C1 Sentence Structure 21 min read 어려움

시간과 장소를 강조하는 It-Cleft: '...했던 것은 바로 그때/거기였다'

시간과 장소를 강조하는 It-Cleft는 말하고자 하는 바에 «핵심»을 부여하고 «명확성»을 더해줘요.

Grammar Rule in 30 Seconds

Use 'It + be + [Time/Place] + that' to put a linguistic spotlight on exactly when or where something happened.

  • Start with 'It' plus the verb 'to be' in the correct tense. Example: 'It was...'
  • Insert the time or place you want to emphasize. Example: 'It was in Paris...'
  • Connect the rest of the sentence using 'that'. Example: '...that we first met.'
It + 🐝 (be) + ⏰/📍 + 🌉 (that) + 📝 (rest of sentence)

Overview

### Overview
영어를 모국어처럼 구사한다는 것은 단순히 문법적으로 맞는 문장을 만드는 것을 넘어, 대화의 '흐름'과 '초점'을 자유자재로 조절할 수 있음을 의미합니다. C1 레벨의 학습자라면 이제 정보를 중립적으로 전달하는 단계를 지나, 어떤 정보를 강조하고 어떤 정보를 배경으로 밀어낼지 결정하는 전략적 선택을 해야 합니다. 이때 가장 강력한 도구 중 하나가 바로 It-Clefts (it-강조 구문)입니다.
특히 시간(Time)과 장소(Place)를 강조하는 It-Clefts는 문장 내에서 특정 시점이나 장소를 '주인공'으로 만들어주는 역할을 합니다. 단순히 I met him yesterday.라고 말하는 것과 It was yesterday that I met him.이라고 말하는 것은 전달하는 뉘앙스에서 큰 차이가 있습니다. 후자는 듣는 이의 주의를 '어제'라는 시간적 요소에 강력하게 고정시키며, 다른 날이 아닌 바로 '그날'이었음을 명시적으로 드러냅니다.
한국어에서는 이런 강조를 위해 "내가 그를 만난 건 바로 '어제'였어"라며 단어의 순서를 바꾸거나 '바로', '다름 아닌'과 같은 부사를 사용합니다. 영어에서도 이와 유사한 효과를 내기 위해 문장을 두 부분으로 쪼개는(cleft) 구조를 사용하는데, 이를 마스터하면 격식 있는 글쓰기나 설득력 있는 스피치에서 훨씬 더 세련된 표현을 구사할 수 있게 됩니다. 이번 강의에서는 시간과 장소에 특화된 It-Clefts의 구조와 용법, 그리고 한국인 학습자들이 흔히 범하는 실수까지 심도 있게 다루어 보겠습니다.
### How This Grammar Works
It-Cleft 구문의 핵심은 '분열(Cleft)'에 있습니다. 원래 하나의 절(clause)이었던 문장을 두 개의 부분으로 쪼개어, 강조하고자 하는 요소를 It is/wasthat 사이의 명당자리로 옮기는 것입니다.
한국어와 비교해 볼까요? 한국어는 조사가 발달한 언어입니다. «강남역에서 친구를 만났다»라는 문장에서 장소를 강조하고 싶다면 "친구를 만난 건 '강남역에서'였다"라고 하거나, 단순히 강조하고 싶은 단어 뒤에 조사나 보조사를 붙여 강조합니다. 반면, 영어는 어순이 고정된 언어이기 때문에 강조를 위해서는 문장 구조 자체를 재배치해야 합니다.
이 구조에서 It은 아무런 의미가 없는 '가주어(Dummy Subject)' 혹은 '형식상의 주어' 역할을 합니다. 날씨를 말할 때의 It is raining에서의 it과 비슷하게, 문법적 틀을 유지하기 위해 그 자리에 있을 뿐입니다. 그 뒤에 오는 be 동사는 강조하는 내용의 시제를 결정하며, 강조하려는 시간이나 장소 표현이 그 뒤를 따릅니다. 마지막으로 that, when, where 등으로 시작하는 관계절이 나머지 정보를 보충하며 문장을 완성합니다.
이 구조가 작동하는 방식의 핵심은 정보의 전경화(Foregrounding)입니다. 문장의 맨 앞에 It was...를 배치함으로써 청자에게 «지금부터 아주 중요한 정보를 줄 테니 집중해!»라는 신호를 보내는 것입니다. 이는 특히 비즈니스 미팅에서 마감 기한을 명확히 하거나, 역사적 사실을 서술할 때, 혹은 누군가의 오해를 바로잡을 때 매우 유용하게 쓰입니다.
### Formation Pattern
It-Clefts for Time and Place를 만드는 공식은 명확합니다. 하지만 C1 레벨에서는 단순히 공식을 외우는 것을 넘어, 각 구성 요소의 세밀한 변화를 이해해야 합니다.
기본 공식:
It + be (am/is/are/was/were) + [강조할 시간/장소] + that/when/where + [나머지 문장]
