C1 noun #25,000 most common 12 min read
An arraignment is when a person goes to see a judge for the first time after the police say they did something wrong. It is a very important meeting in a big room called a courtroom. The judge is the person in charge. The judge reads a paper that says what the person did wrong. For example, the paper might say the person took something that was not theirs. The judge asks the person, 'Did you do it?' The person can say 'Yes' or 'No.' Most people say 'No' at first. The judge also tells the person about their rights. A right is something the law says you can do, like having a lawyer to help you. This meeting is short. It is not a trial. A trial is a long meeting where people show evidence. The arraignment is just the start. If you watch a movie about police, you will see this. The person might be wearing special clothes from the jail. Their family might be there to watch. It is a serious time. You use this word when you talk about the law or news. For example, 'The man had his arraignment today.' It means he went to court to hear the charges. It is a big word, but it just means the first court visit for a crime.
An arraignment is a formal meeting in a court. It happens after the police arrest someone for a crime. At the arraignment, the person who is accused of the crime (the defendant) stands in front of a judge. The judge explains the charges. Charges are the specific crimes the police think the person committed. The judge also tells the defendant about their legal rights. One important right is the right to a lawyer. If the person does not have money for a lawyer, the court will give them one. Then, the judge asks the defendant to enter a 'plea.' A plea is an answer. The defendant can plead 'guilty' (I did it), 'not guilty' (I did not do it), or 'no contest' (I will not fight the charges). Most of the time, the defendant pleads not guilty so their lawyer can look at the evidence later. The judge also decides if the person can go home or must stay in jail until the next court date. Sometimes the person must pay 'bail' to go home. Bail is money that the court keeps to make sure the person comes back. The arraignment is a very quick process, often lasting only a few minutes, but it is the official beginning of a legal case.
In the legal system, an arraignment is a critical procedural step that occurs shortly after an individual has been arrested and charged with a criminal offense. It is the first time the defendant appears before a judicial officer, such as a judge or a magistrate. The primary purpose of the arraignment is to ensure that the defendant is fully aware of the charges against them. The prosecutor, who represents the government, will read the formal complaint or indictment. After the charges are read, the judge will confirm that the defendant understands their constitutional rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The most significant part of the arraignment is when the defendant enters a plea. The options are typically guilty, not guilty, or no contest. In addition to the plea, the judge will address the issue of 'pretrial release.' This involves deciding whether the defendant can be released on their own recognizance (a promise to return) or if they must post bail. If the crime is very serious or the defendant is considered a flight risk, the judge might order them to stay in jail. The arraignment sets the schedule for future court appearances, such as the preliminary hearing or the trial. It is a formal and public event that marks the transition from a police investigation to a legal proceeding.
The arraignment is a fundamental component of due process in criminal law, serving as the formal initiation of the judicial phase of a case. Once a person is taken into custody and charged, the law requires that they be brought before a court without unnecessary delay for an arraignment. This proceeding serves several vital functions. First, it provides the defendant with formal notice of the accusations, which is a requirement under the Sixth Amendment in the U.S. and similar legal principles worldwide. Second, it allows the court to establish the defendant’s identity and ensure they have legal representation. If the defendant is indigent, the court will appoint a public defender at this stage. The core of the proceeding is the entry of a plea. While 'guilty' and 'not guilty' are the most common, a 'nolo contendere' (no contest) plea is also an option, which has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea but cannot be used as an admission of guilt in subsequent civil litigation. Furthermore, the arraignment is where the conditions of release are determined. The judge weighs factors such as the severity of the offense, the defendant's criminal history, and their ties to the community to decide on bail. Because it is a public hearing, the arraignment often provides the first opportunity for the media and the public to learn the specifics of a criminal case, making it a high-stakes event for all parties involved.
An arraignment is a sophisticated procedural juncture in criminal litigation that functions as the formal reading of a charging document in the presence of the defendant. This proceeding is the mechanism by which the court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the defendant and informs them of the specific statutory violations alleged by the state. At this stage, the defendant is typically represented by counsel, and the court must verify that the defendant has been apprised of their fundamental constitutional protections, including the privilege against self-incrimination. The entry of a plea—guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere—is the definitive act of the arraignment, which then dictates the subsequent trajectory of the case. A plea of not guilty triggers the discovery process and the scheduling of pretrial motions, whereas a guilty plea may lead directly to sentencing or a specialized diversion program. Beyond the plea, the arraignment is the primary forum for the adjudication of pretrial detention and bail. The court must balance the presumption of innocence against the necessity of ensuring the defendant's future appearance and the safety of the community. Legal practitioners often view the arraignment as a strategic opportunity to argue for favorable release conditions or to identify potential procedural defects in the charging process. It is a highly formalized event, governed by strict rules of criminal procedure, and it serves as a critical safeguard against arbitrary detention, ensuring that the coercive power of the state is exercised within a framework of transparency and judicial oversight.
Within the intricate architecture of the adversarial legal system, the arraignment constitutes the definitive formalization of the state's accusatory instrument against an individual. It is the quintessential manifestation of the 'notice' requirement of due process, ensuring that the machinery of criminal prosecution operates with requisite transparency. During this high-level procedural event, the defendant is brought before a court of competent jurisdiction to be judicially informed of the specific charges contained within an information or indictment. The arraignment is not merely an administrative formality; it is a critical constitutional threshold where the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights are activated and documented. The judge’s role is to act as a neutral arbiter, overseeing the defendant's entry of a plea, which serves as the formal joinder of issues between the prosecution and the defense. Whether the defendant opts for a plea of 'not guilty'—thereby demanding that the state meet its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt—or chooses a more complex route like 'nolo contendere,' the arraignment fixes the legal posture of the case. Furthermore, the proceeding involves a nuanced determination of pretrial liberty. The judicial assessment of bail or 'release on recognizance' (ROR) requires a complex weighing of the 'nature and circumstances of the offense' against the 'history and characteristics of the defendant.' In the context of C2-level English, 'arraignment' is understood not just as a court date, but as the procedural pivot upon which the entire weight of the criminal justice system turns, embodying the tension between individual liberty and the state's interest in public order.

