중립성 في 30 ثانية
- 중립성 means neutrality: not taking sides.
- It's about being impartial and unbiased in conflicts.
- Used in politics, law, and journalism.
- Key concept for fairness and objective reporting.
The Korean word 중립성 (jungnipseong) translates directly to 'neutrality' in English. It refers to the state of not taking sides in a conflict, disagreement, or competition. When someone or something exhibits 중립성, they remain impartial, unbiased, and detached from the outcome of the dispute. This concept is crucial in various fields, including politics, law, journalism, and even personal relationships.
In international relations, for example, countries often strive for 중립성 to avoid getting entangled in foreign conflicts. This policy allows them to maintain diplomatic ties with all parties involved and focus on their own national interests. Similarly, in legal proceedings, judges and juries are expected to uphold 중립성, ensuring a fair trial based solely on the evidence presented, without any personal biases influencing their decisions.
Journalists also play a vital role in maintaining 중립성 when reporting news. Their objective is to present information factually and without injecting personal opinions or favoring one perspective over another. This commitment to impartiality builds trust with the audience and is a cornerstone of ethical journalism. In everyday life, 중립성 can be observed when mediating a dispute between friends, where the mediator aims to facilitate a resolution without taking sides.
The concept of 중립성 is not about indifference or apathy; rather, it's about a deliberate choice to remain objective and fair. It requires a conscious effort to set aside personal feelings or affiliations and focus on the principles of fairness and impartiality. Understanding 중립성 is essential for comprehending how various systems and interactions function, from global politics to the dynamics of a classroom debate.
- Core Meaning
- Not supporting or favoring any side in a conflict or disagreement.
- Key Attribute
- Impartiality and unbiasedness.
- Application Areas
- Politics, law, journalism, mediation, international relations.
The international community is urging the warring nations to respect the 중립성 of humanitarian aid organizations.
A good mediator must demonstrate unwavering 중립성 to gain the trust of both parties.
The news report was praised for its objective tone and commitment to 중립성.
Using 중립성 (jungnipseong) correctly in sentences involves understanding its grammatical role as a noun and its semantic connection to impartiality and non-alignment. It often appears in contexts discussing politics, diplomacy, legal matters, or any situation requiring objective handling. Here are various ways to incorporate 중립성 into your Korean sentences, demonstrating its versatility.
One common structure involves expressing the importance or necessity of 중립성. For instance, 'The committee's 중립성 is essential for fair decision-making' can be translated as '위원회는 공정한 의사결정을 위해 중립성을 지켜야 합니다.' (Wi-wonh-neun gongjeonghan uisa-gyeoljeong-eul wihae jungnipseong-eul jikyeoya hamnida.). This highlights the active role of maintaining neutrality.
You can also describe an entity's stance or policy regarding 중립성. 'The country has adopted a policy of 중립성 in the ongoing dispute' becomes '그 나라는 현재 진행 중인 분쟁에서 중립성 정책을 채택했습니다.' (Geu nara-neun hyeonjae jinhaeng jung-in bunjaeng-eseo jungnipseong jeongchaeg-eul chaetaekhaetseumnida.). This sentence clearly indicates a formal declaration of neutrality.
Furthermore, 중립성 can be discussed in terms of its challenges or erosion. 'Maintaining 중립성 can be difficult when personal feelings are involved' translates to '개인적인 감정이 개입될 때 중립성을 유지하는 것은 어려울 수 있습니다.' (Gaeinjeok-in gamjeong-i gaeipdoel ttae jungnipseong-eul yujihaneun geos-eun eoryeoul su itseumnida.). This sentence explores the psychological aspect of neutrality.
In legal contexts, 중립성 is often linked to fairness and objectivity. 'The judge is expected to exhibit strict 중립성 throughout the trial' can be rendered as '판사는 재판 전 과정에서 엄격한 중립성을 보여야 할 것으로 기대됩니다.' (Pan-sa-neun jaepan jeon gwajeong-eseo eomgyeokhan jungnipseong-eul boya hal geos-euro gidae doemnida.). This emphasizes the professional obligation of neutrality.
Finally, 중립성 can be the subject of debate or policy. 'We need to ensure the 중립성 of the media during election periods' translates to '선거 기간 동안 언론의 중립성을 보장해야 합니다.' (Seongeo gigan dongan eollon-ui jungnipseong-eul bojanghaeya hamnida.). This highlights the importance of unbiased reporting in democratic processes.
- Subject of a Sentence
- 중립성은 매우 중요합니다. (Jungnipseong-eun maeu jungyohamnida. - Neutrality is very important.)
- Object of a Verb
- 그들은 중립성을 유지하려고 노력했습니다. (Geudeul-eun jungnipseong-eul yujiryeogo noryeokhaetseumnida. - They tried to maintain neutrality.)
- Complement
- 그의 발언은 중립성을 강조했습니다. (Geu-ui bal-eon-eun jungnipseong-eul gangjohaetseumnida. - His statement emphasized neutrality.)
- With '없다' (to lack)
- 그 기사는 중립성이 부족했습니다. (Geu gisa-neun jungnipseong-i bujokahaetseumnida. - That article lacked neutrality.)
