用你的语言查看此页面

English

فارسی

العربية

Deutsch

Español

Français

日本語

한국어

Português

हिन्दी

B2 noun #3,500 最常用 7分钟阅读

논쟁

nonjaeng 前3,500

开始练习例句笔记与提示 논쟁 30秒了解

解析 논쟁 in your Level:

At the A1 level, '논쟁' (non-jaeng) might be a bit difficult because it is a formal word. However, you can think of it simply as a 'big argument' or 'serious talk about different ideas.' At this level, you don't need to use it in complex sentences. You just need to recognize that it means people are disagreeing about something important. For example, if you see two people on TV talking loudly about rules, they are having a '논쟁.' You can use it with simple verbs like '해요' (do). For example, '논쟁해요' means 'to have a debate.' It is different from '싸워요' (fight) because '논쟁' is usually about ideas, not just being angry. You might hear it in very basic news or when people talk about 'hot topics' like 'Mint Chocolate.' Just remember: 논쟁 = Big Argument about Ideas.

免费注册阅读完整解释

At the A2 level, you can start to use '논쟁' in basic sentences to describe situations you see in the news or at school. You should understand that '논쟁' is a noun. You can say '논쟁이 있어요' (There is a debate) or '논쟁을 해요' (They are debating). It is useful when you want to talk about topics that people disagree on. For example, '인터넷에 논쟁이 많아요' (There are many debates on the internet). You should also learn the difference between '논쟁' and '말다툼.' '말다툼' is for small things like who washed the dishes, but '논쟁' is for bigger things like 'Is social media good or bad?' Learning this word helps you sound more grown-up and serious when you talk about disagreements. You can also start using adjectives like '큰' (big) or '어려운' (difficult) with it, such as '큰 논쟁' (a big debate).

免费注册阅读完整解释

At the B1 level, you should be able to use '논쟁' more naturally in discussions about social issues. You should know that it often pairs with the particle '~에 대한' (about). For example, '환경 문제에 대한 논쟁' (the debate about environmental issues). You can also use the verb '벌이다' (to conduct/start) which is very common with '논쟁.' Instead of just saying '논쟁을 해요,' try saying '논쟁을 벌여요.' This makes you sound much more like a native speaker. At this level, you can also understand the word in context when reading short news articles or watching YouTube discussions. You should realize that a '논쟁' isn't always bad; it can be a way to find the truth or see different sides of a story. You might also encounter the word '논쟁점' (point of debate), which refers to the specific thing people are disagreeing about.

免费注册阅读完整解释

At the B2 level, you are expected to use '논쟁' in academic or professional contexts. You should understand the nuance that '논쟁' involves logic and evidence. You should be able to use various adjectives to describe the nature of the debate, such as '치열한' (fierce), '뜨거운' (heated), or '소모적인' (wasteful). You should also be comfortable with the verb '휘말리다' (to get caught up in), as in '그는 정치적 논쟁에 휘말렸다' (He got caught up in a political dispute). At this level, you can distinguish '논쟁' from '토론' (formal debate) and '토의' (collaborative discussion). You should be able to participate in a '논쟁' yourself, presenting your opinions clearly and using the word to describe the exchange. You will often see this word in editorials (사설) and should be able to summarize the '주요 논쟁' of a text.

At the C1 level, you should have a deep understanding of '논쟁' and its related Hanja. You know that '논' (論) relates to logic and '쟁' (爭) relates to struggle. You can use this word in complex grammatical structures, such as '논쟁의 여지가 없다' (to be beyond debate/indisputable). You should also be familiar with more advanced synonyms like '설전' (war of words) or '분쟁' (legal/territorial dispute) and know exactly when to use each. In your writing, you can use '논쟁' to frame sophisticated arguments, discussing '학술적 논쟁' (academic debates) or '이데올로기적 논쟁' (ideological disputes). You should be able to analyze the '논쟁적' (argumentative/controversial) nature of a statement. Your usage should reflect an understanding of the subtle emotional and intellectual connotations the word carries in high-level Korean discourse, including its use in historical and philosophical contexts.

免费注册阅读完整解释

At the C2 level, '논쟁' is a tool you use with precision and flair. You understand its historical weight and how it has been used in Korean intellectual history (e.g., the '사단칠정 논쟁' in Neo-Confucianism). You can use the word to describe abstract concepts like '존재론적 논쟁' (ontological debate) or '형이상학적 논쟁' (metaphysical dispute). You are capable of deconstructing a '논쟁' into its constituent logical fallacies or rhetorical strategies. You can use the word in highly formal speeches, legal briefs, or literary critiques. You also appreciate the ironic or cultural use of the word in modern 'internet debates' and can navigate the full spectrum from the most serious '국가적 논쟁' (national debate) to the most trivial social '밈' (meme) debates. Your mastery includes knowing when not to use the word to avoid sounding overly pedantic or aggressive, demonstrating perfect pragmatic competence.

免费注册阅读完整解释

开始练习例句笔记与提示

논쟁 30秒了解

논쟁 (Nonjaeng) means a formal debate or a logic-based argument between people with opposing views.
It is commonly used in news, academic writing, and discussions about social or political controversies.
Pair it with verbs like '벌이다' (to engage in) or '휘말리다' (to get caught up in).
It differs from '말다툼' (petty quarrel) by its focus on logic and seriousness of the topic.

