B1 adjective #5,000 가장 일반적인 5분 분량

根拠のある

konkyo no aru

§ Understanding 根拠のある (konkyo no aru)

Let's break down 根拠のある (konkyo no aru). This phrase translates to 'well-grounded,' 'justifiable,' or 'having a sound basis in logic or fact.' It's an adjective, so it will modify nouns. Think of it as describing something that isn't just an idea or a guess, but something with solid proof or reasoning behind it.

§ Basic Sentence Structure

Since 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) is an adjective, it will directly precede the noun it modifies. Here's the common pattern:

Structure
根拠のある (konkyo no aru) + Noun

For example, if you want to say 'a well-grounded argument,' you would say:

根拠のある議論 (konkyo no aru giron)

Here, 議論 (giron) means 'argument' or 'discussion.'

§ Examples in Context

Let's look at a few more examples to solidify your understanding:

  • You're talking about a report that has solid data.

    これは根拠のある報告書だ。 (Kore wa konkyo no aru hōkokusho da.)
    This is a well-grounded report.

  • Someone makes a statement, and you want to ask if it's based on facts.

    彼の意見は根拠のあるものですか? (Kare no iken wa konkyo no aru mono desu ka?)
    Is his opinion well-grounded (or justifiable)?

    Note here that 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) is followed by もの (mono), which acts as a general placeholder for 'thing' or 'one,' effectively turning the adjective phrase into a noun phrase.

  • When discussing a theory that has strong evidence:

    それは根拠のある理論だ。 (Sore wa konkyo no aru riron da.)
    That is a well-grounded theory.

§ Using it with 'to be' verbs

You can also use 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) with forms of 'to be' (です desu, だ da). In this case, it functions as a predicate, describing the subject of the sentence.

その主張は根拠のあるものです。 (Sono shuchō wa konkyo no aru mono desu.)
That claim is well-grounded.

Again, もの (mono) is used here. You could also say:

その主張は根拠がある。 (Sono shuchō wa konkyo ga aru.)
That claim has a basis/is well-grounded.

Here, we use the direct form 根拠がある (konkyo ga aru), which means 'there is a basis' or 'it has a basis.' Both convey a similar meaning, but 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) acts more directly as an adjective modifying an implied 'thing' (mono), while 根拠がある (konkyo ga aru) is a complete clause.

§ Common Situations

You'll often hear 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) in discussions, debates, academic settings, or any situation where facts and logic are important. It's a useful phrase to show that you're looking for solid reasons or providing them yourself.

§ Understanding 根拠のある

You've learned that 根拠のある (konkyo no aru) means "well-grounded" or "justifiable." It's used when you want to emphasize that something has a solid basis, whether it's in fact, logic, or evidence. Think of it as saying, "This isn't just a guess; there's a reason behind it."

§ When to use 根拠のある

Use 根拠のある when you are presenting an argument, a conclusion, or a statement that relies on concrete evidence or logical reasoning. It's a good word to use in more formal or serious contexts, like discussions, reports, or when trying to persuade someone with facts.

根拠のある情報に基づいて判断すべきです。

You should make decisions based on well-grounded information.

§ Similar words and their nuances

While 根拠のある is great, there are other words you might encounter that express similar ideas. Let's look at some and understand when to use them instead.

  • 確かな (tashika na) - Certain, reliable, accurate

    This word emphasizes certainty and reliability. It's used when something is known to be true or dependable.

    Difference from 根拠のある:
    While both imply truth, 確かな focuses more on the established truth or accuracy itself, rather than the underlying evidence or reasoning. You'd use it for a fact that's simply known to be true, without necessarily needing to explain how it's known.

    確かな情報源から聞いた話です。

    I heard it from a reliable source.

  • 正当な (seito na) - Legitimate, proper, just

    This word highlights fairness, legality, or moral correctness. It's often used in contexts of rights, reasons, or claims.

    Difference from 根拠のある:
    While something that is 正当な might also have 根拠, the focus of 正当な is on its moral or legal justification, not just its factual or logical basis. You'd use 正当な when discussing ethics, laws, or rights.

    それは正当な理由です。

    That is a legitimate reason.

  • 合理的 (gōri-teki) - Rational, logical, reasonable

    This word specifically emphasizes logic and reason. It's about something making sense from a logical perspective.

    Difference from 根拠のある:
    While 根拠のある can include logical basis, 合理的 almost exclusively points to it. If you want to say something is sound because of its logical structure or reasoning, 合理的 is a strong choice. 根拠のある is broader, encompassing factual evidence too.

    彼の説明はとても合理的だった。

    His explanation was very logical.

§ Key takeaway

When you're trying to convey that something is supported by concrete facts, data, or strong evidence, 根拠のある is your go-to word. If you're talking about something being simply true or dependable, use 確かな. For moral or legal justification, 正当な fits well. And if the emphasis is purely on logical reasoning, 合理的 is the best choice. Choosing the right word makes your Japanese more precise and natural.

