यह पेज आपकी भाषा में

English

فارسی

العربية

Deutsch

Español

Français

日本語

한국어

Português

中文

B2 noun 9 मिनट पढ़ने का समय

타당도

tadangdo

इसका अभ्यास करें उदाहरण नोट्स और सुझाव 타당도 30 सेकंड में

व्याख्या 타당도 in your Level:

At the A1 level, '타당도' (validity) is a very difficult word because it is an academic term. However, you can think of it as a way to ask, 'Is this a good test?' or 'Is this right?' In simple Korean, we usually say '맞아요?' (Is it right?) or '좋은 시험이에요?' (Is it a good test?). You won't see '타당도' in basic textbooks for beginners. If you see it, just remember it means how 'correct' or 'proper' a measurement is. For example, if you want to know how tall someone is, using a ruler is '타당' (proper). Using a scale (for weight) is not '타당'. The 'degree' of how proper it is, is called '타당도'. It's like a score for how well a tool does its job.

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

At the A2 level, you might start seeing '타당도' in news headlines or simple educational articles. It is a noun. You can use it with '높다' (high) or '낮다' (low). For example, '이 시험은 타당도가 높아요' means 'This test has high validity.' It means the test is doing a great job of measuring what it should. Even though it's a big word, you can understand it by looking at the '도' at the end, which often means 'degree' or 'level,' like in '온도' (temperature) or '습도' (humidity). So, '타당도' is just the 'level of being valid.' You should focus on recognizing it rather than trying to use it in daily conversation.

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

At the B1 level, you should understand that '타당도' is a formal word used in schools and offices. It's used when talking about evaluations and research. If you are preparing for the TOPIK II exam, you might see this in the reading or listening sections, especially in topics about education or social issues. You should know that '타당도' is different from '신뢰도' (reliability). A test can be consistent (신뢰도) but not actually measure the right thing (타당도). You can start using it in written essays when you want to sound more professional. For example: '설문조사의 타당도를 높여야 합니다' (We must increase the validity of the survey).

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

At the B2 level, you are expected to use '타당도' accurately in academic or professional contexts. You should understand specific collocations like '타당도를 검증하다' (verify validity) and '타당도를 확보하다' (ensure validity). At this stage, you should also be aware of different types of validity, such as '내용 타당도' (content validity). You can explain why a certain research method might have low validity. For instance, if a sample size is too small or the questions are biased, the '타당도' will suffer. You should be able to distinguish '타당도' (technical metric) from '타당성' (general logic/feasibility) in your writing to show a high level of Korean proficiency.

At the C1 level, you should have a nuanced understanding of '타당도' as a foundational concept in the philosophy of science and psychometrics. You should be able to discuss complex topics like '구인 타당도' (construct validity) and '준거 타당도' (criterion validity) fluently. You can use the word to critique complex systems, such as the '타당도' of the national college entrance exam (수능) or the '타당도' of psychological assessments used in clinical settings. Your use of the word should reflect an understanding that validity is not just a 'yes/no' property but a multi-faceted evidence-based argument. You should also be able to recognize when the term is being used rhetorically in political or social debates.

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

At the C2 level, '타당도' is a tool for deep analytical discourse. You can engage in high-level debates about the '타당도' of various epistemological frameworks or the cultural '타당도' of Western psychological models when applied to a Korean context. You understand the historical evolution of the concept from simple correlation to complex structural equation modeling. You can write peer-reviewed quality critiques on the '타당도' of research designs, identifying subtle threats like confounding variables or measurement errors. At this level, the word is part of your professional lexicon, used with absolute precision to evaluate the structural integrity of any scientific or logical inquiry.

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

इसका अभ्यास करें उदाहरण नोट्स और सुझाव

타당도 30 सेकंड में

타당도 (Validity) measures if a test or tool accurately captures the specific concept it was designed to measure in research.
It is a formal, academic term (Noun) used frequently in psychology, education, and statistics to evaluate measurement quality.
High 타당도 means the results are meaningful and appropriate for their purpose, whereas low 타당도 suggests a flawed measurement process.
It is distinct from 신뢰도 (reliability), which refers to the consistency and repeatability of results over time.

The Korean word 타당도 (Tadangdo) is a critical academic and technical term, primarily used in the fields of psychology, education, statistics, and research methodology. At its core, it translates to 'validity.' However, to understand its full weight in a Korean context, one must look at how it evaluates the 'truthfulness' or 'appropriateness' of a measurement tool. While an English speaker might use 'validity' in a casual sense (e.g., 'the validity of your argument'), in Korean, 타당도 is almost exclusively reserved for the scientific degree to which a test, instrument, or research design actually measures what it was intended to measure. For instance, if you design a math test to measure mathematical ability, but the questions are so wordy that they actually measure reading comprehension, a researcher would say the test has low 타당도.