The Korean word 논쟁 (Nonjaeng) is a sophisticated noun that represents the intersection of logic and conflict. At its core, it refers to a formal debate, a dispute, or a heated argument centered around a specific topic where parties hold differing opinions. Unlike simple casual arguments (말싸움) or structured academic discussions (토론), 논쟁 often implies a high degree of intensity and a clash of fundamental beliefs or evidence. It is a word that carries weight, suggesting that the disagreement is not merely about personal feelings but about ideas, policies, or truths. In a professional or academic setting, it denotes a rigorous exchange of views, while in social contexts, it can describe a controversy that has captured public attention.

Etymological Roots: The word consists of two Hanja characters: 논 (論) meaning 'to discuss, discourse, or argue' and 쟁 (爭) meaning 'to struggle, fight, or compete.' Together, they literally mean 'a struggle through discourse.' This highlights that the 'fight' is conducted through words and logic rather than physical force.

그 주제는 학계에서 여전히 뜨거운 논쟁의 대상입니다. (That topic is still a subject of heated debate in academia.)

Understanding when to use 논쟁 requires recognizing the scale of the disagreement. You wouldn't typically use it for a small disagreement about what to eat for dinner. Instead, you use it when discussing the ethics of artificial intelligence, the validity of a scientific theory, or a political policy change. It is the word of choice for news headlines reporting on parliamentary disputes or talk shows where experts clash. It suggests a level of intellectual engagement, even if the emotions involved are running high. When you hear this word, expect a situation where points are being made, evidence is being presented, and a resolution might not be easily reached.

Nuance Comparison: Compared to '토론' (debate/discussion), 논쟁 is more confrontational. A '토론' is often a planned event with a moderator, whereas a 논쟁 can erupt spontaneously or represent a long-standing intellectual feud. Compared to '언쟁' (verbal quarrel), 논쟁 is more formal and focused on the content of the argument rather than just the act of shouting.

불필요한 논쟁을 피하는 것이 상책입니다. (It is best to avoid unnecessary disputes.)

In modern Korean society, 논쟁 is frequently paired with the adjective '뜨거운' (hot/heated) to describe '뜨거운 논쟁' (a heated debate). This is ubiquitous in media when discussing social issues like the 'Mint Chocolate' debate (민초 논쟁) or more serious issues like the minimum wage. The word encapsulates the dynamic nature of Korean public discourse, where people are passionate about expressing their views and defending their logical positions. It is a vital word for anyone looking to engage with Korean news, literature, or high-level conversation.

Social Context: In Korea, the culture of 'Debate' (토론 문화) is evolving. While traditional values might have emphasized harmony (화합), modern Korean society increasingly values the ability to engage in a logical 논쟁 to reach a better conclusion or to express individual identity. Thus, the word is becoming even more common in everyday digital spaces.

그의 발언은 인터넷상에서 큰 논쟁을 불러일으켰다. (His remarks sparked a huge controversy online.)

부먹과 찍먹 사이의 영원한 논쟁. (The eternal debate between pouring and dipping sauce.)

Using 논쟁 (Nonjaeng) correctly involves understanding its grammatical pairings and the verbs that typically follow it. As a noun, it often acts as the object of a sentence or the subject of a state. The most common verb associated with 논쟁 is 벌이다 (to start/conduct/engage in). When you say '논쟁을 벌이다', you are describing the act of actively participating in a debate. Another essential verb is 휘말리다 (to get caught up in), which implies that a person became part of a controversy or argument, often unintentionally or unpleasantly.

Common Verb Pairings: 1. 논쟁을 벌이다: To have/engage in a debate.
2. 논쟁이 그치지 않다: The debate does not stop.
3. 논쟁을 종식시키다: To put an end to a dispute.
4. 논쟁에 휩싸이다: To be engulfed in controversy.

두 학자는 진화론의 세부 사항을 두고 치열한 논쟁을 벌였다. (The two scholars engaged in a fierce debate over the details of evolutionary theory.)

When constructing sentences, pay attention to the particles. Use ~에 대한 (about) or ~을/를 둘러싼 (surrounding/concerning) to specify the topic of the debate. For example, '안락사에 대한 논쟁' (the debate about euthanasia) or '최저임금을 둘러싼 논쟁' (the debate surrounding the minimum wage). These structures allow you to clearly define the scope of the intellectual conflict. Furthermore, you can use ~와/과 (with) to indicate the party you are debating with, such as '친구와 논쟁하다' (to debate with a friend), although the verb form 논쟁하다 is also very common and useful.

Sentence Patterns: [Topic] + 에 대한 + [Adjective] + 논쟁이 + [Verb].
예: 원자력 발전소 건설에 대한 뜨거운 논쟁이 계속되고 있다. (The heated debate over the construction of nuclear power plants is continuing.)

우리는 그 문제로 더 이상 논쟁하고 싶지 않습니다. (We do not want to argue about that matter any further.)

