Diese Seite in deiner Sprache
English فارسی العربية Español Français 日本語 한국어 Português 中文 हिन्दी
C1 verb 12 Min. Lesezeit

motsäga

Beispiele
Erklärung motsäga in your Level:
At the A1 level, the word motsäga is generally too advanced for active use. However, you can understand its basic concept by looking at the words that make it up: mot (against) and säga (to say). At this stage, you are mostly learning how to say 'no' (nej) or 'I don't agree' (jag håller inte med). You might encounter motsäga in very simple texts about people disagreeing, but you won't be expected to use it in your own sentences. Instead, focus on the verb säga (to say). If you see motsäga, just think of it as a very formal way of saying 'to say no to something' or 'to say the opposite'. It is a building block for your future vocabulary. At A1, your goal is to recognize that Swedish often combines small words to make new, bigger words. This is a perfect example of that pattern. You might hear it in a classroom when a teacher explains that two things are different. But for now, stick to simple disagreement. Practice saying 'Jag tycker inte det' (I don't think so) or 'Det stämmer inte' (That's not correct). These are the A1 equivalents of the complex idea of contradiction. Learning motsäga now is like looking at a map of a city you will visit later; it's good to know it's there, but you don't need to know every street yet.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung
At the A2 level, you are starting to build more complex sentences and might begin to recognize motsäga in news headlines or simple stories. You understand that it means 'to contradict'. You might even try to use it in a very basic way, like 'Han säger en sak, men gör en annan; han motsäger sig själv'. This is a great way to show you are moving beyond basic Swedish. However, you will still mostly use the phrase säga emot when you want to talk about disagreeing with someone. Säga emot is easier to use in daily conversation. At A2, you should focus on the fact that motsäga is a 'strong' verb, meaning it changes its vowels in the past tense. Just like 'säga' becomes 'sade', 'motsäga' becomes 'motsade'. You can practice this by writing simple sentences about people who change their minds or say things that aren't true. For example, 'Vittnet motsade polisen' (The witness contradicted the police). This level is about building the bridge between simple everyday words and the more formal words used in society. You are beginning to see how Swedish functions in more official contexts, and motsäga is one of those 'official' words. Keep an eye out for it when you read easy news (Klartext) or listen to simple podcasts.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung
At the B1 level, you are expected to have a solid grasp of motsäga and begin using it in your writing and speaking, especially in formal situations like a workplace or a school essay. You should understand the difference between motsäga (formal contradiction) and säga emot (informal disagreement). You can now use the verb to describe logical problems. For instance, in a discussion about a project, you might say, 'Den här planen motsäger vår budget' (This plan contradicts our budget). This shows a high level of professional competence. You should also be comfortable with the reflexive form motsäga sig själv. If you are describing a character in a book or a person in a news story, you can explain how they are being inconsistent. At B1, you are also learning about word order in more detail. You know that 'inte' comes after the verb in a main clause: 'Han motsäger inte chefen'. You are also starting to use the noun form motsägelse (a contradiction). This is a key word for debates. You might say, 'Det finns en motsägelse i ditt argument'. By using these words, you make your Swedish sound much more mature and precise. You are no longer just 'disagreeing'; you are identifying logical conflicts. This is a major step forward in your language journey.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung
At the B2 level, motsäga should be a natural part of your vocabulary. You use it fluently to analyze arguments, discuss scientific findings, and participate in complex debates. You understand the nuances of the word—that it isn't just about speaking, but about any two things that cannot be true at the same time. You can use it to talk about abstract concepts like values, theories, and data. For example, 'Deras handlingar motsäger deras uttalade värderingar' (Their actions contradict their stated values). At this level, you are also aware of the passive voice and can use it correctly: 'Påståendet motsades av flera oberoende källor'. You are also familiar with the adjective motsägelsefull (contradictory) and can use it to describe complex situations or people. You might write in an essay, 'Samhällets inställning till miljöfrågor är ofta motsägelsefull'. You can also distinguish motsäga from more specific terms like bestrida (to contest legally) or vederlägga (to refute with proof). Your ability to choose the right word among these synonyms shows that you have reached an upper-intermediate level of Swedish. You are now able to follow complex news reports and academic lectures where these terms are used frequently to maintain a high level of intellectual rigor.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung
