B2 · Intermédiaire supérieur Chapitre 19

Citing Sources and Causes

4 Règles totales
40 exemples
5 min
Règles dans ce chapitre Pratique rapide

Chapter in 30 Seconds

Master the art of explaining causes, citing sources, and setting conditions like a native speaker.

  • Distinguish between internal and external causes for negative outcomes.
  • Integrate news and professional reports using proper citation structures.
  • Express conditional dependencies and universal independence in any situation.
Mastering nuance: from causes to conditions.

Ce que tu vas apprendre

Ready to fine-tune your Korean to B2? This chapter is your secret weapon for sounding truly native when you discuss *why* things happen and *who* or *what* is responsible. You’ll master four essential grammar patterns to express cause, blame, external information, and conditional relationships with precision. First, you'll master attributing negative outcomes. Ever want to subtly blame someone or explain an unexpected mishap? We'll show you how to use -탓에 for assigning blame ('Because of you, I was late!') and -바람에 for sudden, unforeseen problems ('Traffic caused me to be late!'). This nuance is key for B2 speakers. Then, learn to cite information like a pro with -에 따르면. This isn't just 'according to,' it's about correctly integrating reports and news, always paired with the right indirect speech ending like -대요. Imagine discussing current events or sharing advice – you'll do it seamlessly. Next, master -에 따라(서), a versatile expression linking changing results to specific variables. Explain how your exam score *depends on* study effort, or how prices *vary according to* the season. Finally, express absolute independence with -ㄴ/은/는 관계없이. Declare something is true *regardless of* age, cost, or any other condition. Say things like, 'No matter the weather, I'm going!' By chapter's end, you'll confidently wield these rules, expressing complex ideas with native-like accuracy. You'll articulate causes, cite sources, and discuss dependencies, truly elevating your Korean. Get ready to impress!

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  1. 1
    By the end you will be able to: Articulate specific causes for negative events using -탓에 and -바람에.
  2. 2
    By the end you will be able to: Synthesize information from external sources using -에 따르면.
  3. 3
    By the end you will be able to: Describe variable results based on changing factors using -에 따라.
  4. 4
    By the end you will be able to: Assert statements that remain true regardless of context using -관계없이.

Guide du chapitre

Overview

Welcome to your next step in mastering B2 Korean grammar! This chapter is meticulously designed to elevate your ability to articulate *why* things happen, *who* or *what* is responsible, and how information is presented in Korean. Moving beyond basic cause-and-effect, you'll delve into nuances that are crucial for sounding truly native and expressing complex ideas with precision.
Understanding these advanced patterns is key to unlocking a higher level of fluency and engaging in sophisticated conversations.
By focusing on specific expressions for cause, blame, external information, and conditional relationships, you'll gain the tools to discuss current events, share opinions based on reports, and explain dependencies like a seasoned speaker. This isn't just about memorizing rules; it's about integrating them into your natural speech to convey subtle meanings. Get ready to refine your Korean grammar and impress with your enhanced communicative abilities.
We'll cover four essential grammar patterns: -탓에, -바람에, -에 따르면, -에 따라(서), and -ㄴ/은/는 관계없이. Each one offers a unique way to connect ideas, attribute outcomes, and structure arguments, pushing your B2 Korean skills to new heights.

How This Grammar Works

Let's dive into the core mechanics of these powerful Korean grammar patterns, each offering a distinct way to express causality, citation, or dependency.
First, for attributing negative outcomes, we have -탓에 and -바람에. -탓에 is used when you want to assign blame or fault for a negative result, often implying a specific person or action is responsible. It carries a stronger negative connotation than a simple because of. For example: 네 탓에 우리가 늦었어. (We were late because of you.) Here, you are directly blamed.
On the other hand, -바람에 is used for sudden, unforeseen negative consequences, typically caused by external circumstances or events beyond one's control. It doesn't imply blame but rather an unfortunate chain of events. For instance: 갑자기 비가 오는 바람에 소풍이 취소됐어요. (The picnic was canceled because it suddenly rained.)
Next, when you need to cite sources or report information professionally, you'll use -에 따르면. This pattern means according to and is essential for integrating news, reports, or official statements. Crucially, it almost always pairs with indirect speech endings like -대요 (short for -다고 해요) or -라고 합니다.
For example: 뉴스에 따르면 내일 날씨가 맑대요. (According to the news, the weather will be clear tomorrow.)
Then, to express how something changes or varies based on a specific factor, we use -에 따라(서). This versatile expression means depending on, according to, or in accordance with. It highlights a relationship where one element's state or outcome is determined by another. You can use either -에 따라 or -에 따라서 interchangeably.
For example: 가격은 계절에 따라 달라져요. (Prices vary according to the season.)
Finally, to express absolute independence from a condition, you'll master -ㄴ/은/는 관계없이. This pattern translates to regardless of or irrespective of, indicating that a certain condition or factor does not influence the outcome. It's perfect for making strong, unconditional statements.
For instance: 나이와 관계없이 누구나 참여할 수 있어요. (Anyone can participate regardless of age.)

