B1 Relative Clauses 11 min read Medio

Oraciones de relativo: Diferencia entre especificativas y explicativas

Las cláusulas definitorias te ayudan a 'señalar' un sustantivo específico, mientras que las no definitorias solo añaden detalles 'extra' usando 'comas' y 'which' o 'who'.

Grammar Rule in 30 Seconds

Defining clauses identify exactly who/what you mean; non-defining clauses just add extra details using commas.

  • Defining: No commas, 'that' is okay, essential for meaning. Example: 'The car that I bought is red.'
  • Non-Defining: Use commas, 'that' is NOT okay, extra info only. Example: 'My car, which is red, is fast.'
  • Omission: In defining clauses, you can drop 'who/which/that' if it's the object. Example: 'The book (that) I read.'
👤/📦 + (who/which/that) + Action = Defining | 👤/📦 + , + (who/which) + , + Action = Non-Defining

Overview

Imagina que estás navegando por tu feed de Instagram. Ves una publicación de un amigo que tiene dos gatos. Uno es blanco y esponjoso, y el otro es negro y elegante.
Si tu amigo dice, The cat that is white is so moody, está usando una oración de relativo especificativa (defining relative clause). ¿Por qué? ¡Porque sin la parte that is white, no sabrías de qué gato está hablando!
Ahora, imagina que solo tiene un gato. Si dice, My cat, which is white, is so moody, eso es una oración de relativo explicativa (non-defining relative clause). El hecho de que el gato sea blanco es solo un detalle extra.
Ya sabes qué gato es: ¡es su único gato!
Confundir estas dos es como darle 'me encanta' por error a una publicación de LinkedIn de tu jefe sobre una hoja de cálculo. Es un poco incómodo y cambia totalmente el rollo de lo que intentas decir. En inglés, una diminuta coma puede decirle a quien te escucha si tienes un hermano o cinco.
Es básicamente un código secreto para saber cuánta información es 'necesaria' frente a la que es solo 'un detalle curioso'. Vamos a ver cómo estas cláusulas cambian todo el significado de tus frases para que puedas evitar dramas familiares accidentales o mensajes confusos.

How This Grammar Works

En el fondo, esta gramática trata sobre la identificación. Piensa en una oración de relativo especificativa como un puntero láser. Apunta directamente a una cosa específica en un grupo.
Si digo, The movie that we watched last night was awesome, la parte that we watched last night es el puntero láser. Te dice exactamente a qué película me refiero. Si la quito y solo digo The movie was awesome, me dirías: "¿Qué película, tío?
Llevamos seis horas viendo Netflix".
Una oración de relativo explicativa, por otro lado, es como una nota adhesiva (post-it). Es solo información extra pegada a un sustantivo que ya reconocemos. Si digo, Inception, which we watched last night, was awesome, ya sabes que la película es *Inception*.
El hecho de que la viéramos anoche es solo un dato extra. Si quito esa nota adhesiva, la frase Inception was awesome sigue teniendo todo el sentido.
¿La mayor pista? Las comas. Las oraciones explicativas siempre van entre comas.
Las especificativas, no. Es como si las comas dijeran:
¡Oye, puedes saltarte esta parte si tienes prisa!
. Sin comas, la información se trata como combustible esencial para el motor de la frase.
Si olvidas las comas cuando deberías ponerlas, podrías dar a entender cosas que no pretendías. Por ejemplo, My girlfriend who lives in London is coming to visit implica que tienes otras novias en otras ciudades (¡movimiento arriesgado!), mientras que My girlfriend, who lives in London, is coming to visit simplemente nos dice dónde vive tu única novia.

Formation Pattern

1
Elige tu sustantivo: Es la persona o cosa de la que quieres hablar (ej. the laptop, my boss).
2
Decide el 'rollo': ¿Es la información esencial para identificar al sustantivo? Si es así, es Especificativa (Defining). Si es solo cotilleo extra, es Explicativa (Non-Defining).
3
Elige tu pronombre:
4
Para personas: Usa who o that (Especificativa) o *solo* who (Explicativa).
5
Para cosas: Usa which o that (Especificativa) o *solo* which (Explicativa).
6
Controla las comas:
7
Especificativa: Sin comas. Nunca. Mantenlo unido.
8
Explicativa: Usa una coma antes y después de la cláusula (a menos que esté al final de la frase).
9
La regla del 'That': Recuerda que that es un poco casero. Solo vive en oraciones especificativas. Nunca va a las explicativas.
10
El truco de la omisión: En las oraciones especificativas, si el pronombre va seguido de otro sujeto (como I, you, we), a menudo puedes borrarlo por completo (The phone [that] I bought). En las explicativas, el pronombre es obligatorio. Es el VIP que nunca se va de la fiesta.