Adjectives play a crucial role in giving 논쟁 its specific flavor. Common adjectives include 치열한 (fierce), 소모적인 (wasteful/draining), 생산적인 (productive), and 끝없는 (endless). Using '소모적인 논쟁' (a wasteful dispute) is a powerful way to criticize an argument that isn't leading anywhere useful. Conversely, '생산적인 논쟁' (a productive debate) suggests that the disagreement is healthy and leads to growth or better solutions. These descriptors help the listener understand the nature and quality of the interaction.

Descriptive Phrases: - 격렬한 논쟁 (A violent/intense debate)
- 철학적 논쟁 (A philosophical debate)
- 역사적 논쟁 (A historical dispute)
- 사회적 논쟁 (A social controversy)

그 영화는 결말을 두고 많은 논쟁을 낳았다. (The movie gave birth to many debates regarding its ending.)

이것은 단순한 말다툼이 아니라 가치관의 논쟁입니다. (This is not a simple quarrel, but a debate of values.)

In your daily life in Korea, you will encounter the word 논쟁 (Nonjaeng) in various media and social settings. One of the most common places is the evening news or digital news portals like Naver and Daum. Headlines often use 논쟁 to describe political standoffs between the ruling and opposition parties. For example, '여야, 예산안 처리를 두고 날 선 논쟁' (Ruling and opposition parties in a sharp debate over budget processing). The word provides a sense of formality and seriousness to these reports, distinguishing professional disagreements from petty bickering.

Media Usage: You will see this word in editorials, opinion pieces, and televised debate programs (토론 프로그램). In these contexts, 논쟁 refers to the substantive issues being contested, such as economic policies, diplomatic strategies, or environmental regulations.

오늘 9시 뉴스에서는 교육 개혁안을 둘러싼 논쟁을 다루겠습니다. (On tonight's 9 o'clock news, we will cover the debate surrounding the education reform plan.)

Academic environments are another primary habitat for this word. If you are a student in Korea or reading academic papers, 논쟁 is used to describe the ongoing scholarly disputes within a field. Phrases like '학계의 논쟁' (debate in academic circles) or '이론적 논쟁' (theoretical debate) are standard. Professors might ask students to summarize the '주요 논쟁점' (main points of contention) in a particular study. This usage emphasizes the word's connection to logic, evidence, and systematic thought.

Academic Contexts: - 학술 논쟁 (Academic debate)
- 신구 논쟁 (Debate between the old and the new)
- 논쟁의 여지 (Room for debate/controversy)

이 가설은 여전히 많은 논쟁의 여지가 남아 있습니다. (This hypothesis still leaves much room for debate.)

Interestingly, the word has also found a place in Korean pop culture and social media through 'Balance Games' and lighthearted internet controversies. Koreans love to engage in playful 논쟁 about trivial topics. The most famous example is the 'Perilla Leaf Debate' (깻잎 논쟁), where people argue whether it's okay for your partner to help your friend peel off a perilla leaf during a meal. Other examples include the 'Shrimp Peeling Debate' (새우 까주기 논쟁) and the 'Padding Jacket Debate' (패딩 지퍼 올려주기 논쟁). In these cases, the word 논쟁 is used somewhat ironically to elevate a silly topic to the level of a serious social inquiry, making it a fun and essential part of modern Korean slang and social interaction.

Pop Culture Examples: - 깻잎 논쟁 (The Perilla Leaf Debate)
- 민초 논쟁 (The Mint Chocolate Debate)
- 찍먹 vs 부먹 논쟁 (The Dipping vs. Pouring Sauce Debate)

친구들과 깻잎 논쟁에 대해 이야기하다가 시간이 다 갔어요. (We spent all our time talking about the Perilla Leaf Debate with friends.)

인터넷 커뮤니티에서 이 사진 한 장으로 뜨거운 논쟁

One of the most frequent mistakes English speakers make when using 논쟁 (Nonjaeng) is confusing it with other words for 'argument' or 'discussion.' While English often uses 'argument' for everything from a petty fight to a legal case, Korean is more segmented. A common error is using 논쟁 when you actually mean a simple, emotional quarrel. For that, the word 말다툼 (mal-da-tum) is more appropriate. If you tell a Korean friend, '어제 엄마랑 논쟁했어' (I had a nonjaeng with my mom yesterday), it sounds like you and your mother had a formal, logic-based debate about a social or philosophical issue, rather than a typical parent-child disagreement.

Mistake 1: Misapplying Formality: Using 논쟁 for personal, emotional fights.
Correction: Use 말다툼 or 싸움 for emotional conflicts.

[Incorrect] 여자친구와 사소한 논쟁을 했어요. (I had a formal debate over a trivial matter with my girlfriend.)
[Correct] 여자친구와 사소한 말다툼을 했어요. (I had a small argument with my girlfriend.)

Another common confusion occurs between 논쟁 and 토론 (toron). While both involve discussing different views, 토론 is generally more structured and aims toward a conclusion or a shared understanding through a formal process. 논쟁, however, focuses more on the conflict of opinions and the act of arguing against one another. If you are participating in a classroom activity where everyone shares ideas politely, call it a 토론. If the participants are aggressively attacking each other's logic to prove who is right, it has become a 논쟁.

Mistake 2: Confusing with 'Discussion': Using 논쟁 for a collaborative discussion.
Correction: Use 토의 (discussion for a solution) or 토론 (formal debate).

우리는 해결책을 찾기 위해 토의했습니다. (We discussed to find a solution. - Use this instead of 논쟁 for teamwork.)

