B2 Advanced Grammar 9 min read Medium

Formal 'Namely' Logic (-ㄴ/은/는 즉)

Use -ㄴ/은/는 즉 to provide a formal, logical definition or clarification of a previous statement.

Grammar Rule in 30 Seconds

Use '즉' to clarify or rename a previous concept with a more precise term.

  • Use '즉' to introduce a synonym: '그는 나의 스승, 즉 나의 멘토이다.'
  • Use it to summarize: '상황이 악화되었다, 즉 더 이상 기다릴 수 없다.'
  • Always place it between the two clauses or noun phrases being equated.
Concept A + 즉 (namely) + Concept B (Clarification)

Overview

Korean grammar pattern -ㄴ/은/는 즉 (romanized: -(n/eun/neun) jeuk) serves as a highly formal and authoritative connective, establishing a direct logical relationship between a preceding clause and a subsequent explanation, definition, or unavoidable consequence. Derived from the Hanja character (즉), meaning 'immediately,' 'that is,' or 'namely,' this pattern imbues statements with a sense of definitive truth and logical inevitability. It signals that the second clause is not merely a result or a reason, but rather the essential nature, inherent meaning, or precise logical deduction of the first.

This is crucial for distinguishing it from other causal connectives.

Unlike the subjective reasoning of -니까 or the simple cause-and-effect of -아서/어서, -ㄴ/은/는 즉 operates on a more objective and definitional plane. It's employed when the speaker or writer intends to present information as an established fact, a clear definition, or an indisputable implication. Consequently, its usage is almost exclusively confined to formal discourse: academic papers, legal documents, official reports, and high-level speeches.

Employing it effectively demonstrates a mastery of formal Korean rhetorical structures, allowing for the precise articulation of complex logical arguments. Consider it the linguistic equivalent of stating, "Given A, it is B," or "A, by its very nature, implies B."

How This Grammar Works

At its core, -ㄴ/은/는 즉 functions as a subordinating conjunctive ending, linking two clauses in a manner that asserts the second clause as an inherent truth or direct, necessary outcome of the first. The initial clause (-ㄴ/은/는) establishes a premise – a condition, a fact, or an observation. The subsequent clause, introduced by , then provides the definitive explanation, clarification, or logical conclusion that naturally and inevitably follows from that premise.
This structure guides the listener or reader towards a specific, unambiguous interpretation of the relationship between the two pieces of information.
The pattern emphasizes that the relationship is not arbitrary or merely correlational, but rather causal by definition or logical necessity. For instance, if you state 이것은 본질적인 문제인 즉, 해결이 시급합니다. (This is an essential problem, namely, its resolution is urgent.), you are not merely offering a reason for urgency. You are asserting that being an essential problem inherently means it requires urgent resolution; the urgency is part of its definition as an essential problem.
This makes -ㄴ/은/는 즉 a powerful tool for structuring arguments where premises lead directly to conclusions that are presented as self-evident or universally accepted within a given formal context. The pattern essentially proclaims, "The reality of the first clause is, by its very essence, manifest in the second clause." This deepens the argumentative weight beyond simple causation, moving into the realm of logical identity and definitional consequence.
Consider another example: 정확한 정보는 성공적인 분석의 기반인 즉, 데이터 수집에 만전을 기해야 합니다. (Accurate information is the basis of successful analysis, namely, we must thoroughly ensure data collection.) Here, the second clause (데이터 수집에 만전을 기해야 합니다.) isn't just a separate action prompted by the first. It's presented as an inherent and unavoidable action stemming from the definitive statement that accurate information is the basis of successful analysis. This grammatical construct compels the listener to accept the direct logical flow.