When To Use It

Usarás cláusulas especificativas cada vez que necesites ser concreto. Piensa en pedir comida en una app. Si dices, I want the burger that has no onions, esa parte es 100% necesaria.
Sin ella, te traen cualquier hamburguesa y tu cena se arruina. Úsalas cuando estés distinguiendo una cosa de un grupo de cosas similares. Es genial para reseñas: The hotel that we stayed at was trash, o para quejarte de la tecnología: The update that I downloaded broke my phone.
Las cláusulas explicativas son para cuando estás siendo descriptivo o dando contexto. Aparecen mucho en historias o biografías profesionales. En un perfil de LinkedIn, podrías ver: Sarah, who has ten years of experience in marketing, joined our team. Ya sabes que es Sarah.
Su experiencia es solo una razón por la que es una jefa. Úsalas cuando el sustantivo ya es único, como el nombre de una persona, un lugar específico (Paris) o una relación única (my mother). Si estás cotilleando sobre un famoso, dirías: Taylor Swift, who is currently on tour, just released a new album. Sabemos quién es Taylor; lo de la gira es solo un por cierto.

Common Mistakes

  • El drama de la coma: Olvidar las comas en una cláusula explicativa es el error nº 1. Escribir My dad who is a doctor lives in Berlin sugiere que tienes varios padres y estás identificando al médico. A menos que tengas una dinámica familiar muy moderna, probablemente necesites esas comas: My dad, who is a doctor, lives in Berlin.
  • La trampa del 'That': Usar that en una cláusula explicativa. No puedes decir: ✗ Paris, that I love, is beautiful. Suena como un fallo en Matrix. Usa which en su lugar: ✓ Paris, which I love, is beautiful.
  • La confusión del 'Who': A veces la gente usa which para personas. ¡No lo hagas! ✗ The guy which lives next door es un gran error. Es ✓ The guy who lives next door.
  • Sujetos dobles: Añadir un pronombre extra después de la cláusula. ✗ The car that I bought it is fast. ¡No necesitas el it! El pronombre relativo that ya hace la función de objeto. Mantenlo simple: ✓ The car that I bought is fast.
  • Obsesión por la omisión: Intentar borrar el pronombre en una cláusula explicativa. ✗ My brother, lives in Tokyo, is a chef. Necesitas ese who para unir las partes: ✓ My brother, who lives in Tokyo, is a chef.

Contrast With Similar Patterns

A veces las oraciones de relativo parecen Aposiciones. Una aposición es cuando pones dos sustantivos juntos para describir algo, como My friend, a professional gamer, is rich. Es muy parecido a My friend, who is a professional gamer, is rich.
La diferencia es que la oración de relativo usa un verbo (is), mientras que la aposición solo usa una frase nominal. Ambas se usan para 'información extra' y a ambas les encantan las comas.
Otro primo es la Cláusula de Participio. En lugar de decir The girl who is sitting over there, puedes decir simplemente The girl sitting over there. Esta es una forma más avanzada y 'guay' de hablar que te hace sonar muy nativo.
Solo funciona para oraciones especificativas cuando el pronombre relativo es el sujeto.
Por último, no confundas estas con las Oraciones Sustantivas (Noun Clauses). Una oración sustantiva es el objeto de un verbo, como I know what you did. Una oración de relativo describe un sustantivo, como I know the person who did it.
Una va sobre el 'qué', la otra sobre el 'quién'. Es como la diferencia entre saber un secreto y conocer a la persona que lo contó.

Quick FAQ

P: ¿Puedo usar which en una oración especificativa?

R: ¡Sí, puedes! The car which I bought está totalmente bien, aunque that es más común al hablar. Eso sí, nunca uses that en una explicativa.

P: ¿Está bien omitir who o that?

R: Solo en las especificativas, y solo si hay otro sujeto después. The man [who] I saw está bien. The man who saw me no; ahí necesitas el who porque es el sujeto.

P: ¿Por qué necesito comas con los nombres?