Conceptual Root: The term is composed of '타당' (妥當), meaning proper, reasonable, or valid, and '도' (度), meaning degree or level. Together, they quantify how 'proper' a measurement is.

이번 설문조사는 질문의 구성이 모호하여 결과의 타당도가 낮게 나타났습니다. (This survey's results showed low validity because the question structures were ambiguous.)

In South Korea, a society deeply invested in standardized testing (like the CSAT or Suneung), the concept of 타당도 is a frequent topic of public and academic debate. If a national exam is perceived to test rote memorization rather than creative problem-solving, critics will attack its 타당도. It is distinct from 신뢰도 (reliability), which refers to consistency. You can think of it like a target: if you hit the same spot every time, you have high reliability; if you hit the bullseye you intended to hit, you have high 타당도. This word is rarely used in casual street conversation but is a staple in university lectures, news reports on social science, and professional development seminars.

Academic Context: It is often paired with specific types such as '내용 타당도' (content validity) or '안면 타당도' (face validity) in educational psychology.

새로운 지능 검사의 타당도를 입증하기 위해 기존 검사들과 비교 분석을 실시했습니다. (To prove the validity of the new IQ test, a comparative analysis with existing tests was conducted.)

Beyond the classroom, you might encounter this word in legal or administrative settings where the 'validity' of a process is being questioned. For example, if a selection process for a high-ranking official is deemed unfair because it didn't assess relevant skills, the 타당도 of the selection criteria becomes a point of contention. It implies a moral and logical correctness as well as a technical one. Understanding this word helps learners navigate high-level Korean texts and participate in intellectual discussions about societal systems and scientific rigor.

Using 타당도 correctly requires an understanding of its grammatical role as a noun. It is almost always the subject or the object of a sentence involving measurement, evaluation, or verification. Common verbs that follow 타당도 include 검증하다 (to verify), 확보하다 (to secure/ensure), 높이다 (to increase), and 낮다/높다 (to be low/high). Because it is a formal term, sentences containing it usually end in formal speech styles like -ㅂ니다/-습니다 or the literary -다 style.

Verb Pairing: Verifying Validity: '타당도를 검증하다' is the most standard way to say 'to verify the validity' of something in a research context.

연구자는 설문 문항의 타당도를 검증하기 위해 전문가의 자문을 구했다. (The researcher sought expert advice to verify the validity of the survey questions.)

When discussing the results of a study, you use 타당도 with adjectives. '타당도가 높다' (high validity) suggests the data is meaningful and accurate relative to its goals. '타당도가 결여되다' (to lack validity) is a more sophisticated way of saying the research is flawed. It is important to note that 타당도 is a noun; if you want to say something 'is valid' as an adjective, you should use 타당하다 (to be valid/proper). For example, '그의 주장은 타당하다' (His argument is valid) uses the adjective form, whereas '그 주장의 타당도를 검토해야 한다' (We must examine the validity of that argument) uses the noun form.

평가 도구의 타당도가 확보되지 않으면 그 결과는 신뢰하기 어렵다. (If the validity of the evaluation tool is not ensured, the results are hard to trust.)

In complex sentences, 타당도 often appears in the middle of a chain of technical terms. For example, '공인 타당도' (concurrent validity) or '예측 타당도' (predictive validity). These are used when specifying exactly how a test is valid. If a university entrance exam accurately predicts how well a student will do in college, it has high '예측 타당도'. When writing, ensure you use the appropriate particles like -가/이 for the subject or -를/을 for the object. Mastery of this word allows you to discuss complex systems of evaluation with precision.

You are most likely to encounter 타당도 in environments characterized by intellectual rigor and formal evaluation. The first and most common place is Academia. Whether you are reading a Master's thesis in Sociology or attending a Psychology lecture at a Korean university, 타당도 will be mentioned whenever data collection is discussed. Professors will emphasize that without a high degree of 타당도, the entire premise of a study might crumble. It is the gatekeeper of scientific credibility.

News & Media: In news segments discussing national policy or education reform, experts are often interviewed regarding the '타당도' of new evaluation systems or government polls.

"최근 시행된 인성 검사의 타당도에 대해 교육계에서 논란이 일고 있습니다." (Controversy is rising in the education sector regarding the validity of the recently implemented personality test.)

