The video owner has disabled playback on external websites.
This video is no longer available on YouTube.
This video cannot be played right now.
Watch on YouTube
KI-gestützte Lerntools freischalten
Registriere dich, um leistungsstarke Tools zu nutzen, die dir helfen, schneller aus jedem Video zu lernen.
Why obvious lies make great propaganda
Lernstatistiken
GER-Niveau
Schwierigkeit
Untertitel (197 Segmente)
At the height of the 2016 election researchers released a report warning about a strange
propaganda technique.
Another day, another lie, another conspiracy theory, another falsehood.
They called it the "firehose of falsehood."
When a propagandist bombards people with more lies than they can possibly keep up.
Why all these lies?
Why is it lie after lie after lie?
According to the report, these lies don't have to be believable.
It wasn't just a lie.
It was such a bad obvious lie.
Researchers found that even obvious lies had the potential to be highly effective at shaping
public opinion.
I mean he just says things and then they are the truth in the world of the Donald.
The thing is, that report wasn't about Trump.
It didn't even mention him.
It was about Russian propaganda.
And it raised an interesting question: How could a powerful leader benefit from telling
obvious lies?
We've signed more bills than any president ever.
The president just simply lies for no reason.
I was against the war in Iraq.
Why lie about something that you don't have to lie about?
You have people registered in two states.
They vote twice.
Why does he keep repeating it if it's obviously not true?
We're going to get to Trump in a minute.
Hell yeah!
But before that, we have to talk to Christopher Paul.
I'm a senior social scientist at the RAND Corporation.
He co-wrote the report on Russian firehosing and he described it as having four key characteristics.
Russian propaganda is high volume and multichannel.
It's rapid, continuous, and repetitive.
It makes no commitment to objective reality.
And it makes no commitment to consistency.
Oooh, sounds like Trump.
Can you give me a second?
I'm building a narrative here.
The first two characteristics are pretty standard for propaganda.
Research shows that if we hear a lie from multiple sources, we think of it as more credible.
The same is true for lies we hear repeatedly.
Vollständige Untertitel im Videoplayer verfügbar
Mit Übungen trainieren
Erstelle Vokabel-, Grammatik- und Verständnisübungen aus diesem Video
Kommentare (0)
Zum Kommentieren AnmeldenRegistriere dich, um alle Features freizuschalten
Verfolge deinen Fortschritt, speichere Vokabeln und übe mit Übungen
Interaktiver Modus
Quiz
Richtige Antwort:
Ähnliche Videos
Game of thrones | Hold the door | calming ambient music Extended
Jordan Peterson Calls Out The "Pseudo-moralistic Stances" Of Activists | Q&A
What Is Business Analytics? | Business: Explained
Seven Worlds, One Planet Season 1 First Look | Rotten Tomatoes TV
History Has its Eyes on You - Hamilton (Original Cast 2016 - Live) [HD]
Vox
Quiz
Richtige Antwort:
Quizfragen erscheinen beim Anschauen des Videos
Merkhilfe
Aus diesem Video
Kostenlos Sprachen lernen