R: Porque los nombres ya identifican a la persona. Si dices John, sabemos que es John. Cualquier información después es automáticamente 'extra', así que necesita comas.

P: ¿Cambia esto el tono de mi escritura?

R: Totalmente. Las oraciones explicativas te hacen sonar más detallista y sofisticado. Las especificativas te hacen sonar directo y claro. Usarlas bien demuestra que has pasado del inglés 'básico'.

P: ¿Y si tengo dos hermanas?

R: Si quieres hablar de la que vive en España, di My sister who lives in Spain. ¡Sin comas! Esto le dice al oyente que estás eligiendo a una hermana de entre las dos. Magia, ¿verdad?

Relative Pronoun Selection

Function For People For Things For Places/Time
Subject
who / that
which / that
N/A
Object
who / whom / that / (ø)
which / that / (ø)
where / when
Possessive
whose
whose / of which
N/A

Pronoun Omission (Defining Only)

Full Form Short Form (Omitted) Condition
The man who I met
The man I met
Pronoun is the Object
The book that you read
The book you read
Pronoun is the Object
The man who lives here
NOT POSSIBLE
Pronoun is the Subject

Meanings

Relative clauses provide more information about a noun. Defining clauses limit the noun to a specific one, while non-defining clauses provide supplementary details about a noun already identified.

1

Defining (Restrictive)

Tells us which specific person or thing we are talking about. Without it, the sentence is incomplete or unclear.

“The students who studied hard passed the exam.”

“I'm looking for the keys that I left on the table.”

2

Non-Defining (Non-Restrictive)

Adds extra information about a noun we already know. The sentence still makes sense if you remove this clause.

“My brother, who lives in New York, is a chef.”

“The Eiffel Tower, which was built in 1889, is in Paris.”

3

Object Pronoun Omission

In defining clauses, if the relative pronoun is the object of the verb, it can be deleted.

“The movie (that) we watched was boring.”

“The person (who) I called didn't answer.”

Reference Table

Reference table for Oraciones de relativo: Diferencia entre especificativas y explicativas
Característica Cláusula Definitoria Cláusula No Definitoria
Propósito
Identifica el sustantivo
Proporciona información extra
Comas
No se usan comas
Siempre usa comas
¿Puede usar 'that'?
Sí (muy común)
No (¡nunca!)
¿Se puede omitir el pronombre?
Sí (si es objeto)
No (nunca)
Ejemplo
The car that I like...
My car, which I like,...
Significado si se elimina
La oración se vuelve confusa
La oración sigue siendo clara

Espectro de formalidad

Formal
The colleague with whom I collaborated on the project is absent.

The colleague with whom I collaborated on the project is absent. (Workplace)

Neutral
The colleague who I worked with on the project is away.

The colleague who I worked with on the project is away. (Workplace)

Informal
The guy I worked with is out.

The guy I worked with is out. (Workplace)

Jerga
My project partner's ghosting today.

My project partner's ghosting today. (Workplace)

Cláusulas Relativas: La Prueba de Identidad

Cláusula Relativa

Definitoria (Esencial)

  • No Commas Identificación
  • Uses 'That' Casual/Diario

No Definitoria (Extra)

  • Has Commas Detalle Extra
  • No 'That' Regla Estricta

Definitoria vs. No Definitoria

Definitoria (La que Señala)
The guy who... Nos dice qué chico
The app that... Nos dice qué app
No Definitoria (El Chismoso)
My dad, who... Información extra sobre él
TikTok, which... Información extra sobre la app

¿Coma o Sin Coma?

1

¿La oración sigue teniendo sentido si eliminas la cláusula?

YES
Ir al siguiente paso
NO
Cláusula Definitoria: SIN COMAS
2

¿Es el sustantivo un nombre específico o algo único (como 'Paris')?

YES
Cláusula No Definitoria: USA COMAS
NO ↓

Límites de Uso de Pronombres

Seguro para Ambos

  • Who (para personas)
  • Which (para cosas)
  • Whose
  • Where
🚫

SOLO Definitoria

  • That
  • Omission (Zero pronoun)

Ejemplos por nivel

1

The boy who is happy is my brother.

The boy who is happy is my brother.

2

I have a dog that is big.

I have a dog that is big.

3

This is the book that I want.

This is the book that I want.

4

The girl who lives here is nice.

The girl who lives here is nice.