Second, you will hear it in Corporate Human Resources (HR). Large Korean conglomerates like Samsung or Hyundai use rigorous testing (like the GSAT) to hire employees. HR managers and consultants discuss the 타당도 of these tests to ensure they are hiring candidates who actually possess the skills needed for the job, rather than just those who are good at taking tests. If you work in a Korean office in a specialized role, you might hear this during quarterly reviews or project evaluations.

Third, in Medical and Clinical Settings. When a new diagnostic tool for a condition like depression or ADHD is developed in Korea, its 타당도 must be clinically proven. Doctors and researchers will discuss whether the symptoms being measured truly represent the underlying condition. You might see this word on brochures or clinical reports explaining why a certain test was chosen. Finally, in legal contexts, if a polygraph test or a specific piece of forensic evidence is challenged, lawyers might debate its 타당도 as an accurate reflection of reality. It is a word that carries the weight of evidence and truth.

The most frequent mistake learners make with 타당도 is confusing it with 신뢰도 (reliability). While they are often mentioned together, they mean very different things. 신뢰도 is about consistency—if you take the same test twice, do you get the same score? 타당도 is about accuracy—does the test measure what it says it does? Using 신뢰도 when you mean 타당도 is a common error even for native speakers, but in a professional or academic setting, it can lead to significant misunderstandings about the quality of data.

Mistaken Identity: 타당도 vs. 신뢰도: A scale that always weighs 5kg too light is highly reliable (신뢰도 높음) because it's consistent, but has zero validity (타당도 없음) because it's not the correct weight.

[Wrong]: 이 시험은 매번 결과가 같으니 타당도가 높아요. (This test is valid because results are the same every time.)
[Correct]: 이 시험은 매번 결과가 같으니 신뢰도가 높아요. (This test is reliable because results are the same every time.)

Another mistake is the confusion between 타당도 and 타당성 (feasibility/validity). While they share the same root, 타당성 is much broader and often refers to whether a project or plan is logical and 'doable' (e.g., '경제적 타당성' - economic feasibility). 타당도 is strictly a measurement of 'degree' (hence the '도'). You wouldn't usually say the '타당도' of a business plan; you would say its '타당성'. Using '도' implies a statistical or evaluative scale.

Lastly, learners sometimes use 타당도 in casual conversation where 말이 되다 (to make sense) or 정확하다 (to be accurate) would be more natural. If a friend makes a good point, saying "네 말의 타당도가 높다" sounds overly robotic and strange. Instead, say "네 말이 타당해" or "네 말이 맞아." Save 타당도 for when you are discussing tests, surveys, or formal evaluations. Overusing academic jargon in casual settings can make you sound detached or like you are reading from a textbook.

While 타당도 is a specific technical term, there are several related words that you might encounter depending on the context. Understanding the nuances between these will greatly enhance your Korean vocabulary and help you choose the right word for the right situation. The most closely related word is 신뢰도 (reliability), which we've already discussed as the 'consistency' of a measure. They are almost always paired in research: '신뢰도와 타당도'.

Comparison: 타당도 vs. 적합성: 타당도 (Validity): Focuses on whether a tool measures the intended construct.
적합성 (Suitability/Fitness): Focuses on whether something is appropriate for a specific purpose or environment (e.g., '직무 적합성' - job suitability).

이 검사는 타당도는 높지만, 현장 적용의 적합성은 떨어집니다. (This test has high validity, but its suitability for field application is low.)

Another alternative is 정확도 (accuracy). While 타당도 is about the 'what' (are we measuring the right thing?), 정확도 is about the 'how close' (how close is the measurement to the true value?). In engineering or computer science, 정확도 is much more common. For example, a facial recognition system's '정확도' refers to its error rate. In contrast, the '타당도' of a facial recognition system might refer to whether it is actually measuring 'identity' or just 'lighting and shadows'.

Finally, 개연성 (probability/plausibility) is often used in literature or film criticism to describe whether a plot development is 'valid' or believable within the story's world. While an English speaker might say "The validity of the plot," a Korean speaker would say "플롯의 개연성." Knowing these distinctions prevents you from sounding like you're using a dictionary translation and instead allows you to speak with the precision of a native speaker who understands the domain-specific nuances of each term.

How Formal Is It?

रोचक तथ्य

The character '妥' (Ta) originally depicted a hand over a woman, suggesting 'peace' or 'settling down,' which evolved to mean 'proper' or 'appropriate.'

उच्चारण मार्गदर्शिका

UK tʰa.daŋ.do

US tʰa.daŋ.do

In Korean, syllables generally have equal weight, but a slight emphasis on the first syllable '타' is common in clear speech.

