts of interest.

What It Means

Ever noticed a science article mentioning who paid for it? That's what The research was funded by is all about! It’s like the opening credits of a movie, but for serious studies. It tells you the financial backer. Simple, right?

What It Means

This phrase does exactly what it says on the tin. It identifies the organization or group that provided the money. This financial support helps make the research possible. Without funding, many studies would never happen. It's a cornerstone of modern science. It builds trust with the readers. You know who has a vested interest. It's all about being open. Nobody likes secrets, especially in science! It's the grown-up version of 'who paid for your toy?'

How To Use It

You'll find this phrase mostly in formal written contexts. Think academic papers, scientific journals, and grant reports. It usually appears near the beginning or end of a document. Often, it's in a dedicated 'Acknowledgements' or 'Funding' section. You state the funder directly after the phrase. For example, The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health. It's straightforward and to the point. No flowery language needed here. Just the facts, ma'am! You're providing crucial context for the reader. It sets the stage for credibility.

Formality & Register

This phrase screams formal. You wouldn't use it chatting with friends at a coffee shop. Or texting your mom about a new recipe. It belongs firmly in the academic and scientific registers. It’s part of the standard operating procedure. Imagine using it in a TikTok dance caption. Awkward! It signals serious, peer-reviewed work. It’s the language of grants and scientific discovery. So, save it for your next groundbreaking paper.

Real-Life Examples

Think about a major medical breakthrough you hear about. Chances are, a phrase like this was tucked away in the full report. Or a climate change study in a respected journal. They need to disclose their funding. Even a study on the best way to compost. If a company paid for it, it gets mentioned. It's standard practice everywhere. From university labs to government agencies. It ensures everyone plays fair. And avoids any sneaky business. Like when your friend 'finds' money in their old coat. Was it really 'lost'?

When To Use It

Use this phrase when you are presenting formal research findings. Whenever financial backing influences your work. It's essential for maintaining academic integrity. It’s a requirement for many publications. It protects against accusations of bias. If a pharmaceutical company funds a drug study. You *must* declare it. If a tech giant sponsors AI research. Transparency is key. It's about being upfront. It shows you have nothing to hide. Your reputation depends on it. It’s like telling your boss who really did the work on a project.

When NOT To Use It

Avoid this phrase in casual conversation. It sounds stiff and unnatural. Don't use it for personal projects or hobbies. No one cares who funded your sourdough starter. Unless it's a very serious, professional bake-off! It’s not for social media posts or blogs. Unless you’re a science blogger discussing funding. It’s too formal for emails to colleagues about daily tasks. Save it for the big, important stuff. It's a bit like wearing a tuxedo to a picnic. Overdressed and out of place.

Common Mistakes

The research was paid for by The research was funded by (Less formal and common phrasing)
The research got money from The research was funded by (Too casual, lacks academic weight)
My research was funded by The research was funded by (Maintain objective tone; avoid first person in formal declarations)
Funding for the research came from The research was funded by (While grammatically correct, funded by is the most standard and concise phrasing)

Real Conversations

Journal Editor: "Before we publish, did you include the funding statement?"

Researcher: "Yes, The research was funded by the Wellcome Trust, it's in the acknowledgments."

Graduate Student 1: "This paper on sustainable energy is fascinating!"

Graduate Student 2: "Agreed. I saw The research was funded by the Department of Energy. Makes sense."

Colleague A: "Did you see the new study on caffeine intake?"

Colleague B: "Yeah, The research was funded by a coffee brand, apparently. Makes me wonder, doesn't it?"

Professor: "Remember, transparency is vital. Every paper needs to state who helped. So, The research was funded by should always be clear."

Quick FAQ

  • Q: Why is funding disclosure so important?

A: It ensures transparency and helps readers evaluate potential biases. Knowing who paid allows for a more critical assessment of the study's conclusions. It maintains trust in the scientific process.

  • Q: Can I use sponsored by instead?

A: While similar, sponsored by can imply a more commercial or marketing-oriented relationship. Funded by is preferred in academic contexts as it specifically refers to financial support for the research itself. It's about precision in academic language.

  • Q: Does it have to be a major institution?

A: Not necessarily. Funding can come from universities, government grants, non-profits, or even private individuals. The key is to declare *any* external financial support that significantly contributed to the research project. Small grants matter too!

  • Q: What if the researchers used their own money?

A: If the research was entirely self-funded, a statement like "The authors declare no specific funding for this work" or "The research was self-funded" might be appropriate. The goal is to be clear about *all* financial inputs, or lack thereof. Honesty is the best policy.