Formation Pattern

1
The formation of -ㄴ/은/는 즉 varies depending on whether it attaches to a verb, an adjective, or a noun, and also considers the final consonant or vowel of the stem. It primarily occurs in the present tense, reflecting its use in stating present facts, definitions, or logical deductions.
2
1. Verbs (동사) – Present Tense:
3
For all verbs, regardless of whether the stem ends in a consonant or a vowel, attach -는 즉.
4
Example:
5
하다 (to do) → 하는 즉 (ha-neun jeuk): Namely, doing / That is to say, doing
6
먹다 (to eat) → 먹는 즉 (meok-neun jeuk): Namely, eating / That is to say, eating
7
읽다 (to read) → 읽는 즉 (ik-neun jeuk): Namely, reading / That is to say, reading
8
2. Adjectives (형용사) – Present Tense:
9
The attachment for adjectives depends on the final sound of the adjective stem.
10
Vowel Ending: If the adjective stem ends in a vowel, attach -ㄴ 즉.
11
Example:
12
크다 (to be big) → 큰 즉 (keun jeuk): Namely, being big / That is to say, being big
13
바쁘다 (to be busy) → 바쁜 즉 (ba-ppeun jeuk): Namely, being busy / That is to say, being busy
14
Consonant Ending: If the adjective stem ends in a consonant, attach -은 즉.
15
Example:
16
작다 (to be small) → 작은 즉 (jag-eun jeuk): Namely, being small / That is to say, being small
17
좋다 (to be good) → 좋은 즉 (jo-eun jeuk): Namely, being good / That is to say, being good
18
ㅂ Irregular Adjectives: For adjectives ending in that follow the irregular conjugation rule (where changes to or before a vowel), the changes to before -즉.
19
Example:
20
아름답다 (to be beautiful) → 아름다운 즉 (a-reum-da-un jeuk): Namely, being beautiful / That is to say, being beautiful
21
춥다 (to be cold) → 추운 즉 (chu-un jeuk): Namely, being cold / That is to say, being cold
22
3. Nouns (명사):
23
For nouns, you attach -인 즉. This is essentially the copula 이다 (to be) conjugated into the -ㄴ 즉 form (이다 + -ㄴ 즉인 즉).
24
Example:
25
사실 (fact) → 사실인 즉 (sa-sil-in jeuk): Namely, being a fact / That is to say, being a fact
26
학생 (student) → 학생인 즉 (hak-saeng-in jeuk): Namely, being a student / That is to say, being a student
27
전문가 (expert) → 전문가인 즉 (jeon-mun-ga-in jeuk): Namely, being an expert / That is to say, being an expert
28
4. Past Tense (Verbs/Adjectives):
29
While less common due to the pattern's emphasis on inherent or present logical truths, -ㄴ/은/는 즉 can be used with past tense verbs and adjectives by attaching -았/었는 즉. This forms a logical consequence based on a completed action or state.
30
Example:
31
마쳤다 (finished) → 마쳤는 즉 (ma-chyeot-neun jeuk): Namely, having finished / That is to say, having finished
32
끝났다 (ended) → 끝났는 즉 (kkeut-nat-neun jeuk): Namely, having ended / That is to say, having ended
33
좋았다 (was good) → 좋았는 즉 (jo-at-neun jeuk): Namely, having been good / That is to say, having been good
34
Conjugation Summary Table:
35
| Category | Stem Ending | Pattern | Example (합니다체) | Romanization | Translation |
36
| :-------------- | :------------- | :--------------- | :---------------------- | :----------------------- | :----------------------------- |
37
| Verbs | All | -는 즉 | 조사하는 즉, ... | jo-sa-ha-neun jeuk | Namely, investigating, ... |
38
| | | | 분석하는 즉, ... | bun-seok-ha-neun jeuk | Namely, analyzing, ... |
39
| Adjectives | Vowel | -ㄴ 즉 | 정확한 즉, ... | jeong-hwak-an jeuk | Namely, being accurate, ... |
40
| | Consonant | -은 즉 | 필요한 즉, ... | pil-yo-han jeuk | Namely, being necessary, ... |
41
| | ㅂ Irregular | -운 즉 | 아름다운 즉, ... | a-reum-da-un jeuk | Namely, being beautiful, ... |
42
| Nouns | All | -인 즉 | 원칙인 즉, ... | won-chi-g-in jeuk | Namely, being a principle, ... |
43
| | | | 사실인 즉, ... | sa-sil-in jeuk | Namely, being a fact, ... |
44
| Past Tense | Verbs/Adjectives | -았/었는 즉 | 완료되었는 즉, ... | wan-lyo-doe-eot-neun jeuk | Namely, having been completed, ... |