- With '지키다' (to keep/maintain)
- 심판은 중립성을 잘 지켰습니다. (Simpan-eun jungnipseong-eul jal jikyeotseumnida. - The referee maintained neutrality well.)
The mediator explained the importance of 중립성 to both parties.
A truly objective report requires strict adherence to 중립성.
Political analysts debated whether the politician truly possessed 중립성.
You'll frequently encounter the word 중립성 (jungnipseong) in formal settings and discussions where impartiality is a key concern. News reports, political analyses, and legal discussions are prime examples. For instance, when a country declares its stance in an international conflict, news anchors will often refer to its 중립성 (or lack thereof).
In political debates, candidates might be accused of lacking 중립성 if they appear to favor one party or ideology. Similarly, discussions about the media's role often revolve around its commitment to journalistic 중립성. You might hear phrases like '언론의 중립성을 보장해야 한다' (eollon-ui jungnipseong-eul bojanghaeya handa - 'we must guarantee the neutrality of the press').
Legal professionals, such as judges and lawyers, frequently discuss 중립성. A judge's decision is scrutinized for impartiality, and a lawyer might argue that a witness or another party has failed to maintain their 중립성. Courtroom dramas and legal documentaries are good places to hear this term in context.
Beyond these formal arenas, 중립성 is also relevant in discussions about ethics and fairness in various professions. For example, when discussing the role of educators or researchers, their adherence to 중립성 in presenting information or conducting studies might be highlighted. Even in sports, referees and umpires are expected to exhibit 중립성.
You might also hear it in discussions about international organizations like the United Nations, where maintaining 중립성 is crucial for their peacekeeping and diplomatic missions. The concept is fundamental to understanding how global bodies attempt to mediate conflicts and foster cooperation without taking sides.
- News Broadcasts
- Reporting on international conflicts, political events, and legal cases.
- Political Debates
- Discussions about politicians' stances, media bias, and electoral fairness.
- Legal Proceedings
- Arguments about judges' impartiality, witness credibility, and fair trials.
- Academic Discussions
- Explanations of ethical standards, research objectivity, and professional conduct.
- International Relations
- Analysis of foreign policy, diplomatic efforts, and the roles of international organizations.
The news channel emphasized its commitment to 중립성 during the election coverage.
Lawyers argued over whether the judge had demonstrated sufficient 중립성.
The country's foreign policy is built on a foundation of 중립성.
When learning and using 중립성 (jungnipseong), English speakers might make a few common mistakes. One frequent error is confusing 중립성 with indifference or apathy. While both involve a lack of active participation, 중립성 is a deliberate stance of impartiality, often requiring active effort to remain unbiased, whereas indifference is a lack of concern or interest.
Another mistake is using 중립성 interchangeably with words that imply a lack of knowledge or understanding. For example, someone might mistakenly use 중립성 when they simply mean 'ignorance' or 'unawareness.' 중립성 is about a chosen position, not necessarily a lack of information.
Grammatically, learners might sometimes struggle with the particles or sentence structures that typically accompany 중립성. For instance, they might forget to use appropriate postpositions like '을/를' (object markers) when 중립성 functions as the object of a verb, such as '유지하다' (to maintain). This can lead to awkward or incorrect sentence constructions.
Additionally, there's a tendency to oversimplify the contexts in which 중립성 is used. While it applies to major political or legal conflicts, it's also relevant in smaller-scale disagreements or when discussing professional ethics. Failing to recognize this broader applicability can limit one's understanding and usage of the word.
Finally, some learners might confuse 중립성 with words that mean 'compromise' or 'concession.' While neutrality can sometimes lead to compromise, it is not the same thing. 중립성 is about not siding, whereas compromise involves finding a middle ground between opposing views.
- Confusing with Indifference
- Mistaking 중립성 (active impartiality) for apathy (lack of concern).
- Using for Ignorance
- Applying 중립성 when the intended meaning is simply 'unawareness' or 'lack of knowledge'.
- Grammatical Errors
- Incorrect use of particles (e.g., missing object markers) or sentence structures when 중립성 is the object or subject.
- Limited Contextual Understanding
- Thinking 중립성 only applies to large-scale conflicts, ignoring its relevance in smaller disputes or professional ethics.
- Confusing with Compromise
- Equating 중립성 (not taking sides) with compromise (finding a middle ground).
Incorrect: He showed 중립성 because he didn't care about the argument. (This implies indifference, not active neutrality.)
Correct: He maintained 중립성 by listening to both sides without judgment.
Incorrect grammar: The judge 중립성 kept. (Missing object marker and verb)
Correct grammar: The judge maintained 중립성.
Understanding 중립성 (jungnipseong) is enhanced by comparing it with related terms. While 중립성 emphasizes the state of not taking sides, other words describe aspects of impartiality or detachment in different ways.
A close synonym is 공정성 (gongjeongseong), meaning 'fairness' or 'impartiality.' While 중립성 is about not picking a side, 공정성 is about treating all parties justly and equitably. You can have 중립성 without necessarily guaranteeing 공정성, and vice versa, though they often go hand in hand.
Another related term is 객관성 (gaekgwanseong), which means 'objectivity.' Objectivity focuses on presenting facts without personal bias or subjective interpretation. While 중립성 is a stance in a conflict, 객관성 is a method of presentation or analysis. A neutral report should ideally be objective.