  1. 1It (The Dummy Subject): 항상 단수형 It을 사용합니다. 강조하는 대상이 복수형(예: the 1990s)이라 하더라도 주어는 언제나 It입니다.
  2. 2be 동사의 시제: 강조 구문의 시제는 원래 문장의 시제와 일치해야 합니다.
  • I finished the report on Monday.It was on Monday that I finished the report.
  • We are meeting at the cafe.It is at the cafe that we are meeting.
  1. 1강조 요소 (The Focused Constituent): 시간 부사구(on Friday, in 2023), 장소 부사구(in the lobby, at the headquarters), 혹은 시간/장소 부사(then, there)가 올 수 있습니다.
  2. 2연결어 (The Relative-like Clause): that은 만능입니다. 시간과 장소 모두에 쓸 수 있습니다. 하지만 더 구체적으로는 시간일 때 when, 장소일 때 where를 쓰기도 합니다.
| 문장 성분 | 시간 강조 예시 | 장소 강조 예시 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Intro | It was | It is |
| Focus | in 2010 | in this very room |
| Linker | that (or when) | that (or where) |
| Rest | the company was founded. | the contract will be signed. |
주의할 점: 강조하고자 하는 요소가 전치사구(in the office)인 경우, 전치사를 포함하여 통째로 옮기는 것이 원칙입니다. It was the office where I left my keys.라고 하면 '사물'로서의 사무실을 강조하는 느낌이 강해지지만, It was in the office that I left my keys.라고 하면 '장소'라는 맥락이 훨씬 선명해집니다.
### When To Use It
이 문법을 언제 사용하느냐는 '스타일'과 '전략'의 문제입니다. 단순히 사실을 나열하는 것이 아니라, 다음과 같은 상황에서 빛을 발합니다.
1. 대조 및 수정 (Contrast and Correction)
누군가 잘못된 정보를 알고 있을 때 이를 정중하지만 단호하게 바로잡기 위해 사용합니다. 한국어의 «~가 아니라 ...야»에 해당합니다.
  • A: I heard the conference is in Tokyo.
  • B: No, it is in Seoul that the conference is being held. (도쿄가 아니라 바로 '서울'이라는 점을 강조)
2. 특정 시점이나 장소의 중요성 부각 (Highlighting Significance)
어떤 사건이 일어난 시점이나 장소가 그 사건의 성격에 결정적인 영향을 미쳤을 때 사용합니다.
  • It was only after the financial crisis that the government implemented these regulations. (단순히 규제를 시행했다는 사실보다, '금융 위기 이후에야 비로소' 했다는 시간적 선후 관계를 강조)
  • It was at the university cafe where they first discussed their startup idea. (그들의 사업 아이디어가 시작된 '상징적인 장소'를 강조)
3. 서사적 효과와 긴장감 조성 (Narrative Flair)
이야기를 들려줄 때 독자의 주의를 집중시키기 위해 사용합니다. 소설이나 격식 있는 에세이에서 자주 볼 수 있습니다.
  • It was then that she realized she had made a grave mistake. (그녀가 실수를 깨달은 바로 '그 순간'의 긴박함을 강조)
4. 새로운 정보 도입 (Introducing New Information)
글의 흐름상 새로운 단락을 시작하거나 중요한 전환점을 언급할 때 유용합니다.
  • It is in the field of biotechnology where we see the most rapid growth today. (오늘날 가장 성장이 빠른 분야가 바로 '바이오테크'임을 선언적으로 제시)
### Common Mistakes
한국인 학습자들은 한국어의 논리 구조를 영어에 그대로 투영하려다 보니 다음과 같은 실수를 자주 범합니다.
1. 관계대명사 which의 오용
장소를 강조할 때 wherethat 대신 which를 쓰는 경우가 많습니다.
  • 잘못된 예: It was in the library which I found the book. (X)
  • 옳은 예: It was in the library that/where I found the book. (O)