When To Use It

-ㄴ/은/는 즉 is a stylistic choice that significantly elevates the formality and authoritative tone of your communication. Its proper application is crucial for conveying precise logical relationships in contexts demanding rigor and clarity. You should integrate this pattern when your objective is to articulate an undeniable truth, a foundational definition, or a consequence that logically and necessarily springs from a stated premise.
1. Academic and Research Contexts:
This pattern is ubiquitous in academic writing, research papers, and formal presentations. It helps to structure arguments by presenting hypotheses, methodologies, or findings as direct logical antecedents to conclusions or implications.
  • 본 연구는 최신 통계 자료에 기반한 즉, 객관성을 확보하고 있습니다. (This research is based on the latest statistical data, namely, it secures objectivity.) - Here, the objectivity is presented as a direct, inherent quality derived from its basis on recent statistics.
2. Legal and Official Documents:
In legal contracts, government proclamations, and formal reports, precision is paramount. -ㄴ/은/는 즉 is invaluable for defining terms, stating conditions, and outlining the legal or administrative ramifications of certain actions or states.
  • 본 조항은 계약의 핵심 내용인 즉, 어떠한 변경도 당사자 간의 합의를 요합니다. (This clause is the core content of the contract, namely, any alteration requires agreement between the parties.) - The requirement for agreement is a direct and necessary consequence of the clause's fundamental nature.
3. Formal Speeches and Debates:
When delivering formal speeches, participating in debates, or engaging in serious discussions, -ㄴ/은/는 즉 lends weight and gravitas to your statements. It frames your points as logical deductions rather than mere opinions, enhancing persuasiveness.
  • 우리의 목표는 국민의 삶의 질 향상인 즉, 이에 대한 최우선 정책을 추진해야 합니다. (Our goal is the improvement of the citizens' quality of life, namely, we must pursue policies of utmost priority regarding this.) - The need for priority policies is presented as an inherent duty stemming from the defined goal.
4. Defining and Clarifying Concepts:
When introducing or elaborating on complex concepts, -ㄴ/은/는 즉 allows for clear, concise definitions, ensuring the audience understands the precise meaning or scope.
  • 인공지능은 학습하는 지능인 즉, 지속적인 데이터 입력이 필수적입니다. (Artificial intelligence is a learning intelligence, namely, continuous data input is essential.) - The necessity of data input is a direct implication of AI's definitional characteristic as a 'learning intelligence.'
5. Stating Inherent Qualities or Universal Truths:
Use it when articulating principles, axioms, or observations that are considered universally true or fundamentally characteristic of a subject.
  • 시간은 되돌릴 수 없는 자원인 즉, 효율적인 관리가 중요합니다. (Time is an irreversible resource, namely, efficient management is important.) - The importance of efficient management is an inherent consequence of time's nature as an irreversible resource.

Common Mistakes

Understanding where not to use -ㄴ/은/는 즉 is as important as knowing when to use it, given its strong formal register and specific logical function. Misapplication can lead to awkward, unnatural, or even incomprehensible communication.
1. Using in Informal Contexts:
This is by far the most prevalent error among learners. -ㄴ/은/는 즉 is highly formal and carries significant gravitas. Using it in casual conversation, texting, or informal emails will sound incredibly stiff, pedantic, or even sarcastic to a native speaker. Imagine saying, "I'm hungry, namely, let's eat" in English. It's jarring. For everyday reasons or simple explanations, opt for patterns like -아서/어서, -니까, -기 때문에, or -(으)면.
  • Incorrect (too formal): 배고픈 즉 밥 먹자. (baego-peun jeuk bap meok-ja. - Namely, I'm hungry, let's eat.)
  • Correct (casual): 배고프니까 밥 먹자. (baego-peu-ni-kka bap meok-ja. - Because I'm hungry, let's eat.)
2. Confusing with the Adverb :
The standalone adverb also means 'namely' or 'that is,' and is used to rephrase or clarify a preceding statement. However, it functions as an independent adverb, often appearing between sentences or noun phrases, rather than as a connective ending attached to a clause.
  • (adverb): 그는 유명한 가수이다. 즉, 아이돌 그룹의 멤버이다. (He is a famous singer. Namely, he is a member of an idol group.)
  • -ㄴ/은/는 즉 (connective): 그는 유명한 가수인 즉, 콘서트 표가 금방 매진될 것입니다. (He is a famous singer, namely, concert tickets will be sold out quickly.) - Here, being a famous singer directly implies the quick sell-out of tickets.
While both convey 'namely,' the connective -ㄴ/은/는 즉 creates a tighter, more integral logical link between the clauses.
3. Incorrect Noun Conjugation:
Learners sometimes mistakenly attach directly to a noun without the copula . Remember, for nouns, the correct form is always -인 즉.
  • Incorrect: 학생 즉, 공부를 해야 한다. (Student namely, must study.)
  • Correct: 학생인 즉, 공부를 해야 한다. (hak-saeng-in jeuk, gong-bu-reul hae-ya han-da. - Being a student, namely, one must study.)
4. Overuse or Misinterpreting the Logical Relationship:
Due to its strong emphasis on logical necessity, using -ㄴ/은/는 즉 too frequently or for relationships that are not strictly definitional or inevitable can make your writing sound forced or bombastic. Reserve it for crucial logical pivots where you want to highlight an undeniable truth or direct consequence. It's not a generic