In contrast, words like 편파성 (pyeonpaseong), meaning 'partiality' or 'bias,' are antonyms. If something is 편파적 (biased), it lacks 중립성.
For situations where one might try to avoid involvement altogether, the term 회피 (hoepi), meaning 'avoidance,' might be considered, but it lacks the implication of active impartiality that 중립성 carries. 중립성 is a principled position, not just an act of staying away.
Lastly, 방관 (banggwan), meaning 'looking on' or 'standing by,' implies passive observation without intervention. This is closer to indifference than the active maintenance of fairness associated with 중립성.
- Similar: 공정성 (gongjeongseong)
- Meaning: Fairness, impartiality. 중립성 is about not taking sides; 공정성 is about equitable treatment. A judge should have both.
- Similar: 객관성 (gaekgwanseong)
- Meaning: Objectivity. 중립성 is a stance in conflict; 객관성 is presenting facts without personal bias. A neutral report aims for objectivity.
- Antonym: 편파성 (pyeonpaseong)
- Meaning: Partiality, bias. Anything exhibiting 편파성 lacks 중립성.
- Alternative: 회피 (hoepi)
- Meaning: Avoidance. 회피 is simply staying away; 중립성 is an active, principled stance of impartiality.
- Alternative: 방관 (banggwan)
- Meaning: Looking on, standing by. 방관 is passive observation, closer to indifference than the active fairness of 중립성.
A fair judge must possess both 중립성 and 공정성.
The report lacked 중립성 and was clearly 편파적.
Choosing 중립성 is different from simply 회피ing the issue.
How Formal Is It?
حقيقة ممتعة
The character 中 (jung) also appears in words like '중앙' (jungang - center) and '중심' (jungsim - center/core), emphasizing the concept of being in the middle. The character 立 (nip) means 'to stand', highlighting the act of maintaining a position.
دليل النطق
- Pronouncing '중' as 'jung' with a hard 'g' instead of the palatalized 'j' sound.
- Not clearly articulating the final 'ng' sound in '성'.
- Misplacing the stress on the second or third syllable.
مستوى الصعوبة
The word '중립성' itself is a B2 level vocabulary item. Understanding its nuances requires comprehending contexts related to politics, law, and ethics, which often involve complex sentence structures and abstract concepts typical of B2 and C1 level reading materials.
ماذا تتعلّم بعد ذلك
المتطلبات الأساسية
تعلّم لاحقاً
متقدم
قواعد يجب معرفتها
Using topic and subject markers (은/는, 이/가) with abstract nouns like 중립성.
중립성은 중요하다. (Neutrality is important.) vs. 중립성이 요구된다. (Neutrality is required.)
Using object markers (을/를) with verbs like 유지하다, 지키다, 잃다 when 중립성 is the object.
그는 중립성을 지켰다. (He maintained neutrality.)
Connecting 중립성 to other nouns using the possessive particle 의.
위원회의 중립성 (The committee's neutrality.)
Using adjectives derived from 중립성, such as 중립적인 (neutral, impartial).
그는 중립적인 태도를 보였다. (He showed a neutral attitude.)
Using adverbs like 중립적으로 (neutrally, impartially).
그는 상황을 중립적으로 판단했다. (He judged the situation neutrally.)
أمثلة حسب المستوى
나는 아무 편도 들지 않을 거예요.
I will not take anyone's side.
This expresses a simple intention of not choosing a side.
이것은 내 문제가 아니에요.
This is not my problem.
Indicates detachment from a situation.
나는 누구 편도 아니에요.
I am not on anyone's side.
A direct statement of not aligning with any group.
모두에게 똑같이 대할 거예요.
I will treat everyone the same.
Focuses on equal treatment, a component of fairness.
나는 싸움에 끼고 싶지 않아요.
I don't want to get involved in the fight.
Expresses a desire to avoid conflict.
나는 중간에 있을 거예요.
I will be in the middle.
A literal description of physical or metaphorical positioning.
나는 어느 쪽도 좋아하지 않아요.
I don't like either side.
Expresses a lack of preference.
나는 조용히 있을 거예요.
I will be quiet.
Implies not taking an active role or expressing an opinion.
그는 논쟁에서 중립성을 지켰다.
He maintained neutrality in the argument.
Uses the noun form 중립성 (jungnipseong) with the verb '지키다' (jikida - to keep/maintain).
이 문제는 중립성이 필요해요.
This issue requires neutrality.
Highlights the necessity of neutrality for a specific issue.
기자는 중립성을 잃지 않아야 합니다.
A journalist must not lose neutrality.
Emphasizes the professional duty to maintain neutrality.
나는 어느 팀에도 속하지 않아요.
I don't belong to any team.
A more direct way to express non-alignment.
그들의 관계는 중립성을 유지했어요.
Their relationship maintained neutrality.
Describes a relationship that remains unbiased.
심판은 중립성을 보여줘야 해요.
The referee must show neutrality.
Applies the concept to a specific role requiring impartiality.
이 상황에서는 중립성이 최선입니다.
Neutrality is the best option in this situation.
States neutrality as the optimal course of action.
나는 누구 편도 들지 않을 거야.
I will not take anyone's side.
A firm declaration of not siding with anyone.