  • 이유: 강조 구문의 뒷부분은 관계절의 성격을 띠지만, 강조되는 대상이 전치사구(in the library)라면 장소 부사 역할을 하므로 which는 올 수 없습니다.
2. 시제 불일치 (Tense Mismatch)
강조하는 내용이 과거의 일인데 It is를 쓰거나, 현재의 일인데 It was를 쓰는 실수입니다.
  • 잘못된 예: It is in 1950 that the war broke out. (X)
  • 옳은 예: It was in 1950 that the war broke out. (O)
  • 이유: 한국어에서는
    전쟁이 일어난 건 1950년이다
    처럼 현재형을 써도 어색하지 않은 경우가 있지만, 영어에서는 주절의 be 동사와 종속절의 시제를 엄격하게 일치시켜야 합니다.
3. 강조 요소에서 전치사 누락
한국어 조사는 생략되는 경우가 많아 영어에서도 전치사를 빼먹곤 합니다.
  • 잘못된 예: It was Friday that the deadline expired. (X - 단순히 날짜를 명사로 볼 수도 있지만, '금요일에'라는 부사적 의미라면 on이 필요함)
  • 옳은 예: It was on Friday that the deadline expired. (O)
  • 이유: 원래 문장이 The deadline expired on Friday.이므로, on Friday 전체가 강조 위치로 이동해야 합니다.
### Contrast With Similar Patterns
It-Clefts와 유사한 다른 강조 구조들을 비교해 보면 이 문법의 독특한 위치를 더 잘 이해할 수 있습니다.
| 구조 | 예시 | 강조의 특징 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Standard SVO | I met him there. | 중립적, 평범한 정보 전달 |
| It-Cleft | It was there that I met him. | 특정 정보(장소)를 분리하여 강력하게 노출 |
| Wh-Cleft | Where I met him was there. | '어디서 만났는지'라는 질문에 대한 답을 뒤로 밀어 강조 (초점이 뒤에 있음) |
| Inversion (도치) | There I met him. | 문학적, 격식 있는 느낌. 장소를 문두에 두어 시각적 효과 극대화 |
It-Cleft vs. Wh-Cleft:
It-Cleft는 강조하고 싶은 내용을 문장의 앞부분(It was [Focus]...)에 배치하여 즉각적인 주의를 끄는 반면, Wh-Cleft (Pseudo-cleft)는 The place where I met him was... 처럼 강조할 내용을 문장 끝으로 보내 정보를 지연시킴으로써 궁금증을 유발하는 효과가 있습니다.
It-Cleft vs. Fronting (전치):
Yesterday I saw her. 처럼 단순히 단어를 앞으로 보내는 '전치'는 It-Cleft보다 강조의 강도가 훨씬 약합니다. It-Cleft는 문장 구조를 완전히 재편하기 때문에 훨씬 더 명시적이고 의도적인 강조로 느껴집니다.
### Quick FAQ
Q1: that 대신 when이나 where를 써도 항상 똑같나요?
A: 문법적으로는 that이 가장 표준적이고 안전한 선택입니다. 특히 격식 있는 글쓰기에서는 that을 선호합니다. 하지만 현대 구어체나 부드러운 문체에서는 시간일 때 when, 장소일 때 where를 쓰는 것이 더 자연스럽게 들릴 때가 많습니다. 다만, It was then that... 처럼 관용적으로 that과 결합하는 표현들도 있으니 문맥에 따라 선택하세요.
Q2: 강조 구문에서 It is/was를 생략할 수 있나요?
A: 매우 비격식적인 대화에서는 Was yesterday I saw her. 처럼 It을 생략하는 경우가 드물게 있지만, C1 레벨의 학습자라면 생략하지 않는 것이 원칙입니다. It은 이 구조를 지탱하는 문법적 뼈대이기 때문입니다.
Q3: 시간이나 장소 말고 '사람'이나 '사물'도 이 구조로 강조할 수 있나요?
A: 네, 가능합니다! It was John who/that called you. 처럼 주어나 목적어도 강조할 수 있습니다. 다만 이번 강의에서 다룬 시간과 장소의 It-Cleft는 부사구(Adverbial phrase)를 강조한다는 점에서 문장 구조가 약간 더 복잡하게 느껴질 수 있으니 전치사 활용에 유의해야 합니다.
Q4: 너무 자주 쓰면 문장이 지저분해 보이지 않을까요?
A: 아주 좋은 질문입니다! It-Cleft는 양념과 같습니다. 모든 문장을 강조 구문으로 쓰면 글의 리듬이 깨지고 오히려 무엇이 중요한지 알 수 없게 됩니다. 정말로 대조가 필요하거나, 오해를 바로잡아야 하거나, 서사적인 전환점이 필요할 때만 전략적으로 사용하세요. 세련된 영어의 핵심은 '절제된 강조'에 있습니다.

