قابل اجرا

The Persian term قابل اجرا (ghābel-e ejrā) is a sophisticated compound adjective that serves as a cornerstone in formal, technical, and administrative Persian. At its core, it translates to 'executable,' 'feasible,' or 'enforceable.' To understand this word, one must look at its two components: ghābel (meaning capable, worthy, or susceptible) and ejrā (meaning execution, performance, or implementation). When fused together with the Ezafe construction (-e), they create a descriptor for any plan, law, project, or computer command that is not merely theoretical but can actually be brought into the physical or digital world. In everyday Iranian life, you will encounter this word most frequently in professional settings. If a manager asks if a project is ghābel-e ejrā, they are asking for a reality check—can this actually happen given our budget and time? In legal contexts, it refers to the enforceability of a contract or a court's verdict. If a law is passed but lacks the infrastructure to be supported, a critic might argue that it is not ghābel-e ejrā. This nuance separates it from simple 'possibility' (momken). While something might be 'possible' in a vacuum, ghābel-e ejrā implies that the mechanisms for its realization are present and ready.

Technical Application

In computer science, this is the standard term for an 'executable' file. A file ending in .exe is described in Persian technical manuals as a file that is ghābel-e ejrā.

The versatility of this adjective allows it to bridge the gap between abstract thought and concrete action. For a student of Persian, mastering this word signals a move into the B1/B2 level of proficiency, where one begins to discuss logistics, systemic functionality, and institutional processes. It is often used with the auxiliary verb budan (to be) or shodan (to become). For example, a contract becomes ghābel-e ejrā once both parties sign it. It is also important to note the negative form: gheyr-e ghābel-e ejrā (unfeasible/unenforceable), which is just as common in debates and critiques. When you use this word, you are focusing on the 'how' and the 'can' of a situation, moving beyond the 'what'.

Legal Context

In the Iranian legal system, a 'Hokm-e Ghābel-e Ejrā' is a final judgment that the authorities are now authorized to carry out.

Furthermore, the word carries a weight of pragmatism. In political discourse, politicians often promise things that are popular but, according to analysts, not ghābel-e ejrā. Using this word allows you to challenge the practicality of an idea without necessarily attacking its morality or desirability. It is the ultimate word for the realist. If you are describing a software bug, you might say the code is no longer ghābel-e ejrā. If you are discussing a recipe, you might say it's not ghābel-e ejrā because a certain ingredient is unavailable in your country. This breadth makes it one of the most useful compound adjectives in the Persian lexicon.

Using قابل اجرا correctly requires an understanding of Persian sentence structure and the specific contexts where 'feasibility' is the primary concern. Typically, this adjective follows the noun it modifies or appears as a predicate adjective after a linking verb. Because it is a compound adjective formed with the Ezafe (-e), the pronunciation flows smoothly from ghābel into ejrā. Let's look at the primary ways you will integrate this into your Persian speech and writing. Most commonly, you will see it paired with nouns like tarh (plan), prozhe (project), ghānun (law), or dastur (command).

As a Predicate Adjective

Noun + (Subject Marker) + Adjective + Verb. Example: 'In barnāme ghābel-e ejrā nist' (This program is not executable).

In this example, the word acts as the core requirement for the 'solutions' (rāhkārhā). Notice the use of 'vāghe'an' (truly) to add emphasis. In Persian, adverbs of degree or intensity usually precede the adjective. You could also say 'kamtar ghābel-e ejrā' (less feasible) or 'bishtar ghābel-e ejrā' (more feasible). When discussing software, the sentence might be: 'In fāyel ghābel-e ejrā nist' (This file is not executable). This is a common error message you might see on a Persianized operating system.

Another frequent usage is in the negative. By adding the prefix gheyr-e, you create the opposite meaning. 'In pishnahād gheyr-e ghābel-e ejrā ast' (This proposal is unfeasible). This is a very polite but firm way to reject an idea in a business meeting. It focuses on the logistical impossibility rather than personal disagreement. In more formal writing, you might see it used as an attributive adjective modifying a noun directly: 'Yek tarh-e ghābel-e ejrā' (A feasible plan). Here, the Ezafe connects 'tarh' to 'ghābel'.