At the C1 level, you have a masterly command of motsäga and its entire word family. You use it with precision to navigate the most formal and academic environments. You are sensitive to the rhetorical power of the word. In a high-level debate, you might use it to point out a 'logisk motsägelse' (logical contradiction) in an opponent's argument, effectively dismantling their position. You understand how the word functions in legal Swedish, where 'att motsäga ett vittnesmål' is a specific and serious action. You are also proficient in using the word in its participial and adjective forms to add depth to your descriptions. For example, you might discuss 'den motsägelsefulla naturen hos mänskligt beteende' (the contradictory nature of human behavior). At C1, you also recognize the word in historical or literary contexts where it might be used slightly differently. You can appreciate the irony when an author describes a character who 'motsäger sitt eget öde' (contradicts their own fate). Your use of the word is not just grammatically correct; it is stylistically appropriate. You know exactly when to use motsäga to sound authoritative and when to use a synonym to avoid repetition. You can also handle complex sentence structures involving the verb, such as 'Utan att för den skull motsäga tidigare talare, vill jag tillägga...' (Without necessarily contradicting previous speakers, I would like to add...). This level of sophistication is what defines the C1 learner.
At the C2 level, your understanding of motsäga is indistinguishable from that of a highly educated native speaker. You can use the word to explore philosophical paradoxes, intricate legal disputes, and high-level scientific discourse. You are aware of the word's etymological journey and how it fits into the broader Germanic and Latinate linguistic landscape. You can use the word in extremely nuanced ways, such as discussing how certain quantum phenomena 'tycks motsäga vår intuitiva uppfattning om tid och rum' (seem to contradict our intuitive perception of time and space). You are also capable of using the word in creative writing to create complex, multi-layered meanings. You might describe a silence that motsäger the chaos of a scene, or a look that motsäger a spoken 'yes'. At this level, you don't just use the word; you play with it. You can identify and use rare or archaic forms of the word if necessary for a specific stylistic effect. You are also a master of the noun motsägelse and its various collocations, such as 'en inneboende motsägelse' (an inherent contradiction) or 'en skriande motsägelse' (a glaring contradiction). Your ability to navigate these complexities with ease and elegance is the hallmark of near-native proficiency. Motsäga is no longer just a vocabulary item; it is a precision instrument in your linguistic toolkit, used to carve out exact meanings in the most demanding communicative situations.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung
Beispiele
The Swedish verb motsäga is a sophisticated and essential term within the Swedish language, primarily used to describe the act of asserting the opposite of a statement or to express that two facts or ideas are mutually exclusive. At its linguistic core, the word is a compound of mot (against) and säga (to say), mirroring the Latin roots of the English word 'contradict' (contra-dicere). This direct structural parallel makes it relatively intuitive for English speakers to grasp, yet its application requires a nuanced understanding of Swedish formality and sentence structure. In contemporary Swedish, you will encounter motsäga in professional, academic, and legal contexts where precision is paramount. It is not merely a word for 'disagreeing'; it carries the weight of logical inconsistency. When a witness in a courtroom provides testimony that conflicts with physical evidence, a lawyer might state that the testimony motsäger the facts. Similarly, in scientific discourse, if a new experiment yields results that do not align with a prevailing hypothesis, the results are said to motsäga the theory.
Semantic Nuance
Unlike the more colloquial 'säga emot', which often implies a personal disagreement or a child talking back to a parent, motsäga focuses on the objective incompatibility of information.

Resultaten i den nya rapporten verkar motsäga allt vi tidigare trodde oss veta om klimatet.

