典拠
A 典拠 is a source or authority that provides reliable information or evidence.
Explanation at your level:
Hello! Let's learn about 典拠. Imagine you have a favorite toy, and your mom tells you it's the best. Your mom is like a 典拠! She is a source of good information. Or, if you read a book about dinosaurs, the book is a 典拠. It tells you true things about dinosaurs. So, a 典拠 is a place or person that gives you true information or proof. It helps you know what is real. It's like a helper for finding facts!
The word 典拠 means a source or authority that provides reliable information or evidence. Think of it as a trustworthy place or person you can go to when you need proof for something. For example, if you are writing a school report, you need to find good 典拠, like books or websites that have correct facts. If a scientist makes a new discovery, they need to show their 典拠, which are their experiments and data, to prove their discovery is real. A 典拠 helps make your ideas strong and believable because it shows you have good reasons for what you say.
A 典拠 refers to a source or authority that serves as a basis for information, belief, or argument. It's essentially the evidence or backing that makes a claim credible. For instance, when writing an essay, you must cite your 典拠 – the books, articles, or studies you used – to support your points. In a legal context, a lawyer might present a document or a witness's testimony as the key 典拠 to win their case. Using a strong 典拠 means your statements are well-supported and trustworthy, rather than just opinions. It's crucial for academic work, research, and any situation where accuracy and validity are important.
The term 典拠 denotes a source or authority that substantiates a claim, argument, or piece of knowledge. It represents the foundation upon which assertions are built, providing verifiable evidence or established precedent. In academic discourse, a 典拠 might be a seminal research paper, a historical document, or a recognized theoretical framework that lends weight to new findings. In legal settings, case law and statutes serve as critical 典拠. Effectively utilizing a 典拠 involves not just identifying it, but also demonstrating how it supports your position, thereby enhancing the persuasiveness and credibility of your communication. It distinguishes well-founded arguments from mere speculation.
A 典拠 signifies a source, precedent, or authority that provides substantive validation for a proposition, theory, or claim. It functions as the evidential bedrock or authoritative underpinning that lends credibility and intellectual rigor. In scholarly pursuits, a 典拠 can range from foundational texts and empirical data to established methodologies that frame research questions and interpret findings. The selection and articulation of a 典拠 are paramount in academic and professional contexts, as they directly influence the perceived validity and robustness of one's work. Effectively leveraging a 典拠 involves a nuanced understanding of its scope, limitations, and relevance, ensuring that it genuinely strengthens the argument rather than merely serving as a superficial citation.
The term 典拠 encompasses a source, authority, or precedent that serves as the ultimate validation or foundational evidence for a given assertion, belief system, or body of knowledge. It represents the bedrock of credibility, often rooted in established doctrine, empirical verification, or historical record. In advanced academic and philosophical discourse, a 典拠 might refer to foundational texts, axiomatic principles, or irrefutable empirical data that shape entire disciplines. The critical evaluation and application of a 典拠 involve a deep understanding of its historical context, epistemological status, and potential biases. Mastery of the concept requires not only identifying appropriate 典拠 but also synthesizing them into a coherent and compelling argument that withstands rigorous scrutiny, reflecting a profound engagement with the subject matter.
Palabra en 30 segundos
- 典拠 means a reliable source or authority.
- It provides evidence and backs up claims.
- Used mainly in formal, academic, or legal contexts.
- Essential for credibility and trustworthiness.
Hey there! Let's dive into the word 典拠. Think of it as your go-to for anything that proves a point or gives you solid information. It’s the bedrock of truth, the solid ground you stand on when you need to be sure about something. When you hear 典拠, imagine a library full of verified facts, a wise person’s testimony, or a historical document that settles a debate. It’s all about reliability and trustworthiness.
In essence, a 典拠 is an authority or a source that you can trust. It’s what backs up your statements, your research, or even just your opinion when you want to be convincing. Without a good 典拠, claims can feel flimsy, like a house built on sand. But with one? Your arguments become strong, well-supported, and much more persuasive. It’s the difference between guessing and knowing, between hearsay and fact. So, whenever you need to find the solid truth or prove a point, you're looking for a 典拠!
The concept behind 典拠 is ancient, rooted in the need for validation and proof across cultures. While the specific word 典拠 has its origins in Chinese (diǎnjù), the idea of relying on established sources or authorities is universal. In classical Chinese, 典 (diǎn) often referred to canonical texts, laws, or models, while 拠 (jù) meant to rely on, support, or evidence. Together, they formed the idea of relying on canonical texts or established models as evidence.