Tense Variations of the It-Cleft

Tense It + Be Focus (Time/Place) Connector Clause
Present Simple
It is
in the city
that
he works.
Past Simple
It was
in 1995
that
they met.
Present Perfect
It has been
since May
that
we've waited.
Future
It will be
at the gala
that
she'll perform.
Past Negative
It wasn't
until then
that
I knew.
Past Question
Was it
in Rome
that
it happened?

Contractions in Clefts

Full Form Contraction Usage Note
It is
It's
Common in speech/informal writing
It was
N/A
Rarely contracted in standard English
It is not
It isn't / It's not
Standard negative contractions
It was not
It wasn't
Standard past negative contraction

Meanings

A construction used to focus on a specific piece of information (the focus) by placing it in a separate clause starting with 'It is' or 'It was'.

1

Temporal Emphasis

Highlighting a specific moment or period in time to show its significance to the event.

“It was in 1969 that man first walked on the moon.”

“It is only now that we are seeing the results of the policy.”

2

Locative Emphasis

Focusing on a specific location to contrast it with other possible places.

“It was in this very room that the treaty was signed.”

“It is in the heart of the city that the most vibrant markets are found.”

3

Corrective Focus

Using the cleft structure to explicitly correct a previous statement about time or place.

“No, it was on Tuesday that I sent the email, not Wednesday.”

“It wasn't in London that they stayed, but in a small village nearby.”

Reference Table

Reference table for 시간과 장소를 강조하는 It-Cleft: '...했던 것은 바로 그때/거기였다'
구조 강조 요소 예시 원래 문장
It + be + TIME + that...
시간
It was *yesterday* that I saw him.
I saw him yesterday.
It + be + PLACE + that...
장소
It was *in the park* that we met.
We met in the park.
It + be + TIME + when...
시간 (대안)
It was *in 2022* when she graduated.
She graduated in 2022.
It + be + PLACE + where...
장소 (대안)
It was *at the cafe* where they first spoke.
They first spoke at the cafe.
It + be + PREP PHRASE + that...
복합 시간/장소
It was *after midnight* that he arrived.
He arrived after midnight.
It + be + ADVERB + that...
단순 시간/장소
It was *then* that I understood.
I understood then.
It + be + TIME CLAUSE + that...
특정 시점
It was *before the game started* that we left.
We left before the game started.

격식 수준 스펙트럼

격식체
It was in the boardroom that the executive committee convened.

It was in the boardroom that the executive committee convened. (Professional meeting)

중립
It was in the boardroom that we had the meeting.

It was in the boardroom that we had the meeting. (Professional meeting)

비격식체
It was in the boardroom that we met up.

It was in the boardroom that we met up. (Professional meeting)

속어
It was in the boardroom where it all went down.