Finally, learners sometimes struggle with the particle usage. They might say '논쟁을 하다' (to do a debate), which is technically correct but can sound a bit plain. Advanced learners should try to use more descriptive verbs like '벌이다' (to stage/conduct) or '참여하다' (to participate in). Also, be careful with '논쟁이 되다' (to become a debate/controversial). If you say '이 책은 논쟁이 되었다,' it means the book itself caused a controversy, which is a very useful passive-style expression in Korean.

Mistake 3: Weak Verb Choices: Relying solely on '하다'.
Correction: Use 벌이다, 일으키다 (to cause), or 종식시키다 (to end) to sound more natural.

그의 논문은 학계에 큰 논쟁을 불러일으켰다. (His paper sparked a great debate in the academic world.)

소모적인 논쟁은 그만합시다. (Let's stop the wasteful dispute.)

To truly master 논쟁 (Nonjaeng), you must understand its synonyms and how they differ in register and usage. Korean has a rich vocabulary for disagreements, each with its own flavor. The most common alternative is 토론 (toron). As mentioned before, 토론 is more formal and structured, often used in educational or broadcast settings where participants follow specific rules to explore a topic. Another similar word is 토의 (to-ui), which is used when people discuss a specific problem to reach a collaborative decision or solution.

Comparison Table

Word	Nuance	English Equivalent
논쟁	Logic-based conflict	Debate/Dispute
토론	Structured exchange	Formal Debate
언쟁	Verbal fight	Wordy argument
다툼	General conflict	Quarrel

For more casual or emotional situations, you should look toward 언쟁 (eonjaeng) or 말다툼 (mal-da-tum). 언쟁 literally means 'word struggle' and is often used to describe a sharp verbal exchange between two people, usually where emotions are higher and logic is lower than in a 논쟁. 말다툼 is even more informal, typical for siblings or couples arguing over daily chores. If the argument escalates to a full-blown conflict, you might use 분쟁 (bunjaeng), which is often used for legal, territorial, or serious organizational disputes.

Context-Specific Alternatives: - 설전 (Seol-jeon): Literally 'tongue war.' Used in news to describe a very sharp, quick exchange of words between politicians.
- 시비 (Si-bi): Distinguishing right from wrong. Often used in the context of '시비를 걸다' (to pick a fight).
- 반론 (Ban-ron): A counter-argument. Used within a debate to specifically address the opposing side's point.

두 정치인은 방송에서 날 선 설전을 벌였습니다. (The two politicians engaged in a sharp war of words on the broadcast.)

In writing, you might encounter 쟁론 (jaeng-ron), which is a more literary or archaic version of 논쟁. However, in modern contexts, sticking to 논쟁 is your safest bet for clarity. For those interested in law or international relations, 분쟁 (dispute) is essential. For example, '영토 분쟁' (territorial dispute) or '노사 분쟁' (labor-management dispute). These words share the '쟁' (struggle) character but apply it to broader, more institutionalized conflicts. Understanding these distinctions will help you choose the right level of intensity and formality for any situation.

이 문제는 단순한 말다툼 수준을 넘어 법적 분쟁으로 번졌습니다. (This issue went beyond the level of a simple quarrel and escalated into a legal dispute.)

서로의 의견을 존중하며 토론하는 자세가 필요합니다. (An attitude of debating while respecting each other's opinions is necessary.)

How Formal Is It?

趣味小知识

The character 爭 (Jaeng) is also found in the word '전쟁' (war). So, a '논쟁' is essentially a 'war of words and logic.' This explains why it feels much more intense than a simple '토론' (debate).

发音指南

UK /nɒn.dʑɛŋ/

US /nɑn.dʒɛŋ/

The stress is balanced between both syllables, but the second syllable 'jaeng' often carries a slightly higher pitch in natural speech.

押韵词

전쟁 (Jeonjaeng - War) 경쟁 (Gyeongjaeng - Competition) 분쟁 (Bunjaeng - Dispute) 항쟁 (Hangjaeng - Resistance) 논리 (Nonri - Logic - shares the first syllable) 민생 (Minsaeng - People's livelihood - slant rhyme) 평생 (Pyeongsaeng - Lifetime - slant rhyme) 동생 (Dongsaeng - Younger sibling - slant rhyme)

常见错误

Pronouncing 'jaeng' like 'jang' (without the 'ae' sound).
Making the 'n' in the middle too soft; it should be a clear 'n'.
Over-aspirating the 'j' sound; it is a soft 'j' in Korean.
Pronouncing the first 'o' like 'oo' (noon-jaeng). It should be 'o' like in 'hot'.
Confusing the pitch accent, making it sound like a question when it's a statement.

难度评级

阅读 3/5

Common in news and books, but requires understanding Hanja nuances.

写作 4/5

Requires knowledge of specific verb collocations like '벌이다'.

口语 3/5

Useful for expressing opinions, but shouldn't be overused in casual talk.

听力 3/5

Easily recognizable in formal broadcasts due to its clear pronunciation.

接下来学什么

前置知识

말하다 싸우다 의견 생각 다르다

接下来学习

토론 비판 반박 근거 주장

高级

변증법 이데올로기 패러다임 고찰 야기하다

需要掌握的语法

~에 대한 (About/Regarding)

환경 오염에 대한 논쟁이 많다.

