A warrant is a very important paper. A judge or someone with power signs it. This paper tells the police they can do something special. For example, it might say they can look inside a house. Or it could say they can take someone to the police station. It makes sure the police follow the rules.
§ Mistakes People Make with "Warrant"
The word "warrant" can be a bit tricky, especially for learners at the A1 CEFR level, because it has several meanings and can be used as both a noun and a verb. Here, we'll focus on common mistakes when using "warrant" as a noun, specifically in the context of an official document. Understanding these pitfalls can help you use the word more accurately and confidently.
§ Mistake 1: Confusing "Warrant" with "Order" or "Permission"
Many learners might incorrectly use "order" or "permission" instead of "warrant" when referring to the specific legal document. While a warrant *gives* permission or *orders* an action, the word "warrant" itself refers to the document. It's more specific than general permission.
- Incorrect Usage
- The police got an order to search the house.
- Correct Usage
- The police got a warrant to search the house.
§ Mistake 2: Using "Warrant" without the Indefinite Article "a"
Since "warrant" is a countable noun, it almost always needs an article (like "a" or "the") when it's singular. A common error is to omit this article, which can make the sentence sound unnatural or grammatically incorrect.
- Incorrect Usage
- Police need warrant to arrest him.
- Correct Usage
- Police need a warrant to arrest him.
The judge issued a warrant for his arrest.
§ Mistake 3: Misusing Verbs with "Warrant"
The verbs used with "warrant" are important. Common verbs include "issue," "get," "obtain," "have," and sometimes "serve." Incorrectly pairing "warrant" with other verbs can sound awkward.
"Make a warrant" vs. "Issue a warrant": You don't "make" a warrant; a judge or authority "issues" it.
- Incorrect Usage
- The judge made a warrant.
- Correct Usage
- The judge issued a warrant.
"Do a warrant" vs. "Execute/Serve a warrant": Police don't "do" a warrant; they "execute" or "serve" it, meaning they carry out the actions it permits.
- Incorrect Usage
- The police did the warrant.
- Correct Usage
- The police executed the warrant.
They need to get a warrant from the court.
§ Mistake 4: Not Specifying the Type of "Warrant"
While at the A1 level, the general understanding of "warrant" is often sufficient, as you progress, you'll find there are different types, like a "search warrant" or an "arrest warrant." Omitting this detail when it's relevant can sometimes lead to less precise communication, though it's less of a "mistake" and more of a simplification at the basic level.
- Less Specific
- They had a warrant.
- More Specific
- They had a search warrant.
The police had an arrest warrant for the suspect.
§ Mistake 5: Overlooking the Context
"Warrant" as a noun, in the context of a legal document, is almost exclusively used in legal or crime-related discussions. Using it outside this context can sound very out of place. For instance, you wouldn't say "I need a warrant to buy groceries."
- Incorrect Usage
- My boss gave me a warrant to start the project.
- Correct Usage
- My boss gave me permission to start the project.
By being aware of these common mistakes, you can significantly improve your understanding and usage of "warrant" as a noun at the A1 CEFR level and beyond. Practice using it in sentences related to police and court actions, and pay attention to articles and appropriate verbs.
چقدر رسمی است؟
"The court issued a warrant for his arrest."
"The police needed a permission slip to search the property."
"The cops got the go-ahead to raid the apartment."
"The police had a special paper that let them look in the house."
"They flashed the paper and went inside."
گرامر لازم
Nouns can be singular or plural. 'Warrant' is singular. Its plural form is 'warrants'.
The judge issued a warrant. The police have several warrants to serve.
Nouns can be preceded by articles (a, an, the). 'A warrant' is used when introducing it for the first time or referring to any warrant. 'The warrant' is used when referring to a specific warrant.
A warrant was issued for his arrest. The warrant stated the reason for the search.
Nouns can be followed by prepositions to show relationships. In the definition, 'permission to do something' uses the preposition 'to' with an infinitive verb.
The warrant gives the police permission to search. They received a warrant for his arrest.
Nouns can be modified by adjectives. 'Official' and 'signed' are adjectives describing 'document' in the definition.
It is an official document. A signed warrant is required.
Nouns can act as subjects or objects of a sentence. In the definition, 'A warrant' is the subject of the sentence, and 'someone' is the object of the verb 'arrest'.
A warrant gives permission. The police arrested someone with a warrant.