तुकबंदी

강도 (Gangdo - Robbery/Intensity) 밀도 (Mildo - Density) 속도 (Sokdo - Speed) 온도 (Ondo - Temperature) 습도 (Seupdo - Humidity) 각도 (Gakdo - Angle) 지도 (Jido - Map) 태도 (Taedo - Attitude)

आम गलतियाँ

Pronouncing '타' like '다' (unaspirated).
Pronouncing '당' without the 'ng' sound clearly.
Stressing the final syllable '도' too heavily.
Mixing up with '타당성' (Tadangseong).
Shortening the 'a' sound in '타' too much.

कठिनाई स्तर

पठन 4/5

Requires understanding of academic context.

लिखना 5/5

Hard to use correctly without confusing it with similar terms.

बोलना 4/5

Rarely used in daily speech; sounds very formal.

श्रवण 4/5

Must be able to distinguish from similar sounding words in lectures.

आगे क्या सीखें

पूर्वापेक्षाएँ

시험 정확하다 조사 방법 결과

आगे सीखें

신뢰도 변별도 객관성 상관관계 유의미하다

उन्नत

요인 분석 척도 구성 표집 오차 가설 검정 회귀 분석

ज़रूरी व्याकरण

Noun + -도 (Suffix for degree)

습도, 온도, 속도, 타당도

~기 위해 (In order to)

타당도를 높이기 위해 노력했다.

~면에서 (In terms of)

타당도 면에서 문제가 있다.

~에 미치는 영향 (Impact on...)

타당도에 미치는 영향이 크다.

Passive Voice (-되다)

타당도가 검증되었다.

पूरी व्याख्या पढ़ने के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें

स्तर के अनुसार उदाहरण

이 시험의 타당도는 무엇입니까?

What is the validity of this test?

타당도 + 는 (subject marker)

타당도가 높아요.

The validity is high.

타당도 + 가 (subject marker) + 높아요

타당도가 낮아요.

The validity is low.

타당도 + 가 + 낮아요

이것은 타당도 문제입니다.

This is a validity problem.

타당도 + 문제 (noun compound)

타당도를 확인하세요.

Check the validity.

타당도 + 를 (object marker)

타당도가 중요합니다.

Validity is important.

중요합니다 (formal polite)

선생님이 타당도를 말해요.

The teacher talks about validity.

말해요 (present tense)

타당도가 없어요.

There is no validity.

없어요 (negation)

연구의 타당도를 생각해야 합니다.

We must think about the validity of the research.

-해야 합니다 (must)

질문의 타당도가 아주 낮습니다.

The validity of the question is very low.

아주 (adverb) + 낮습니다

타당도가 높은 시험을 만드세요.

Make a test with high validity.

높은 (adjective form of 높다)

이 결과는 타당도가 부족합니다.

This result lacks validity.

부족합니다 (to be lacking)

타당도를 어떻게 측정합니까?

How do you measure validity?

어떻게 (how) + 측정합니까 (measure)

데이터의 타당도를 확인했습니다.

I checked the validity of the data.

확인했습니다 (past tense)

타당도가 왜 중요할까요?

Why would validity be important?

-ㄹ까요? (speculative question)

타당도를 높이는 방법이 있어요.

There is a way to increase validity.

높이는 (present participle)

설문지의 내용 타당도를 검토 중입니다.

We are reviewing the content validity of the questionnaire.

-중입니다 (in the middle of)

타당도가 확보되지 않은 조사는 무의미합니다.

A survey without secured validity is meaningless.

-지 않은 (negative modifier)

전문가들은 이 검사의 타당도를 의심합니다.

Experts doubt the validity of this test.

의심합니다 (to doubt)

타당도를 높이기 위해 문항을 수정했습니다.

I revised the items to increase validity.

-기 위해 (in order to)

신뢰도뿐만 아니라 타당도도 중요합니다.

Not only reliability but also validity is important.

-뿐만 아니라 (not only... but also)

이 지능 검사는 타당도가 검증되었습니다.

The validity of this IQ test has been verified.

검증되었습니다 (passive voice)

타당도가 낮은 이유는 표본이 작기 때문입니다.

The reason for low validity is that the sample size is small.

-기 때문입니다 (because)

보고서에서 타당도 분석을 누락했습니다.

The validity analysis was omitted from the report.

누락했습니다 (omitted)

측정 도구의 구인 타당도를 분석할 필요가 있다.

It is necessary to analyze the construct validity of the measurement tool.

-ㄹ 필요가 있다 (need to)

이 연구는 타당도 면에서 몇 가지 한계를 지닌다.

This study has several limitations in terms of validity.

면에서 (in terms of)

타당도를 높이려면 객관적인 기준이 필요하다.

To increase validity, objective criteria are necessary.

-려면 (if you want to)

수능 시험의 타당도에 대한 논란이 끊이지 않는다.