It was in the boardroom where it all went down. (Professional meeting)

시간과 장소를 강조하는 It-Cleft

It-Cleft (시간/장소)

구조

  • It is/was 고정된 시작
  • Emphasized Phrase 시간 또는 장소
  • that/when/where 접속사
  • Rest of Clause 나머지 내용

용법

  • Correction 잘못된 정보 정정
  • Emphasis 핵심 내용 강조
  • Storytelling 극적인 이야기
  • Clarification 모호함 제거

예시

  • It was yesterday... 시간 강조
  • It was in the lab... 장소 강조
  • It's now... 현재 시간 강조

It-Cleft와 단순 문장 비교

단순 문장
I met her at the cafe. 사실 진술
The event happened last night. 직접적이고 중립적
We found the answer in the book. 표준 순서
It-Cleft (시간/장소)
It was at the cafe that I met her. 장소 강조
It was last night that the event happened. 시점 강조
It was in the book that we found the answer. 출처 강조

It-Cleft 만들기 (시간/장소)

1

특정 시간이나 장소를 강조하고 싶으신가요?

YES
계속 진행
NO
다른 강조 구조 (예: 기본 It-Cleft, Wh-Cleft) 사용
2

원래 문장의 주요 행동은 과거인가요, 현재인가요?

YES
'It was' (과거) 또는 'It is' (현재) 사용
NO
해당 없음 (시제 선택)
3

강조하고 싶은 정확한 시간 또는 장소 구문을 식별하세요.

YES
'It is/was' 바로 뒤에 배치
NO
강조 다시 평가
4

강조된 구문이 시간 (예: 'yesterday', 'in 2023')인가요?

YES
'that' 또는 'when' 추가
NO
계속 진행 (장소 강조)
5

강조된 구문이 장소 (예: 'in the park', 'here')인가요?

YES
'that' 또는 'where' 추가
NO
해당 없음 (시간 강조)
6

강조된 시간/장소를 제외하고 원래 절의 나머지를 구성하세요.

YES
모든 부분을 결합하세요!
NO
문장 구조 검토

It-Cleft 사용 시점 (시간/장소)

정정할 때

  • 잘못된 날짜/시간
  • 잘못된 장소
📖

스토리텔링

  • 결정적인 순간
  • 중요한 배경
💡

명확히 할 때

  • 모호한 정보
  • 새로운 세부 사항
🎭

극적 효과 추가

  • 갑작스러운 깨달음
  • 예기치 않은 사건

수준별 예문

1

It is here that I work.

It is here that I work.

2

It was then that he left.

It was then that he left.

3

It is in the box that the toy is.

It is in the box that the toy is.

4

It was at 5:00 that we ate.

It was at 5:00 that we ate.

1

It was in Paris that they met.

It was in Paris that they met.

2

It wasn't at home that I saw her.

It wasn't at home that I saw her.

3

Was it on Monday that you called?

Was it on Monday that you called?

4

It was in the garden that we played.

It was in the garden that we played.

1

It was only after the rain that we went out.

It was only after the rain that we went out.

2

It is in this office that the decisions are made.

It is in this office that the decisions are made.

3

It was during the summer that I learned to swim.

It was during the summer that I learned to swim.

4

It wasn't until midnight that the party started.

It wasn't until midnight that the party started.

1

It was in the 1920s that the building was constructed.

It was in the 1920s that the building was constructed.

2

It is primarily in rural areas that the problem exists.

It is primarily in rural areas that the problem exists.

3

It was only when I saw the photo that I remembered him.

It was only when I saw the photo that I remembered him.

4

It was through this door that the thief entered.

It was through this door that the thief entered.

1

It was against this backdrop of economic instability that the revolution began.

It was against this backdrop of economic instability that the revolution began.

2

It is in the nuances of the language that the true meaning is found.

It is in the nuances of the language that the true meaning is found.

3

It was not until the final chapter that the mystery was solved.

It was not until the final chapter that the mystery was solved.

4

It was there, amidst the ruins, that they found the ancient scroll.

It was there, amidst the ruins, that they found the ancient scroll.

1

It was only upon the cessation of hostilities that reconstruction could commence.

It was only upon the cessation of hostilities that reconstruction could commence.

2

It is within the intersection of technology and ethics that our greatest challenges lie.