Usage Structure

Structure Part A Connector Part B
Noun + 즉 + Noun
선생님
멘토
Clause + 즉 + Clause
그는 바쁘다
만날 수 없다

Meanings

A formal conjunction used to equate two concepts, where the second clarifies or defines the first.

1

Clarification

Providing a more precise term for a previously mentioned idea.

“그것은 불가능하다, 즉 할 수 없다.”

“그는 나의 은인, 즉 생명의 구원자이다.”

Reference Table

Reference table for Formal 'Namely' Logic (-ㄴ/은/는 즉)
Form Structure Example
Affirmative
A, 즉 B
그는 천재, 즉 똑똑하다.
Clarification
A, 즉 B
이것은 사과, 즉 과일이다.
Summary
A, 즉 B
상황이 나쁘다, 즉 위험하다.
Formal
A, 즉 B
이것은 법, 즉 규칙이다.
Noun-Noun
A, 즉 B
나의 친구, 즉 동료.
Clause-Clause
A, 즉 B
그는 떠났다, 즉 끝났다.

Formality Spectrum

Formal
그는 나의 스승, 즉 멘토이다.

그는 나의 스승, 즉 멘토이다. (Professional introduction)

Neutral
그는 제 스승, 즉 멘토예요.

그는 제 스승, 즉 멘토예요. (Professional introduction)

Informal
그는 내 스승, 즉 멘토야.

그는 내 스승, 즉 멘토야. (Professional introduction)

Slang
N/A

N/A (Professional introduction)

The '즉' Bridge

Function

  • 정의 Definition
  • 요약 Summary

Examples by Level

1

이것은 사과, 즉 과일이다.

This is an apple, namely a fruit.

2

그는 나의 친구, 즉 동료다.

He is my friend, namely a colleague.

3

이것은 책, 즉 지식이다.

This is a book, namely knowledge.

4

그것은 끝, 즉 종료다.

That is the end, namely the finish.

1

그는 천재, 즉 아주 똑똑한 사람이다.

He is a genius, namely a very smart person.

2

이것은 규칙, 즉 법이다.

This is a rule, namely a law.

3

그녀는 리더, 즉 팀장이다.

She is the leader, namely the team manager.

4

이것은 기회, 즉 찬스다.

This is an opportunity, namely a chance.

1

상황이 심각하다, 즉 대책이 필요하다.

The situation is serious, namely, a countermeasure is needed.

2

그는 나의 스승, 즉 멘토이다.

He is my teacher, namely my mentor.

3

우리는 같은 목표, 즉 성공을 원한다.

We want the same goal, namely success.

4

이것은 필수, 즉 꼭 해야 하는 일이다.

This is essential, namely a must-do task.

1

그는 정직하다, 즉 거짓말을 하지 않는다.

He is honest, namely he does not lie.

2

이것은 비효율적이다, 즉 시간 낭비다.

This is inefficient, namely a waste of time.

3

그는 나의 파트너, 즉 동업자이다.