Controversy over the validity of the CSAT does not cease.

끊이지 않는다 (unceasing)

공인 타당도를 확인하기 위해 기존 척도와 비교했다.

To check concurrent validity, it was compared with existing scales.

비교했다 (compared)

평가 결과의 타당도를 저해하는 요인을 제거하라.

Remove factors that hinder the validity of the evaluation results.

저해하는 (hindering)

타당도가 결여된 데이터는 의사결정에 위험하다.

Data lacking validity is dangerous for decision-making.

결여된 (lacking)

이론적 배경을 바탕으로 타당도를 입증하였다.

The validity was proven based on the theoretical background.

바탕으로 (based on)

준거 타당도 계수가 통계적으로 유의미하게 나타났다.

The criterion validity coefficient appeared to be statistically significant.

유의미하게 (significantly)

질적 연구에서도 타당도의 개념은 매우 중요하다.

The concept of validity is also very important in qualitative research.

-에서도 (even in)

외적 타당도를 확보하기 위해 표본의 대표성을 높였다.

To ensure external validity, the representativeness of the sample was increased.

대표성 (representativeness)

측정의 타당도를 위협하는 내적 요인들을 통제해야 한다.

Internal factors threatening measurement validity must be controlled.

통제해야 한다 (must control)

안면 타당도만으로는 검사의 과학적 근거를 충분히 설명할 수 없다.

Face validity alone cannot sufficiently explain the scientific basis of a test.

-만으로는 (with only...)

이 논문은 새로운 평가 모델의 타당도를 정교하게 분석하고 있다.

This paper elaborately analyzes the validity of a new evaluation model.

정교하게 (elaborately)

문화적 차이가 심리 검사의 타당도에 미치는 영향을 고찰하다.

Examine the impact of cultural differences on the validity of psychological tests.

미치는 (exerting/affecting)

타당도 검증 과정에서 발생한 오류를 수정 보완하였다.

Errors that occurred during the validity verification process were corrected and supplemented.

수정 보완 (correction and supplementation)

구인 타당도의 확립은 심리 측정학의 핵심적인 과제 중 하나이다.

Establishing construct validity is one of the core tasks of psychometrics.

확립 (establishment)

본 연구는 수렴 타당도와 판별 타당도를 통해 척도의 우수성을 입증했다.

This study proved the excellence of the scale through convergent and discriminant validity.

수렴 (convergent) vs 판별 (discriminant)

생태학적 타당도가 결여된 실험실 연구의 결과는 일반화하기 어렵다.

Results of laboratory studies lacking ecological validity are difficult to generalize.

생태학적 (ecological)

다특성-다방법 행렬을 사용하여 타당도를 다각도로 분석하였다.

Validity was analyzed from multiple angles using a Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.

다각도로 (from multiple angles)

검사의 타당도는 고정된 속성이 아니라 지속적인 검증의 대상이다.

The validity of a test is not a fixed attribute but an object of continuous verification.

고정된 (fixed)

측정 오차의 구조를 파악함으로써 타당도 저하의 원인을 규명하였다.

The cause of validity decline was identified by grasping the structure of measurement error.

규명하였다 (identified/investigated)

사회적 소망성 편향은 설문 타당도를 위협하는 주요 변수이다.

Social desirability bias is a major variable that threatens survey validity.

사회적 소망성 (social desirability)

타당도에 대한 재정의를 통해 현대 평가 이론의 지평을 넓혔다.

The horizon of modern evaluation theory was expanded through the redefinition of validity.

지평을 넓혔다 (expanded the horizon)

समानार्थी शब्द

적합성 정확성 타당성

विलोम शब्द

부당함 부적합

सामान्य शब्द संयोजन

타당도를 검증하다

타당도를 확보하다

타당도가 높다

타당도가 낮다

타당도를 높이다

내용 타당도

구인 타당도

안면 타당도

타당도 계수

타당도 논란

सामान्य वाक्यांश

타당도가 결여되다

— To lack validity. Used when a test or argument is fundamentally flawed.

그의 주장은 증거가 없어 타당도가 결여되어 있다.

타당도를 의심하다

— To doubt the validity. Used when questioning the accuracy of a measure.

많은 학자들이 그 실험의 타당도를 의심하고 있다.

타당도 분석

— Validity analysis. A formal process of checking measurement quality.

타당도 분석 결과, 문항 수정이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

예측 타당도

— Predictive validity. How well a score predicts future performance.

수능은 대학 학업 성취도에 대한 예측 타당도가 중요하다.

공인 타당도

— Concurrent validity. Comparison with a current gold standard.