Common Mistakes

  1. 1✗ Wrong: 교통체증 탓에 비행기를 놓쳤어요. (I missed the flight because of traffic congestion [blaming traffic].)
✓ Correct: 교통체증 바람에 비행기를 놓쳤어요. (I missed the flight due to traffic congestion [unforeseen circumstance].)
*Explanation:* While -탓에 indicates a cause for a negative outcome, it strongly implies blame or fault, often human. Traffic congestion is an external, unforeseen event, making -바람에 the more natural and appropriate choice to express the negative consequence without assigning blame.
  1. 1✗ Wrong: 기상청에 따르면 «내일은 춥다.» (According to the meteorological agency, Tomorrow is cold.)
✓ Correct: 기상청에 따르면 내일은 춥대요. (According to the meteorological agency, tomorrow is cold.)
*Explanation:* -에 따르면 always requires an indirect speech ending (like -대요, -라고 합니다, -다고 합니다, etc.) to properly integrate the reported information into the sentence. Using direct speech or omitting the indirect speech ending is grammatically incorrect in this context.
  1. 1✗ Wrong: 열심히 공부한 것에 따라 시험에 합격했어요. (I passed the exam according to studying hard.)
✓ Correct: 노력에 따라 결과가 달라져요. (Results vary depending on effort.) / 열심히 공부해서 시험에 합격했어요. (I studied hard, so I passed the exam.)
*Explanation:* -에 따라 indicates a variable relationship or a consequence of a *changing factor*, not a direct cause for a single, completed event. For a direct cause resulting in a specific outcome, simpler conjunctions like -아/어서 or -기 때문에 are more suitable. The wrong example awkwardly implies the passing was *conditional* on studying rather than a direct result.

Real Conversations

A

A

네 탓에 중요한 회의에 늦었잖아! (Because of you, I was late for the important meeting!)
B

B

미안해, 갑자기 차가 고장 나는 바람에 어쩔 수 없었어. (I'm sorry, my car suddenly broke down, so I couldn't help it.)
A

A

새로운 연구 결과에 따르면 커피가 건강에 좋대요. (According to new research, coffee is good for your health.)
B

B

정말요? 그럼 이제 마음 놓고 마셔도 되겠네요. (Really? Then I can drink it without worry now.)
A

A

이용 요금은 사용하는 시간에 따라 달라지나요? (Does the usage fee vary depending on the time you use it?)
B

B

아니요, 시간과 관계없이 한 달에 만 원이에요. (No, regardless of the time, it's 10,000 won per month.)

Quick FAQ

Q

How do -탓에 and -바람에 differ from -때문에 in B2 Korean grammar?

-때문에 is a neutral because of. -탓에 implies blame or fault for a negative outcome. -바람에 suggests an unforeseen, often sudden, negative consequence from external factors.

Q

Can I use -에 따르면 to report my own opinion in Korean?

No, -에 따르면 is strictly for citing external, often objective, sources like news, reports, or official statements, not personal opinions.

Q

Is there a difference between -에 따라 and -에 따라서?

While largely interchangeable, -에 따라서 can sometimes feel slightly more complete or emphatic, but their core meaning and usage for expressing dependency remain the same.

Q

What's a common mistake when using -ㄴ/은/는 관계없이?

A common mistake is trying to attach it to a verb phrase directly without nominalizing it first. Remember to use -는 것 or a noun form before 관계없이. For example, 날씨가 좋은 것과 관계없이 (regardless of the weather being good).