그 나라는 국제 분쟁에서 중립성을 선언했다.
That country declared neutrality in the international conflict.
Uses 중립성 in a political context, with the verb '선언하다' (seon-eonhada - to declare).
재판관은 엄격한 중립성을 유지해야 합니다.
The judge must maintain strict neutrality.
Highlights the requirement for strict neutrality in a legal setting.
이 기사는 중립성이 부족하다는 비판을 받았다.
This article received criticism for lacking neutrality.
Discusses a lack of neutrality and the resulting criticism.
중재자는 양측의 중립성을 보장해야 한다.
The mediator must ensure the neutrality of both parties.
Focuses on ensuring neutrality from others involved in a dispute.
그의 발언은 중립성을 잃고 편향되었다.
His remarks lost neutrality and became biased.
Describes a loss of neutrality leading to bias.
언론의 중립성은 민주주의의 핵심이다.
The neutrality of the press is core to democracy.
Connects journalistic neutrality to democratic principles.
우리는 이 문제에 대해 중립성을 지킬 것입니다.
We will maintain neutrality regarding this issue.
A formal statement of intent to remain neutral.
그의 의견은 중립성을 유지하고 있었다.
His opinion maintained neutrality.
Describes an opinion that is balanced and unbiased.
국제 연합은 분쟁 지역에서의 중립성 유지를 위해 노력하고 있다.
The United Nations is striving to maintain neutrality in conflict zones.
Complex sentence structure involving international organizations and the concept of maintaining neutrality.
언론의 중립성은 정보의 신뢰도와 직결된다.
The neutrality of the media is directly linked to the credibility of information.
Discusses the direct relationship between media neutrality and information reliability.
정치인에게 중립성을 기대하는 것은 때로는 비현실적일 수 있다.
Expecting politicians to maintain neutrality can sometimes be unrealistic.
Explores the challenges and potential unrealistic expectations of political neutrality.
개인의 중립성은 도덕적 판단과는 구별되어야 한다.
An individual's neutrality should be distinguished from their moral judgment.
Differentiates personal neutrality from moral stances.
이러한 상황에서 중립성을 표방하는 것은 전략적인 선택일 수 있다.
Adopting a stance of neutrality in such a situation can be a strategic choice.
Frames neutrality as a strategic decision rather than an inherent quality.
그는 양측의 입장을 모두 존중하며 중립성을 견지했다.
He held onto his neutrality, respecting the positions of both sides.
Describes the act of maintaining neutrality while respecting opposing views.
공공 기관은 정치적 중립성을 의무적으로 지켜야 한다.
Public institutions are obligated to maintain political neutrality.
Highlights the legal or ethical obligation of public institutions to be politically neutral.
그의 보고서는 사실에 기반하여 중립성을 잃지 않았다.
His report did not lose neutrality, being based on facts.
Emphasizes that factual reporting preserves neutrality.
국제법상 중립국의 지위는 엄격한 요건과 의무를 수반하며, 이는 분쟁 당사국으로부터의 중립성 침해를 방지하기 위함이다.
The status of a neutral country under international law entails strict requirements and obligations, aimed at preventing breaches of neutrality by belligerent parties.
Sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structure discussing international law and neutrality.
미디어의 중립성에 대한 논쟁은 종종 정보의 객관적 전달이라는 이상과 현실적인 이해관계 사이의 긴장 관계를 드러낸다.
The debate over media neutrality often reveals the tension between the ideal of objective information delivery and practical vested interests.
Analyzes the complexities and tensions surrounding media neutrality.
학문적 탐구에서 중립성을 견지하는 것은 연구자의 주관적 편견을 배제하고, 오롯이 증거와 논리에 기반하여 결론을 도출하는 것을 의미한다.
Maintaining neutrality in academic inquiry means excluding the researcher's subjective biases and drawing conclusions solely based on evidence and logic.
Defines academic neutrality in terms of excluding bias and relying on evidence.
정치적 중립성을 표방하는 시민 단체라 할지라도, 특정 사안에 대한 입장은 필연적으로 발생할 수밖에 없으며, 이를 어떻게 관리하느냐가 관건이다.
Even a civic group claiming political neutrality may inevitably develop stances on certain issues, and how these are managed becomes the key.
Discusses the inherent challenges in maintaining absolute neutrality even for ostensibly neutral organizations.
외교적 협상 과정에서 중립성을 표방하는 제3국의 역할은 갈등 완화와 평화적 해결에 기여할 수 있는 잠재력을 지닌다.
The role of a third country professing neutrality in diplomatic negotiations holds the potential to contribute to conflict de-escalation and peaceful resolution.
Examines the potential positive impact of neutral third parties in diplomacy.
기술 발전의 속도가 가속화됨에 따라, 알고리즘의 중립성 확보는 사회적 형평성과 공정성을 위한 중요한 과제가 되고 있다.
As the pace of technological advancement accelerates, ensuring algorithmic neutrality has become a critical challenge for social equity and fairness.
Addresses the contemporary issue of algorithmic neutrality in the context of technological advancement.
그는 자신의 개인적인 신념과 직업적 중립성 사이에서 끊임없이 고뇌하며 균형점을 찾으려 노력했다.
He constantly agonized between his personal beliefs and professional neutrality, striving to find a balance.