The term arraignment refers to a pivotal moment in the criminal justice system. It is the first time a defendant appears in court after being charged with a crime. During this proceeding, the court formally reads the charges, and the defendant is asked to respond. Understanding this term is essential for anyone following legal news, watching crime dramas, or studying civic procedures. It is not a trial; it is the formal introduction of the legal battle ahead.

Legal Definition
A criminal proceeding where the defendant is officially called before a court of competent jurisdiction to be informed of the charges and to enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere.

The defendant stood silently as the clerk began the arraignment, detailing the counts of grand larceny.

In a broader sense, an arraignment serves as a constitutional checkpoint. It ensures that the government cannot hold a person indefinitely without specific, articulated reasons. In many jurisdictions, this must happen within 48 to 72 hours of an arrest. This timeframe prevents the state from violating the habeas corpus rights of the individual. People use this word most frequently in the context of high-profile court cases where the initial appearance sets the tone for the entire judicial process.

Procedural Role
It establishes the timeline for discovery, future hearings, and determines whether the defendant will be released on bail or held in custody pending trial.

Media outlets gathered outside the courthouse, awaiting the conclusion of the senator's arraignment.

The word 'arraignment' carries a weight of formality. You wouldn't use it for a casual meeting or a minor disagreement. It implies the machinery of the state is in motion. It is the bridge between the investigation phase and the litigation phase. When you hear this word, you should visualize a judge on a bench, a prosecutor reading from a document, and a defense attorney standing beside their client. It is a moment of high tension because it is the point of no return for the legal process.

Constitutional Context
In the United States, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, which is the primary function of the arraignment.

Due to a lack of evidence, the prosecutor requested a delay in the arraignment to further refine the charges.

The judge waived the reading of the full indictment during the arraignment as the defense had already reviewed the documents.

The suspect pleaded not guilty at his arraignment yesterday morning.

Ultimately, the arraignment is about transparency. It ensures the defendant knows exactly what they are up against. It is a procedural safeguard that defines the democratic legal system, distinguishing it from systems where people can be disappeared or jailed without explanation. It is a word that signifies the start of a public record of a dispute between the state and an individual.

Using the word arraignment correctly requires an understanding of its grammatical role as a noun and its specific legal context. It is almost always used in the singular when referring to a specific event, though it can be pluralized when discussing multiple cases. It commonly follows verbs like 'attend,' 'conduct,' 'schedule,' or 'delay.'