Beyond the physical act of speaking, the word extends to abstract concepts. For instance, a person's actions might motsäga their stated values. If someone claims to be an environmentalist but frequently travels by private jet, their lifestyle motsäger their principles. This word is a powerful tool for critical thinking and debate in Swedish, allowing the speaker to pinpoint logical flaws without necessarily attacking the individual's character. In the realm of Swedish literature and philosophy, motsäga is used to explore paradoxes and the complexities of human nature, where internal desires often motsäger external expectations. Understanding this word is a hallmark of reaching the C1 level, as it transitions the learner from simple communication to analytical expression.
Logical Application
In formal logic, a statement that is both true and false simultaneously is a 'motsägelse' (a contradiction), making the verb the foundational action of that state.

Det är logiskt omöjligt att motsäga naturlagarna utan att begå ett tankefel.

Vittnet började motsäga sig själv under korsförhöret.

Formal Tone
Using 'motsäga' instead of 'säga emot' in a professional email or academic paper instantly elevates your register to a more scholarly or authoritative level.

Ingen vågade motsäga direktörens beslut under styrelsemötet.

Dessa två teorier tycks motsäga varandra, vilket kräver ytterligare forskning.

In summary, motsäga is the go-to verb for expressing formal disagreement, logical conflict, and self-contradiction in the Swedish language.
Using motsäga correctly requires attention to both its grammatical function as a transitive verb and its reflexive application. As a transitive verb, it takes a direct object—the person or the statement being contradicted. For example, 'Han motsäger mig' (He contradicts me). Unlike some other Swedish verbs that require a preposition like 'på' or 'till', motsäga connects directly to its object. This is a common point of confusion for learners who might try to insert a preposition. Furthermore, the verb follows the conjugation pattern of 'säga', which is irregular. The present tense is motsäger, the past tense is motsade, and the supine form is motsagt. Mastering these forms is vital for fluid communication.
Grammar Tip
In subordinate clauses, remember that the word order changes. For example: 'Jag vet att han motsäger mig' (I know that he contradicts me).

Det är oartigt att ständigt motsäga sina kollegor inför chefen.

The reflexive form, motsäga sig själv, is particularly common in debates or when discussing hypocrisy. It means 'to contradict oneself'. If a politician makes two statements that cannot both be true, a journalist might point out that they are motsäger sig själva. This usage is crucial for critical analysis. In more complex sentence structures, motsäga can be used in the passive voice with the '-s' suffix, though this is less common than the active voice. 'Beslutet motsades av fakta' (The decision was contradicted by facts). However, it is usually more natural to use the active voice: 'Fakta motsade beslutet'. Another important aspect is the use of the word in participial forms. 'En motsägelsefull person' (A contradictory person) uses the related adjective form to describe someone whose behavior is inconsistent.
Word Order in Questions
When forming a question, the verb comes first: 'Motsäger du mitt påstående?' (Do you contradict my claim?)

Varför väljer du att motsäga den vetenskapliga konsensusen?

Hon motsade aldrig sin lärare, även när hon visste att han hade fel.

Negative Sentences
In main clauses, 'inte' follows the verb: 'Jag motsäger inte dina känslor, bara dina fakta.'

Ingen kan motsäga att ekonomin har förbättrats under det senaste året.

Det vore dumt att motsäga en expert på området utan bevis.

By practicing these patterns, you will develop the ability to use motsäga with the same precision as a native speaker, ensuring your arguments are both grammatically sound and rhetorically effective.
To hear motsäga in its natural habitat, one should look towards Swedish media, intellectual debates, and professional settings. It is a staple of 'Sveriges Radio' (Swedish Radio) news broadcasts, particularly during interviews with politicians or experts. When a reporter notices a discrepancy in a politician's argument, they might ask, 'Men motsäger inte detta vad ni sa förra veckan?' (But doesn't this contradict what you said last week?). This use highlights the word's role in accountability and investigative journalism. In the Swedish legal system, the word is used to evaluate the validity of evidence. A prosecutor might argue that the DNA evidence motsäger the defendant's alibi. In these contexts, the word is devoid of emotional heat; it is a clinical observation of factual mismatch.
Academic Environment
At Swedish universities, students are taught to look for 'motsägelser' (contradictions) in texts as part of critical source analysis (källkritik).