Illustrates the internal conflict between personal convictions and professional neutrality.
역사적 사건에 대한 해석에 있어 중립성을 유지하려는 시도는 종종 다양한 관점의 충돌을 야기하지만, 이는 학문의 발전을 위한 필수적인 과정이다.
Attempts to maintain neutrality in the interpretation of historical events often lead to clashes between different perspectives, but this is an essential process for academic advancement.
Discusses the challenges and necessity of neutrality in historical interpretation.
국제 관계의 복잡성 속에서 중립성을 표방하는 국가의 외교 정책은 종종 기회주의적 혹은 이상주의적 해석의 양날의 검을 쥐게 된다.
In the complexity of international relations, the foreign policy of a nation professing neutrality often wields a double-edged sword of opportunistic or idealistic interpretation.
Nuanced analysis of neutrality in international relations, using sophisticated metaphors.
인공지능의 발전은 중립성의 본질에 대한 철학적 성찰을 요구하며, 알고리즘 편향성의 잠재적 위험성을 간과할 수 없음을 시사한다.
The advancement of artificial intelligence necessitates philosophical reflection on the essence of neutrality, suggesting that the potential risks of algorithmic bias cannot be overlooked.
Deep philosophical inquiry into AI and neutrality, highlighting potential dangers.
역사 서술에 있어 중립성의 추구는 필연적으로 특정 시대의 지배적인 이데올로기와 담론에 의해 제약받을 수밖에 없으며, 이는 탈구축적 비평의 필요성을 제기한다.
The pursuit of neutrality in historical narrative is inevitably constrained by the dominant ideologies and discourses of a particular era, raising the necessity for deconstructive critique.
Advanced critical theory applied to historical narratives and neutrality.
미디어의 중립성 담론은 종종 권력 구조와의 복잡한 상호작용 속에서 그 의미가 재정의되곤 하며, 이는 미디어 리터러시 교육의 중요성을 부각시킨다.
The discourse on media neutrality often sees its meaning redefined within the complex interplay with power structures, highlighting the importance of media literacy education.
Critical analysis of media neutrality discourse in relation to power and media literacy.
인도주의적 개입에서의 중립성 원칙은 때때로 인도주의적 위기의 심각성과 정치적 현실 사이의 윤리적 딜레마를 야기한다.
The principle of neutrality in humanitarian intervention sometimes creates an ethical dilemma between the severity of a humanitarian crisis and political realities.
Explores the ethical complexities of neutrality in humanitarian interventions.
디지털 시대의 중립성 개념은 정보의 흐름을 통제하려는 잠재적 시도와 개인의 자유로운 정보 접근권 사이의 균형점을 찾는 복잡한 과제를 안고 있다.
The concept of neutrality in the digital age presents the complex challenge of finding a balance between potential attempts to control information flow and individuals' right to free access to information.
Addresses the evolving concept of neutrality in the digital information landscape.
그의 논증은 중립성이라는 미명 하에 사실상의 편향성을 은폐하려는 시도로 해석될 여지가 있었다.
His argument had room for interpretation as an attempt to conceal de facto bias under the guise of neutrality.
Critically analyzes arguments that may use 'neutrality' to mask bias.
현대 지정학적 환경에서 중립성을 유지하는 것은 점점 더 어려워지고 있으며, 이는 국가의 외교적 자율성과 안보적 고려사항 간의 섬세한 줄타기를 요구한다.
Maintaining neutrality in the contemporary geopolitical landscape is becoming increasingly difficult, demanding a delicate balancing act between a nation's diplomatic autonomy and security considerations.
Discusses the increasing difficulty of maintaining neutrality in modern geopolitics.
تلازمات شائعة
العبارات الشائعة
— To maintain neutrality; to remain impartial.
심판은 경기 내내 중립성을 지켰다.
— To lose neutrality; to become biased.
그의 발언은 중립성을 잃었다는 비판을 받았다.
— To profess neutrality; to declare oneself neutral.
그 나라는 분쟁에서 중립성을 표방했다.
— To maintain neutrality; similar to 지키다 but often implies a continuous effort.
위원회는 모든 당사자 간의 중립성을 유지하려고 노력했다.
— To undermine or damage neutrality.
그의 행동은 조직의 중립성을 훼손할 수 있다.
— To deviate from neutrality; to no longer be neutral.
그는 결국 중립성에서 벗어나 한쪽 편을 들었다.
— To emphasize neutrality.
연설자는 중립성을 강조하며 공정한 판단을 촉구했다.
— To secure or ensure neutrality.
알고리즘의 중립성 확보는 기술 윤리의 중요한 과제이다.
— To doubt or question someone's neutrality.
많은 사람들이 그의 중립성을 의심했다.
— To possess or have neutrality.
심판은 중립성을 갖춘 인물이어야 한다.
يُخلط عادةً مع
While both involve a lack of taking sides, indifference implies a lack of care or interest, whereas neutrality is often an active, principled stance of impartiality.
Compromise involves finding a middle ground or mutual concession between opposing sides. Neutrality is about not siding with any party, which may or may not involve compromise.
Avoidance is simply staying away from a situation. Neutrality is maintaining an impartial stance within or related to a situation.