새 검사의 공인 타당도를 확인하기 위해 기존 검사와 병행했다.

타당도를 입증하다

— To prove or substantiate validity.

수많은 실험을 통해 이 방법의 타당도를 입증했다.

타당도 저하

— Decline or decrease in validity.

부적절한 질문은 설문의 타당도 저하를 초래한다.

외적 타당도

— External validity (generalizability).

실험실 연구는 외적 타당도가 낮을 수 있다.

내적 타당도

— Internal validity (causal accuracy).

변수 통제는 내적 타당도를 높이는 데 필수적이다.

타당도 평가

— Validity evaluation.

매년 교육 과정의 타당도 평가를 실시한다.

अक्सर इससे भ्रम होता है

타당도 vs 신뢰도

Reliability (consistency) vs. Validity (accuracy). This is the most common confusion.

타당도 vs 타당성

General feasibility or logic vs. technical measurement validity.

타당도 vs 정확도

Precision/Accuracy in hitting a value vs. whether the value itself is the right thing to measure.

मुहावरे और अभिव्यक्तियाँ

"번지수를 잘못 찾다"

— To look in the wrong place or address the wrong person/issue. Related to low validity (measuring the wrong thing).

수학 실력을 보는데 영어로 문제를 내면 번지수를 잘못 찾은 것이다.

Informal

"뜬구름 잡다"

— To chase clouds; to be unrealistic or vague. Used for arguments with no validity.

그의 주장은 구체적인 근거가 없어 뜬구름 잡는 소리 같다.

Informal

"앞뒤가 안 맞다"

— The front and back don't match; to be inconsistent or illogical.

그 보고서는 데이터와 결론의 앞뒤가 안 맞아 타당도가 낮다.

Neutral

"어불성설"

— A story that doesn't make sense; illogical.

증거도 없이 남을 비난하는 것은 어불성설이다.

Formal

"뜬금없다"

— Out of the blue; irrelevant. Irrelevance leads to low validity.

회의 중에 뜬금없는 질문을 하면 타당도가 떨어진다.

Informal

"수박 겉 핥기"

— Licking the outside of a watermelon; superficial. Lacks deep validity.

그 조사는 수박 겉 핥기 식이라 타당도가 낮다.

Informal

"말이 안 되다"

— To not make sense; to be invalid.

그런 조건으로 실험을 하는 것은 말이 안 된다.

Neutral

"근거 없는 자신감"

— Confidence without basis (unfounded).

타당도 없는 데이터로 내린 결론은 근거 없는 자신감일 뿐이다.

Slang/Informal

"도마 위에 오르다"

— To be on the cutting board; to be under scrutiny (often regarding validity).

이번 시험의 타당도가 도마 위에 올랐다.

Neutral/Media

"빛 좋은 개살구"

— A wild apricot with a good color; looks good on the outside but is useless. (Face validity vs. Actual validity).

이 검사는 디자인만 좋지 타당도는 빛 좋은 개살구다.

Informal

आसानी से भ्रमित होने वाले

타당도 vs 신뢰도

Both are core measurement qualities.

신뢰도 is about getting the same result every time. 타당도 is about getting the *right* result for your goal.

시계가 매일 5분씩 늦으면 신뢰도는 높지만 타당도는 낮다.

타당도 vs 타당성

They share the same root '타당'.

타당성 is used for the logic of a plan or argument. 타당도 is used for the metric of a test.

사업의 타당성을 검토하다 (Check business feasibility).

타당도 vs 적합성

Both deal with 'appropriateness'.

적합성 is about fitting a situation. 타당도 is about the truth of a measure.

직무 적합성 (Job fitness).

타당도 vs 객관도

Both are test qualities.

객관도 is about the lack of bias in the *grader*. 타당도 is about the *test itself*.

채점자의 주관이 개입되면 객관도가 떨어진다.

타당도 vs 실용도

Both are test qualities.

실용도 is about how easy/cheap a test is to give. 타당도 is about how accurate it is.

이 시험은 타당도는 높지만 비용이 많이 들어 실용도가 낮다.

वाक्य संरचनाएँ

N의 타당도가 높다/낮다

이 조사의 타당도가 낮다.

타당도를 높이기 위해 V-기

타당도를 높이기 위해 질문을 고쳤다.

N의 타당도를 검증하다

새로운 척도의 타당도를 검증했다.

타당도가 확보되다

연구의 타당도가 충분히 확보되었다.

N은 타당도 면에서 한계가 있다

이 모델은 타당도 면에서 한계가 있다.

V-는 것은 타당도를 저해한다

편향된 질문은 타당도를 저해한다.

N을 통해 타당도를 입증하다

실험을 통해 타당도를 입증하였다.