I debatten motsade de två forskarna varandra gällande vaccinets effektivitet.

Beyond formal settings, you might hear it in workplace meetings. If a project manager proposes a timeline that conflicts with the available budget, a team member might say, 'Jag vill inte motsäga dig, men budgeten tillåter inte detta.' This is a polite but firm way to point out a practical impossibility. It is less aggressive than saying 'Du har fel' (You are wrong) because it focuses on the internal logic of the situation. In Swedish culture, which often values consensus and 'lagom' (just the right amount), using a word like motsäga allows for disagreement within a structured, respectful framework. You will also find it in literature, where authors use it to describe internal conflict. A character might have feelings that motsäger their duty to their family. This duality is a common theme in Scandinavian noir and drama.
News Media
Headlines often use the word for impact: 'Nya bevis motsäger polisens teori om rånet.'

Det finns inget som motsäger att vi kan nå målet i tid.

Kritikerna menar att regeringens politik motsäger deras miljölöften.

Social Media
In online comments, you might see 'Sluta motsäga dig själv!' (Stop contradicting yourself!) during heated arguments.

Hennes kroppsspråk tycktes motsäga hennes vänliga ord.

Det är svårt att motsäga statistik som är så tydlig.

By immersing yourself in these diverse contexts, you will begin to recognize the frequency and importance of motsäga in everyday Swedish life.
Even advanced learners of Swedish can stumble when using motsäga due to its specific grammatical requirements and its relationship with similar-sounding phrases. One of the most frequent errors is the addition of an unnecessary preposition. Many learners, perhaps influenced by other Swedish verbs or English constructions, try to say 'motsäga till någon' or 'motsäga emot någon'. Both are incorrect. The verb motsäga is strictly transitive and takes the object directly: 'Han motsäger mig'. If you want to use 'emot', you must use the phrasal verb 'säga emot', which is a separate entity.
The Preposition Trap
Correct: 'Våga inte motsäga mig!' Incorrect: 'Våga inte motsäga emot mig!'

Många elever gör felet att lägga till 'till' efter motsäga.

Another common mistake involves the irregular conjugation. Because the base is 'säga', the past tense must be 'motsade', not 'motsägde'. While 'sägde' was used historically in some dialects, it is considered incorrect in modern standard Swedish. Similarly, the supine is 'motsagt', not 'motsägt'. Ensuring you use the correct vowel shifts is essential for maintaining a high level of proficiency. A third area of confusion is the reflexive pronoun. When saying 'to contradict oneself', the pronoun must agree with the subject. 'Jag motsäger mig själv', 'Du motsäger dig själv', etc. Forgetting to change the pronoun to match the person is a frequent slip-up.
Conjugation Error
Correct: 'Han motsade vittnet.' Incorrect: 'Han motsägde vittnet.'

Kom ihåg att motsäga böjs precis som det enkla verbet 'säga'.

Man bör undvika att motsäga sig själv i en vetenskaplig uppsats.

Register Mismatch
Using 'motsäga' in a very casual conversation with friends might sound overly stiff. In those cases, 'säga emot' is usually better.

Det är lätt att motsäga någon, men svårare att bevisa att de har fel.

Bevisen motsade allt han hade påstått under förhöret.

