发展战略性产业

Literally, it breaks down to 发展 (develop), 战略性 (strategic), and 产业 (industries). So, the direct translation is 'develop strategic industries'. This literal meaning gives you a good starting point, but the phrase carries much more weight in its actual usage.

Yes, it's quite common, but primarily within specific contexts. You'll hear it frequently in news reports, government policy discussions, economic analyses, and academic settings related to national development. It's not typically used in everyday casual conversation.

The core idea is about a nation's proactive strategy to invest in and nurture specific industries that are deemed crucial for its future economic growth, technological advancement, and national security. It's about identifying future engines of prosperity and giving them focused support.

Generally, no. 发展战略性产业 implies a large-scale, often national or governmental, effort. Using it for a small business would sound overly ambitious or even humorous, like calling your lemonade stand a 'strategic beverage industry initiative'.

Strategic industries typically include sectors like advanced technology (AI, semiconductors, biotech), renewable energy, aerospace, high-end manufacturing, and sometimes key resource sectors. The definition can evolve based on global trends and national priorities.

It's considered quite formal. You'd use it in official documents, academic papers, economic forums, and serious news reporting. It's not suitable for casual chats, texting, or informal social media posts unless you're quoting or discussing something formal.

发展经济 (develop the economy) is a very broad goal. 发展战略性产业 is a specific *method* or *strategy* to achieve that broader goal, by focusing resources on particular key sectors expected to drive future economic success.

For less formal contexts, you might talk about 'investing in future tech' (投资未来科技), 'supporting key sectors' (支持关键行业), or 'building up new industries' (发展新产业). These are simpler and more direct for everyday conversation.

A common mistake is adding unnecessary particles like '的' (de) between the words, making it sound unnatural (e.g., 发展的战略性的产业). Another is using it in overly casual situations where its formality is inappropriate.

Sure! A learner might say, 'I want to 发展 my own 战略性产业,' when they mean they have a business idea. The correct, less formal way would be something like, 'I have a business idea in a growing field' (我有个在增长领域的商业想法).

The phrase carries a tone of ambition, foresight, and national purpose. It suggests a deliberate, planned approach to securing future economic strength and technological leadership. It sounds serious and forward-looking.

Often, yes. While private companies might engage in developing strategic industries, the phrase is most frequently used in the context of government policy, indicating state support, investment, and strategic planning to foster these key sectors.

A very close phrase is 培育战略性新兴产业 (péiyù zhànlüèxìng xīnxīng chǎnyè), which means 'cultivate/nurture strategic emerging industries'. It highlights the focus on new, developing sectors rather than established ones.

Initiatives like 'Made in China 2025' are concrete examples of policies aimed at 发展战略性产业. They represent a national strategy to upgrade manufacturing capabilities and focus on high-tech sectors, aligning perfectly with the meaning of the phrase.

Yes, the phrase is understood and used in Taiwan and Hong Kong, particularly in formal economic and policy contexts. Usage might be slightly less frequent than in mainland China, but the meaning remains consistent across Mandarin-speaking regions.

In this phrase, 产业 functions more like a collective noun or refers to industries in general. While it can technically be singular, it's most often understood as referring to multiple strategic industries or the concept of strategic industries as a category.

发展 (fāzhǎn) implies growth, progress, and overall development over time, which fits the long-term nature of strategic industries. 开发 (kāifā) often means to 'open up', 'exploit', or 'develop' something new (like a resource or software), and is less suitable for the ongoing strategic growth implied here.

For casual chat, you'd avoid the formal phrase. You might say something like 'focusing on future tech' (关注未来科技), 'building up important sectors' (发展重要行业), or 'making cool new stuff' (搞点高科技玩意儿).

It evokes a sense of seriousness, ambition, and national pride. It suggests careful planning and a commitment to future prosperity and strength. It's not an emotional phrase itself, but it relates to deeply felt national aspirations.

Yes, it can be used ironically, especially by younger generations or in informal settings. Someone might jokingly say they need to 'develop strategic industries' when referring to a mundane task, contrasting the grand phrase with a trivial reality, similar to how 'synergy' might be used sarcastically.