مثالها بر اساس سطح
The police have a warrant.
The police have permission from a judge.
Simple present tense, 'have' for possession.
They need a warrant to search.
They need official permission to look inside.
Simple present tense, 'need' for necessity, 'to search' is an infinitive.
A judge signs the warrant.
A judge writes his name on the official paper.
Simple present tense, 'signs' for regular action.
The warrant is for an arrest.
The official paper is to catch someone.
Simple present tense, 'is' for existence, 'for an arrest' indicates purpose.
Police show the warrant.
Police present the official document.
Simple present tense, 'show' for action.
We got a warrant today.
We received an official paper today.
Simple past tense, 'got' for completed action.
They had a warrant yesterday.
They possessed an official paper yesterday.
Simple past tense, 'had' for past possession.
Is this a warrant?
Is this an official paper?
Simple present tense, question form with 'is'.
The police had a warrant to search the house.
Los policías tenían una orden para registrar la casa.
Simple past tense, 'had' is the past of 'have'.
The judge signed the warrant for the arrest.
El juez firmó la orden de arresto.
Simple past tense, 'signed' is the past of 'sign'.
They couldn't enter without a warrant.
No pudieron entrar sin una orden.
'Couldn't' is a contraction of 'could not', indicating impossibility.
A search warrant allows them to look for stolen goods.
Una orden de registro les permite buscar bienes robados.
'Allows' is a verb in the simple present tense, third person singular.
You need a warrant to take someone's property.
Necesitas una orden para tomar la propiedad de alguien.
'Need' is a verb in the simple present tense.
The officer showed them the warrant.
El oficial les mostró la orden.
Simple past tense, 'showed' is the past of 'show'.
Do they have a warrant to be here?
¿Tienen una orden para estar aquí?
Simple present tense question with 'do'.
An arrest warrant was issued for the suspect.
Se emitió una orden de arresto para el sospechoso.
Past tense passive voice, 'was issued'.
مترادفها
متضادها
نحوه استفاده
Usage Notes:
1. Legal Context: The word "warrant" almost exclusively appears in a legal context. It's usually associated with police, courts, or other authorities.
2. Common Collocations: You'll often hear or read "search warrant," "arrest warrant," or "warrant for arrest."
3. Verb Form: While the definition focuses on the noun, "warrant" can also be a verb, meaning to justify or guarantee something. For example, "The evidence doesn't warrant an arrest." However, at the A1 level, focus on the noun form.
4. Formal Language: "Warrant" is a formal word. You wouldn't typically use it in casual conversation unless you're specifically discussing legal matters.
Common Mistakes:
1. Confusing with "Warranty": "Warrant" sounds similar to "warranty," but they are very different. A "warranty" is a guarantee on a product or service. A "warrant" is a legal document.
2. Incorrect Context: Using "warrant" in a non-legal context. For example, saying "I need a warrant to buy groceries" is incorrect.
3. Misunderstanding Authority: Thinking that anyone can issue a warrant. It must be a judge or someone in authority.
4. Singular/Plural Confusion: While less common at A1, ensure you use the correct plural form: "warrants."
5. Overuse: As it's a formal and specific term, avoid overusing it in general conversation.
نکات
Visual Association
For 'warrant', imagine a police officer showing an official document. Create a mental image.
Pronunciation Practice
Say 'warrant' aloud several times. Pay attention to the stress and sounds. You can use online dictionaries for audio.
Synonyms and Antonyms
Think of words with similar meanings (e.g., 'permit', 'authorization') or opposite meanings (though 'warrant' might not have a direct antonym for this specific sense). This builds your vocabulary network.
Flashcards
Create a flashcard with 'warrant' on one side and its definition, a sentence, and maybe a small drawing on the other. Review regularly.
Use it in a Sentence
Try to create your own sentence using 'warrant'. For example: 'The police had a warrant to search the suspect's car.'
Break it Down
Sometimes, knowing word parts can help, but for 'warrant', focus on the whole word. Understand its core meaning.
Legal Context
Understand that 'warrant' often appears in legal or police contexts. This helps you anticipate where you might hear or read it. It's a formal term.
Review Regularly
Don't just learn a word once. Come back to it after a few hours, a day, a week. This reinforces memory.
Listen for it
When watching English TV shows or movies, especially crime dramas, try to listen for the word 'warrant'. See if you can identify its use.