Common Verb Pairings
Verbs such as 'postpone,' 'waive,' or 'preside over' are frequently used in conjunction with arraignment.

The defense attorney moved to postpone the arraignment until her client could be properly evaluated by a physician.

When constructing sentences, remember that the arraignment is a 'stage' or an 'event.' You don't 'arraign' a crime; you 'arraign' a person. Therefore, the noun 'arraignment' is the act of that person being brought to court. It is often the object of a prepositional phrase, such as 'at the arraignment' or 'during the arraignment.'

Prepositional Usage
Use 'at' to specify the location/time of the event. Use 'following' to describe subsequent actions.

The judge's primary duty during the arraignment is to ensure the defendant understands their rights.

In professional writing, especially journalism and legal briefs, the word is used with precision. It is never confused with 'trial' or 'sentencing.' For instance, a journalist might write, 'The suspect remained stoic throughout the arraignment,' indicating their behavior during that specific initial court appearance. It is a formal word, so it fits best in serious, descriptive, or analytical contexts.

Descriptive Adjectives
Adjectives like 'brief,' 'contentious,' 'public,' or 'televised' often modify the noun to provide more detail.

A brief arraignment was held via video link due to security concerns at the local jail.

The family of the victim was present at the arraignment to see the accused face the charges.

The defendant's refusal to speak during the arraignment led the judge to enter a 'not guilty' plea on their behalf.

When writing about multiple defendants, you would say 'their arraignments were scheduled for different dates.' This emphasizes that each person has their own distinct legal proceeding. The word functions as the anchor for the beginning of the story of a criminal case, providing the necessary 'who, what, and where' for the legal record.

You are most likely to encounter the word arraignment in news reports, particularly those covering the legal beat. When a high-profile individual is arrested, the headline often reads, 'Arraignment Scheduled for [Name].' This is because the arraignment is the first public event where the specific details of the government's case are revealed. It is a staple of broadcast journalism, where reporters stand in front of courthouses and describe the atmosphere inside the room.

Journalistic Context
News anchors use the term to signal the transition from the investigation of a crime to the formal legal process.

Breaking news: The arraignment of the suspect in the downtown robbery is taking place right now.

Another common place to hear this word is in legal dramas and police procedurals like 'Law & Order,' 'Better Call Saul,' or 'Suits.' These shows often depict the arraignment because it is a scene of high conflict. The defendant might plead 'not guilty' defiantly, or the prosecutor might argue for a high bail amount, creating immediate drama. In these fictional settings, the word is used to build tension and move the plot into the courtroom phase.

Entertainment Context
Screenwriters use 'arraignment' to establish the stakes of the case and the legal hurdles the characters must overcome.

'We need to prepare our strategy before the arraignment on Tuesday,' the lawyer told his client.

In real-life legal settings, if you ever have the misfortune of being in a courthouse, you will hear the word 'arraignment' called out by bailiffs or clerks. It is part of the daily rhythm of the court. 'Arraignment Court' is often a specific room where dozens of these hearings are handled in rapid succession. In this context, the word is utilitarian and administrative, representing a necessary step in the bureaucratic process of justice.

Administrative Context
Court clerks use the term to organize the daily docket and manage the flow of defendants through the system.

The clerk announced, 'Next on the docket is the arraignment for Case Number 4052.'

The international tribunal set a date for the arraignment of the former dictator.

The podcast host explained the significance of the arraignment in the context of the state's evidence.

Finally, you will find 'arraignment' in academic textbooks about law, government, and sociology. It is studied as a component of procedural justice. Scholars analyze how arraignments differ across cultures and legal systems, and how the conduct of an arraignment can influence the eventual outcome of a case. It is a fundamental building block of legal literacy.

One of the most frequent mistakes people make is confusing arraignment with other legal terms like 'indictment' or 'trial.' While they are related, they represent very different parts of the legal process. An indictment is the formal charge itself (the document), whereas the arraignment is the hearing where that charge is read. You cannot 'have an indictment' in a courtroom; you are 'served an indictment' and then 'attend an arraignment.'

Arraignment vs. Indictment
An indictment is the 'what' (the charges), and the arraignment is the 'where and when' (the court appearance).

Incorrect: The jury decided the verdict during the arraignment.