  • Q: Is this phrase specific to English?

A: The concept of disclosing research funding is global in academia. While the exact phrasing will differ, the requirement for transparency is universal across scientific disciplines and languages. It's an international ethical standard.

  • Q: Where in the paper does it usually appear?

A: Most commonly, it's found in an 'Acknowledgements' or 'Funding Statement' section, often near the end of the manuscript, just before the references. Some journals might require it earlier, but a dedicated section is typical. Always check journal guidelines.

इस्तेमाल की जानकारी

This phrase is strictly formal and academic, almost exclusively found in written scholarly works like research papers, reports, and grant acknowledgments. Its primary role is to ensure transparency by explicitly naming financial contributors, which is vital for ethical considerations and avoiding perceived conflicts of interest. Do not use this phrase in casual communication; it will sound awkward and out of place.

🎯

Use the Passive Voice

In academic writing, always use 'The research was funded by' instead of 'The NSF funded the research.' It sounds more objective.

⚠️

Don't Forget the 'By'

Using 'from' or 'with' is a common mistake. Stick to 'by' for the funding source.

💬

Transparency is Key

In English-speaking academia, failing to disclose funding is considered a serious ethical violation.

उदाहरण

11
#1 Reading a medical journal article
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

The study investigating the new cancer therapy was rigorous. The research was funded by a leading pharmaceutical company.

The study investigating the new cancer therapy was rigorous. The research was funded by a leading pharmaceutical company.

A standard, formal declaration of funding source in an academic context.

#2 Presenting a scientific poster at a conference
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

Our preliminary findings are promising. As stated on the poster, the research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Our preliminary findings are promising. As stated on the poster, the research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Used to inform the audience about the financial support for the project.

#3 University grant application report
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

This detailed report outlines our progress. The research was funded by the university's innovation grant, as per our agreement.

This detailed report outlines our progress. The research was funded by the university's innovation grant, as per our agreement.

Formal acknowledgment within a financial reporting document.

#4 News article citing a new study

The new study linking diet to mood has generated buzz. Interestingly, the research was funded by a large organic food corporation.

The new study linking diet to mood has generated buzz. Interestingly, the research was funded by a large organic food corporation.

Used by journalists to provide context about a study's potential interests.

#5 Twitter discussion about a new climate report
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M14.828 14.828a4 4 0 01-5.656 0M9 10h.01M15 10h.01M21 12a9 9 0 11-18 0 9 9 0 0118 0z"/></svg>

Just read that climate report. Super important work. Pretty sure #TheResearchWasFundedBy a combination of UN agencies and academic grants.

Just read that climate report. Super important work. Pretty sure #TheResearchWasFundedBy a combination of UN agencies and academic grants.

A modern, slightly informal usage on social media to highlight funding transparency.

#6 Documentary discussing scientific ethics
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

It's critical to know who stands to gain. Here, the research was funded by a foundation with no commercial ties, ensuring impartiality.

It's critical to know who stands to gain. Here, the research was funded by a foundation with no commercial ties, ensuring impartiality.

Emphasizing the integrity of the funding source.

#7 Instagram post by a science communicator
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M14.828 14.828a4 4 0 01-5.656 0M9 10h.01M15 10h.01M21 12a9 9 0 11-18 0 9 9 0 0118 0z"/></svg>

Fascinating new study on deep-sea ecosystems! 🐠🦐 #OceanResearch. Important to note: the research was funded by a global conservation charity.

Fascinating new study on deep-sea ecosystems! 🐠🦐 #OceanResearch. Important to note: the research was funded by a global conservation charity.

Integrating the phrase into a social media context for educational purposes.

Journal club discussion about a paper's limitations आम गलती
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

✗ This paper's findings are shaky because a candy company paid for the research. → ✓ This paper's findings are shaky because the research was funded by a candy company.

✗ This paper's findings are shaky because a candy company paid for the research. → ✓ This paper's findings are shaky because the research was funded by a candy company.

Correcting an overly casual way to express funding in an academic discussion.

Email to a peer reviewing a manuscript आम गलती
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M21 13.255A23.931 23.931 0 0112 15c-3.183 0-6.22-.62-9-1.745M16 6V4a2 2 0 00-2-2h-4a2 2 0 00-2 2v2m4 6h.01M5 20h14a2 2 0 002-2V8a2 2 0 00-2-2H5a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2z"/></svg>

✗ I checked the funding section, and it said, 'Research got money from TechCorp.' → ✓ I checked the funding section, and it clearly stated, 'The research was funded by TechCorp.'