The 'Shodan' Construction

Using it with 'shodan' (to become) implies a change in state. 'Gharārdād pas az emzā ghābel-e ejrā mishavad' (The contract becomes enforceable after signing).

Finally, consider the context of 'enforceability' in social or legal settings. If a rule is passed in a school but no one follows it and there are no consequences, a teacher might say, 'In ghānun dar in kelās ghābel-e ejrā nist' (This rule is not enforceable in this class). This demonstrates the word's ability to describe social dynamics and authority, not just technical tasks. By practicing these different sentence patterns, you will develop a natural feel for how to slot this powerful adjective into your Persian conversations.

If you were to walk through the streets of Tehran, you might not hear قابل اجرا in a casual conversation about the weather or what's for dinner. However, the moment you step into a professional, academic, or legal environment, the word becomes ubiquitous. It is a 'high-frequency' word for the 'formal' (rasmi) register of Persian. If you listen to the evening news on IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting), you will hear news anchors discussing whether a new international treaty or a domestic economic policy is ghābel-e ejrā. Political analysts on talk shows spend hours debating the 'ghābel-e ejrā' nature of various government promises.

In the Tech World

If you visit a Persian tech blog like Digiato or Zoomit, you will see this word in every article about software, operating systems, or coding. 'Fāyel-hā-ye ghābel-e ejrā' (executable files) is the standard term for programs.

Another place you will frequently encounter this is in the legal system. If you are ever involved in a contract in Iran—whether for renting an apartment or starting a business—the term 'ghābel-e ejrā' will appear in the fine print. It defines which clauses are legally binding and which are conditional. Lawyers use it to describe the status of a court order. If a verdict is 'ghat'i' (final), it is then ghābel-e ejrā. In this context, it carries the weight of the law, meaning that if you don't comply, the state has the right to intervene. This gives the word a much more serious tone than its English counterpart 'feasible' often has.

In universities, during a thesis defense (defā-e pāyān-nāme), professors will often critique a student's proposed solution by saying it is 'theoretically sound but not ghābel-e ejrā.' This distinction is crucial in Persian academic culture, which values the bridge between 'nazariye' (theory) and 'amal' (practice). You might also hear it in environmental activism. When discussing a plan to save Lake Urmia, scientists might argue about which methods are ghābel-e ejrā given the current water scarcity and climate conditions. This word is the filter through which all grand ideas must pass before they are taken seriously in the Iranian public sphere.

Corporate Culture

In modern Iranian startups, which often use a mix of Persian and English business terms, 'ghābel-e ejrā' remains the preferred term for 'actionable' or 'viable'.

To truly hear this word, pay attention to the 'official' voice of institutions. It is the language of the 'edāre' (office) and the 'dāshghāh' (university). It is a word of authority, realism, and technical precision. By recognizing it in these contexts, you'll start to see how Persian speakers navigate the complex world of bureaucracy and planning.

Learning to use قابل اجرا correctly involves avoiding several common pitfalls that English speakers often encounter. The first and most frequent mistake is confusing it with the word momken (possible). While they are related, they are not interchangeable. Momken refers to the theoretical possibility of something happening, whereas ghābel-e ejrā specifically refers to the practical ability to perform or enforce a specific action or plan. For example, it is 'possible' to build a house on the moon, but it is not currently ghābel-e ejrā. If you use 'momken' when you mean 'feasible,' you might sound less professional or precise.

The 'Gheyr-e' Placement

A common grammatical error is putting the negative marker in the wrong place. You must say gheyr-e ghābel-e ejrā. Some learners mistakenly try to say 'ghābel-e gheyr-e ejrā' or 'ghābel-e ejrā nist' (though the latter is a correct sentence, the former is nonsense).