Another mistake is thinking that evidence is presented or witnesses testify during an arraignment. This is incorrect. The arraignment is purely procedural. Its purpose is to inform the defendant of the charges and their rights. No one is found 'guilty' or 'innocent' based on evidence at this stage. If you say, 'The witness gave a powerful statement at the arraignment,' you are likely confusing it with a preliminary hearing or the trial itself.

Arraignment vs. Trial
A trial determines guilt or innocence through evidence; an arraignment merely starts the process by stating the charges.

Incorrect: He was sentenced to five years at his arraignment.

Spelling and pronunciation are also common areas for errors. The word contains a silent 'g' (ar-RAIN-ment). Some people mistakenly spell it 'arraignment' without the 'g' or 'arraignment' with an extra 'e.' In terms of usage, don't use it as a verb. You don't 'arraignment' someone; the court 'arraigns' them. Using the noun form as a verb is a grammatical error that marks you as a non-native or inexperienced speaker.

Grammatical Precision
Use 'arraign' as the verb and 'arraignment' as the noun. Avoid saying 'The judge arraignmented the man.'

The judge will arraign the suspect tomorrow; the arraignment is set for 9 AM.

The prosecutor argued against bail during the arraignment, citing the defendant's flight risk.

People often confuse a preliminary hearing with an arraignment, but they serve different purposes.

Finally, ensure you don't use 'arraignment' for civil cases. Arraignments are strictly for criminal law. In a civil lawsuit, the initial steps involve 'filing a complaint' and 'serving a summons.' If you use 'arraignment' to describe a divorce proceeding or a contract dispute, it will be technically incorrect and confusing to your audience.

While arraignment is a specific legal term, there are several words that are often used in similar contexts. Understanding the nuances between these words will help you choose the most accurate term for your writing. The most common alternatives are 'hearing,' 'appearance,' and 'prosecution,' but each has a distinct meaning.

Arraignment vs. Appearance
'Appearance' is a broader term for any time a person shows up in court. An arraignment is a *specific type* of appearance.
Arraignment vs. Hearing
A 'hearing' is a general term for a legal proceeding. An arraignment is the *first* hearing in a criminal case.

While the initial appearance was brief, the subsequent arraignment took several hours.

In some jurisdictions, the term 'initial appearance' or 'first appearance' is used interchangeably with arraignment, although they can technically be separate events (where the first appearance is just for bail, and the arraignment is for the plea). Another related word is 'indictment,' which refers to the formal accusation issued by a grand jury. While an indictment often leads to an arraignment, they are not the same thing.

Arraignment vs. Indictment
The indictment is the charging document; the arraignment is the hearing where that document is read to the defendant.

The indictment was handed down on Friday, followed by the arraignment on Monday.

You might also hear 'preliminary hearing.' This is a later stage where the judge decides if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. It is much more involved than an arraignment. If you are describing a scene where witnesses are being questioned, 'preliminary hearing' is the correct term, not 'arraignment.' Using the correct term shows a high level of English proficiency and legal understanding.

Arraignment vs. Preliminary Hearing
Arraignment is for pleading; the preliminary hearing is for testing the evidence.

The defendant's lawyer used the preliminary hearing to challenge the validity of the search warrant, which happened weeks after the arraignment.

The proceedings began with the arraignment of all twelve suspects.

The arraignment is the gateway to the rest of the criminal litigation process.

In summary, while 'appearance' or 'hearing' can be used as synonyms in a pinch, 'arraignment' is the most precise term for the initial step of a criminal case where charges are read and a plea is entered. Using it correctly demonstrates a sophisticated grasp of legal English and ensures clarity in communication.

Examples by Level

1

The man went to his arraignment today.

L'homme est allé à son passage devant le juge aujourd'hui.

Noun phrase used as the object of a preposition.

2

Is the arraignment in this room?

Le passage devant le juge est-il dans cette salle ?

Simple question structure with 'is'.

3

The judge spoke at the arraignment.

Le juge a parlé lors du passage devant le tribunal.

Past tense verb with a prepositional phrase.

4

I saw the arraignment on TV.

J'ai vu le passage au tribunal à la télé.

Direct object of the verb 'saw'.

5

The arraignment was very short.

Le passage devant le juge était très court.

Adjective 'short' describing the noun.

6

He needs a lawyer for his arraignment.

Il a besoin d'un avocat pour son passage au tribunal.

Preposition 'for' indicating purpose.

