B1 · Intermédiaire Chapitre 42

Expressing Purpose & Cause

6 Règles totales
1 min

Ce que tu vas apprendre

Learn various grammatical structures to express purpose ('за да') and cause ('защото', 'поради'). This chapter helps you explain 'why' and 'for what reason'.

Conseils et astuces (4)

💡

Conjugate!

Always conjugate the verb after 'за да'. Never use an infinitive.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Purpose with 'За да' + Verb
💡

Check the register

Ask yourself: is this a formal email or a text to a friend? If it's a text, use 'заради'.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Cause with 'Поради' (Due to)
💡

The Comma is Key

If you forget the comma, your writing looks amateur. Always pause mentally and drop that comma before 'така че'.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Result with 'Така че' (So that)
💡

Punctuation is key

Always place a comma before 'следователно' when it connects two clauses. It helps the reader breathe and understand the logic.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Consequence with 'Следователно' (Consequently)

Pratique rapide (10)

Попълнете празното място с правилната пунктуация и съюз.

Беше много горещо ___ си купих сладолед.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: , така че
We need a comma and the result conjunction.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Result with 'Така че' (So that)

Fix the sentence.

Find and fix the mistake:

Отивам за да ядене.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Отивам, за да ям.
No infinitive.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Purpose with 'За да' + Verb

Find the error.

Find and fix the mistake:

Вали следователно не излизам.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Missing comma
Needs a comma before the connector.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Consequence with 'Следователно' (Consequently)

Which is more formal?

Which is more formal?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Следователно
It is the most formal option.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Consequence with 'Следователно' (Consequently)

Изберете правилното изречение.

Кое изречение е граматически правилно?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Той не учи, така че не знае.
The second option has the correct comma placement and logical conjunction.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Result with 'Така че' (So that)

Fill in the blank with the correct preposition.

___ лошото време, полетът беше отменен.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Поради
Formal context requires 'поради'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Cause with 'Поради' (Due to)

Fill in the blank with 'следователно'.

Вали ___ не излизам.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: следователно
It shows a result.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Consequence with 'Следователно' (Consequently)

Choose the correct connector.

Той учи много, ___ ще вземе изпита.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: следователно
It's a logical result.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Consequence with 'Следователно' (Consequently)

Is this sentence correct?

Поради липса на време, не завърших проекта.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Yes
Correct usage of 'поради' with 'липса на'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Cause with 'Поради' (Due to)

Choose the correct sentence.

Which sentence is more formal?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Поради дъжда не излязох.
'Поради' is the most formal option.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Expressing Cause with 'Поради' (Due to)

Score: /10

Questions fréquentes (6)

No, the verb after 'за да' must be in the present tense, even if the main action happened in the past.
You can use 'за да' even if the subjects are different, e.g., 'Работя, за да учиш ти.'
No, only for formal or objective reasons. For personal reasons, use 'заради'.
No, it is a preposition. It must be followed by a noun or pronoun.
In spoken Bulgarian, yes. In formal writing, it's better to use Следователно or Поради тази причина.
Тъй като means 'because' (cause), while така че means 'so' (result). They are opposites in logic.