سهل الخلط
Both relate to taking sides in a conflict.
<mark>중립성</mark> means not taking sides, being impartial. <mark>편파성</mark> means bias or partiality, unfairly favoring one side. They are direct opposites.
그는 <mark>중립성을</mark> 지켰지만, 그녀는 <mark>편파성</mark>을 보였다.
Both relate to unbiasedness and factual representation.
<mark>중립성</mark> is about not taking sides in a conflict or dispute. <mark>객관성</mark> is about presenting facts without personal bias or subjective interpretation, regardless of whether there's a conflict. A neutral report should be objective.
기자는 <mark>중립성을</mark> 유지하며 사건을 <mark>객관적으로</mark> 보도해야 한다.
Both are related to fairness and equitable treatment.
<mark>중립성</mark> focuses on the stance of not siding with any party. <mark>공정성</mark> focuses on the equitable and just treatment of all parties involved. One can be neutral without necessarily being fair in every action, and vice versa, though they are often linked.
심판은 <mark>중립성을</mark> 지키면서 모든 선수에게 <mark>공정하게</mark> 대했다.
Both imply not actively participating in a conflict.
<mark>중립성</mark> is an active stance of impartiality, often involving careful observation and adherence to principles. <mark>방관</mark> is passive observation, simply 'looking on' without taking any part, akin to indifference.
그는 싸움을 <mark>방관</mark>했지만, <mark>중립성을</mark> 지키려고 노력했다.
Both can involve not engaging directly with a conflict.
<mark>회피</mark> is the act of avoiding a situation altogether. <mark>중립성</mark> involves taking a specific, impartial stance within or concerning a situation, rather than simply running away from it.
그는 논쟁을 <mark>회피</mark>하기보다는 <mark>중립성을</mark> 유지했다.
أنماط الجُمل
Noun + 은/는 + <mark>중립성</mark> + 이/가 + 중요하다/필요하다.
이 문제는 <mark>중립성</mark>이 중요하다.
Subject + 은/는 + (Object + 에서) + <mark>중립성</mark> + 을/를 + 지키다/유지하다/표방하다.
그 나라는 분쟁에서 <mark>중립성을</mark> 지켰다.
Noun + 의 + <mark>중립성</mark> + 은/는 + Noun + 과/와 + 직결되다/관련되다.
언론의 <mark>중립성</mark>은 신뢰도와 직결된다.
Subject + 은/는 + <mark>중립성</mark> + 이/가 + 부족하다/없다 + 는 + 비판/지적 + 을/를 + 받다/받았다.
그 기사는 <mark>중립성이</mark> 부족하다는 비판을 받았다.
<mark>중립성</mark> + 을/를 + 견지하다/수반하다/확보하다 + (Contextual Clause).
국제법상 <mark>중립성을</mark> 견지하는 것은 많은 의무를 수반한다.
Noun + 에서 + <mark>중립성</mark> + 의 + 본질/개념 + 은/는 + Noun + 을/를 + 의미하다/요구하다.
학문적 탐구에서 <mark>중립성의</mark> 본질은 편견 배제를 의미한다.
<mark>중립성</mark> + 이라는 + 미명/탈/이름 + 하에 + (Biased Action/Statement).
<mark>중립성이라는</mark> 미명 하에 편향된 주장을 펼쳤다.
Noun + 의 + 복잡성 + 속에서 + <mark>중립성</mark> + 을/를 + 표방하는 + Noun + 은/는 + ...
국제 관계의 복잡성 속에서 <mark>중립성을</mark> 표방하는 국가는...
عائلة الكلمة
الأسماء
الصفات
مرتبط
كيفية الاستخدام
High, especially in news, politics, and legal contexts.
-
Using '중립성' to mean 'indifference'.
→
Using '무관심' (mu-gwan-sim) for indifference.
<mark>중립성</mark> is an active stance of impartiality, often requiring effort to remain unbiased. Indifference means a lack of care or interest, which is passive. For example, a judge shows <mark>중립성</mark>, while someone who doesn't care about a fight is indifferent.
-
Confusing '중립성' with '회피' (avoidance).
→
Using '회피' when the intention is to simply avoid a situation.
<mark>중립성</mark> involves taking a specific, impartial position. <mark>회피</mark> is simply staying away from something. One can maintain <mark>중립성</mark> while still being involved in observing or mediating, whereas avoidance means not engaging at all.
-
Incorrectly using particles with '중립성'.
→
Using appropriate particles like '을/를' when '중립성' is the object of a verb (e.g., '중립성을 유지하다').
As an abstract noun, <mark>중립성</mark> often functions as the object of verbs like '유지하다' (maintain) or '지키다' (keep). Forgetting the object marker '을/를' can lead to ungrammatical sentences.
-
Treating '중립성' as a synonym for 'compromise'.
→
Recognizing that neutrality is about not taking sides, while compromise is about finding a middle ground.
<mark>중립성</mark> means not siding with anyone. Compromise means both sides give up something to reach an agreement. While neutrality might lead to compromise, they are distinct concepts.
-
Overusing '중립성' in informal contexts where simpler terms suffice.
→
Using simpler phrases like '나는 아무 편도 안 들 거야' (I won't take anyone's side) in casual conversation.