7

The police took him to the arraignment.

La police l'a emmené au passage devant le juge.

Action verb 'took' with a destination.

8

There is no arraignment on Sunday.

Il n'y a pas de passage au tribunal le dimanche.

Negative existential 'there is no'.

1

The defendant pleaded not guilty at the arraignment.

Le prévenu a plaidé non coupable lors de sa mise en accusation.

Specific legal verb 'pleaded' used with 'at'.

2

The judge set the bail during the arraignment.

Le juge a fixé la caution pendant l'audience de mise en accusation.

Preposition 'during' showing time frame.

3

The arraignment lasted only ten minutes.

La mise en accusation n'a duré que dix minutes.

Verb 'lasted' used for duration.

4

She was nervous about her arraignment next week.

Elle était nerveuse à propos de sa mise en accusation la semaine prochaine.

Adjective + preposition 'nervous about'.

5

The lawyer explained what happens at an arraignment.

L'avocat a expliqué ce qui se passe lors d'une mise en accusation.

Noun clause 'what happens...' as the object.

6

They scheduled the arraignment for Monday morning.

Ils ont programmé la mise en accusation pour lundi matin.

Verb 'scheduled' with a time preposition.

7

The arraignment is a public hearing.

La mise en accusation est une audience publique.

Noun as subject with a complement.

8

He missed his arraignment and the judge was angry.

Il a raté sa mise en accusation et le juge était en colère.

Compound sentence with 'and'.

1

The prosecutor read the formal charges during the arraignment.

Le procureur a lu les chefs d'accusation formels pendant l'interrogatoire de première comparution.

Past tense with specific legal agents (prosecutor).

2

The defendant's family waited outside during the arraignment.

La famille du prévenu a attendu dehors pendant l'interrogatoire de première comparution.

Possessive noun + subject + verb.

3

An arraignment is required before the trial can begin.

Une mise en accusation est requise avant que le procès ne puisse commencer.

Passive voice 'is required'.

4

The judge informed the suspect of his rights at the arraignment.

Le juge a informé le suspect de ses droits lors de la mise en accusation.

Verb 'inform' followed by 'of'.

5

Many people were surprised by the outcome of the arraignment.

Beaucoup de gens ont été surpris par l'issue de la mise en accusation.

Passive construction 'were surprised by'.

6

The arraignment was delayed because the lawyer was late.

La mise en accusation a été retardée parce que l'avocat était en retard.

Conjunction 'because' introducing a reason.

7

The defendant chose to waive the reading of the charges at his arraignment.

Le prévenu a choisi de renoncer à la lecture des charges lors de sa mise en accusation.

Infinitive phrase 'to waive' as an object.

8

The media covered the arraignment of the famous actor.

Les médias ont couvert la mise en accusation de l'acteur célèbre.

Transitive verb 'covered' with a complex object.

1

The judge denied bail at the arraignment, citing the defendant's criminal history.

Le juge a refusé la caution lors de la mise en accusation, citant les antécédents criminels du prévenu.

Participle phrase 'citing...' providing additional info.

2

The arraignment serves as a safeguard against unlawful detention.

La mise en accusation sert de protection contre la détention illégale.

Verb 'serves as' used for function.

3

The defense attorney requested a postponement of the arraignment.

L'avocat de la défense a demandé un report de la mise en accusation.

Noun 'postponement' followed by 'of'.

4

During the arraignment, the suspect entered a plea of nolo contendere.

Pendant la mise en accusation, le suspect a plaidé 'nolo contendere'.

Introductory prepositional phrase.

5

The arraignment is the first public step in the criminal justice process.

La mise en accusation est la première étape publique du processus de justice pénale.

Superlative 'first' modifying the noun phrase.

6

The judge must ensure the defendant is competent at the time of the arraignment.

Le juge doit s'assurer que le prévenu est apte au moment de la mise en accusation.

Modal 'must' + infinitive 'ensure'.

7

The arraignment was televised, attracting millions of viewers.

La mise en accusation a été télévisée, attirant des millions de téléspectateurs.

Comma + present participle for result.

8

The suspect’s behavior during the arraignment was described as defiant.

Le comportement du suspect pendant la mise en accusation a été décrit comme provocateur.

Passive voice 'was described as'.

1

The arraignment is a critical juncture where the court establishes its jurisdiction.