Throughout history, as societies developed, the need for reliable information grew. Think about ancient philosophers citing earlier thinkers, legal systems referencing precedents, or religious texts being used as divine authority. These were all forms of 典拠. In the development of scholarship and law, specific texts, decrees, or expert opinions became formalized as the accepted 典拠 for various fields. The evolution of printing and widespread literacy further democratized access to sources, but the fundamental principle remained: knowledge and arguments are strengthened by reference to established authorities and verifiable evidence. This concept traveled across East Asia and influenced scholarly traditions, emphasizing the importance of citing one's sources to lend credibility and weight to any assertion.
You’ll find 典拠 used most often in academic, legal, and formal writing. It’s the word you reach for when you want to talk about the foundation of knowledge or the proof behind a statement. Think of researchers citing their 典拠 in papers, lawyers referring to legal precedents as their 典拠, or historians pointing to primary documents as the 典拠 for their interpretations.
It’s not a word you’d typically use in casual chat with friends, unless you’re perhaps discussing a very serious topic or making a point about the importance of evidence. In everyday conversation, people might use simpler terms like ‘source’, ‘proof’, ‘basis’, or ‘evidence’. However, when precision and formality are key, 典拠 is the perfect fit. It carries a weight of authority and reliability that simpler words might lack. It’s often paired with verbs like ‘cite’, ‘provide’, ‘find’, or ‘establish’, as in ‘to cite one's 典拠’ or ‘to provide a strong 典拠’.
While 典拠 itself isn't typically part of many common idioms, the *concept* it represents is woven into many expressions related to proof, authority, and knowledge. Think about phrases that emphasize reliability and backing:
- On solid ground: This means having a strong basis or reliable evidence for something. Example: "Her research is on solid ground because she used multiple peer-reviewed studies as her 典拠."
- Back it up: This is a casual way to say provide evidence or proof for a claim. Example: "You say the earth is flat? You need to back that up with some serious 典拠!"
- The last word: While often meaning the final decision, it can also imply having the ultimate authority or the definitive 典拠. Example: "The Supreme Court ruling is considered the last word on the matter, serving as the ultimate 典拠."
- By the book: This means following rules or procedures exactly, implying reliance on established procedures as the 典拠. Example: "He always does things by the book, using the official manual as his 典拠."
- Chapter and verse: This idiom means providing exact details or references, often from a book or document, serving as precise 典拠. Example: "She could recite the company policy chapter and verse, making it her undeniable 典拠."
- A matter of record: This refers to something officially documented and therefore serving as a reliable 典拠. Example: "The incident is a matter of record, so we have a clear 典拠 for what happened."
The word 典拠 functions as a noun. In English, it's generally treated as a singular, non-count noun when referring to the concept of a source or authority in general, but it can be pluralized when referring to multiple specific sources. For instance, you might say, "This book provides the primary 典拠 for the study" (singular concept) or "The historian consulted several ancient 典拠 for her research" (plural specific sources).
Articles like 'a', 'an', and 'the' are used based on whether you're referring to a specific 典拠 or the general concept. "We need a 典拠 for this claim" (indefinite, singular) vs. "The 典拠 for this theory is well-established" (definite, singular). When discussing multiple sources, you'd use the plural form without an article, or with 'the' if referring to specific ones: "These are important 典拠" or "We examined the 典拠 mentioned in the appendix." Pronunciation can vary, but generally, the focus is on clear articulation of the syllables. Stress typically falls on the most significant part of the word in context, often the root or the part that carries the main meaning.
Fun Fact
The concept of citing sources dates back to ancient times, with scholars meticulously referencing earlier works to build upon existing knowledge.
Pronunciation Guide
Sounds like DEE-en-joo, with emphasis on the first syllable.
Similar to UK, DEE-en-joo, with a clear 'd' sound at the start.
Common Errors
- Mispronouncing the vowel sounds.
- Incorrect stress placement.
- Swallowing the middle syllable sound.
Rhymes With
Difficulty Rating
Requires understanding of formal contexts.
Needs careful use in appropriate registers.
Less common in spontaneous speech.
Easier to understand in formal lectures or discussions.
What to Learn Next
Prerequisites
Learn Next
Avanzado
Grammar to Know
Countable vs. Uncountable Nouns
'Evidence' is often uncountable, while '典拠' can be treated as countable when referring to specific sources.