<mark>중립성</mark> is a more formal and abstract term. In casual chat, simpler expressions convey the same idea more appropriately. Using <mark>중립성</mark> informally might sound overly stiff or academic.
نصائح
Visualize the Scale
Imagine a perfectly balanced scale when you think of 중립성. This visual helps remember the core idea of impartiality and equal weight given to all sides.
Common Verb Pairings
Remember that 중립성 is often paired with verbs like '유지하다' (maintain), '지키다' (keep), '잃다' (lose), and '표방하다' (profess). Practicing these combinations will solidify your understanding.
Focus on the Final 'ng'
Ensure you clearly pronounce the final 'ng' sound in the syllable '성' (seong). This is a crucial part of distinguishing Korean words and sounds accurately.
Synonym Exploration
Learning related words like '공정성' (fairness) and '객관성' (objectivity) will deepen your understanding of 중립성 and its nuances.
Sentence Construction
Actively try to construct your own sentences using 중립성 in different contexts. This hands-on practice is key to mastering new vocabulary.
Cultural Nuances
Be aware that while neutrality is often valued, in some Korean cultural contexts, extreme neutrality might be perceived as a lack of commitment. Understanding the cultural backdrop helps in appropriate usage.
Know the Opposite
Understanding the antonyms, such as '편파성' (bias) and '당파성' (partisanship), helps to clearly define what 중립성 is *not*.
Real-World Examples
Look for examples of 중립성 in the news, documentaries, or historical accounts. Seeing how the concept is applied in real situations aids comprehension.
Character Breakdown
Remembering the Hanja characters 中 (middle), 立 (stand), and 性 (nature) can provide a deeper, mnemonic understanding of the word's origin and core meaning.
احفظها
وسيلة تذكّر
Imagine a referee in a game, standing perfectly in the 중간 (middle), not moving to either side (립 - stand). This referee's nature (성 - quality) is one of 중립성.
ربط بصري
Picture a perfectly balanced scale, with nothing on either side, representing impartiality. Or, envision a person standing precisely in the center of a line, equidistant from two opposing groups.
Word Web
تحدٍّ
Try to explain the concept of 중립성 to someone using only analogies related to sports or games, focusing on the role of a referee or umpire.
أصل الكلمة
The word '중립성' is a Sino-Korean word, meaning it is derived from Chinese characters. The characters are 中 (jung - middle/center), 立 (nip - stand/establish), and 性 (seong - nature/quality).
المعنى الأصلي: Literally translates to 'middle-standing nature' or 'quality of standing in the middle'.
Sino-Korean (derived from Chinese Hanja)السياق الثقافي
When discussing 중립성, be mindful of the context. In highly polarized situations, claiming neutrality might be perceived as taking a side by those who expect strong allegiance. It's important to differentiate genuine impartiality from apathy or strategic maneuvering.
In English-speaking cultures, neutrality is highly valued in legal systems (impartial judges), journalism (objective reporting), and diplomacy. The concept is generally well-understood and appreciated.
تدرّب في الحياة الواقعية
سياقات واقعية
International Relations / Politics
- 국가 <mark>중립성</mark> 선언
- 분쟁 지역 <mark>중립성</mark> 유지
- 정치적 <mark>중립성</mark> 확보
Journalism / Media
- 언론의 <mark>중립성</mark> 보장
- <mark>중립성</mark>을 잃은 보도
- 객관적 <mark>중립성</mark> 추구
Legal System
- 판사의 <mark>중립성</mark> 의무
- <mark>중립성</mark>을 훼손한 판결
- 공정한 재판을 위한 <mark>중립성</mark>
Mediation / Dispute Resolution
- 중재자의 <mark>중립성</mark>
- <mark>중립성</mark>을 지키며 대화
- 양측의 <mark>중립성</mark> 존중
Ethics / Professional Conduct
- 직업적 <mark>중립성</mark> 유지
- <mark>중립성</mark>과 공정성의 관계
- 개인의 <mark>중립성</mark>과 신념
بدايات محادثة
"Have you ever had to remain neutral in a disagreement?"
"What does 'neutrality' mean to you in everyday life?"
"Can you think of a situation where maintaining neutrality is difficult?"
"Is it always best to be neutral, or are there times when taking a side is necessary?"
"How important is neutrality in the news you consume?"
مواضيع للكتابة اليومية
Reflect on a time you had to act as a mediator or peacemaker. How did you ensure your neutrality?
Consider the role of neutrality in your favorite sport or game. Who is responsible for maintaining it, and why is it important?
Write about a fictional scenario where a country must decide whether to remain neutral or get involved in a conflict. What factors would influence their decision?
Explore the challenges of maintaining neutrality when you have strong personal beliefs or affiliations.
Imagine you are a journalist reporting on a highly controversial topic. Describe the steps you would take to ensure your reporting is neutral and unbiased.
الأسئلة الشائعة
10 أسئلةIn Korean, 중립성 (jungnipseong) directly translates to neutrality. Impartiality is a key characteristic of neutrality. While neutrality is the state of not taking sides, impartiality refers to the quality of being unbiased and fair in one's judgment or actions. Therefore, 중립성 inherently involves impartiality. Think of a judge: they must be neutral in the case and impartial in their decisions.