수준별 예문

1

彼の意見には根拠がある。

His opinion has a basis.

「意見には根拠がある」means 'The opinion has grounds/basis.' This is a common way to say something is well-grounded.

2

そのうわさには根拠がなかった。

That rumor had no basis.

Adding 「なかった」 makes it negative, meaning 'there was no basis'.

3

根拠のあるデータを見せてください。

Please show me the well-grounded data.

Here, 「根拠のある」 directly modifies 「データ」 (data).

4

これは根拠のある計画です。

This is a justifiable plan.

「根拠のある計画」 means 'a plan with a basis/grounds'.

5

彼の話には根拠がありません。

His story has no basis.

Similar to 「根拠がなかった」, 「根拠がありません」 is a polite negative form.

6

根拠のある情報が必要です。

I need well-grounded information.

「根拠のある情報」 directly modifies 「情報」 (information).

7

この主張は根拠がない。

This claim has no basis.

「主張」 means 'claim' or 'assertion'. 「根拠がない」 is a more casual negative form.

8

それは根拠のある判断でした。

That was a justifiable judgment.

「根拠のある判断」 means 'a judgment with a basis/grounds'.

셀프 테스트 24 질문

sentence order B1

아래 단어를 탭해서 문장을 만들어 보세요
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 彼らの 意見は 根拠のある ものだ

This sentence means 'Their opinion is well-grounded.' 根拠のある modifies もの (thing/one).

sentence order B1

아래 단어를 탭해서 문장을 만들어 보세요
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: その 主張には 根拠のある 証拠が 必要だ

This sentence means 'That claim requires justifiable evidence.' 根拠のある modifies 証拠 (evidence).

sentence order B1

아래 단어를 탭해서 문장을 만들어 보세요
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 彼女の 報告は 非常に 根拠のある ものだった

This sentence means 'Her report was very well-grounded.' 非常に (very) modifies 根拠のある.

fill blank B2

彼の主張には確かな___がなかった。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 根拠

「根拠」は主張や意見の裏付けとなる事実や論理を指します。

fill blank B2

その科学的発見は、長年の研究に___。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 基づいている

「基づいている」は、何かが他のものによって支えられている、あるいは由来していることを示します。

fill blank B2

あなたの意見には、もっと具体的な___が必要だ。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: データ

「データ」は、議論や結論を裏付けるための具体的な数値や資料を意味します。

fill blank B2

その理論は、いくつかの重要な___によって支持されている。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 証拠

「証拠」は、ある事柄が真実であることを証明するための客観的な事実を指します。

fill blank B2

彼の判断は、豊富な経験に___いる。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 裏付けられて

「裏付けられて」は、ある主張や判断が確かな根拠によって支えられている状態を表します。

fill blank B2

この主張の___となる事実は何ですか?

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 根拠

「根拠」は、ある主張を正当化するための基礎となる事実や論理を指します。

multiple choice B2

Choose the most appropriate phrase to complete the sentence: 彼の主張には___。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 根拠のあるものがない (There is nothing well-grounded)

The sentence implies a lack of justification. '根拠のあるものがない' (negation of well-grounded) fits best here.

multiple choice B2

Which sentence uses 「根拠のある」 correctly?

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: それは根拠のある意見だ。 (That is a well-grounded opinion.)

「根拠のある」 describes things like opinions, theories, or facts, not people directly. Option A correctly uses it to describe an opinion.

multiple choice B2

「根拠のある」と意味が近い言葉を選びなさい。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 確実な (Certain)

「根拠のある」 implies certainty and reliability, making 「確実な」 the closest in meaning.

true false B2

彼女の提案は、具体的なデータに基づいているため「根拠のある」と言える。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:

If a proposal is based on concrete data, it is indeed 'well-grounded' or 'justifiable'.

true false B2

「根拠のある」は、感情的な理由を表現する際に使われることが多い。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 거짓

「根拠のある」 refers to logical or factual basis, not emotional reasons.

true false B2

このニュースは憶測に過ぎず、根拠のある情報ではない。

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:

If something is mere speculation, it lacks a sound basis and is therefore not 'well-grounded' information.

listening B2

The speaker is talking about needing evidence for a claim.

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: その主張には根拠のある証拠が必要です。
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:
listening B2

Listen for how his opinion is supported.

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 彼の意見は、しっかりとした根拠のあるデータに基づいています。
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:
listening B2

What kind of discussion are they looking for?

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답: 私たちは根拠のある議論を求めています。
정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:
speaking B2

Read this aloud:

根拠のある事実を提示してください。

Focus: こんきょのある

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:
speaking B2

Read this aloud:

その仮説は根拠のあるものですか?

Focus: ものですか

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:
speaking B2

Read this aloud:

根拠のある情報に基づいて判断しましょう。

Focus: はんらんしましょう

정답! 아쉬워요. 정답:

/ 24 correct

Perfect score!

도움이 되었나요?
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째로 생각을 공유하세요!