타당도에 미치는 영향을 고찰하다

변수가 타당도에 미치는 영향을 고찰하다.

शब्द परिवार

संज्ञा

타당성 (Feasibility/Validity)

타당화 (Validation)

क्रिया

타당하다 (To be valid)

타당화하다 (To validate)

विशेषण

타당한 (Valid)

इसे कैसे इस्तेमाल करें

frequency

High in academic/professional settings; Low in daily life.

सामान्य गलतियाँ

Using 타당도 for reliability. → 신뢰도
If you mean the test is consistent, use 신뢰도. If you mean it's accurate for its goal, use 타당도.
Using 타당도 for a business plan's logic. → 타당성
Feasibility or general logic uses '타당성'. '타당도' is for measurement scales.
Saying '타당도가 맞다'. → 타당도가 높다
Validity is a 'degree', so it is 'high' or 'low', not 'correct' or 'incorrect'.
Using 타당도 in a casual chat with friends. → 말이 되다 / 타당하다
It sounds too robotic. Use '네 말이 타당해' (Your word is valid) instead of '네 말의 타당도가 높아'.
Confusing 타당도 with 정확도. → 타당도
In social sciences, '타당도' is the standard term for measurement truth, while '정확도' is more for physical precision.

सुझाव

Context is King

Always look at whether the text is talking about a 'test' or an 'argument'. If it's a test, it's almost always '타당도'.

TOPIK Tip

In TOPIK II reading, this word often appears in the context of 'research problems'. If a study is criticized, look for '타당도' in the options.

Root Word

Learn '타당하다' first. If you know that means 'to be valid', adding '도' (degree) makes sense instantly.

The Bullseye

Visualize a bullseye. Validity (타당도) is the arrow in the center. Reliability (신뢰도) is all arrows in the same spot.

Don't Overuse

Avoid using this in daily life. Saying 'Your lunch choice has low validity' will make people look at you strangely.

Formal Endings

Since this is an academic word, use it with -습니다 or -ㄴ다 endings for the best stylistic match.

News Keywords

When you hear '여론조사' (poll) or '통계' (stats), get ready to hear '타당도' soon after.

Collocation Mastery

Memorize '타당도를 확보하다'. It's the most sophisticated way to say 'make sure it's valid'.

Fairness Focus

Understand that in Korea, 'validity' is tied to the concept of 'fairness' in education.

Logical Link

Validity is the bridge between your data and your conclusion. If the bridge is broken, the conclusion fails.

याद करें

स्मृति सहायक

Think of 'Target' (타) + 'Dang' (hit the mark) + 'Do' (degree). 타당도 is the 'Degree' to which you hit the 'Target' you actually 'Dang' aimed for.

दृश्य संबंध

A target where the arrows are all in the bullseye. This represents high 타당도. If they are all together but far from the center, that's reliability but NOT 타당도.

Word Web

Research Statistics Psychology Accuracy Measurement Test Scientific Method Evidence

चैलेंज

Try to explain the difference between '타당도' and '신뢰도' to a friend using the 'broken clock' vs. 'working clock' analogy.

शब्द की उत्पत्ति

Derived from Sino-Korean characters: 妥 (Ta) meaning 'proper/appropriate' and 當 (Dang) meaning 'to correspond/be right', plus 度 (Do) meaning 'degree'.

मूल अर्थ: The degree of being appropriate or corresponding to the truth.

Sino-Korean (Hanja-based)

सांस्कृतिक संदर्भ

Be careful not to dismiss someone's research by saying it has 'no 타당도' unless you have scientific evidence, as it is a very serious academic criticism.

English speakers often use 'validity' loosely in arguments. In Korean, '타당도' is much more technical and restricted to measurement.

Psychometrics textbooks in Korea (심리측정학) National Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) reports Academic papers on the 'Validity of the TOPIK exam'

असल ज़िंदगी में अभ्यास करें

वास्तविक संदर्भ

University Lecture

타당도의 정의
타당도를 검증하는 방법
내용 타당도의 중요성
이 연구의 타당도는?

Research Paper

타당도를 확보하기 위하여
타당도 분석 결과
제한된 타당도
후속 연구의 타당도

Corporate HR

채용 시험의 타당도
직무 타당도 분석
평가 도구의 타당도
타당도 높은 인재 선발

News/Media

여론조사의 타당도 논란
수능 타당도 의문
정부 통계의 타당도
전문가들이 말하는 타당도

Hospital/Clinic

진단 도구의 타당도
임상적 타당도
검사 타당도 입증
환자 평가의 타당도

बातचीत की शुरुआत

"새로 도입된 평가 방식의 타당도에 대해 어떻게 생각하세요? (What do you think about the validity of the newly introduced evaluation method?)"