It is within the intersection of technology and ethics that our greatest challenges lie.

3

It was then, and only then, that the gravity of his error became apparent.

It was then, and only then, that the gravity of his error became apparent.

4

It is in the very fabric of our society that these prejudices are woven.

It is in the very fabric of our society that these prejudices are woven.

혼동하기 쉬운

It-Clefts for Time and Place: 'It was then that...' Wh-Clefts

Learners often use 'What' when they should use 'It' to focus on a specific time/place.

It-Clefts for Time and Place: 'It was then that...' There is/are

Confusing the existential 'There' with the dummy 'It'.

자주 하는 실수

Is here that I live.

It is here that I live.

You must include the 'It' as a subject.

It was in 1990 when I was born.

It was in 1990 that I was born.

While 'when' is used in speech, 'that' is the standard cleft connector.

It is in London that I met him.

It was in London that I met him.

The tense of 'be' must match the time of the event (past).

It was because of the rain that caused the delay.

It was the rain that caused the delay. / It was because of the rain that the delay happened.

Avoid 'double subjects' or redundant phrasing within the cleft.

문장 패턴

It was in ___ that I first ___.

It was only after ___ that I realized ___.

It is within ___ that the true ___ lies.

Real World Usage

Job Interview common

It was during my time at Google that I developed these skills.

Texting a Friend occasional

It was only when I got home that I saw your message!

Academic Essay very common

It was in the 19th century that industrialization transformed the city.

Police Report common

It was at approximately 10 PM that the witness heard the noise.

Travel Blog common

It is in the hidden alleys of Kyoto that you find the best tea.

Social Media occasional

It was here that it all started! #memories

💡

원래 문장 파악하기

It-Cleft를 만들려면, 먼저 말하려는 내용을 간단한 주어-동사-목적어 구조로 생각해 보세요. 그리고 강조하고 싶은 시간이나 장소를 쏙 뽑아내서 It-Cleft 구문을 만들면 돼요.
The concert was held in the main hall.
⚠️

남용은 금물!

강력한 표현이지만, It-Cleft를 너무 자주 쓰면 글이나 말이 부자연스럽거나 반복적으로 들릴 수 있어요. 특정 시간이나 장소를 정말 강조하고 싶을 때만 아껴서 사용해 주세요.
I really want to emphasize this point.
🎯

어떤 접속사를 쓸까요?

that은 언제나 무난하게 쓸 수 있는 접속사예요. 하지만 시간을 강조할 때는 when이, 장소를 강조할 때는 where가 더 자연스럽게 들릴 때가 많아요. 좀 더 정확한 접속사를 쓰면 문장이 훨씬 매끄러워져요.
It was last night when he called.
🌍

미묘함 vs. 직접적임

영어를 모국어로 쓰는 사람들은 특히 Zoom 회의나 대학 토론 같은 공식적인 자리에서, 대놓고 반대하지 않으면서도 정보를 은근히 수정하거나 명확히 하려고 It-Cleft를 자주 사용해요. '사실 이 부분이 중요해요!'라고 정중하게 말하는 방법인 거죠.
It was the third point that we agreed on.
💡

질문으로 연습하기

'When did you...?' 또는 'Where did you...?' 같은 질문에 대답할 때 It-Cleft를 사용해 보세요. 그러면 자연스럽게 시간이나 장소를 강조하는 연습이 될 거예요. 예를 들어,
When did you go?
라는 질문에
It was last week that I went.
라고 대답하는 것처럼요.

Smart Tips

Use the negative it-cleft followed by the positive one for maximum clarity.

No, I moved in 2010, not 2011. It wasn't in 2011, but in 2010 that I moved.

Use an it-cleft to define the scope of your research.

This paper discusses the 18th century. It is within the context of the 18th century that this paper operates.

Try 'clefting' your time or place adjuncts to add variety to your rhythm.

The accident happened here. It was here that the accident happened.

Place these words immediately after 'is/was' for the strongest effect.

I realized it only then. It was only then that I realized it.

발음

It was in LONdon that I met him.

Stress on the Focus

The word or phrase immediately following 'It is/was' receives the strongest sentence stress.

/ðət/

Weak 'that'

The word 'that' is usually reduced to a schwa sound /ðət/.