~을/를 두고 (Over/Concerning)

결말을 두고 논쟁을 벌였다.

~(으)로 인한 (Due to/Caused by)

오해로 인한 논쟁은 피해야 한다.

~(으)로 인해 (Because of)

논쟁으로 인해 사이가 멀어졌다.

~ㄴ/는다는 점에서 (In that...)

이 이론은 논쟁적이라는 점에서 흥미롭다.

免费注册阅读完整解释

按水平分级的例句

사람들이 논쟁을 해요.

People are having a debate.

Simple Subject + Object + Verb structure.

이것은 큰 논쟁이에요.

This is a big debate.

Noun + 이다 (to be) ending.

우리는 논쟁이 싫어요.

We hate arguments.

Subject + Noun + Adjective (싫다).

그들은 매일 논쟁해요.

They debate every day.

Adverb (매일) + Verb (논쟁하다).

논쟁은 어려워요.

Debating is difficult.

Topic marker '은' highlights the subject.

선생님과 논쟁해요.

I debate with the teacher.

'과' means 'with'.

무슨 논쟁이에요?

What kind of debate is it?

'무슨' is an interrogative adjective.

논쟁을 멈추세요.

Please stop the debate.

'~세요' is a polite command.

인터넷에서 논쟁이 많아요.

There are many debates on the internet.

Location particle '에서' with '많다'.

친구와 게임으로 논쟁했어요.

I had a debate with my friend over a game.

'~으로' indicates the reason/cause.

그 주제는 논쟁이 필요해요.

That topic needs a debate.

'필요하다' takes the subject marker '이/가'.

우리는 짧은 논쟁을 했어요.

We had a short debate.

Adjective '짧은' modifying '논쟁'.

이 책은 논쟁이 될 거예요.

This book will be a subject of debate.

Future tense '~을 거예요'.

논쟁을 피하고 싶어요.

I want to avoid the debate.

'~고 싶다' expresses desire.

그들은 돈 문제로 논쟁 중이에요.

They are in the middle of a debate about money.

'~ 중' means 'in the middle of'.

새로운 법에 대해 논쟁해요.

They debate about the new law.

'~에 대해' means 'about'.

정치인들이 치열한 논쟁을 벌이고 있습니다.

Politicians are engaging in a fierce debate.

Using '벌이다' for active engagement.

그 문제는 논쟁의 여지가 많습니다.

That issue has a lot of room for debate.

'논쟁의 여지' is a common set phrase.

환경 보호를 둘러싼 논쟁이 뜨겁습니다.

The debate surrounding environmental protection is heated.

'~을 둘러싼' means 'surrounding/concerning'.

불필요한 논쟁은 시간 낭비입니다.

Unnecessary debate is a waste of time.

Using '소모적인' would also fit here.

그의 발언은 사회적 논쟁을 일으켰다.

His remarks sparked a social debate.

'일으키다' means 'to cause/spark'.

우리는 생산적인 논쟁을 해야 합니다.

We must have a productive debate.

'~해야 하다' expresses necessity.

그 영화의 결말은 많은 논쟁을 낳았다.

The movie's ending gave birth to many debates.

'낳다' (to give birth) is used metaphorically for results.

어떤 논쟁도 해결되지 않았습니다.

No debate has been resolved.

Passive form '해결되다'.

학계에서는 이 이론을 두고 논쟁이 분분하다.

In academic circles, opinions are divided and debates are rife over this theory.

'분분하다' means 'to be diverse/conflicting'.

그는 자신의 주장을 굽히지 않고 논쟁을 이어갔다.

He continued the debate without yielding his argument.

'굽히지 않고' means 'without bending/yielding'.

기술의 발전은 윤리적 논쟁을 수반한다.

The advancement of technology entails ethical debates.

'수반하다' means 'to accompany/entail'.

소모적인 논쟁에 휘말리지 않도록 주의하세요.

Be careful not to get caught up in wasteful disputes.

'~지 않도록' means 'so as not to'.

이번 논쟁의 핵심은 공정성입니다.

The core of this debate is fairness.

'핵심' means 'core' or 'key point'.

양측의 논쟁은 평행선을 달리고 있다.

The debate between both sides is running on parallel lines (making no progress).

'평행선을 달리다' is an idiom for failing to reach agreement.

그 기사는 독자들 사이에서 큰 논쟁을 불러왔다.

That article brought about a big debate among readers.

'불러오다' means 'to bring about/cause'.

역사적 사실에 대한 논쟁은 끝이 없다.

Debates over historical facts are endless.

'끝이 없다' means 'to be endless'.

본 논문은 현대 철학의 주요 논쟁점을 고찰한다.

This paper examines the major points of contention in modern philosophy.

'고찰하다' is a formal verb for 'examine/investigate'.

그 사건은 사법부 내에서 격렬한 논쟁을 야기했다.

The incident caused an intense debate within the judiciary.

'야기하다' is a formal term for 'to cause/bring about'.

논쟁의 본질을 파악하는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다.

It is more important than anything to grasp the essence of the debate.

'본질' means 'essence'.

그의 이론은 논쟁적 요소가 다분함에도 불구하고 널리 수용되었다.