"이 설문조사의 타당도를 높이려면 어떤 문항을 수정해야 할까요? (What questions should we revise to increase the validity of this survey?)"

"심리 검사의 타당도와 신뢰도 중 무엇이 더 중요하다고 보십니까? (Which do you think is more important, the validity or reliability of a psychological test?)"

"수능 시험이 학생들의 능력을 측정하는 데 충분한 타당도를 가지고 있을까요? (Does the CSAT have enough validity to measure students' abilities?)"

"연구 설계 단계에서 타당도를 확보하는 가장 좋은 방법은 무엇입니까? (What is the best way to ensure validity during the research design phase?)"

डायरी विषय

오늘 배운 '타당도'의 개념을 자신의 언어로 정의해 보고, 실생활에서 타당도가 낮은 사례를 하나 찾아 적어보세요. (Define the concept of 'validity' in your own words and write about a real-life example of low validity.)

당신이 선생님이라면, 학생들의 창의성을 측정하기 위해 어떤 타당도 높은 시험을 만들겠습니까? (If you were a teacher, what kind of high-validity test would you create to measure students' creativity?)

최근에 본 뉴스 기사 중 통계나 조사의 타당도가 의심스러웠던 적이 있나요? 그 이유는 무엇인가요? (Was there a recent news article where you doubted the validity of a statistic or survey? What was the reason?)

신뢰도는 높지만 타당도는 낮은 상황을 가정하여 짧은 이야기를 써보세요. (Write a short story assuming a situation where reliability is high but validity is low.)

자신의 업무나 학습 과정에서 '타당도'를 높이기 위해 노력했던 경험이 있다면 서술해 보세요. (Describe an experience where you tried to increase 'validity' in your work or learning process.)

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले सवाल

10 सवाल

신뢰도는 '일관성'입니다. 같은 조건에서 같은 결과가 나오는 정도를 말합니다. 반면 타당도는 '정확성'입니다. 측정하려는 것을 실제로 측정하고 있는지를 말합니다. 예를 들어, 몸무게를 재는데 자를 사용한다면 매번 같은 결과(신뢰도)가 나올 수 있지만, 몸무게를 재는 도구로서는 타당도가 0입니다.

통계, 시험, 설문조사처럼 '수치'나 '정도'를 나타낼 때는 '타당도'를 씁니다. 반면 계획, 주장, 논리처럼 '성질'이나 '여부'를 나타낼 때는 '타당성'을 씁니다. '이 시험의 타당도' vs '그 주장의 타당성'으로 외우시면 쉽습니다.

시험 문항들이 측정하고자 하는 교육 목표나 내용을 얼마나 잘 대표하고 있는지를 전문가가 판단하는 것입니다. 예를 들어, 수학 시험에 국어 문제가 섞여 있다면 내용 타당도가 낮은 것입니다.

가장 대표적인 방법은 측정 대상을 명확히 정의하고, 전문가의 검토를 거치며, 충분한 표본을 확보하는 것입니다. 또한 이미 타당도가 검증된 기존의 도구를 사용하는 것도 좋은 방법입니다.

타당도가 낮은 연구 결과는 '가짜'일 가능성이 높습니다. 아무리 통계적으로 유의미해도 실제로 측정하려던 것이 아니기 때문에 그 결과를 믿고 의사결정을 하면 큰 오류를 범할 수 있습니다.

안면 타당도는 피검사자(시험 보는 사람)가 보기에 이 시험이 타당해 보이는 정도입니다. 과학적으로는 덜 중요할 수 있지만, 피검사자의 동기 부여와 시험의 권위를 위해 필요합니다.

대학 입학 시험 성적이 실제 대학에서의 학점과 높은 상관관계를 보인다면, 그 입학 시험은 예측 타당도가 높다고 할 수 있습니다.

분야마다 다르지만, 일반적으로 0.3~0.4 이상이면 유의미하다고 보며, 0.7 이상이면 매우 높다고 평가합니다. 하지만 신뢰도 계수보다는 보통 낮게 나타나는 경향이 있습니다.

실험 결과를 실제 세상에 적용할 수 있도록 표본을 다양화하고, 실험 상황을 실제 상황과 유사하게 만들어야 합니다. 이를 '생태학적 타당도'라고도 합니다.

아닙니다. 시대나 문화가 변함에 따라 측정 도구의 타당도는 변할 수 있습니다. 따라서 지속적으로 재검증하는 과정이 필요합니다.

सुझाव और नोट्स के लिए मुफ़्त साइन अप करें