He is my partner, namely a business associate.

4

이것은 중대한 결정, 즉 인생의 전환점이다.

This is a major decision, namely a turning point in life.

1

그의 태도는 오만하다, 즉 타인을 존중하지 않는다.

His attitude is arrogant, namely he does not respect others.

2

이 정책은 실패했다, 즉 수정이 불가피하다.

This policy failed, namely revision is inevitable.

3

그것은 모순이다, 즉 앞뒤가 맞지 않는다.

That is a contradiction, namely it does not add up.

4

이것은 예술, 즉 감정의 표현이다.

This is art, namely an expression of emotion.

1

본질적으로 그는 이기적이다, 즉 자신의 이익만을 추구한다.

Essentially he is selfish, namely he pursues only his own interests.

2

이 법안은 위헌이다, 즉 법적 효력이 없다.

This bill is unconstitutional, namely it has no legal effect.

3

그의 말은 은유다, 즉 문자 그대로의 의미가 아니다.

His words are a metaphor, namely not to be taken literally.

4

이것은 공생, 즉 서로 돕는 관계이다.

This is symbiosis, namely a mutually helpful relationship.

Easily Confused

Formal 'Namely' Logic (-ㄴ/은/는 즉) vs 그러니까

Both connect sentences.

Common Mistakes

나는 배고프다 즉 밥을 먹는다

나는 배가 고프다, 즉 식사가 필요하다.

Logic error: eating is not the definition of hunger.

그는 친절하다 즉 그는 좋다

그는 친절하다, 즉 좋은 사람이다.

Needs a noun phrase for the definition.

비가 온다 즉 우산을 썼다

비가 온다, 즉 날씨가 궂다.

Confusing cause with definition.

그는 늦었다 즉 그는 미안하다

그는 늦었다, 즉 지각했다.

Definition must be precise.

Sentence Patterns

___, 즉 ___.

Real World Usage

Academic Paper constant

이론, 즉 가설을 검증한다.

Business Meeting common

목표, 즉 매출 증대를 달성합시다.

News Report common

사건, 즉 범죄 현장을 조사 중이다.

Speech common

우리의 의지, 즉 결단력이 필요하다.

Legal Document constant

본 조항, 즉 제1조를 준수하라.

Textbook common

이것은 명사, 즉 이름이다.

💡

Keep it formal

Never use '즉' with friends. It will sound like you are reading a textbook.

Smart Tips

Use '즉' to define technical terms.

이것은 효율적이다. 이것은 생산성이 높다는 뜻이다. 이것은 효율적이다, 즉 생산성이 높다.

Pronunciation

jeuk

Pronunciation

Pronounced as [즉].

Pause

A, [pause] 즉, B.

The pause emphasizes the clarification.

Memorize It

Mnemonic

Think of '즉' as 'Jeuk' sounds like 'Juke' (as in 'Juke box' playing the same song in a different style).

Visual Association

Imagine a person holding a sign that says 'A' and then flipping it to reveal 'B'.

Rhyme

Use '즉' to make it clear, the same meaning, just a different gear.

Story

A professor is lecturing. He says 'This is a cat.' He pauses. He adds '즉, a feline.' The students nod.

Word Web

정의요약동의어설명명확화

Challenge

Write 3 sentences using '즉' to define your hobbies.

Cultural Notes

Used heavily in thesis writing to define terms.

Derived from the Hanja character 卽 (to approach/namely).

Conversation Starters

당신의 직업은 무엇인가요? 즉, 어떤 일을 하시나요?

Journal Prompts

Describe your favorite hobby using '즉'.

Common Mistakes

Incorrect

Correct


Incorrect

Correct


Incorrect

Correct


Incorrect

Correct

Test Yourself

Fill in the blank with '즉'.

그는 나의 스승 ___ 나의 멘토이다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer:
Used for definition.
Which sentence is correct? Multiple Choice

Choose the correct usage.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 밥을 먹었다, 즉 배가 부르다.
Definition must be logical.
Fix the sentence. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

그는 천재다, 그러니까 아주 똑똑하다. (Use 즉)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 천재다, 즉 아주 똑똑하다.
Use '즉' for definition.
Reorder the words. Sentence Building

나의 / 즉 / 친구 / 동료 / 이다

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 나의 친구, 즉 동료이다.
Correct order.
Match the term to its definition. Match Pairs

Match each item on the left with its pair on the right:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 스승, 즉 멘토
Synonym match.
Fill in the blank.