Despite having many controversial elements, his theory was widely accepted.

'다분하다' means 'to be plenty/considerable'.

정치적 논쟁이 이념 대립으로 번지는 양상을 보였다.

The political debate showed a pattern of spreading into ideological conflict.

'양상' means 'aspect' or 'pattern'.

이 사안은 더 이상 논쟁의 여지가 없는 기정사실이다.

This matter is an established fact that is no longer open to debate.

'기정사실' means 'established fact'.

그들은 서로의 논리를 반박하며 끝장 논쟁을 벌였다.

They engaged in a 'to-the-finish' debate, refuting each other's logic.

'끝장 논쟁' implies a debate until the very end.

사회적 합의를 이끌어내기 위해 논쟁은 필수적이다.

Debate is essential to draw out a social consensus.

'합의' means 'consensus/agreement'.

칸트의 정언 명령을 둘러싼 해석상의 논쟁은 여전히 현재진행형이다.

The interpretational debate surrounding Kant's categorical imperative is still ongoing.

'현재진행형' (present progressive) is used here metaphorically.

미학적 가치 판단은 주관성과 객관성 사이의 영원한 논쟁거리이다.

Aesthetic value judgment is an eternal subject of debate between subjectivity and objectivity.

'논쟁거리' means 'subject of debate'.

담론의 장에서 논쟁은 진리 탐구를 위한 변증법적 과정이다.

In the field of discourse, debate is a dialectical process for the pursuit of truth.

'변증법적' means 'dialectical'.

그 정치가의 수사는 논쟁의 초점을 흐리는 경향이 있다.

That politician's rhetoric tends to blur the focus of the debate.

'수사' (rhetoric) and '초점을 흐리다' (blur the focus).

구조주의와 포스트구조주의 사이의 지적 논쟁은 현대 사상사에 큰 획을 그었다.

The intellectual debate between structuralism and post-structuralism marked a significant milestone in modern intellectual history.

'큰 획을 긋다' is an idiom for making a significant mark.

법적 논쟁의 이면에는 권력 관계의 역동성이 숨어 있다.

Behind the legal debate lies the dynamics of power relations.

'이면' means 'the hidden side' or 'the back'.

그 학자는 기존의 패러다임을 전복시키려는 논쟁적 시도를 멈추지 않았다.

The scholar did not stop his controversial attempts to subvert the existing paradigm.

'전복시키다' means 'to subvert/overturn'.

논쟁의 종식은 때로 진리의 승리가 아닌 권력의 억압에 의해 이루어진다.

The end of a debate is sometimes achieved through the suppression of power rather than the victory of truth.

'종식' means 'end/cessation'.

近义词

토론 다툼 쟁점 언쟁

反义词

합의 동의

常见搭配

논쟁을 벌이다

뜨거운 논쟁

논쟁에 휘말리다

논쟁의 여지

소모적인 논쟁

논쟁을 종식시키다

학술적 논쟁

논쟁을 불러일으키다

논쟁이 분분하다

논쟁을 그치다

常用短语

논쟁의 중심에 서다

— To be at the center of a debate or controversy.

그 가수는 최근 논쟁의 중심에 섰다.

논쟁을 일축하다

— To dismiss a debate or argument quickly.

정부는 그 논쟁을 일축했다.

논쟁을 잠재우다

— To quiet down or settle a debate.

그의 해명이 논쟁을 잠재웠다.

논쟁을 가열시키다

— To heat up or intensify a debate.

새로운 기사가 논쟁을 가열시켰다.

논쟁의 소지가 있다

— To have the potential for debate or controversy.

이 발언은 논쟁의 소지가 있다.

논쟁을 피하다

— To avoid getting into a debate.

그는 민감한 주제에 대한 논쟁을 피했다.

논쟁을 유발하다

— To trigger or cause a debate.

무책임한 행동이 논쟁을 유발했다.

논쟁 끝에

— After a debate.

긴 논쟁 끝에 합의에 도달했다.

논쟁을 전개하다

— To develop or carry out an argument.

저자는 책에서 자신의 논쟁을 전개한다.

논쟁의 대상

— The object or subject of a debate.

그 건물은 오랫동안 논쟁의 대상이었다.

容易混淆的词

논쟁 vs 말다툼

말다툼 is for emotional, petty fights; 논쟁 is for logical, formal debates.

논쟁 vs 토론

토론 is a structured discussion; 논쟁 is the conflict of opinions itself.

논쟁 vs 분쟁

분쟁 is usually a larger-scale, often legal or physical conflict (e.g., territorial dispute).

习语与表达

"평행선을 달리다"

— To run on parallel lines; to fail to reach an agreement despite debating.

양측의 논쟁은 평행선을 달리고 있다.

Neutral/Formal

"입씨름을 하다"

— To have a 'mouth wrestling'; to argue back and forth about something trivial.

사소한 일로 입씨름을 하지 마라.

Informal

"날 선 논쟁"

— A 'sharp-edged' debate; a very aggressive and sensitive argument.

회의실에서는 날 선 논쟁이 오갔다.

Neutral/Formal

"침소봉대하다"

— To exaggerate a small point to make it a big debate (literally: making a needle into a pole).

그는 상대의 실수를 침소봉대하여 논쟁을 키웠다.

