The video owner has disabled playback on external websites.
This video is no longer available on YouTube.
This video cannot be played right now.
Watch on YouTube
Débloquez les outils d'apprentissage IA
Inscrivez-vous pour accéder à des outils puissants qui vous aident à apprendre plus vite avec chaque vidéo.
How Decision Making is Actually Science: Game Theory Explained
Statistiques d apprentissage
Niveau CECRL
Difficulté
Sous-titres (189 segments)
When you’re hanging out with your friends, you probably don’t think too hard about
the math behind the decisions you’re making.
But there’s a whole field of math — and science — that applies to social interactions.
It’s called Game Theory.
Game theory was pioneered in the 1950s by mathematician John Nash, the guy from that
Russell Crowe played in A Beautiful Mind.
But game theory isn’t about games the way we normally think about them.
Instead, a game is any interaction between multiple people in which each person’s payoff
is affected by the decisions made by others.
So, sure, that could apply to a game of poker.
But it could also apply to practically any situation where people get together and get
up in each other’s business.
Like, did you interact with anyone today?
Well, you can probably analyze the decisions you made using game theory.
Game theory is incredibly wide-ranging, and it’s used all the time by economists, political
scientists, biologists, military tacticians, and psychologists, to name just a few.
Game theory has two main branches: cooperative, and noncooperative, or competitive, game theory.
Noncooperative game theory covers competitive social interactions, where there will be some
winners … and some losers.
Probably the most famous thought experiment in competitive game theory is the Prisoner’s
Dilemma.
The prisoner’s dilemma describes a game — a social interaction — that involves
two prisoners.
We’ll call them Wanda and Fred.
Wanda and Fred were arrested fleeing from the scene of a crime, and based on the evidence
the police have already collected, they’re going to have to spend two years in jail.
But, the DA wants more.
So he offers them both a deal: if you confess to the crime, and your partner does not, you’ll
be granted immunity for cooperating.
You’ll be free to go.
Your partner, though, will serve ten years in jail.
If you both confess, and dish up loads of dirt about each other, then you will both
end up spending five years in jail.
But if neither of you confess, you’ll both spend only two years in jail.
Those are their options.
Then, Wanda and Fred are split up.
They don’t know what their partner is going to do.
They have to make their decisions independently.
Sous-titres complets disponibles dans le lecteur vidéo
Entraînez-vous avec des exercices
Générez des exercices de vocabulaire, grammaire et compréhension à partir de cette vidéo
Commentaires (0)
Connectez-vous pour CommenterInscris-toi pour débloquer toutes les fonctionnalités
Suis ta progression, sauvegarde du vocabulaire et entraîne-toi
Mode interactif
Quiz
Rponse correcte :
Vidéos liées
Joel Interrogation BADASS Scene - The Last of Us Part 1 Remake
Funniest South Park Clips Montage Must See Try Not To Laugh Challenge
Anna and Elsa's Hidden Talents | Frozen
The Best Way to Lose Fat According to Anatomy | The Science of the Fat Burning Zone
Yellowstone | Beth Takes Teeter to the Bar to Drown Their Sorrows & Mess with the Tourists
SciShow
Quiz
Rponse correcte :
Les quiz apparaissent pendant que tu regardes la vidéo
Astuce mémo
Dans cette vidéo
Apprendre les langues gratuitement