이것은 기회, ___ 찬스다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer:
Definition.
Which is formal? Multiple Choice

Which sentence is appropriate for a report?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 천재, 즉 똑똑한 사람이다.
Formal register.
Fix the error. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

그는 나의 적, 즉 친구이다. (Fix the logic)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 나의 적, 즉 원수이다.
Logical equivalence.

Score: /8

Practice Exercises

8 exercises
Fill in the blank with '즉'.

그는 나의 스승 ___ 나의 멘토이다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer:
Used for definition.
Which sentence is correct? Multiple Choice

Choose the correct usage.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 밥을 먹었다, 즉 배가 부르다.
Definition must be logical.
Fix the sentence. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

그는 천재다, 그러니까 아주 똑똑하다. (Use 즉)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 천재다, 즉 아주 똑똑하다.
Use '즉' for definition.
Reorder the words. Sentence Building

나의 / 즉 / 친구 / 동료 / 이다

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 나의 친구, 즉 동료이다.
Correct order.
Match the term to its definition. Match Pairs

Match: '스승' with its definition.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 스승, 즉 멘토
Synonym match.
Fill in the blank.

이것은 기회, ___ 찬스다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer:
Definition.
Which is formal? Multiple Choice

Which sentence is appropriate for a report?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 천재, 즉 똑똑한 사람이다.
Formal register.
Fix the error. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

그는 나의 적, 즉 친구이다. (Fix the logic)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 그는 나의 적, 즉 원수이다.
Logical equivalence.

Score: /8

Practice Bank

10 exercises
Complete the sentence: '문제가 복잡___ (be complex), 해결 시간이 필요합니다.' Fill in the Blank

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 한 즉
Reorder to make a formal logical statement. Sentence Reorder

즉 / 결과인 / 실패는 / 부족의 / 노력

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 실패는 노력 부족의 결과인 즉
Translate to Korean using '-ㄴ/은/는 즉': 'Since he is a student, namely, he must study.' Translation

그가 학생___, 공부를 해야 한다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 인 즉
Fix the casual usage in this formal context. Error Correction

시간이 없으니까 회의를 시작합시다. (Make it sound like a CEO)

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 시간이 없는 즉 회의를 시작합시다.
Match the starting phrase with the '-ㄴ/은/는 즉' logical ending. Match Pairs

Match these pairs:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 진실-인 즉, 가다-는 즉, 멀다-ㄴ 즉, 적다-은 즉
Which is the correct past tense usage? Multiple Choice

How do you say 'Since I already ate' formally?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 먹었는 즉
Fill in: '그가 범인___ (culprit), 체포해야 합니다.' Fill in the Blank

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 인 즉
Pick the sentence that defines a concept. Multiple Choice

Define 'Freedom' formally:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 자유인 즉, 책임을 지는 것이다.
Fix the adjective ending: '높은 즉슨 (being high)' Error Correction

건물이 높은 즉슨...

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 높은 즉슨 (Correct as is)
Translate: 'The result is, namely, a success.' Translation

결과인 즉, 성공입니다.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: 결과인 즉, 성공입니다.

Score: /10

FAQ (8)

No, it is too formal. Use '즉' only in writing or formal speaking.

No, it is a conjunction.

No, it is invariant.

Yes, but it is rare.

'즉, 다시 말해' is just a longer, more emphatic version.

Only in formal speeches or lectures.

No, use '그러니까' for that.

It is a Sino-Korean word (Hanja).

Scaffolded Practice

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

Mastery Progress

Needs Practice

Improving

Strong

Mastered

In Other Languages

Spanish high

es decir

None.

French high

c'est-à-dire

None.

German high

d.h. (das heißt)

None.

Japanese high

すなわち

None.

Chinese high

None.

Arabic high

أي

None.

Learning Path

Prerequisites

Was this helpful?

Comments (0)

Login to Comment
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!