Formal

"설왕설래하다"

— Words coming and going; many people talking and debating about something.

그 소문을 두고 설왕설래가 이어졌다.

Formal

"갑론을박하다"

— Argue pro and con; multiple parties debating heatedly.

위원회는 해결책을 두고 갑론을박했다.

Formal

"벽에 대고 말하다"

— Talking to a wall; debating with someone who doesn't listen.

그와 논쟁하는 것은 벽에 대고 말하는 기분이다.

Informal

"진흙탕 싸움"

— A mud-slinging fight; a messy, dirty debate focused on personal attacks.

선거가 진흙탕 싸움으로 변했다.

Informal/Neutral

"불에 기름을 붓다"

— To pour oil on a fire; to make a debate even more heated.

그녀의 댓글은 논쟁에 불을 붙였다.

Informal/Neutral

"끝장 토론/논쟁"

— A debate to the end; a debate that doesn't stop until a conclusion is reached.

밤새도록 끝장 논쟁을 벌였다.

Neutral

容易混淆

논쟁 vs 토의

Both involve talking about a topic.

토의 is collaborative to find a solution; 논쟁 is confrontational to defend a position.

우리는 회의에서 새로운 마케팅 전략을 토의했다.

논쟁 vs 반박

Both happen during an argument.

반박 is the specific act of refuting a statement; 논쟁 is the whole debate.

그는 나의 주장에 대해 조목조목 반박했다.

논쟁 vs 회의

Both involve a group of people talking.

회의 is a general meeting for any purpose; 논쟁 is a specific disagreement.

부장님은 회의 중에 발생한 논쟁을 중단시켰다.

논쟁 vs 쟁점

They share the same Hanja '쟁'.

쟁점 is the 'point' of contention; 논쟁 is the 'act' of debating.

이번 논쟁의 가장 큰 쟁점은 예산 배정이다.

논쟁 vs 시비

Both involve disagreement.

시비 often implies picking a fight or being troublesome; 논쟁 is more intellectual.

술에 취한 남자가 행인에게 시비를 걸었다.

句型

N에 대한 논쟁이 있어요.

환경에 대한 논쟁이 있어요.

N을/를 두고 논쟁을 벌이다.

돈을 두고 논쟁을 벌였다.

N은/는 논쟁의 여지가 있다.

이 계획은 논쟁의 여지가 있다.

치열한 논쟁 끝에 V.

치열한 논쟁 끝에 합의했다.

N에 휘말려 논쟁이 되다.

스캔들에 휘말려 논쟁이 되었다.

N을/를 둘러싼 논쟁이 가열되다.

세금 인상을 둘러싼 논쟁이 가열되었다.

논쟁의 본질은 N에 있다.

논쟁의 본질은 자유에 있다.

N은/는 학술적 논쟁의 궤를 같이한다.

이 주장은 기존의 학술적 논쟁의 궤를 같이한다.

词族

名词

논쟁 (Debate)

논쟁점 (Point of debate)

논쟁가 (Debater/Polemicist)

비논쟁적 (Non-argumentative)

动词

논쟁하다 (To debate)

논쟁을 벌이다 (To engage in debate)

논쟁되다 (To be debated)

形容词

논쟁적 (Controversial/Argumentative)

논쟁적인 (Being controversial)

如何使用

frequency

High in media and academic contexts; medium in daily life.

常见错误

Using '논쟁' for a simple fight with a sibling. → 말다툼
논쟁 implies a formal or logical disagreement, which is too heavy for a sibling squabble.
Saying '논쟁을 주다' to mean 'to give an argument'. → 논쟁을 벌이다 / 주장을 하다
You don't 'give' a debate; you 'conduct' or 'engage in' one.
Using '논쟁' when you mean a single reason or point. → 주장 / 근거
논쟁 is the whole situation of debating, not an individual point of logic.
Confusing '논쟁' with '전쟁' in a speech. → 논쟁
While they share '쟁', '전쟁' is a literal war with weapons. Mixing them up can be very confusing!
Forgetting the particle '~에 대한' when specifying the topic. → 주제에 대한 논쟁
Without the particle, the sentence structure often becomes broken or unclear.

小贴士

Academic Writing

In essays, use '논쟁적 사안' to describe a controversial issue. It sounds very professional.

Hanja Power

Remember '쟁' (Struggle). It appears in '경쟁' (competition) and '전쟁' (war). This helps you feel the intensity of the word.

Internet Slang

On Korean forums, you might see '키보드 논쟁' (keyboard debate), referring to people arguing in the comments section.

Passive Form

Use '논쟁이 되다' when you want to say something became a subject of debate. '그 발언은 큰 논쟁이 되었다.'

Softening the Blow

If you want to disagree politely, say '그 점에 대해서는 논쟁의 여지가 있을 것 같습니다' (I think there might be room for debate on that point).

News Keywords

When you hear '논쟁' on the news, listen for the words '여야' (ruling and opposition) or '정부' (government) to understand the context.

Synonym Variety

Instead of saying '논쟁이 많다,' try '논쟁이 끊이지 않는다' (the debate does not end) for a more dramatic effect.

Core Meaning

Always remember that '논쟁' requires a topic. You don't just '논쟁'; you '논쟁' *about* something.