Rise-Fall on Focus

It was in ↗PARis ↘that we met.

Conveys certainty and emphasis on the location.

암기하기

기억법

IT is the spotlight, BE is the stand, THAT is the bridge to the rest of the land.

시각적 연상

Imagine a dark stage where a single spotlight (the 'It was') shines on a clock (Time) or a map (Place). Everything else on stage is in the dark until the word 'that' connects them.

Rhyme

If you want to show where or when, start with 'It was' and use 'that' then.

Story

A detective is interrogating a suspect. The suspect says 'I was at home.' The detective slams the table and says, 'No! It was AT THE BANK that you were seen!' The 'It was' makes the detective's point much stronger.

Word Web

EmphasisFocusInformation PackagingDummy SubjectRelative ClauseContrast

챌린지

Look at your calendar. Pick three events from last week and rewrite them as it-clefts. (e.g., 'It was on Tuesday that I went to the gym.')

문화 노트

It-clefts are very common in British academic prose to maintain an objective but focused tone.

In US political rhetoric, it-clefts are used to create 'soundbites' that emphasize specific values or locations.

Hiberno-English often uses cleft-like structures more frequently than other dialects for everyday emphasis.

Clefting has been a feature of English since the Old English period, though it became much more structured in Middle English.

대화 시작하기

Was it in your hometown that you had your first job?

Was it only recently that you decided to master English?

In which decade was it that your country saw the most change?

일기 주제

Describe a life-changing moment. Use at least three it-clefts to emphasize when and where it happened.
Write a short historical summary of a city you love. Focus on key dates using cleft sentences.

자주 하는 실수

Incorrect

정답


Incorrect

정답


Incorrect

정답


Incorrect

정답

Test Yourself

`It-Cleft`를 완성하는 올바른 단어를 고르세요.

It was in the park ___ we first met.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: that
that은 가장 다재다능한 접속사이며, 장소를 강조한 후 나머지 절을 도입하는 데 완벽하게 작동합니다.
문장의 오류를 찾아 고치세요. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

It is last night that the concert was.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was last night that the concert was.
원래 문장은 과거 사건(last night, was)에 is를 잘못 사용했어요. It-Cleftbe 동사는 that 절에서 설명된 사건의 시제와 일치해야 합니다.
단어들을 배열하여 올바른 `It-Cleft`를 만드세요. Sentence Reorder

Arrange the words in the correct order:

All words placed

Click words above to build the sentence

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was after the meeting that we left
올바른 순서는 It + be + 강조된 시간 + that + 나머지 절 패턴을 따릅니다: It was after the meeting that we left.

Score: /3

연습 문제

8 exercises
Complete the cleft sentence focusing on the time.

I graduated in 2015. -> It was in 2015 ___ I graduated.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: that
'That' is the standard relative pronoun for it-clefts.
Select the grammatically correct sentence. 객관식

Which sentence correctly emphasizes the location?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was in London that I was born.
Requires 'It', 'was' (past tense), and 'that'.
Find the mistake in the sentence. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

It is in 1945 that the war ended.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: is
Since the war ended in the past, we must use 'was'.
Transform the sentence into an it-cleft focusing on the underlined part: 'We first met *at a concert*.' Sentence Transformation

We first met at a concert.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was at a concert that we first met.
This correctly uses the it-cleft structure for a past event.
Is the following statement true or false? True False Rule

In formal writing, 'that' is preferred over 'where' in it-clefts for place.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: True
'That' is the standard formal relative pronoun for all it-clefts.
Choose the best response to emphasize the correction. Dialogue Completion

Person A: 'I heard you're moving to Spain in July.' Person B: 'Actually, ___'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: it is in August that I'm moving.
Uses present tense 'is' for a future/planned event and emphasizes the correct month.
Which of these is a correctly formed it-cleft for place? Grammar Sorting

Identify the correct structure.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was in the park that I lost my keys.
Follows the It + Be + Focus + That pattern perfectly.
Reorder the words: [that / it / in / was / 2020 / we / started] Sentence Building

Reorder the words to form a cleft sentence.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was in 2020 that we started
Standard it-cleft word order.