La mise en accusation est un moment critique où le tribunal établit sa compétence.

Relative clause 'where...' defining the noun.

2

Failure to hold a timely arraignment can lead to the dismissal of charges.

Le fait de ne pas procéder à une mise en accusation en temps voulu peut entraîner le rejet des charges.

Gerund phrase 'Failure to hold...' as the subject.

3

The defendant's constitutional rights are formally acknowledged during the arraignment.

Les droits constitutionnels du prévenu sont formellement reconnus lors de la mise en accusation.

Adverb 'formally' modifying the passive verb.

4

The prosecutor outlined the severity of the crimes at the arraignment to justify high bail.

Le procureur a souligné la gravité des crimes lors de la mise en accusation pour justifier une caution élevée.

Infinitive of purpose 'to justify'.

5

The arraignment provides a procedural framework for the subsequent litigation.

La mise en accusation fournit un cadre procédural pour le litige ultérieur.

Abstract noun phrase 'procedural framework'.

6

Legal scholars debate the efficacy of the arraignment in protecting civil liberties.

Les spécialistes du droit débattent de l'efficacité de la mise en accusation pour la protection des libertés civiles.

Transitive verb 'debate' with an abstract object.

7

The judge's demeanor during the arraignment set a somber tone for the case.

L'attitude du juge pendant la mise en accusation a donné un ton sombre à l'affaire.

Possessive noun + subject + verb 'set'.

8

An arraignment is essentially the formal joinder of issues in a criminal matter.

Une mise en accusation est essentiellement la jonction formelle des points de droit dans une affaire pénale.

Adverb 'essentially' used for emphasis.

1

The arraignment represents the quintessential intersection of individual liberty and state authority.

La mise en accusation représente l'intersection quintessencielle de la liberté individuelle et de l'autorité de l'État.

Sophisticated vocabulary (quintessential, intersection).

2

The procedural integrity of the arraignment is paramount to the legitimacy of the judicial system.

L'intégrité procédurale de la mise en accusation est primordiale pour la légitimité du système judiciaire.

Adjective 'paramount' followed by a prepositional phrase.

3

The defendant's counsel utilized the arraignment to challenge the sufficiency of the indictment.

L'avocat du prévenu a utilisé la mise en accusation pour contester le caractère suffisant de l'acte d'accusation.

Formal verb 'utilized

Synonyms

initial hearing court appearance prosecution summons indictment hearing

Antonyms

acquittal dismissal exoneration

Related Content

More Law words

abfinor

C1

A formal term denoting the absolute and final settlement of a legal dispute or the conclusive discharge of a financial obligation. It signifies the definitive point at which all parties are released from further claims or responsibilities regarding a specific matter.

abfortious

C1

To abfortious is to strengthen a logical argument or a formal claim by providing additional, even more compelling evidence. It describes the process of reinforcing a conclusion so that it follows with even greater certainty than initially established.

abide

C1

To accept or act in accordance with a rule, decision, or recommendation. It can also mean to tolerate or endure a person or situation, typically used in negative constructions.

abjugcy

C1

The state or act of being unyoked or released from a bond, burden, or state of servitude. It describes a liberation from metaphorical yokes such as oppressive systems, heavy responsibilities, or restrictive contracts.

abolished

B2

To formally put an end to a system, practice, or institution, especially one that has been in existence for a long time. The act of abolishing something is a decisive and official termination, often done by law or through an executive order.

abrogate

C1

To formally repeal, abolish, or do away with a law, right, or formal agreement. It typically refers to an authoritative or official action taken to end the validity of a legal or political document.

abscond

C1

To depart suddenly and secretly, often to avoid detection or arrest for an unlawful action. It is typically used when someone leaves a place with something they are not supposed to have, such as stolen money or information.

absolve

C1

To formally declare someone free from guilt, obligation, or punishment, especially after a legal proceeding or a religious confession. It suggests a complete release from the consequences or blame associated with an action.

accomplice

C1

An accomplice is a person who helps someone else commit a crime or a dishonest act. This individual is legally or morally responsible for their involvement, even if they were not the primary person performing the act.

accord

C1

A formal agreement or treaty between parties, or a state of harmony and consistency between different things. As a verb, it means to grant someone power or status, or to be consistent with a particular fact or rule.

Was this helpful?

Comments (0)

Login to Comment
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!