1

The car which he bought is blue.

The car which he bought is blue.

2

The man (who) I saw yesterday was tall.

The man (who) I saw yesterday was tall.

3

I like the city where I was born.

I like the city where I was born.

4

She is the teacher who helps me.

She is the teacher who helps me.

1

My sister, who lives in Rome, is a lawyer.

My sister, who lives in Rome, is a lawyer.

2

The laptop that I use for work is broken.

The laptop that I use for work is broken.

3

London, which is the capital of the UK, is huge.

London, which is the capital of the UK, is huge.

4

The man whose car was stolen is very angry.

The man whose car was stolen is very angry.

1

The company, which was founded in 1920, is closing.

The company, which was founded in 1920, is closing.

2

He failed his driving test, which was a surprise.

He failed his driving test, which was a surprise.

3

The candidate for whom I voted didn't win.

The candidate for whom I voted didn't win.

4

Is that the reason why you were late?

Is that the reason why you were late?

1

The building, the roof of which was damaged, is old.

The building, the roof of which was damaged, is old.

2

Anyone wishing to leave early may do so.

Anyone wishing to leave early may do so.

3

The method by which they achieved this is unknown.

The method by which they achieved this is unknown.

4

The town, where many artists live, is very vibrant.

The town, where many artists live, is very vibrant.

1

The project, the success of which remains to be seen, is costly.

The project, the success of which remains to be seen, is costly.

2

He was late, as is often the case with him.

He was late, as is often the case with him.

3

Whosoever finds the key shall be rewarded.

Whosoever finds the key shall be rewarded.

4

The situation, albeit difficult, is not hopeless.

The situation, albeit difficult, is not hopeless.

Fácil de confundir

Relative Clauses: Defining vs Non-Defining Meaning vs That vs. Which

Learners often use them interchangeably in all contexts.

Relative Clauses: Defining vs Non-Defining Meaning vs Who vs. Whom

Learners aren't sure when to use the object form 'whom'.

Relative Clauses: Defining vs Non-Defining Meaning vs Relative Clauses vs. Participle Clauses

Both describe nouns but use different structures.

Errores comunes

The man which lives here.

The man who lives here.

Use 'who' for people, not 'which'.

I like the book what you gave me.

I like the book that you gave me.

'What' cannot be used as a relative pronoun for a noun.

The girl she lives next door is nice.

The girl who lives next door is nice.

Don't use a personal pronoun (she) when you need a relative pronoun (who).

I saw the man who he is a doctor.

I saw the man who is a doctor.

Do not repeat the subject pronoun after 'who'.

The house that I live is small.

The house where I live is small.

Use 'where' for places or include a preposition: 'The house that I live in'.

This is the man who's car is red.

This is the man whose car is red.

'Who's' means 'who is'. 'Whose' is for possession.

The movie who I saw was good.

The movie that I saw was good.

Use 'that' or 'which' for movies, not 'who'.

My mother, that is 50, is a nurse.

My mother, who is 50, is a nurse.

You cannot use 'that' in non-defining clauses (after a comma).

Paris which is in France is beautiful.

Paris, which is in France, is beautiful.

Non-defining clauses need commas because Paris is already a specific place.

The man, who I met him, was nice.

The man, who I met, was nice.

Remove the object pronoun 'him' because 'who' already represents the man.

The car, that's engine is broken, is mine.

The car, whose engine is broken, is mine.

Use 'whose' for possession even for inanimate objects in relative clauses.

Patrones de oraciones

The ___ who ___ is ___.

___, which is ___, is ___.

The ___ (that) I ___ was ___.

The person whose ___ is ___.

Real World Usage

Social Media (Instagram/TikTok) very common

My bestie, who is literally the cutest, just graduated!

Job Interviews constant

I am looking for a role that allows me to use my coding skills.

News Reporting very common

The suspect, who was arrested late last night, is being questioned.

Texting Friends constant

Did you find the keys I lost?

Academic Essays very common

The theory, which was first proposed in 1990, remains controversial.

Travel/Directions common

Take the train that goes toward the city center.