سوالات متداول
10 سوالA warrant is like an official permission slip. It's a document signed by a judge or someone in authority, giving the police or other officials the legal right to do something specific, like search a house or arrest a person.
Usually, a judge signs a warrant. It has to be someone in a position of authority who can legally grant such permission.
Police need a warrant to make sure their actions are legal and to protect people's rights. It's a way to ensure that searches or arrests are justified and not done without good reason.
Generally, no, police cannot search your house without a warrant. However, there are some specific situations where they might be able to, like if they have your permission or if there's an emergency.
A search warrant gives police permission to search a specific location for evidence. An arrest warrant gives them permission to arrest a specific person.
If police act without a warrant when one is required, anything they find or do might not be usable in court. This is because it could be considered an illegal search or arrest.
In many places, if police don't have a warrant, you don't have to let them into your home unless there are special circumstances, like an emergency.
Traditionally, yes, warrants were paper documents. However, with technology, some jurisdictions might have digital versions, but it still has to be an official document signed by an authority.
No, a warrant does not mean someone is guilty. It just means there's enough reason to believe that a search or an arrest is necessary to investigate a crime or bring someone to court.
If you see a warrant, you should look for the signature of a judge or authorized person, the date, and what specific action it permits (e.g., searching a particular address, arresting a specific person).
خودت رو بسنج 66 سوال
Listen for 'warrant'.
Listen for 'warrant' and 'judge'.
Listen for 'warrant' and 'arrest'.
این را بلند بخوانید:
The police need a warrant.
تمرکز: war-rant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
I have a warrant.
تمرکز: warrant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
They showed the warrant.
تمرکز: warrant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
Think about what police need to search a house legally.
What official document allows police to arrest someone?
What did 'they' show before entering?
این را بلند بخوانید:
The police officer presented the warrant.
تمرکز: warrant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
Do they have a warrant?
تمرکز: warrant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
A warrant is an important document.
تمرکز: important document
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
Imagine you are a police officer. You need to search a house for a missing item. What is the important document you need to get from a judge first?
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
As a police officer, before I search a house, I need to get a warrant from a judge. This gives me permission to search.
Complete the sentence: The police cannot arrest the suspect without a _________ from the judge.
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
The police cannot arrest the suspect without a warrant from the judge.
Describe in one sentence what a 'warrant' is.
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
A warrant is an official document from a judge that gives police permission to do something.
What 'important paper' did the judge sign?
این متن را بخوانید:
The detective went to the court. He needed to talk to the judge. He explained why he needed to search the old house. The judge listened carefully and then signed the important paper. Now the detective could go and search the house.
What 'important paper' did the judge sign?
The passage describes the detective needing permission from a judge to search a house, which is the definition of a warrant.
The passage describes the detective needing permission from a judge to search a house, which is the definition of a warrant.
What kind of document did the police officer show?
این متن را بخوانید:
A police officer knocked on the door. He showed a document to the man inside. The document said he had permission to look inside the house. The man had to let him in because it was an official paper signed by a judge.
What kind of document did the police officer show?
The passage mentions an official paper signed by a judge that gives permission to look inside a house, which matches the definition of a warrant.
The passage mentions an official paper signed by a judge that gives permission to look inside a house, which matches the definition of a warrant.
Why could the police arrest Sarah's brother?
این متن را بخوانید:
Sarah was worried. The police wanted to ask her brother some questions. Her brother said he would not talk to them without a lawyer. The police said they had a warrant to arrest him. This meant they had official permission.
Why could the police arrest Sarah's brother?
The passage states that the police had a 'warrant to arrest him,' which means they had official permission.
The passage states that the police had a 'warrant to arrest him,' which means they had official permission.
This sentence describes the police having official permission to search.
This sentence indicates a judge giving official permission for an arrest.
This sentence explains that official permission (a warrant) was required before taking evidence.
The police obtained a search ___ to investigate the suspect's home.
A warrant is an official document that grants permission, specifically in a legal context for police actions like searches.
The judge issued an arrest ___ for the individual who failed to appear in court.
An arrest warrant is a legal document issued by a judge that permits the police to arrest someone.
Without a valid ___, the police cannot legally enter your property.
A warrant is a specific legal document required for police to conduct searches or arrests.
The detective presented the search ___ to the homeowner before beginning the investigation.
The word 'warrant' specifically refers to the official legal document.
