意思
People don't change their basic nature.
文化背景
The idiom reflects the 'disznóvágás' culture where every part of the pig was utilized. The dog's role was strictly as a guardian, never as a food source, creating a sharp ontological divide. Many 19th-century Hungarian authors, like Zsigmond Móricz, used this phrase to depict the harsh, unchangeable reality of peasant life and character. It is a favorite of Hungarian political cartoonists and columnists to highlight when a politician's new 'friendly' persona is seen as a fake mask over their old ways. Similar 'meat-based' idioms exist across the region, reflecting a shared history of small-scale farming and a pragmatic, sometimes cynical, view of human nature.
Use for 'I told you so' moments
This phrase is most effective when you predicted someone would fail or repeat a mistake.
It's quite negative
Be careful using this about someone you like; it implies they have a fundamental, unfixable flaw.
意思
People don't change their basic nature.
Use for 'I told you so' moments
This phrase is most effective when you predicted someone would fail or repeat a mistake.
It's quite negative
Be careful using this about someone you like; it implies they have a fundamental, unfixable flaw.
The 'Hát' prefix
Hungarians almost always start this idiom with 'Hát...' (Well...) to add a sense of resignation.
自我测试
Complete the idiom with the correct word.
Kutyából nem lesz ________.
The standard form of the idiom uses 'szalonna' (bacon).
Which situation best fits the idiom?
Someone says 'Kutyából nem lesz szalonna' because...
The idiom is used when someone returns to their old, negative ways.
Choose the correct grammatical form.
Which one is the correct idiom?
The elative case '-ból' (from/out of) is required.
Complete the dialogue.
A: 'Péter megint hazudott nekem.' B: 'Ne lepődj meg, tudod mit mondanak: ________.'
This is the most appropriate response to someone repeating a bad behavior like lying.
🎉 得分： /4
视觉学习工具
练习题库
4 练习Kutyából nem lesz ________.
The standard form of the idiom uses 'szalonna' (bacon).
Someone says 'Kutyából nem lesz szalonna' because...
The idiom is used when someone returns to their old, negative ways.
Which one is the correct idiom?
The elative case '-ból' (from/out of) is required.
A: 'Péter megint hazudott nekem.' B: 'Ne lepődj meg, tudod mit mondanak: ________.'
This is the most appropriate response to someone repeating a bad behavior like lying.
🎉 得分： /4
常见问题
10 个问题Not at all. It's a purely logical comparison from a farming perspective. It doesn't imply dogs are 'bad,' just that they aren't pigs.
Technically no. It is almost exclusively used for negative traits or habits that someone can't break.
'A leopard can't change its spots' is the closest match in meaning and tone.
Only if you are speaking very informally with close colleagues about a third party. It's too blunt for formal negotiations.
Szalonna was the most vital energy source in traditional Hungarian life. Its absence or presence was a matter of survival.
It means 'will be' or 'will become.' It implies that even in the future, the transformation won't happen.
People will understand you, but it's not the standard idiom. Stick to 'kutya' (dog).
Yes, it's very much alive in modern Hungarian, though often used with a bit of irony.
You would say 'Mindenki megváltozhat' (Everyone can change) or 'Van remény' (There is hope).
Sometimes people just say 'Kutyából nem lesz...' and let the listener finish it.
相关表达
Aki egyszer hazudik, az máskor is hazudni fog
similarHe who lies once will lie again.
Nem esik messze az alma a fájától
similarThe apple doesn't fall far from its tree.
Csalánba nem üt a mennykő
similarLightning doesn't strike the nettle.
Megváltozik, mint a szélkakas
contrastChanges like a weathercock.