Finally, learners sometimes confuse motsäga with 'emotsäga'. Note that 'emotsäga' does not exist in standard Swedish. The prefix is always 'mot-'. By being aware of these pitfalls—preposition use, conjugation, reflexive agreement, and register—you can use motsäga with confidence and accuracy.
Swedish offers several synonyms and related terms for motsäga, each with its own specific register and application. Understanding these alternatives will help you choose the most appropriate word for your context. The most common alternative is the phrasal verb säga emot. While motsäga is formal and often focuses on logical inconsistency, säga emot is more colloquial and frequently refers to the act of disagreeing or arguing back. For example, a parent might tell a child, 'Säg inte emot mig!' (Don't talk back to me!). You would rarely use motsäga in this interpersonal, disciplinary context.
motsäga vs. säga emot
motsäga: Formal, logical, objective. Used for facts, theories, and self-consistency.
säga emot: Informal, interpersonal, subjective. Used for arguing or talking back.

I stället för att motsäga honom direkt, valde hon att ställa frågor.

Another synonym is vederlägga, which means 'to refute' or 'to disprove'. This is even more formal than motsäga and implies that you have successfully shown a statement to be false. If motsäga is the act of stating the opposite, vederlägga is the act of winning the argument with proof. In academic writing, vederlägga is a very powerful word. Then there is invända (to object). This is used when you have a specific point of disagreement but aren't necessarily saying the whole statement is a logical contradiction. 'Jag har inget att invända' means 'I have no objections'.
motsäga vs. vederlägga
motsäga: To state the opposite or be inconsistent.
vederlägga: To prove something is wrong through evidence.

Det är svårt att vederlägga hans argument med så lite data.

Hon valde att inte invända mot förslaget, trots sina tvivel.

motsäga vs. bestrida
motsäga: General contradiction.
bestrida: Formally disputing a claim, invoice, or legal charge.

Företaget valde att bestrida fakturan eftersom tjänsten inte levererats.

Hans handlingar går emot allt han tidigare har sagt.

By learning these distinctions, you will be able to navigate Swedish conversations and texts with a high degree of precision, choosing exactly the right word to express disagreement, logical conflict, or formal dispute.
Registriere dich kostenlos für die vollständige Erklärung

Beispiele nach Niveau

1

Han säger nej, han vill inte motsäga dig.

He says no, he does not want to contradict you.

A1 students should focus on 'inte' after the verb.

2

Jag vill inte motsäga min vän.

I don't want to contradict my friend.

Simple present tense after 'vill'.

3

Varför motsäger du mig?

Why are you contradicting me?

Question word order.

4

Motsäger han vad jag sa?

Is he contradicting what I said?

Verb-first question.

5

Hon vill aldrig motsäga sin mamma.

She never wants to contradict her mom.

Use of 'aldrig' (never).

6

Det är svårt att inte motsäga honom.

It is hard not to contradict him.

Infinitive form with 'att'.

7

De brukar inte motsäga läraren.

They usually don't contradict the teacher.

Present tense of 'motsäga'.

8

Kan du sluta motsäga mig?

Can you stop contradicting me?

Modal verb 'kan' + infinitive.

1

Vittnet motsade polisen igår.

The witness contradicted the police yesterday.

Past tense 'motsade'.

2

Du motsäger dig själv hela tiden.

You contradict yourself all the time.

Reflexive 'dig själv'.

3

Han har aldrig motsagt sin chef.

He has never contradicted his boss.

Supine form 'motsagt' with 'har'.

4

Det är dumt att motsäga fakta.

It is stupid to contradict facts.

Adjective 'dumt' + infinitive.

5

Varför motsade hon inte honom?

Why didn't she contradict him?

Negative past tense question.

6

De motsäger varandra i rapporten.

They contradict each other in the report.

Reciprocal 'varandra'.

7

Jag tänker inte motsäga ditt beslut.

I am not going to contradict your decision.

Future with 'tänker inte'.

8

Han började motsäga sig själv efter en stund.

He started to contradict himself after a while.

Reflexive 'sig själv'.

1

Den nya statistiken motsäger den gamla teorin.

The new statistics contradict the old theory.

Subject-Verb-Object structure.