Yes, in personal relationships, 중립성 can refer to acting as a mediator between friends or family members who are in conflict. A neutral person in such a situation would listen to both sides without judgment and try to help them find a resolution without taking sides. However, maintaining absolute neutrality in close relationships can be challenging due to personal feelings and loyalties.
Generally, 중립성 is viewed positively, especially in contexts requiring fairness and objectivity like law or journalism. However, in certain situations, a strict adherence to neutrality might be criticized if it prevents necessary action or intervention, particularly in cases of severe injustice or humanitarian crises. The effectiveness and appropriateness of neutrality often depend on the specific context.
중립성 (neutrality) is primarily about one's stance or position in a conflict – not taking sides. 객관성 (objectivity) is about presenting information or making judgments based on facts and evidence, without personal bias or emotion. While a neutral report should strive for objectivity, objectivity itself doesn't necessarily imply neutrality in a conflict; one can be objective about a situation without being neutral in it.
Common phrases include '중립성을 지키다' (to maintain neutrality), '중립성을 잃다' (to lose neutrality), '중립성을 표방하다' (to profess neutrality), and '정치적 중립성' (political neutrality). These phrases are frequently used in news reports and political discussions.
Typically, 중립성 applies to sentient beings or entities that can make decisions or take stances, such as people, countries, organizations, or even algorithms (in the context of fairness). While one might metaphorically describe a situation as 'neutral,' the concept of actively maintaining 중립성 usually refers to agents capable of choice and action.
'중립성' is a broader concept referring to the state of not taking sides in any conflict or competition. '무당파' (mu-dang-pa) specifically refers to being non-partisan, meaning not belonging to or supporting any particular political party. While a non-partisan person or entity is likely neutral in political matters, neutrality can extend beyond politics to various types of disputes.
Try creating sentences describing scenarios where neutrality is important, like a referee in a game, a judge in court, or a mediator. For example: '심판은 중립성을 유지해야 한다.' (The referee must maintain neutrality.) or '그는 친구들 사이의 갈등에서 중립성을 지켰다.' (He maintained neutrality in the conflict between his friends.)
When a country declares 중립성, it typically means it will not participate in wars or alliances that would force it to take sides. This policy often aims to protect the country from conflict and maintain diplomatic relations with all parties. However, it also comes with responsibilities, such as not allowing belligerent forces to use its territory.
Yes, absolutely. For example, a country might choose 중립성 as a foreign policy strategy to avoid entanglement in larger conflicts and focus on its own development. Similarly, in negotiations, a third party might adopt a neutral stance strategically to facilitate communication and build trust between disputing parties.
اختبر نفسك 10 أسئلة
/ 10 correct
Perfect score!
Summary
중립성 (jungnipseong) fundamentally means neutrality—the state of being impartial and unbiased, refusing to take sides in any conflict, disagreement, or competition. It is a crucial concept in fields like politics, law, and journalism, where objectivity and fairness are paramount. Maintaining 중립성 requires a conscious effort to set aside personal biases and focus on equitable treatment and factual representation.
- 중립성 means neutrality: not taking sides.
- It's about being impartial and unbiased in conflicts.
- Used in politics, law, and journalism.
- Key concept for fairness and objective reporting.
Context is Key
The meaning and application of 중립성 can vary slightly depending on the context. Pay attention to whether it's referring to political neutrality, journalistic objectivity, or personal impartiality.
Visualize the Scale
Imagine a perfectly balanced scale when you think of 중립성. This visual helps remember the core idea of impartiality and equal weight given to all sides.
Common Verb Pairings
Remember that 중립성 is often paired with verbs like '유지하다' (maintain), '지키다' (keep), '잃다' (lose), and '표방하다' (profess). Practicing these combinations will solidify your understanding.
Focus on the Final 'ng'
Ensure you clearly pronounce the final 'ng' sound in the syllable '성' (seong). This is a crucial part of distinguishing Korean words and sounds accurately.
مثال
언론은 보도에 있어서 중립성을 지켜야 한다.
محتوى ذو صلة
مزيد من كلمات media
계정
A1حساب عبر الإنترنت يُستخدم للوصول إلى مواقع الويب أو التطبيقات أو الخدمات الرقمية.
광고
B1نشاط إنتاج إعلانات للمنتجات أو الخدمات لتشجيع الناس على شرائها. رسالة مدفوعة الأجر.
이후
A1After; subsequently (refers to a time period after an event).
답변
A1إجابة رسمية على سؤال أو رد على بيان.
기사
A1المقال هو تقرير مكتوب في صحيفة أو مجلة أو موقع إلكتروني.
블로그
A1موقع ويب يتم تحديثه بانتظام، مكتوب بأسلوب غير رسمي. في كوريا، هو المصدر الرئيسي للمعلومات والمراجعات عبر الإنترنت.
연예인
A1شخص مشهور أو فنان معروف على نطاق واسع في وسائل الإعلام.
위주
A1يركز بشكل أساسي على؛ موجه نحو. تُستخدم هذه الكلمة لوصف التركيز الأساسي أو الأولوية لشيء ما.
채널
A1قناة تلفزيونية أو وسيلة اتصال.
댓글
A1تعليق عبر الإنترنت أو رد على الإنترنت. لقد تركت تعليقًا على الفيديو.
