No que concerne à argumentação

Place this at the start of a sentence. It acts as a formal introduction. You are setting the stage. Think of it as a signpost. It tells the reader: 'Attention, logic ahead.' You must follow it with a comma. Then, deliver your analysis. For example: No que concerne à argumentação, os dados são insuficientes. (Regarding the argumentation, the data is insufficient). It works best when you are responding to someone. You acknowledge their logic. Then, you dissect it. It is perfect for essays. It is great for LinkedIn articles. It shows you have a structured mind.

This is strictly high-register Portuguese. You will find it in law books. You will see it in academic journals. It is common in formal emails to CEOs. Do not use it at a pub. Do not use it while playing video games with friends. It would sound like you are a robot. Or a very confused 18th-century philosopher. It is 'Very Formal.' In Brazil, it is part of what we call Juridiquês. That is the fancy language lawyers use. In Portugal, it is standard for serious journalism. It commands respect immediately.

Imagine you are in a Zoom job interview. The recruiter asks about your strategy. You say: No que concerne à argumentação do projeto, foquei em resultados. (Regarding the project's argumentation, I focused on results). You sound professional. You sound like a leader. Now, imagine a university exam. You are writing about history. You use this phrase to link causes. No que concerne à argumentação econômica... (Regarding the economic argumentation...). Your professor will love it. It shows academic maturity. Even in a heated Twitter (X) debate, it can be a 'flex.' It makes you look like the smartest person in the thread. Use it when you want to stop the noise.

You should use it in written reports. It is perfect for 'Conclusion' sections. Use it when presenting to a board of directors. Use it in a cover letter for a high-level job. Use it when you are disagreeing with someone politely. It softens the blow. It makes the disagreement about the *logic*, not the person. It is excellent for analyzing movies or books. 'Regarding the narrative logic...' becomes No que concerne à argumentação narrativa.... It is a tool for deep thinkers.

Never use this with your family. Unless you want them to stop inviting you to dinner. 'Regarding the argumentation for more salt...' is a bad idea. Avoid it in casual texts. If you send this on WhatsApp to a crush, they will think you are weird. It is too stiff for dating apps. Don't use it for simple things. Like choosing a pizza topping. It is for complex ideas. It is for structural reasoning. Keep it in your professional toolbox. Not your casual one.

The most common error is the crase. That is the back-slanting accent on the à. Many people forget it. ✗ No que concerne a argumentação → ✓ No que concerne à argumentação. Another mistake is redundancy. People say No que concerne sobre. That is wrong. Concerne already implies 'about.' Don't double up. Just use à. Some users confuse argumentação with discussão. Argumentation is about logic. Discussion is about the act of talking. Use the right one for the right vibe. Don't use it as a filler word. Use it only when you have something real to say.

You can say Quanto à argumentação. It is a bit more common. Use No que diz respeito à argumentação. This is a classic. It is a bit longer. Use Em relação à argumentação. This is neutral and safe. For a very academic touch, use No que tange à argumentação. This is high-level stuff. It literally means 'In what touches on...' it is very sophisticated. For a more casual way, try Sobre a argumentação. It is simple and clear. This is for everyday work emails. Choose your weapon based on the formality of the person you are talking to.

Is this used only in Brazil? No, Portugal and Angola use it too. It is standard formal Portuguese. It is the gold standard for writing. Is it too stiff for work? No, for formal reports it is perfect. It shows you are serious. What if I forget the accent? Your teacher or boss might notice. It is a common grammar marker. Can I use it in a debate? Yes, it is the best way to pivot. It frames the debate in a logical way. It is a great 'thinking' phrase. It gives you time to speak. Is it the same as 'sobre'? It is a more formal and specific version of 'sobre.' Use it when you want to sound authoritative.