2

Ingen i gruppen vågade motsäga ledaren.

No one in the group dared to contradict the leader.

Past tense 'vågade' + infinitive.

3

Det finns inget som motsäger att han talar sanning.

There is nothing that contradicts that he is telling the truth.

Relative clause with 'som'.

4

Du bör inte motsäga dig själv under intervjun.

You should not contradict yourself during the interview.

Modal verb 'bör' + reflexive.

5

Hennes handlingar motsäger ofta hennes ord.

Her actions often contradict her words.

Present tense plural subject.

6

Han försökte motsäga anklagelserna men misslyckades.

He tried to contradict the accusations but failed.

Past tense 'försökte'.

7

Rapporten motsäger inte våra tidigare fynd.

The report does not contradict our previous findings.

Negative present tense.

8

Det är viktigt att kunna motsäga felaktig information.

It is important to be able to contradict incorrect information.

Infinitive phrase.

1

Forskarens resultat motsäger den rådande hypotesen.

The researcher's results contradict the prevailing hypothesis.

Formal academic vocabulary.

2

Är det möjligt att motsäga naturlagarna?

Is it possible to contradict the laws of nature?

Abstract usage.

3

Vittnet började motsäga sig själv under korsförhöret.

The witness began to contradict himself during the cross-examination.

Legal context.

4

Dessa två lagar tycks motsäga varandra i detta fall.

These two laws seem to contradict each other in this case.

Reciprocal 'varandra'.

5

Man bör undvika att motsäga sig själv i en debatt.

One should avoid contradicting oneself in a debate.

Generic subject 'man'.

6

Hennes tystnad motsade hennes tidigare påståenden om oskuld.

Her silence contradicted her previous claims of innocence.

Metaphorical usage.

7

Det finns bevis som direkt motsäger hans alibi.

There is evidence that directly contradicts his alibi.

Adverb 'direkt' modifying the verb.

8

Ingen vågade motsäga direktören under styrelsemötet.

No one dared to contradict the director during the board meeting.

Formal business context.

1

De empiriska resultaten motsäger den teoretiska modellen helt och hållet.

The empirical results contradict the theoretical model completely.

C1 level precision with 'helt och hållet'.

2

Det vore en logisk motsägelse att påstå något annat.

It would be a logical contradiction to claim otherwise.

Noun form 'motsägelse'.

3

Författaren motsäger ofta sina egna teser i slutet av boken.

The author often contradicts their own theses at the end of the book.

Literary analysis.

4

Rättsläkarens utlåtande motsade den misstänktes berättelse.

The forensic doctor's statement contradicted the suspect's story.

Specialized vocabulary.

5

Det är en skriande motsägelse mellan ord och handling i politiken.

There is a glaring contradiction between word and deed in politics.

Idiomatic 'skriande motsägelse'.

6

Han lyckades vederlägga argumentet genom att motsäga dess grundpremisser.

He managed to refute the argument by contradicting its basic premises.

Sophisticated use of 'vederlägga' and 'motsäga'.

7

Deras livsstil motsäger deras uttalade miljömedvetenhet.

Their lifestyle contradicts their stated environmental awareness.

Social criticism context.

8

Det finns inga skäl att motsäga expertens bedömning i nuläget.

There are no reasons to contradict the expert's assessment at present.

Formal prepositional phrase 'i nuläget'.

1

Kvantfysikens lagar tycks motsäga vår intuitiva förståelse av kausalitet.

The laws of quantum physics seem to contradict our intuitive understanding of causality.

Highly abstract and academic.

2

Texten är fylld av inneboende motsägelser som gör den svårtolkad.

The text is filled with inherent contradictions that make it difficult to interpret.

Registriere dich kostenlos, um alle Beispiele zu sehen

Verwandte Inhalte

War das hilfreich?

Kommentare (0)

Zum Kommentieren Anmelden
Noch keine Kommentare. Sei der Erste, der seine Gedanken teilt!