🎯

El truco de 'señalar con el dedo'

Si puedes señalar algo y decir '¡ESE!', es una cláusula definitoria. No necesitas comas. Por ejemplo: "The book that I'm reading is exciting."
⚠️

Evita 'that' con comas

¡Nunca uses 'that' después de una coma! Es como ponerle piña a la pizza (algunos lo hacen, pero...):
My dog, which is a golden retriever, loves to swim.
💬

La formalidad importa

Hablando, usamos 'that' casi siempre en cláusulas definitorias. 'Which' es más para textos formales o escritos. Por ejemplo:
The movie that I saw was great.
(casual) vs.
The movie, which was a drama, won awards.
(formal, no definitoria).

Smart Tips

Always use a non-defining clause with commas. Proper nouns are already specific, so any extra info is just 'extra'.

Mary who is my friend is here. Mary, who is my friend, is here.

Use 'whom' after prepositions like 'to', 'with', or 'for'.

The person who I spoke to. The person to whom I spoke.

Check if there is another subject immediately after it. If there is, you can usually delete it.

The man that I saw. The man I saw. (Correct because 'I' is the new subject)

Use ', which' at the end of the sentence.

He was late. This was annoying. He was late, which was annoying.

Pronunciación

My brother [pause] who lives in Rome [pause] is a lawyer.

The Comma Pause

In non-defining clauses, there is a slight drop in pitch and a brief pause where the commas are.

The book /ðət/ I read.

Relative Pronoun Reduction

In fast speech, 'that' is often pronounced with a schwa /ðət/.

Non-defining Parenthetical

My car, (which is red), is fast.

The pitch goes down for the clause and back up for the main verb.

Memorízalo

Mnemotecnia

Defining is 'Determining' (no commas needed), Non-defining is 'Needless' (needs commas).

Asociación visual

Imagine a defining clause as a wedding ring—it's essential and stays on the finger. Imagine a non-defining clause as a bracelet—it's extra, and you can take it off (the commas are the clasps).

Rhyme

If it's extra, use a comma. If it's needed, save the drama.

Story

A detective is looking for 'the man who stole the diamond' (Defining). Once he catches him, he says, 'This man, who is wearing a red hat, is the thief' (Non-defining).

Word Web

whowhichthatwhosewhomcommaessentialextra

Desafío

Look at 5 objects in your room. Write one defining and one non-defining sentence for each.

Notas culturales

British speakers are slightly more likely to use 'which' in defining clauses than American speakers, who strictly prefer 'that'.

Using 'whom' is almost exclusively reserved for formal writing or very formal speeches. Using it in casual conversation can sound pretentious.

In some dialects, 'that' is used for people more frequently than 'who' in informal speech.

Relative pronouns in English evolved from demonstrative and interrogative pronouns in Old English ('se', 'seo', 'þæt').

Inicios de conversación

Tell me about a person who has influenced your life.

Describe your hometown, which I've never visited.

What's a movie that you've seen more than three times?

Think of a famous person whom you admire.

Temas para diario

Write about three objects in your house that are special to you. Explain why.
Describe your best friend. Include at least three non-defining clauses about their hobbies or family.
Discuss a global issue that concerns you. Use relative clauses to define the problem and provide extra context.
Write a short biography of a historical figure, using 'whose', 'whom', and 'which' to add detail.

Errores comunes

Incorrect

Correcto


Incorrect

Correcto


Incorrect

Correcto


Incorrect

Correcto

Test Yourself

¿Qué oración implica que el hablante tiene más de un hermano? Opción múltiple

Elige la oración correcta:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: My brother who lives in London is a doctor.
No usar comas significa que es una cláusula definitoria, que identifica *cuál* hermano de varios.
Completa el espacio en blanco con 'that' o 'which'. ¡Recuerda la regla de la coma!

Tokyo, ___ is the capital of Japan, is a huge city.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: which
Esta es una cláusula no definitoria (información extra sobre un lugar único), así que debemos usar 'which', nunca 'that'.
Encuentra el error en esta oración sobre una persona específica y ya conocida. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

Mr. Smith that is my teacher is very kind.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Mr. Smith, who is my teacher, is very kind.
Como conocemos su nombre, la información es extra. Necesitamos comas y 'who' en lugar de 'that'.

Score: /3

Ejercicios de practica

8 exercises
Choose the correct relative pronoun. Opción múltiple

My brother, ___ lives in Spain, is visiting next week.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: who
This is a non-defining clause about a person. 'That' is not allowed after a comma.
Fill in the blank with 'who', 'which', or 'whose'.