They were held in custody until a formal ___ could be issued for their arrest.
A warrant is necessary to formalize and legalize an arrest.
The lawyer questioned the legality of the search, claiming the ___ was improperly obtained.
The term 'warrant' refers to the legal document used to authorize a search.
The police obtained a search ______ before entering the suspect's home.
A 'warrant' is the specific legal document that grants permission for a search by authorities.
After reviewing the evidence, the judge issued an arrest ______ for the fugitive.
An 'arrest warrant' is the official document allowing law enforcement to apprehend someone.
Without a valid ______, the officers could not legally impound the vehicle.
A 'warrant' is required for legal actions such as impounding property by authorities.
A warrant typically needs to be signed by a judge or other person in authority.
Warrants are legal documents that require official approval, usually from a judge, to be valid.
A warrant gives the police unlimited power to do whatever they want.
A warrant specifies the scope of permission granted to the police; it does not grant unlimited power.
If police have a warrant, they can always search any property they wish, even if it's not specified.
A warrant is specific and outlines what property can be searched or what action can be taken.
Focus on the legal context.
Consider the implications of an invalid warrant.
Think about the prerequisite for obtaining a warrant.
این را بلند بخوانید:
Articulate the precise legal ramifications of conducting a search without a warrant.
تمرکز: ramifications, conducting, without, warrant
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
Discuss the ethical considerations inherent in the issuance of arrest warrants, particularly in cases involving civil liberties.
تمرکز: ethical, inherent, issuance, civil liberties
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
این را بلند بخوانید:
Explain the procedural steps a law enforcement agency must follow to obtain a legitimate warrant for electronic surveillance.
تمرکز: procedural, legitimate, electronic, surveillance
تو گفتی:
تشخیص گفتار در مرورگر شما پشتیبانی نمیشود. از کروم یا اج استفاده کنید.
Imagine you are a legal expert advising a client. Explain in detail the process of obtaining a search warrant and the specific circumstances under which one might be issued. Discuss the legal protections in place for individuals whose property is subject to a search warrant.
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
Obtaining a search warrant is a meticulous legal process initiated by law enforcement when they have 'probable cause' to believe that evidence of a crime exists in a particular location. An officer must submit a sworn affidavit to a judge, detailing the specific facts and circumstances that establish this probable cause. This affidavit must be precise, identifying the place to be searched and the items to be seized. The judge then reviews this information to determine if a warrant is legally justifiable. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides crucial protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring that warrants are issued only when necessary and that individuals' privacy rights are respected. Exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as 'exigent circumstances' or 'plain view,' are narrowly construed. Due process demands that any search conducted under a warrant adheres strictly to its terms, safeguarding against arbitrary governmental intrusion.
You are a journalist reporting on a controversial case where a prominent figure was arrested without a warrant. Write an opinion piece discussing the legal implications and public perception of such an arrest. Consider arguments for and against the police's actions.
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
The recent warrantless arrest of [Prominent Figure's Name] has ignited a fierce debate regarding police authority and individual liberties. While law enforcement often cites 'exigent circumstances'—situations demanding immediate action to prevent harm or destruction of evidence—as justification for such arrests, the public rightly scrutinizes the absence of a judicial 'warrant'. The Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable seizures is a cornerstone of our legal system, and circumventing it, even in seemingly urgent situations, raises serious questions about 'due process'. From a public perception standpoint, a warrantless arrest can appear arbitrary or even politically motivated, eroding trust in law enforcement. Conversely, proponents argue that in fast-evolving criminal investigations, waiting for a warrant can compromise public safety and allow suspects to evade justice. This incident underscores the delicate balance between effective policing and the fundamental rights of citizens.
Draft an email to a legal aid organization inquiring about your rights if a police officer arrives at your door with a search warrant. What specific information would you want to know and why?
خوب نوشتید! تلاش خوبی بود! پاسخ نمونه را ببینید.