Use of Articles (a/an/the)
The choice between 'a 典拠' and 'the 典拠' depends on whether the source is specific or general.
Formal vs. Informal Register
'典拠' belongs to a formal register, while 'source' or 'proof' can be used more broadly.
Examples by Level
My mom is a 典拠.
My mom is a source of truth.
Mom is a person who gives information.
The book is a 典拠.
The book is a source of facts.
Book is a thing that gives information.
This is a good 典拠.
This is a good source.
Good describes the source.
I need a 典拠.
I need a source.
Need shows desire for something.
The teacher is a 典拠.
The teacher is an authority.
Teacher is a person with knowledge.
Find a 典拠.
Find a source.
Find is an action word.
The website is a 典拠.
The website is a source.
Website is a place for information.
Use this 典拠.
Use this source.
Use means to employ something.
The library has many reliable 典拠 for your research.
The library has many trustworthy sources for your research.
Plural 'sources' used for multiple books.
Can you provide a 典拠 for that statement?
Can you provide evidence for that statement?
Statement refers to what was said.
This historical document is a key 典拠.
This historical document is a key source.
Key means important.
We need to check the 典拠 before believing the news.
We need to check the sources before believing the news.
News refers to current information.
The professor cited several 典拠 in her lecture.
The professor cited several sources in her lecture.
Lecture is a talk given to a class.
His argument lacked a strong 典拠.
His argument lacked strong evidence.
Argument is a reason given.
The encyclopedia is a good 典拠 for general knowledge.
The encyclopedia is a good source for general knowledge.
General knowledge is basic information.
Always look for official 典拠 when doing homework.
Always look for official sources when doing homework.
Homework is schoolwork done at home.
The validity of the research depends heavily on the quality of its 典拠.
The validity of the research depends heavily on the quality of its sources.
Validity refers to being legally or officially acceptable.
Before accepting the theory, the scientific community demanded rigorous 典拠.
Before accepting the theory, the scientific community demanded rigorous evidence.
Rigorous means extremely thorough.
She used primary source documents as her main 典拠 for the historical analysis.
She used primary source documents as her main evidence for the historical analysis.
Primary source refers to original materials.
The legal team searched for precedents that could serve as 典拠 for their case.
The legal team searched for precedents that could serve as authority for their case.
Precedents are previous legal decisions.
It's important to distinguish between reliable 典拠 and mere hearsay.
It's important to distinguish between reliable sources and mere hearsay.
Hearsay is information received from other people.
The author provides extensive 典拠 in the footnotes to support her claims.
The author provides extensive references in the footnotes to support her claims.
Footnotes provide additional information.
Without a clear 典拠, the argument remains unsubstantiated.
Without a clear basis, the argument remains unsubstantiated.
Unsubstantiated means not proven.
Accessing diverse 典拠 can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Accessing diverse sources can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Comprehensive means including all or nearly all elements.
The academic integrity of the paper hinges on the robustness and relevance of its cited 典拠.
The academic integrity of the paper hinges on the robustness and relevance of its cited sources.
Hinges on means depends on.
When evaluating online information, one must critically assess the 典拠 to discern fact from fabrication.
When evaluating online information, one must critically assess the authorities to discern fact from fabrication.
Fabrication means the action of inventing something.
Legal scholars often debate the interpretive weight of different historical 典拠.
Legal scholars often debate the interpretive weight of different historical authorities.
Interpretive weight refers to the significance in understanding.
The study's conclusions were questioned due to the limited scope of the 典拠 employed.
The study's conclusions were questioned due to the limited scope of the sources employed.
Scope refers to the extent of the area or subject matter.
Establishing a definitive 典拠 for the event remains a challenge for historians.
Establishing a definitive authority for the event remains a challenge for historians.
Definitive means conclusive or final.
The philosophical argument relied on a foundational 典拠 from ancient Greek texts.
The philosophical argument relied on a foundational authority from ancient Greek texts.
Foundational means forming a necessary base.
In investigative journalism, corroborating information from multiple independent 典拠 is paramount.
In investigative journalism, corroborating information from multiple independent sources is paramount.
Paramount means more important than anything else.
The committee sought 典拠 to justify the proposed policy changes.
The committee sought evidence to justify the proposed policy changes.
Justify means to show or prove to be right or reasonable.
The epistemological framework of the discipline relies on a consensus regarding acceptable 典拠.
The epistemological framework of the discipline relies on a consensus regarding acceptable authorities.
Epistemological refers to the theory of knowledge.