The woman ___ car was stolen called the police.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: whose
We are showing possession (the car belongs to the woman).
Correct the mistake in the sentence. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

The laptop, that I bought yesterday, is very fast.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The laptop, which I bought yesterday, is very fast.
You cannot use 'that' in a non-defining clause (with commas).
Combine the two sentences using a relative clause. Sentence Transformation

I have a friend. He speaks five languages.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: I have a friend who speaks five languages.
This is a defining clause identifying the friend.
Match the sentence type to the correct example. Match Pairs

Match types

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Defining: The man who is tall.
Defining clauses have no commas.
Can the relative pronoun be omitted? Opción múltiple

The cake that I ate was delicious.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Yes
Yes, because 'that' is the object of the verb 'ate'.
Can the relative pronoun be omitted? Opción múltiple

The man who lives here is nice.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: No
No, because 'who' is the subject of the verb 'lives'.
Fill in the blank.

This is the park ___ we first met.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: where
Use 'where' for places.

Score: /8

Practice Bank

10 exercises
Completa la cláusula definitoria. Completar huecos

The phone ___ I bought yesterday is broken.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: that
Selecciona la cláusula no definitoria correctamente puntuada. Opción múltiple

Which one is right?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: My car, which is red, is fast.
Reordena las palabras para formar una oración no definitoria. Sentence Reorder

Paris / is / which / beautiful / I / visited / , / ,

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Paris, which I visited, is beautiful.
Corrige el uso del pronombre. Error Correction

The girl which lives next door is nice.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Both A and B
Traduce al inglés: 'El gato que está durmiendo es mío.' Traducción

El gato que está durmiendo es mío.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The cat that is sleeping is mine.
Empareja el tipo de cláusula con su regla. Match Pairs

Empareja los elementos:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Defining | No commas / Essential info
Elige el pronombre correcto para una persona. Completar huecos

My mother, ___ is 60, still runs marathons.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: who
Identifica la cláusula definitoria. Opción múltiple

Which sentence identifies a specific thing?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The book that I read was boring.
¿Puedes omitir el pronombre aquí? Error Correction

The man who is standing there is my uncle.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The man standing there is my uncle.
Cláusula no definitoria formal. Completar huecos

The company, ___ headquarters are in London, is hiring.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: whose

Score: /10

Preguntas frecuentes (8)

Use a comma if the information is 'extra'. If the sentence still makes sense without it, add commas. If the info is needed to know which noun you mean, no commas.

In defining clauses, yes (e.g., 'The man that I saw'). In non-defining clauses, no—you must use 'who'.

'Who' is for subjects (the person doing the action). 'Whom' is for objects (the person receiving the action). 'Whom' is mostly used in formal writing.

No. You can only drop it in defining clauses when it is the object of the sentence (e.g., 'The book I read'). You cannot drop it if it is the subject (e.g., 'The book that is on the table').

In defining clauses, 'which' can sound slightly more formal than 'that', especially in British English. In non-defining clauses, 'which' is the only option for things.

Yes! It is perfectly natural to say 'The car whose engine is broken' instead of the more clunky 'The car the engine of which is broken'.

This is a standard rule of English grammar. 'That' is considered a restrictive pronoun, meaning its job is to limit or define. Non-defining clauses don't limit, so 'that' doesn't fit.

It might change the meaning! 'My brother who is a doctor' implies you have multiple brothers and you're talking about the doctor one. 'My brother, who is a doctor,' implies you have one brother and he happens to be a doctor.

Scaffolded Practice

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

Mastery Progress

Needs Practice

Improving

Strong

Mastered

In Other Languages

Spanish moderate

que / quien / el cual

English distinguishes between 'that' and 'which' based on commas; Spanish uses 'que' for both.

French moderate

qui / que / lequel

French relative pronouns are determined by grammatical function (subject/object), not by the 'essentialness' of the info.

German partial

der / die / das

German requires commas for every relative clause, whereas English only uses them for non-defining ones.

Japanese low

Pre-nominal modifiers

Japanese uses word order (clause + noun) instead of pronouns (noun + who/which).

Arabic partial

al-ladhi (الذي)

Arabic requires a pronoun like 'him' or 'it' inside the clause (e.g., 'the man who I saw him').

Chinese none

de (的)

Chinese places the description before the noun, while English places it after.

Learning Path

Prerequisites

Was this helpful?
¡No hay comentarios todavía. Sé el primero en compartir tus ideas!