پاسخ نمونه
Subject: Inquiry Regarding Rights During Search Warrant Execution Dear Legal Aid Organization, I am writing to inquire about my rights should a police officer arrive at my residence with a 'search warrant'. I understand the basic premise of a 'warrant', but I'd like to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the legal procedures involved. Specifically, I would appreciate clarification on the following points: 1. What steps should I take to verify the 'validity' of the 'warrant' upon presentation? 2. Am I legally obligated to allow immediate 'entry' if a 'warrant' is presented? 3. What are the limitations on what officers can 'search' and 'seize' once inside, based on the 'scope' of the 'warrant'? 4. Can I request to have an 'attorney' present before the search begins, and what are the implications if I am denied this request? 5. What documentation should I expect to receive after the search, detailing any items 'seized'? Understanding these details is crucial for me to be able to assert my rights effectively and ensure due process is followed. Thank you for your time and guidance. Sincerely, [Your Name]
According to the passage, what is the primary historical function of a warrant in common law jurisdictions?
این متن را بخوانید:
The concept of a 'warrant' is deeply embedded in the jurisprudence of many common law countries, serving as a critical safeguard against arbitrary governmental power. Historically, the issuance of a 'warrant' evolved from the need to ensure that the state's authority to intrude upon an individual's liberty or property was not exercised without just cause and judicial oversight. This principle is particularly evident in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which explicitly requires 'probable cause' for the issuance of warrants, thereby protecting citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The specificity demanded for a 'warrant'—describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized—is a testament to the legal system's commitment to individual rights.
According to the passage, what is the primary historical function of a warrant in common law jurisdictions?
The passage explicitly states, 'Historically, the issuance of a 'warrant' evolved from the need to ensure that the state's authority to intrude upon an individual's liberty or property was not exercised without just cause and judicial oversight.' This directly supports option B.
The passage explicitly states, 'Historically, the issuance of a 'warrant' evolved from the need to ensure that the state's authority to intrude upon an individual's liberty or property was not exercised without just cause and judicial oversight.' This directly supports option B.
Which of the following best describes the unifying principle of different types of 'warrants' as discussed in the passage?
این متن را بخوانید:
In legal discourse, the term 'warrant' can also extend beyond criminal proceedings to encompass other official authorizations. For instance, an 'arrest warrant' mandates the apprehension of an individual, while in finance, a 'stock warrant' gives its holder the right to purchase shares at a specified price before a certain date. Though distinct in their application, these various forms of 'warrants' share a common underlying principle: they represent a formal grant of authority or permission, typically issued by an authorized body or individual, to perform a specific action. The precision and legal backing inherent in any 'warrant' are what imbue it with its official weight and enforceability.
Which of the following best describes the unifying principle of different types of 'warrants' as discussed in the passage?
The passage states, 'Though distinct in their application, these various forms of 'warrants' share a common underlying principle: they represent a formal grant of authority or permission, typically issued by an authorized body or individual, to perform a specific action.' This directly matches option D.
The passage states, 'Though distinct in their application, these various forms of 'warrants' share a common underlying principle: they represent a formal grant of authority or permission, typically issued by an authorized body or individual, to perform a specific action.' This directly matches option D.
What is a common strategy employed by defense attorneys when challenging the legality of evidence obtained via a warrant?
این متن را بخوانید:
The execution of a 'warrant' is not without its complexities and potential for legal challenge. Defense attorneys frequently scrutinize the 'warrant' itself, looking for any procedural irregularities or lack of 'probable cause' in its initial application. They might argue that the 'warrant' was overly broad in its scope, or that the information presented to the judge was inaccurate or incomplete. Furthermore, the manner in which the 'warrant' was executed—for example, if officers exceeded the bounds of the authorized search—can also be grounds for challenging the legality of evidence obtained. Such challenges underscore the importance of precision and adherence to strict legal protocols throughout the entire 'warrant' process.
What is a common strategy employed by defense attorneys when challenging the legality of evidence obtained via a warrant?
The passage states, 'Defense attorneys frequently scrutinize the 'warrant' itself, looking for any procedural irregularities or lack of 'probable cause' in its initial application. They might argue that the 'warrant' was overly broad in its scope, or that the information presented to the judge was inaccurate or incomplete. Furthermore, the manner in which the 'warrant' was executed—for example, if officers exceeded the bounds of the authorized search—can also be grounds for challenging the legality of evidence obtained.' This directly supports option B.
The passage states, 'Defense attorneys frequently scrutinize the 'warrant' itself, looking for any procedural irregularities or lack of 'probable cause' in its initial application. They might argue that the 'warrant' was overly broad in its scope, or that the information presented to the judge was inaccurate or incomplete. Furthermore, the manner in which the 'warrant' was executed—for example, if officers exceeded the bounds of the authorized search—can also be grounds for challenging the legality of evidence obtained.' This directly supports option B.