Another mistake involves the Ezafe. Because ghābel-e ejrā is a compound, you must always include the short 'e' sound between ghābel and ejrā. Dropping this sound (saying 'ghābel ejrā') makes the phrase sound disjointed and ungrammatical. Furthermore, learners often forget that this is a formal term. While it's perfectly fine in an office, using it with your friends to discuss whether it's 'feasible' to go to the movies might sound overly stiff. In casual conversation, people prefer words like shodani (do-able) or amali (practical).

There is also a nuance regarding 'applicability.' Sometimes learners use ghābel-e ejrā when they mean 'relevant' or 'applicable' in a general sense. While it can mean 'applicable' in a legal sense (a law that applies to you), if you want to say 'This rule applies to everyone,' a more common construction would use the verb shāmel shodan (to include/apply to). Use ghābel-e ejrā when you are specifically talking about the *action* of carrying it out. Lastly, avoid overusing it. Persian has many 'ghābel-e' compounds (like ghābel-e ghabul for 'acceptable'). If every third adjective you use starts with 'ghābel-e,' your speech will sound repetitive and bureaucratic.

Register Mismatch

Using this word in a very slangy, informal sentence creates a 'clash of registers' that can sound funny to native speakers. Stick to neutral or formal contexts.

To avoid these mistakes, always ask yourself: 'Am I talking about the practical implementation of a plan or law?' If the answer is yes, then ghābel-e ejrā is your best friend. If you are just talking about whether something is possible in a dreamy or theoretical way, stick to momken. By paying attention to these subtle differences, you will sound much more like a native speaker and much less like a textbook translation.

Persian is a language rich in synonyms, and قابل اجرا has several close relatives, each with its own specific flavor. Understanding these alternatives will help you choose the exact word for the right situation. The most common synonym is amali (practical/actionable). While ghābel-e ejrā is formal and often legal or technical, amali is slightly more grounded and common in daily work talk. If a plan is amali, it means it makes sense in the real world. Another frequent alternative is shodani (do-able). This is the most informal of the bunch and is used in casual speech: 'In kār shodani nist' (This job isn't do-able).

Comparison: Ghābel-e Ejrā vs. Emkān-pazir

'Emkān-pazir' (possible/feasible) is very close. However, 'emkān-pazir' focuses on the *existence* of a possibility, while 'ghābel-e ejrā' focuses on the *process* of execution. You use 'emkān-pazir' for 'Is it possible to go?' and 'ghābel-e ejrā' for 'Is the plan executable?'

In a legal or bureaucratic context, you might encounter nāfez (valid/enforceable). This is specifically for laws and contracts. A law that is nāfez is currently in effect and must be followed. While ghābel-e ejrā also works here, nāfez is more specialized. Then there is mo'assar (effective). This is often confused with feasible. A plan might be ghābel-e ejrā (you can do it), but it might not be mo'assar (it doesn't actually solve the problem). Distinguishing between 'can we do it' and 'will it work' is key in professional Persian.

For technical settings, specifically software, you might hear rān-shodani (runnable). This is a direct adaptation from English 'run' and is used almost exclusively in coding circles. However, in formal documentation, ghābel-e ejrā remains the king. If you want to describe something that is 'sustainable,' you would use pāydār. A 'sustainable plan' is yek tarh-e pāydār. This is different from a 'feasible plan' (yek tarh-e ghābel-e ejrā), though they often go hand-in-hand in environmental and economic discussions.

Finally, let's look at mohtamal (probable). This is about the likelihood of something happening. Something might be ghābel-e ejrā (executable) but very ghayr-e mohtamal (improbable) to actually happen due to outside factors. By keeping these distinctions in mind—feasibility vs. possibility vs. probability vs. practicality—you will navigate Persian professional life with much greater clarity and confidence. The choice of word often reveals your level of education and your specific intent, so choose wisely!

Quick Comparison Table

• Ghābel-e Ejrā: Executable/Enforceable (Formal)
• Amali: Practical/Actionable (Neutral)
• Shodani: Do-able (Informal)
• Emkān-pazir: Possible/Feasible (Formal)