Cultural Context

In Korean communication, the choice between -탓에 and -바람에 subtly reflects how speakers perceive responsibility and express frustration. Using -탓에 can be quite direct and, depending on the context and relationship, might be seen as confrontational. In contrast, -바람에 allows for expressing negative outcomes while subtly deflecting direct blame, often used when explaining unfortunate circumstances.
Citing sources with -에 따르면 is a mark of educated speech and is crucial in formal settings or when conveying verified information, reflecting a value placed on credible sources. These nuances are vital for achieving true B2 Korean fluency and demonstrating cultural awareness.

Exemples clés (8)

1

비가 많이 오는 바람에 축구 경기가 취소됐어요.

À cause de la pluie forte (soudaine), le match de foot a été annulé.

Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에
2

어제 술을 많이 마신 탓에 오늘 머리가 너무 아파요.

Parce que j'ai trop bu hier, j'ai très mal à la tête aujourd'hui.

Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에
3

일기 예보에 따르면 내일은 하루 종일 비가 온대요.

D'après la météo, il paraît qu'il va pleuvoir toute la journée demain.

Selon... / D'après... (-에 따르면)
4

최근 조사 결과에 따르면 한국인의 커피 소비량이 늘었대요.

Selon les résultats d'une enquête récente, la consommation de café des Coréens a augmenté.

Selon... / D'après... (-에 따르면)
5

사람에 따라 성격이 다 달라요.

Les personnalités sont toutes différentes selon les personnes.

Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )
6

날씨에 따라서 옷차림이 바뀌어요.

La façon de s'habiller change selon la météo.

Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )
7

이유에 관계없이 지각은 안 돼요.

Peu importe la raison, les retards ne sont pas autorisés.

Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)
8

날씨에 관계없이 경기는 계속됩니다.

Le match continue peu importe la météo.

Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)

Conseils et astuces (4)

⚠️

Attention à ton ton !

Utiliser trop souvent «-탓에» peut te donner l'air de quelqu'un qui n'assume jamais ses responsabilités. Utilise-le avec parcimonie pour blâmer les autres, comme dans : «너 탓에 우리 팀이 졌잖아!»
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에
🎯

L'obligation du discours indirect

C'est la règle d'or : si tu commences par -에 따르면, tu es 'légalement' obligé d'utiliser une terminaison de citation comme «-대요» ou «-라고 해요». Tu ne peux pas juste finir par un simple «-요» car l'info ne vient pas de toi : «뉴스에 따르면 비가 온대요.»
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon... / D'après... (-에 따르면)
🎯

Le combo gagnant avec '다르다'

Si tu ne sais pas comment finir ta phrase avec -에 따라, termine simplement par «다 달라요» (tout est différent). Ça marche pour presque tout ! Par exemple : «사람에 따라 다 달라요.»
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )
💡

L'astuce de la question

Si tu as du mal à conjuguer un verbe avec ça, pense simplement à la structure 'Mot interrogatif + Terminaison de question'. Par exemple : «누가 하는지에 관계없이».
frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)

Vocabulaire clé (6)

결과 result 뉴스 news 탓 fault 관계 relation 변화 change 보고서 report

Real-World Preview

briefcase

Debriefing a Project

Review Summary

  • Noun + 탓에 / Verb + (으)ㄴ/는 바람에
  • Noun + 에 따르면
  • Noun + 에 따라(서)
  • Noun + (과/와) 관계없이

Erreurs courantes

-탓에 is strictly for negative outcomes. You cannot use it for positive results.

Wrong: 비가 온 탓에 기분이 좋아요.
Correct: 비가 온 탓에 기분이 나빠요.

Use -에 따르면 for citations, not -에 따라서.

Wrong: 뉴스에 따라서 말했어요.
Correct: 뉴스에 따르면 말했어요.

Always include the particle -와/과 before 관계없이.

Wrong: 나이 관계없이 공부해요.
Correct: 나이와 관계없이 공부해요.

Next Steps

You have navigated the complexities of B2 causality! Keep practicing these in your daily conversations to solidify your fluency.

Listen to a Korean news broadcast and identify one citation.

Continue to: Advanced Descriptive Patterns

Pratique rapide (10)

Quelle phrase utilise correctement '-에 따라' ?