Scholars often engage in meta-analysis to synthesize findings from disparate 典拠.
Scholars often engage in meta-analysis to synthesize findings from disparate sources.
Disparate means essentially different.
The hermeneutic challenge lies in interpreting the intended meaning behind the textual 典拠.
The hermeneutic challenge lies in interpreting the intended meaning behind the textual authorities.
Hermeneutic refers to interpretation, especially of text.
Establishing the provenance of the artifact required tracing its lineage through various archival 典拠.
Establishing the provenance of the artifact required tracing its lineage through various archival sources.
Provenance refers to the origin and history of ownership.
The critique focused on the inherent biases within the selected 典拠, questioning the objectivity of the conclusions.
The critique focused on the inherent biases within the selected sources, questioning the objectivity of the conclusions.
Objectivity means lack of bias.
The philosophical tradition posits that empirical observation serves as the ultimate 典拠 for scientific knowledge.
The philosophical tradition posits that empirical observation serves as the ultimate authority for scientific knowledge.
Posits means to put forward as a basis for argument.
Navigating the complex legal landscape necessitates a thorough understanding of statutory and case law as primary 典拠.
Navigating the complex legal landscape necessitates a thorough understanding of statutory and case law as primary authorities.
Statutory refers to laws made by a legislative body.
The interdisciplinary study sought to integrate insights from diverse 典拠, creating a richer tapestry of understanding.
The interdisciplinary study sought to integrate insights from diverse sources, creating a richer tapestry of understanding.
Interdisciplinary means involving different fields of study.
The deconstruction of the narrative interrogated the very notion of objective 典拠, revealing its constructed nature.
The deconstruction of the narrative interrogated the very notion of objective authority, revealing its constructed nature.
Deconstruction refers to critical analysis.
The ontological status of the phenomena remains contested, lacking definitive 典拠 within the current paradigm.
The ontological status of the phenomena remains contested, lacking definitive proof within the current paradigm.
Ontological refers to the nature of being.
His exegesis of the ancient text challenged prevailing interpretations by positing novel 典拠 derived from marginalia.
His exegesis of the ancient text challenged prevailing interpretations by positing novel authorities derived from marginalia.
Exegesis means critical explanation or interpretation.
The hermetic tradition often relies on esoteric 典拠, accessible only through initiation and deep study.
The hermetic tradition often relies on esoteric authorities, accessible only through initiation and deep study.
Hermetic refers to relating to or resembling alchemy.
The historiographical debate centered on the reliability and representativeness of the available 典拠 from the period.
The historiographical debate centered on the reliability and representativeness of the available sources from the period.
Historiographical refers to the study of the writing of history.
In quantum physics, the experimental results themselves serve as the primary 典拠, superseding purely theoretical postulates.
In quantum physics, the experimental results themselves serve as the primary evidence, superseding purely theoretical postulates.
Postulates are assumptions or principles.
The critique of post-structuralist thought often involves questioning the foundational 典拠 upon which its theories are built.
The critique of post-structuralist thought often involves questioning the foundational authorities upon which its theories are built.
Post-structuralism is a complex philosophical movement.
Theological discourse frequently grapples with reconciling scriptural 典拠 with rational inquiry.
Theological discourse frequently grapples with reconciling scriptural authorities with rational inquiry.
Theological refers to the study of the nature of God.
Colocaciones comunes
Idioms & Expressions
"Chapter and verse"
To give exact details or references from a source.
She could explain the company policy chapter and verse, citing the exact clauses.
neutral"On solid ground"
Having a strong, reliable basis or evidence.
With all the data collected, the project is now on solid ground.
neutral"The last word"
The final decision or authority on a matter.
The judge’s decision is the last word in this case.
neutral"By the book"
Following rules or procedures exactly, using established guidelines as authority.
He always follows the instructions by the book.
neutral"Back it up"
To provide evidence or proof for a statement (often used as a command or question).
You claim that's true? Back it up!
casual"Matter of record"
Something officially documented and therefore serving as a reliable source.
The official report is a matter of record.
formalEasily Confused
Both relate to supporting claims.
'典拠' is the source or authority *from which* evidence is obtained. 'Evidence' is the actual proof or factual information itself.
The scientist cited a study (典拠) that provided statistical data (evidence) supporting her hypothesis.
'典拠' is a type of source.
'Source' is a broader term. A '典拠' is a source that is particularly authoritative, reliable, or foundational.
The internet is a source, but a peer-reviewed journal article from that internet source is a stronger 典拠.