Formal vs. Informal

If someone is just shouting, call it '언쟁.' If they are presenting points, call it '논쟁'.

Sound Association

Non-Jaeng sounds like 'Known-Jang'. A 'Known' (well-known) 'Jang' (clash). A public, well-known clash of ideas.

记住它

记忆技巧

Think of 'Non' as 'No' and 'Jaeng' as 'Jangling' (like keys hitting each other). A 논쟁 is when people say 'No' and their opinions 'Jangle' against each other.

视觉联想

Imagine two people standing on opposite sides of a bridge, throwing heavy books (logic) at each other to see whose book is stronger.

Word Web

논리 (Logic) 전쟁 (War) 토론 (Debate) 의견 (Opinion) 반대 (Opposite) 주장 (Claim) 근거 (Evidence) 결론 (Conclusion)

挑战

Try to find one '논쟁' in a Korean news headline today and identify the two sides of the argument. Write it down in a sentence using '논쟁을 벌이다'.

词源

Derived from the Hanja characters 論 (Non) and 爭 (Jaeng).

原始含义：論 (discuss/discourse) + 爭 (struggle/fight). It literally means 'to struggle through discourse' or 'to fight using logic.'

Sino-Korean (Hanja-based vocabulary).

文化背景

Be careful when using 논쟁 in personal relationships; calling a disagreement with a friend a 논쟁 might make you sound cold or overly clinical.

In English, 'debate' is often seen as a positive academic exercise, while 'dispute' is negative. 논쟁 covers both, depending on the adjective used (e.g., '생산적인' vs '소모적인').

The 'Perilla Leaf Debate' (깻잎 논쟁) The 'Sa-dan-chil-jeong' Neo-Confucian debate The 'Tangsuyuk' sauce debate

在生活中练习

真实语境

Politics

여야 논쟁
정책 논쟁
예산안 논쟁
치열한 논쟁

Academia

학술적 논쟁
이론적 논쟁
논쟁의 여지
논쟁점

Internet/Social Media

댓글 논쟁
뜨거운 논쟁
논쟁을 유발하다
밈 논쟁

Legal

법적 논쟁
권리 논쟁
분쟁 해결
논쟁의 소지

Daily Life

사소한 논쟁
논쟁을 피하다
말다툼
의견 차이

对话开场白

"최근에 가장 뜨거운 논쟁이 무엇이라고 생각하세요? (What do you think is the hottest debate lately?)"

"깻잎 논쟁에 대해서 어떻게 생각하세요? (What do you think about the Perilla Leaf Debate?)"

"우리는 왜 소모적인 논쟁을 멈추지 못할까요? (Why can't we stop wasteful disputes?)"

"논쟁에서 이기는 것보다 중요한 것은 무엇일까요? (What is more important than winning a debate?)"

"학창 시절에 기억에 남는 토론이나 논쟁이 있나요? (Do you have any memorable debates or discussions from your school days?)"

日记主题

오늘 내가 참여했거나 목격한 논쟁에 대해 적어보세요. (Write about a debate you participated in or witnessed today.)

논쟁이 사회 발전에 도움이 된다고 생각하는지 서술하세요. (Describe whether you think debate helps social development.)

나와 의견이 다른 사람과 논쟁할 때 어떤 태도를 가져야 할까요? (What attitude should we have when debating with someone who has a different opinion?)

'논쟁의 여지가 없는 진리'라는 것이 존재할까요? (Does something like 'indisputable truth' exist?)

가장 기억에 남는 역사적 논쟁 하나를 소개하고 자신의 의견을 쓰세요. (Introduce one memorable historical debate and write your opinion.)

常见问题

10 个问题

No, '논쟁' is not inherently negative. While it can be '소모적인' (wasteful), it can also be '생산적인' (productive). In academia and democracy, '논쟁' is essential for testing ideas and reaching better conclusions through logical conflict.

Yes, but it sounds formal. If you use it playfully (like the 'Perilla Leaf Debate'), it's fine. If you use it seriously for a small disagreement, you might sound like you're overreacting or being too clinical.

The most common and natural verb is '벌이다' (to engage in/conduct). For example, '논쟁을 벌이다.' '하다' is also used but is less descriptive.

It means 'there is no room for debate.' It is used when something is an undeniable fact or a very clear truth. Example: '그의 실력은 논쟁의 여지가 없다' (His skill is beyond debate).

You can use '논쟁을 불러일으키다' or '논쟁을 야기하다' (more formal). Example: '그 기사는 큰 논쟁을 불러일으켰다.'

Mostly, but 'argument' in English can also mean a single point in a debate (주장). In Korean, '논쟁' only refers to the whole debate or dispute, not a single piece of logic.

It's a famous Korean social debate about whether it's okay for your romantic partner to help your friend peel a stuck perilla leaf. It's a classic example of a fun, lighthearted '논쟁'.

Use '토론' when the situation is structured, like a classroom debate or a TV talk show where people take turns. Use '논쟁' when the focus is on the disagreement itself.

No, '논쟁' is strictly verbal and logical. For a physical fight, use '싸움' or '폭력'.

It's a 'wasteful debate'—one that goes in circles, focuses on emotions, or doesn't lead to any useful conclusion or understanding.

免费注册查看提示和笔记