C1 · پیشرفته فصل 52

Academic Writing

4 مجموع قواعد
1 دقیقه

چی یاد می‌گیری

Structure and grammar for research papers. This focuses on precision and formality.

نکات و ترفندها (4)

🎯

The 'Av' Rule

If you have too many 'av' in a row, try to turn one into a compound noun. Instead of 'analysen av tillväxten av cellerna', use 'celltillväxtanalysen'.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Writing
🎯

The 'Red Thread' Check

After writing, read only your research questions and your conclusion. If they don't match perfectly, your 'red thread' is broken.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Research Paper Structure
🎯

The 'Av' Test

If your sentence has more than three 'av' (of) in a row, it's too heavy. Break it up or use a possessive form (e.g., 'Forskarnas analys' instead of 'Analysen av forskarna').
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Precision
🎯

Use 'Därtill' instead of 'Också'

Small word changes like this instantly elevate your text to a higher CEFR level.
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Formal Academic Style

تمرین سریع (10)

Correct the informal word in this academic sentence.

Find and fix the mistake:

Metoden var jättebra för att få svar.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: a
'Ändamålsenlig' (appropriate/fit for purpose) is a high-level academic word replacing the informal 'jättebra'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Research Paper Structure

Which sentence is most appropriate for an academic abstract?

A) Vi kollade hur folk mår. B) Vi undersökte människors hälsa. C) En undersökning avseende folkhälsan genomfördes.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: C
C uses nominalization and s-passive, creating the most objective and formal tone.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Precision

Fyll i rätt form av ordet 'undersöka' för att göra meningen akademisk.

___ av resultaten visar på en tydlig trend.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Undersökningen
Nominalization (turning the verb into a noun) is required here.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Formal Academic Style

Fill in the correct formal connector for contrast.

Resultaten var tydliga. ___ fanns det vissa osäkerheter i mätmetoden.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Emellertid
'Emellertid' is the academic version of 'men' (however).

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Writing

Vilken mening är mest formell?

Välj det mest akademiska alternativet.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Det kan anföras att detta är av stor vikt.
This uses impersonal construction and formal vocabulary ('anföras', 'av stor vikt').

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Formal Academic Style

Fill in the formal connector that shows contrast.

Resultaten var tydliga; ___ fanns det vissa felkällor.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: emellertid
'Emellertid' is the formal equivalent of 'men' or 'however'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Precision

Which sentence is most appropriate for a scientific report?

Choose the objective version:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Deltagarnas reaktioner undersöktes.
This uses both nominalization and the s-passive, removing the agent.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Writing

Fill in the missing academic connector.

Studien har ett litet urval, ___ kan resultatet inte generaliseras.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: a
'Därför' (therefore) shows the logical consequence of the small sample size.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Research Paper Structure

Correct the informal word in this sentence.

Find and fix the mistake:

Det finns många bra grejer med denna metod.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: fördelar
'Fördelar' (advantages) is much more precise and formal than 'grejer' (stuff).

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Academic Writing

Hitta felet i denna akademiska mening.

Find and fix the mistake:

Studien kollar på hur klimatet förändras.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: kollar på
'Kollar på' is too informal. Use 'undersöker' or 'analyserar'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Formal Academic Style

Score: /10

سوالات رایج (6)

In some fields (like social sciences), 'jag' is becoming more common in the introduction, but the 'Method' and 'Results' sections should almost always be passive.
They both mean 'however'. 'Emellertid' is slightly more formal and often placed after the verb, while 'dock' is more flexible.
It stands for Inledning (Introduction), Metod (Method), Resultat (Results), and Diskussion (Discussion).
It depends on the field, but generally, it's safer to use the passive voice or denna studie. In qualitative research, 'jag' is more common.
Not always. While it adds precision, too much of it makes text hard to read. Aim for a balance where key concepts are nouns but the flow remains clear.
It depends on the field. In social sciences, 'jag' is becoming more common, but in natural sciences, the s-passive and nominalization are still the gold standard.