Analysis was conducted via

Using this phrase requires a bit of a "reporting" mindset. You usually place it at the beginning of a sentence or a paragraph when you are about to explain your methods. The structure is almost always: Analysis was conducted via + [The Method/Tool]. For example, you might say, Analysis was conducted via a series of user interviews. Notice how the sentence doesn't start with "I" or "We." This is called the passive voice, and it is the bread and butter of formal English. It makes the statement feel more like an objective fact and less like a personal opinion. If you are using multiple tools, you can even list them. Just remember to keep the tone consistent. If you start this formally, don't end the sentence with "and it was super cool!" Stay professional until the end of the paragraph. It’s like a tuxedo; you can’t really wear it with flip-flops without looking a bit confused.

This phrase sits at the very top of the formality scale. You will find it in academic journals, annual corporate reports, and legal documents. It is definitely not something you would use while grabbing a burger with your friends. If you said, "Analysis of the menu was conducted via my hunger," your friends might think you’ve been reading too many textbooks! It belongs in environments where objectivity is key. Think of Zoom calls with stakeholders, whitepapers for a tech company, or a thesis for your master's degree. In these settings, using the passive voice (was conducted) actually builds trust. It shows you are being systematic and thorough. It is the language of professionals who want their work to speak for itself. Even on LinkedIn, this phrase might appear in a post about a new market trend or a successful project launch.

Imagine you are a data analyst at a big tech company like Netflix. You might write in a report: Analysis was conducted via our internal tracking software to determine which shows are trending in Spain. This sounds much more impressive than "We checked the app to see what people in Spain like." Or think about a travel vlogger who is doing a deep dive into flight prices. They might say, Analysis was conducted via three different booking platforms to find the best deals for 2026. Even in a job interview, if someone asks how you solved a problem, you could say, Initial analysis was conducted via a SWOT framework to identify our biggest risks. It works beautifully in any situation where you need to prove that your conclusions are based on solid evidence. It’s great for when you want to sound like the smartest person in the room—without actually saying, "I'm the smartest person in the room."

You should reach for this phrase whenever you are documenting a process. It is perfect for the "Methodology" section of a report. If you are presenting findings to a client, it helps justify your results. Use it when you want to sound objective and detached. It’s also very useful in written correspondence, like a formal email to a professor or a supervisor. If you’ve just finished a big project and need to summarize how you got there, this is your go-to opener. It’s also a lifesaver when you’re writing for an audience that values data and facts over anecdotes and feelings. In the world of SEO or digital marketing, you’ll see this a lot when people explain how they tracked keyword rankings or website traffic. It’s essentially a signal that says, "Attention: Serious data ahead!"

Please, for the love of all that is holy, do not use this in a text message to your partner. "Analysis of our relationship was conducted via my last three therapy sessions" is a great way to start an argument, not a conversation. Avoid it in casual settings, social gatherings, or when you’re trying to be relatable and warm. It is far too stiff for a casual Instagram caption about your weekend trip. Also, don't use it if the "analysis" was actually just a five-second Google search. You’ll sound like you’re trying way too hard. If the task was simple, use simple language. Overusing high-level jargon for low-level tasks makes you look insecure about your work. It’s like using a chainsaw to cut a piece of cake—technically possible, but totally unnecessary and a bit weird.

The most frequent mistake is forgetting the word was. People often say ✗ "Analysis conducted via..." which is grammatically incomplete in this context. It needs that helping verb to function correctly as a passive sentence. Another slip-up is using the wrong preposition. ✗ Analysis was conducted with or ✗ Analysis was conducted by aren't necessarily "wrong," but they don't carry the same professional weight as via. Some people also try to make it active but keep the formal tone, resulting in ✗ "I conducted analysis via..." which feels like a strange mix of personal and formal. Stick to the passive voice if you’re using this specific phrase. Also, watch out for redundancy. Don't say ✗ Detailed analysis was conducted via a thorough study. That’s just saying the same thing twice. Be concise! If you can say it in fewer words, do it, unless the formality is specifically required.

If you find yourself using this phrase too much, you can swap it out for some cousins. Data was gathered via is a great alternative if you’re talking about the collection phase. Research was performed through is a bit more general. For something slightly more active but still formal, you could try We utilized [tool] to conduct the analysis. If you want to focus on the result, you could say Our findings were derived via... In British English, you might see Analysis was carried out via... which is equally formal. In the world of AI and machine learning, you might hear Processing was handled via [algorithm]. These all serve the same purpose: explaining the "how" without sounding like a casual chat. Variety is the spice of life, even in boring technical reports!

Can I use this in an email? Yes, if the email is to a boss, client, or professor about a project. Is via better than using? In a formal context, yes, it sounds more professional. Does it have to be about data? Not necessarily; it could be about a process, like "Analysis of the legal documents was conducted via a third-party firm." Can I say "My analysis..."? You can, but Analysis was conducted via is even more objective. Is it okay for TikTok? Only if you’re making a joke about being super professional! Otherwise, it’s probably too heavy for a short video. Can I use it for a simple task? Better not; it might sound like you’re being sarcastic or overly dramatic. Just keep it for the big stuff.