Score: /8

Practice Bank

12 exercises
장소를 강조하는 `It-Cleft`를 완성하세요. 빈칸 채우기

It was at the cafe ___ I saw her reading your book.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: that
시간을 강조하는 `It-Cleft`를 완성하세요. 빈칸 채우기

It was on her birthday ___ he proposed.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: that
문장의 오류를 찾아 고치세요. Error Correction

It were a Sunday that they arrived.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was a Sunday that they arrived.
오류를 찾아 고치세요. Error Correction

It's next week when the deadline is gone.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It's next week that the deadline is.
`It-Cleft`를 사용하여 시간을 강조하는 올바른 문장은 무엇인가요? 객관식

올바른 문장을 고르세요:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was in 1999 that the company was founded.
`It-Cleft`를 사용하여 장소를 강조하는 올바른 문장은 무엇인가요? 객관식

올바른 문장을 고르세요:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It's at the corner where the new shop is opening.
`It-Cleft`를 사용하여 시간을 강조하는 올바른 영어 문장을 입력하세요. 번역

영어로 번역하세요: 'Foi só depois da palestra que ela fez a pergunta.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["It was only after the lecture that she asked the question."]
`It-Cleft`를 사용하여 장소를 강조하는 올바른 영어 문장을 입력하세요. 번역

영어로 번역하세요: 'É no jardim que as crianças brincam.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["It is in the garden that the children play.","It's in the garden that the children play.","It is in the garden where the children play.","It's in the garden where the children play."]
단어들을 배열하여 올바른 `It-Cleft`를 만드세요. Sentence Reorder

이 단어들을 문장으로 배열하세요:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was at the airport that they said goodbye
단어들을 재배열하여 문법적으로 올바른 `It-Cleft`를 만드세요. Sentence Reorder

이 단어들을 문법적으로 올바른 `It-Cleft`로 재배열하세요.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: It was then that I finally realized my mistake
`It-Cleft`의 시작 부분과 올바르게 강조된 구문을 짝지으세요. Match Pairs

절들을 짝지으세요:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: matched
간단한 문장을 시간 또는 장소를 강조하는 `It-Cleft`와 짝지으세요. Match Pairs

문장들을 짝지으세요:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: matched

Score: /12

자주 묻는 질문 (8)

Yes, in informal speech it is very common to hear `It was then when...`. However, in formal writing and exams, `that` is the preferred and safer choice.

You can use any tense of the verb `to be`. For example, `It has been in this house that we've raised our children` or `It will be at the meeting that we decide`.

An it-cleft starts with `It` (e.g., 'It was John who...'), while a pseudo-cleft (or Wh-cleft) starts with a Wh-word (e.g., 'What I need is...'). It-clefts are better for focusing on specific nouns/times/places.

Absolutely. `It wasn't in London that we met` is a very common way to correct someone's assumption.

Because the word `it` doesn't refer to anything specific (like a cat or a book). It is just a grammatical placeholder to allow the sentence to function.

No, it can be a long phrase. `It was only after three years of intensive research and many failures that the cure was found.`

Yes, especially when we want to be emphatic or when we are correcting someone. It adds a clear 'beat' to the sentence that draws attention.

Yes, for people, `who` is very common and accepted even in formal English. `It was Sarah who told me.`

Scaffolded Practice

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

Mastery Progress

Needs Practice

Improving

Strong

Mastered

In Other Languages

Spanish high

Fue entonces cuando / Es allí donde

English requires the dummy 'It', whereas Spanish starts with the verb 'Fue/Es'.

French high

C'est... que

French uses this structure much more frequently in everyday speech than English does.

German moderate

Es war... dass

German word order is more flexible, making clefts less 'necessary' for focus.

Japanese low

...no wa ... da

The structure is reversed: [Action] no wa [Time/Place] da.

Arabic low

Innama / Word order

Arabic lacks a 'dummy subject' equivalent to the English 'It'.

Chinese moderate

Shi... de (是...的)

The 'de' comes at the very end of the sentence, unlike the English 'that' which acts as a bridge.

Learning Path

Prerequisites

Was this helpful?
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째로 생각을 공유하세요!