The video owner has disabled playback on external websites.
This video is no longer available on YouTube.
This video cannot be played right now.
Watch on YouTube
ابزارهای یادگیری هوش مصنوعی را باز کنید
ثبتنام کنید تا به ابزارهای قدرتمندی دسترسی پیدا کنید که به شما کمک میکنند سریعتر از هر ویدیو یاد بگیرید.
Sen. Bernie Sanders - Harnessing Energy From "No Kings" Rally to "Fight Oligarchy" | The Daily Show
آمار یادگیری
سطح CEFR
سختی
زیرنویسها (566 بخشها)
my guest tonight. He is an independent
senator from Vermont. His latest book is
called Fight Oligarchy. Please welcome
to the program Senator Bernie Sanders.
Sir,
[Music]
Fair enough.
>> Been here 20 years. Never as much as a
John.
>> Only you, brother. Uh, first of all,
thank you for being here. How were uh
these no king rallies? You went, you
addressed one. Where where did you
speak? What was
>> in DC? There were some 200,000
people out in DC.
Uh there were some 7 million people out
in 2600 events all over the country, not
only in big cities but in small towns.
Bottom line, extraordinary people came
out. They said no to Trumpism, no to
authoritarianism,
no to oligarchy.
It was uh uh and it and it grew from the
previous uh expression of those. And
obviously you can go back and you can
say well it's you know maybe the left is
building a similar thing uh to to the
tea party with all this
potential energy
that's moving in that direction.
How do you harness that for purpose for
being directional? There not a lot of
people out there other than yourself,
other than Representative Cortez, who
are very clearly delineated about a
point of view that people can rally
behind.
>> Well, let me just say two things. We are
in an extraordinarily dangerous time, as
you know. You got an authoritarian
president who wants more and more power,
doesn't respect the Constitution,
doesn't respect the law.
>> Well, Supreme Court that's granting it
to him,
>> right? That's true. I mean, that's part
of the process. I mean, you got a
Republican party that's now lock step.
It's kind of a cult of the individual.
We got to stop him. But there's
something else that we got to do, John.
We have to have a vision for the future
of this country.
>> And and I I think that many of my my
colleagues in the Democratic party have
not had that vision. And what what that
means is that we should not accept the
fact that we have so much income and
wealth inequality that you got one guy,
Mr. Musk, owning more wealth than the
bottom 52% of the American people. That
we have a corrupt campaign finance
system that allows billionaires in both
parties to determine who wins and who
loses elections. Right.
>> Right. And the vision has got to be and
I want people to think about this in
this extraordinarily great country,
wealthy country, why don't we guarantee
healthcare to every man, woman and child
that so this is what the rebel needs to
learn. So
in this moment all this potential energy
there is clearly a thirst in this
country for uh leadership and and and
smart politics. You know, I know uh
Kamla's book was 107 days, this
shortened time that she had uh uh to run
the campaign, but the Democrats have had
now
>> a much longer time frame.
>> Yes.
>> And yet, to my mind, have not
articulated
>> Yes.
>> a simple clear vision addressing those
very things at all.
>> In fact, I would go further. There seems
to be a whole thing where they say,
"Let's not address that vision. What we
need to do is not bother anybody and be
just totally
>> You're not far from wrong. I And and
it's a conscious decision. You're I
mean, look,
>> it's my GPS. I'm near right.
>> Look, um and a lot of that gets back to
money. Basically, if you're a political
party, you got to make a decision. Do
you go where the money is, where the
billionaires are, where the super PACs
are and kind of do what these guys want?
Or do you go where the working class and
the middle class of this country are?
And those are people who are hurting,
who want real change. You know, I'll
give Donald Trump, he may be crazy, he
may be a pathological liar, but he's not
stupid. And
>> I'm going to say something. That's a
rather passive aggressive comment. I
think
it's classic.
زیرنویس کامل در پخشکننده ویدیو موجود است
با تمرینها یاد بگیرید
تمرینهای واژگان، گرامر و درک مطلب از این ویدیو بسازید
نظرات (0)
برای نظر دادن وارد شویدثبتنام کن و همه امکانات رو باز کن
پیشرفتت رو دنبال کن، واژگان رو ذخیره کن و تمرین کن
حالت تعاملی
آزمون
پاسخ صحیح:
ویدیوهای مرتبط
Intro to Economics: Crash Course Econ #1
Billie Eilish Monologue - SNL
La La Land - Another Day of Sun (subtitle english)
Ex-leader of Reform UK in Wales sentenced for taking pro-Russian bribes | BBC News
Why do so many cultures have dragon legends? - Timothy J. Burbery
The Daily Show
آزمون
پاسخ صحیح:
آزمونها هنگام تماشای ویدیو ظاهر میشوند
راهنمای حفظ
از این ویدیو
شروع رایگان یادگیری زبان