This sentence describes a common legal action involving a warrant.
This sentence illustrates the use of an arrest warrant.
This sentence shows a situation where a warrant might not be issued.
The detective obtained a search _______ to meticulously scour the suspect's premises for incriminating evidence.
A 'warrant' specifically refers to an official document authorizing an action like a search, often by law enforcement. While other options have similar meanings of official orders, 'warrant' is the precise legal term here.
Despite the compelling circumstantial evidence, the prosecution struggled to secure an arrest _______ without more concrete proof linking the suspect directly to the crime.
An 'arrest warrant' is the official document that permits law enforcement to take someone into custody. The other options are legal documents with different purposes.
The judge ultimately decided against issuing a judicial _______ for the controversial surveillance operation, citing concerns about potential infringements on civil liberties.
In legal contexts, a 'warrant' is the document that grants permission for actions like surveillance or searches. The other terms refer to different types of official statements or laws.
A warrant can only be issued by a jury after a full trial has concluded.
A warrant is typically issued by a judge or magistrate, usually before a trial, to authorize actions such as arrests or searches, not by a jury after a trial.
Possessing a warrant grants law enforcement officers unrestricted authority to act without any legal limitations.
Warrants are specific and delineate the scope of permissible action, such as the location to be searched or the individual to be arrested. They do not grant unrestricted authority.
A warrant serves as a crucial legal safeguard, ensuring that police actions like searches and arrests are conducted under judicial oversight and with probable cause.
The primary function of a warrant is to provide judicial oversight, ensuring that law enforcement operations are justified by probable cause and adhere to legal principles, thus protecting individual rights.
This sentence describes the legal process of a warrant's issuance, a complex concept suitable for C2 level.
This sentence discusses the legal implications of a warrant's absence, requiring understanding of nuanced legal terminology.
This sentence elaborates on the specific actions permitted by a warrant in a modern context, appropriate for C2 learners.
/ 66 درست
نمره کامل!
Context is Key
Always try to learn new words in a sentence or phrase. This helps you understand how the word is used naturally.
Visual Association
For 'warrant', imagine a police officer showing an official document. Create a mental image.
Pronunciation Practice
Say 'warrant' aloud several times. Pay attention to the stress and sounds. You can use online dictionaries for audio.
Synonyms and Antonyms
Think of words with similar meanings (e.g., 'permit', 'authorization') or opposite meanings (though 'warrant' might not have a direct antonym for this specific sense). This builds your vocabulary network.
مثال
The police had a search warrant for the apartment.
محتوای مرتبط
![K-2SO's Hallway Scene [4K HDR] - Star Wars: Andor](https://sublearn.com/storage/thumbnails/Z28he3vNOfA.jpg)
واژههای بیشتر law
bail
A1Bail is a sum of money paid to a court so that a person who has been accused of a crime can stay out of jail until their trial starts. If the person shows up for their court date, the money is usually returned.
bankruptcy
A1یعنی وقتی یه نفر یا یه شرکت نمیتونه پولهایی رو که بده، پرداخت کنه. دادگاه کمک میکنه که این وضعیت رو سر و سامون بدن.
burden of proof
A1یعنی مسئولیت اینکه ثابت کنی چی میگی درسته. هر کی ادعایی داره باید اثباتش کنه.
charge
A1وقتی پلیس یا دادگاه رسماً میگه که یه نفر جرم کرده.
clause
A1بند یا ماده توی یه قرارداد یا سند قانونیه که یه شرط یا قانون خاص رو توضیح میده.
compensation
A1جبران خسارت یعنی پولی که برای جبران یه ضرر، صدمه یا سختی به کسی میدن.
compliance
A1Compliance is the act of following a rule, law, or specific order. It is most often used to describe when a person or a company obeys legal requirements or safety standards.
confidentiality
A1Confidentiality means keeping information secret or private. It is a rule that says you cannot tell other people's secrets to anyone else.
conviction
A1حکم دادگاه که ثابت میکنه کسی گناهکاره، یا یه باور خیلی قلبی و محکم.
copyright
A1این حقیه که بهت اجازه میده روی کاری که ساختی (مثل کتاب یا آهنگ) کنترل داشته باشی. بقیه نمیتونن بدون اجازه کپی کنن یا استفاده کنن.