Both refer to the foundation of something.
'Basis' is the underlying reason or principle. '典拠' is the specific information or authority that forms that basis.
The policy's basis was public safety; the 典拠 included accident reports and expert recommendations.
'典拠' often implies authority.
'Authority' can refer to power or expertise. '典拠' specifically refers to the source or evidence that *grants* or *demonstrates* that authority.
The professor has authority in her field; her published research papers are her 典拠.
Sentence Patterns
Subject + verb + [典拠]
The book serves as a primary 典拠.
Cite + [noun] + as a 典拠
She cited the historical document as a 典拠.
Provide + [典拠]
We need to provide 典拠 for our claims.
Lack + [典拠]
His argument lacked sufficient 典拠.
The + [典拠] + for + [noun phrase]
The 典拠 for this theory is well-documented.
Familia de palabras
Nouns
Relacionado
How to Use It
3/10 (Less common in everyday speech, more in specific contexts)
Formality Scale
Errores comunes
'典拠' implies a formal, authoritative, or evidence-based source, not casual conversation.
A book (典拠) contains the evidence.
Like 'book' vs 'books', '典拠' can refer to one or many.
'典拠' has a formal register and can sound pretentious if misused.
The key is reliability and authority, not just the format.
Tips
Memory Palace Trick
Imagine a grand library (the '典' part, like canon/scripture) where every book is a key (the '拠' part) to unlocking truth. Walk through this library in your mind whenever you need to recall the word.
When Native Speakers Use It
Native speakers typically reserve '典拠' for formal contexts like academic papers, legal arguments, or serious research discussions where the reliability and authority of the information are paramount.
Cultural Insight
In many East Asian cultures, referencing established texts and authorities is deeply ingrained in education and scholarship, making the concept of '典拠' a cornerstone of intellectual life.
Grammar Shortcut
Think of '典拠' as often acting like 'evidence' or 'information' – it can be singular or plural depending on whether you mean the concept or specific items.
Say It Right
Focus on the 'dee-en' sound, making sure the 'd' is clear and the vowels are distinct. The 'joo' sound at the end should be soft.
Don't Make This Mistake
Avoid using '典拠' for casual 'sources' like gossip or a friend's opinion. It sounds overly formal and misplaced.
Did You Know?
The characters 典 and 拠 themselves suggest 'canonical texts' and 'reliance/support', highlighting the word's deep roots in established knowledge systems.
Study Smart
When you encounter '典拠' in reading, pause and ask: 'What specific information or authority is the author relying on here?' This active engagement solidifies understanding.
Formal vs. Informal
In informal settings, use 'source', 'proof', or 'basis'. Reserve '典拠' for when you need to sound precise, authoritative, and academic.
Contextual Learning
Learn '典拠' by finding examples in academic articles or legal documents. Seeing it used correctly in context is more effective than memorizing definitions alone.
Memorize It
Mnemonic
Think of 'Den-kyo': 'Den' like a 'den' of lions (where you get strong evidence) and 'kyo' sounding like 'key-o' (the key to proving something).
Visual Association
Imagine a sturdy, ancient stone tablet (典) with a strong hand (拠) firmly gripping it, symbolizing solid, reliable information.
Word Web
Desafío
Find an article online and identify at least three different 典拠 the author used.
Origen de la palabra
Chinese
Original meaning: 典 (diǎn) - canon, code, scripture; 拠 (jù) - to rely on, to support, evidence.
Contexto cultural
None specifically, but the *misuse* or *misrepresentation* of 典拠 can lead to controversy or accusations of bias.
In English-speaking cultures, the concept of citing sources (典拠) is fundamental to academic honesty and intellectual discourse. Plagiarism is a serious offense, highlighting the importance placed on acknowledging one's 典拠.
Practice in Real Life
Real-World Contexts
Academic Research
- cite academic 典拠
- primary 典拠
- scholarly 典拠
Legal Proceedings
- legal 典拠
- case law as 典拠
- establish 典拠
Formal Debates
- lack of 典拠
- support with 典拠
- reliable 典拠
Historical Analysis
- historical 典拠
- interpret 典拠
- archival 典拠
Conversation Starters
"What kind of 典拠 do you trust most when learning something new?"
"How important is it to cite your 典拠 when you speak or write?"
"Can you think of a time when a lack of 典拠 led to a misunderstanding?"
"What makes a source a reliable 典拠 in today's world?"
"If you were writing a report, what would be your first step in finding good 典拠?"