✗ I checked the funding section, and it said, 'Research got money from TechCorp.' → ✓ I checked the funding section, and it clearly stated, 'The research was funded by TechCorp.'

Correcting informal language to the standard formal academic phrasing.

#10 A humorous thought when reading a surprising claim
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M14.828 14.828a4 4 0 01-5.656 0M9 10h.01M15 10h.01M21 12a9 9 0 11-18 0 9 9 0 0118 0z"/></svg>

Wait, a study says eating pizza every day is healthy? I'm willing to bet `The research was funded by` a major pizza chain. Pure coincidence, I'm sure!

Wait, a study says eating pizza every day is healthy? I'm willing to bet `The research was funded by` a major pizza chain. Pure coincidence, I'm sure!

Using the phrase humorously to express skepticism about biased findings.

#11 Reflecting on a personal tragedy related to an untreated disease
<svg class="w-5 h-5" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true"><path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M4.318 6.318a4.5 4.5 0 000 6.364L12 20.364l7.682-7.682a4.5 4.5 0 00-6.364-6.364L12 7.636l-1.318-1.318a4.5 4.5 0 00-6.364 0z"/></svg>

It breaks my heart that so many suffer. If only `the research was funded by` more generous patrons earlier, perhaps a cure would exist.

It breaks my heart that so many suffer. If only `the research was funded by` more generous patrons earlier, perhaps a cure would exist.

Expressing a longing for greater financial support for critical research.

खुद को परखो

Complete the sentence with the correct preposition and verb form.

The groundbreaking research into solar energy _______ funded _______ the Department of Energy.

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: was / by

We use 'was' for a completed study and 'by' to indicate the source.

Which sentence is the most appropriate for an academic paper?

Choose the best disclosure statement:

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: The research was funded by a grant from the World Bank.

This uses the standard formal passive structure and precise vocabulary ('grant').

Fill in the missing line in this professional dialogue.

Journalist: 'Dr. Smith, your findings on sugar are controversial. Who paid for the study?' Dr. Smith: '________________________________________'

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: The research was funded by an independent health NGO.

This is a formal, complete, and professional response.

Match the funding source to the most likely context.

1. National Science Foundation | 2. Coca-Cola | 3. Patreon Supporters

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: 1: Academic, 2: Corporate, 3: Crowdfunded

NSF is a government/academic body, Coca-Cola is a corporation, and Patreon is for crowdfunding.

🎉 स्कोर: /4

विज़ुअल लर्निंग टूल्स

अभ्यास बैंक

4 अभ्यास
Complete the sentence with the correct preposition and verb form. Fill Blank B1

The groundbreaking research into solar energy _______ funded _______ the Department of Energy.

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: was / by

We use 'was' for a completed study and 'by' to indicate the source.

Which sentence is the most appropriate for an academic paper? Choose B2

Choose the best disclosure statement:

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: The research was funded by a grant from the World Bank.

This uses the standard formal passive structure and precise vocabulary ('grant').

Fill in the missing line in this professional dialogue. dialogue_completion C1

Journalist: 'Dr. Smith, your findings on sugar are controversial. Who paid for the study?' Dr. Smith: '________________________________________'

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: The research was funded by an independent health NGO.

This is a formal, complete, and professional response.

Match the funding source to the most likely context. situation_matching B2

1. National Science Foundation | 2. Coca-Cola | 3. Patreon Supporters

✓ सही! ✗ बिलकुल नहीं। सही जवाब: 1: Academic, 2: Corporate, 3: Crowdfunded

NSF is a government/academic body, Coca-Cola is a corporation, and Patreon is for crowdfunding.

🎉 स्कोर: /4

वीडियो ट्यूटोरियल

इस मुहावरे के लिए YouTube पर वीडियो ट्यूटोरियल खोजें।

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले सवाल

4 सवाल

No, that sounds informal and slightly ungrammatical. Use 'The research was funded by' or 'The research was paid for by.'

Yes, but 'funded' is much more common in science and academia, while 'financed' is used for business and large infrastructure (like a bridge).

You can say: 'The research was funded by the NIH, the Wellcome Trust, and a private donor.'

Usually, no. In the disclosure, the source is more important than the amount.

संबंधित मुहावरे

🔗

Supported by a grant from

similar

A more specific version of 'funded by.'

🔗

Sponsored by

similar

Paid for by a company, often for marketing.

🔗

In collaboration with

builds on

Working together with another group.

🔗

Endorsed by

contrast

An organization says they like the research.

क्या यह मददगार था?
अभी तक कोई टिप्पणी नहीं। अपने विचार साझा करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!