Choisis la phrase la plus naturelle :

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 메뉴에 따라 가격이 달라요.
La particule correcte à utiliser avec cette structure est -에.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )

Trouve la partie maladroite de la phrase.

비가 오다 관계없이 축구를 했어.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 비가 오는 것에 관계없이 축구를 했어.
Tu ne peux pas attacher 관계없이 directement à un radical verbal comme 오다. Tu dois le transformer en groupe nominal (오는 것) ou en clause interrogative (오는지).

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)

Trouve et corrige l'erreur.

Find and fix the mistake:

날씨가 추운 바람에 감기에 걸렸어요.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 날씨가 추운 탓에 감기에 걸렸어요.
'-바람에' ne peut pas être utilisé avec des adjectifs comme '춥다'. Utilise '-탓에' à la place.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에

Complète la phrase en utilisant la forme correcte de '-바람에'.

갑자기 사고가 (나다) ___ 길이 많이 막혔어요.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 나는 바람에
'-바람에' utilise uniquement la forme présente '-는', même pour des événements passés.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에

Trouve et corrige l'erreur dans la traduction de 'Selon la tendance'.

유행에 의해서 옷을 샀어요.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 유행에 따라 옷을 샀어요.
-에 의해서 impliquerait que la tendance est l'agent actif, alors que -에 따라 signifie que tu as suivi la tendance comme un standard.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )

Laquelle de ces phrases est naturelle ?

Choisis l'usage correct de '-탓에' ou '-덕분에'.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 선생님 덕분에 시험에 합격했어요.
Réussir un examen est positif, donc tu dois utiliser '덕분에' (grâce à) au lieu de '탓에' (faute).

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Blâmer les autres : -탓에 et -바람에

Quelle terminaison est la plus naturelle avec -에 따르면 ?

일기 예보에 따르면 비가 ___.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 온대요 (on dit qu'il vient)
Quand tu utilises 'Selon', tu cites une info, donc tu dois utiliser les terminaisons de rumeur comme -대요 (court pour -다고 해요).

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon... / D'après... (-에 따르면)

Remplis le vide avec la forme correcte.

상황___ 계획이 바뀔 수도 있어요. (Selon la situation, le plan peut changer.)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 에 따라
-에 따라 est l'expression correcte pour dire 'selon' ou 'en fonction de'.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Selon / En fonction de ( -에 따라 / -에 따라서 )

Remplis le vide pour compléter la phrase.

경험___ 관계없이 누구나 환영합니다. (Tout le monde est bienvenu peu importe l'expérience.)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 에
Quand on connecte un nom directement à 관계없이, on utilise la particule 에.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)

Quelle phrase dit correctement "Peu importe l'heure" ?

Choisis la phrase naturelle :

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 시간에 관계없이
La structure standard est Nom + 에 + 관계없이.

frontend.learn_grammar.from_rule: Indépendamment de / Peu importe (관계없이)

Score: /10

Questions fréquentes (6)

Oui, tout comme en français ! Tu peux dire «너 탓에 너무 행복해» pour plaisanter, mais dans les examens, c'est toujours négatif.
'때문에' est une raison neutre, mais '탓에' est une accusation directe de faute. «탓에» est beaucoup plus fort.
Oui, ils sont presque identiques ! «-에 의하면» sonne juste un peu plus formel ou écrit, comme dans une thèse, alors que «-에 따르면» est utilisé plus largement à l'oral et dans les infos : «뉴스에 의하면...»
Parce que -에 따르면 prépare une citation. Si tu dis
Selon les infos, il pleut
avec une fin directe, on dirait que c'est toi qui confirmes la pluie. Utiliser «-대요» (indirect) confirme que tu ne fais que rapporter ce que tu as entendu : «비가 온대요.»
Oui, mais tu dois les nominaliser. En général, on utilise la structure -느냐에 따라(서). Par exemple : «무엇을 먹느냐에 따라» (Selon ce que tu manges).
Pas vraiment. La politesse dépend de la fin du verbe (ex: -요). Le «서» ajoute juste une petite pause rythmique et sonne un peu plus naturel à l'oral.
Chapitre précédent
Reaching the Limit
Chapitre suivant
Advanced Descriptive Patterns
Retour à la feuille de route