Journal Prompts
Describe a situation where you had to find strong 典拠 to support your point of view.
Reflect on the difference between believing something based on opinion versus believing it based on solid 典拠.
Write about a time you encountered unreliable information and how you identified it as lacking proper 典拠.
Imagine you are a historian. What kind of 典拠 would you seek to understand a past event?
Preguntas frecuentes
8 preguntas'典拠' is often a more formal term, implying a higher degree of authority or reliability than the general English word 'source'. While 'source' can refer to anything information comes from (like a website or a friend), '典拠' usually points to something more established, like a documented fact, a legal precedent, or an expert's work.
Yes, but with caution. An online source can be a '典拠' if it is authoritative and reliable (e.g., a government report, a peer-reviewed journal article published online). However, a random blog post or social media update is unlikely to qualify as a strong '典拠'.
The plural form is often '典拠s' or sometimes just '典拠' when the context makes it clear you're referring to multiple sources. For example, 'The researcher consulted several 典拠s.' or 'The book lists its 典拠s in the appendix.'
Primarily, yes. It's most common in formal writing, especially academic and legal texts. While the *concept* of authority or source is used in speech, the word '典拠' itself is less frequent in casual conversation.
If your claims lack strong backing, they might be considered opinions or speculations. You should aim to find reliable sources or present your ideas as hypotheses rather than established facts.
Yes, depending on the context, synonyms include 'source', 'authority', 'evidence', 'basis', 'precedent', and 'reference'.
Using a 典拠 lends credibility and validity to your statements. It shows that your claims are based on facts, research, or established knowledge, making your arguments more persuasive and trustworthy.
Yes, an expert or authority figure in a particular field can be considered a '典拠' if their knowledge or testimony is used to support a claim.
Ponte a prueba
My teacher is a good ____.
The teacher provides reliable information, acting as a source or authority.
What is a 典拠?
A 典拠 is a reliable source or authority.
A rumor from a friend can be considered a strong 典拠 for a scientific paper.
A 典拠 needs to be reliable and authoritative, which a casual rumor usually isn't.
Word
Significado
Matching helps understand the core meaning and application.
The correct sentence is 'This is the 典拠 for the research.'
The historian used original letters as her primary ______.
Original letters serve as a primary source or authority (典拠) for historical research.
Which of the following best describes a 'scholarly 典拠'?
A scholarly 典拠 is a source recognized for its academic rigor and expertise.
In legal contexts, established case law functions as a significant 典拠.
Case law provides precedent and authority, serving as a crucial 典拠 in legal arguments.
His argument lacked sufficient ______ to be convincing.
Arguments need supporting sources or evidence (典拠) to be convincing.
A good 典拠 helps you know if something is ____.
A 典拠 provides reliable information, helping you know what is true.
Puntuación: /10
Summary
A 典拠 is the bedrock of reliable information, providing the authority and evidence needed to make claims trustworthy.
- 典拠 means a reliable source or authority.
- It provides evidence and backs up claims.
- Used mainly in formal, academic, or legal contexts.
- Essential for credibility and trustworthiness.
Memory Palace Trick
Imagine a grand library (the '典' part, like canon/scripture) where every book is a key (the '拠' part) to unlocking truth. Walk through this library in your mind whenever you need to recall the word.
When Native Speakers Use It
Native speakers typically reserve '典拠' for formal contexts like academic papers, legal arguments, or serious research discussions where the reliability and authority of the information are paramount.
Cultural Insight
In many East Asian cultures, referencing established texts and authorities is deeply ingrained in education and scholarship, making the concept of '典拠' a cornerstone of intellectual life.
Grammar Shortcut
Think of '典拠' as often acting like 'evidence' or 'information' – it can be singular or plural depending on whether you mean the concept or specific items.
Related Content
Esta palabra en otros idiomas
Más palabras de academic
絶対的
B2Absolute; not qualified or diminished in any way; total.
絶対的に
B1In a complete, unconditional, or conclusive manner; absolutely.
抽象的だ
B1Abstract; existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence.
抽象
B2Existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence. It refers to generalizing or extracting the essence of something away from specific details.
抽象的に
B1In an abstract or theoretical manner.
学術的な
B1Academic, scholarly; relating to education and scholarship.
学術的だ
B1Academic; relating to education and scholarship.
学術的
B2Academic; relating to education and scholarship.
学術
B1Academia; scholarship; relating to scholarly pursuits.
学力
B1Academic ability; a person's level of knowledge and skill in academic subjects.
