B1 Prepositions 13 min read ふつう

前置詞で終わる文:誰といるの?

前置詞が文の最後にあるのは、けっして変じゃないですよ。「dangling」な前置詞を恐れないで!現代英語では「natural」で、これが「modern English」の話し方なんです。

Grammar Rule in 30 Seconds

In modern English, it is perfectly natural and often preferred to place a preposition at the very end of a sentence or question.

  • Use it in questions: 'Who are you talking to?' instead of 'To whom are you talking?'
  • Use it in relative clauses: 'The person I work with' is more natural than 'The person with whom I work.'
  • Keep it for phrasal verbs: 'What are you looking for?' cannot be changed to 'For what are you looking?'
Wh-word + Auxiliary + Subject + Verb + 🔚 Preposition

Overview

英語の先生に嘘をつかれたような気がしたことある?たぶん、「文末を前置詞で終わらせてはいけない」って言われたんじゃないかな。実はそのルール、ただの迷信なんだ。英語をラテン語のようにしようとした人たちが作ったルールなんだよ。でも英語はラテン語じゃないよね。現実の世界では、僕たちはしょっちゅう文末を前置詞で終わらせているんだ。もし To whom are you speaking? なんて言ったら、19世紀の亡霊みたいに聞こえちゃうよ。Who are you talking to? と言えば、普通の人間らしく聞こえる。これを「preposition stranding(前置詞の残留)」と呼ぶんだ。これが、自然でリラックスした響きにするための秘密だよ。ネイティブスピーカーは、ほぼすべての会話でこれを使っている。テキストメッセージやゲーム、友達と遊ぶときには完璧だね。文法警察に脅かされて使わないなんてことのないようにね。あのウィンストン・チャーチルでさえ、「文末に前置詞はダメ」というルールがいかに馬鹿げているか冗談を言っていたくらいだ。彼はそのルールのことを up with which I will not put (我慢ならないルールだ)と言ったとされているよ。どれだけぎこちなく聞こえるかわかるでしょ?前置詞を後ろに残すバージョン(stranded version)を使い続けよう。その方が脳にとっても処理しやすいからね。

How This Grammar Works

towithforat のような前置詞は、通常名詞の前に置かれます。フォーマルな書き言葉では、それらはその位置にとどまる。でもカジュアルな英語では、その名詞を前に移動させるんだ。そして前置詞を一番後ろに「取り残された(stranded)」状態にする。これは主に4つの特定の状況で起こるよ。第一に、Wh- 疑問文。第二に、thatwho を使った関係詞節。第三に、受動態の文。最後に、不定詞句の中だね。複雑に聞こえるかもしれないけど、たぶん君はもうやっているはずだよ。What are you looking at? という質問を考えてみて。at という単語が最後に残されているよね。後ろに続く名詞とはつながっていない。この構造にすることで、最も重要な情報を最初に持ってくることができるんだ。そうすると、文のバランスが良くなって、パンチが効いた感じになる。冗談のオチを最後に持ってくるようなものかな。ただし、前置詞は冗談じゃなくてアンカー(錨)の役割を果たしているんだけどね。まあ、前置詞についての冗談を言っているなら話は別だけど。その場合は、続けてどうぞ。

Formation Pattern

1
こういう文を作るのは、実はとても論理的なんだ。プロのように前置詞を文末に残すには、次の3つのシンプルなステップに従ってみて。
2
動詞とそれに必要な前置詞を特定する。例えば、wait for
3
目的語(人や物)を文頭に移動させる。WhoWhat のような疑問詞を使ってね。
4
前置詞は動詞の後ろの元の位置にそのままにしておく。
5
Who are you waiting for? で試してみよう。for が最後にちょこんと座っているのがわかる?友達である名詞が前に移動しちゃったから、それを待っているんだね。関係詞節では、関係代名詞を省略することさえできるよ。The movie that I was talking aboutThe movie I was talking about になる。効率的で速いよね。ちゃんと機能している時の5G回線みたいにね。

When To Use It

日常生活の95%でこのパターンを使うといいよ。これはカジュアルなコミュニケーションにおけるゴールドスタンダードだから。WhatsAppのグループチャットでメッセージを送るときに使おう。YouTube動画にコメントを残すときにも使おう。チームとのZoom会議でも最良の選択だね。ほとんどのビジネスメールでさえ、前置詞で終わっても大丈夫。自信があって現代的だという印象を与えるからね。もし正式な学術論文を書いているなら、ちょっと考え直した方がいいかも。でもブログ記事や旅行のVlogなら?この「Stranding」は君の親友になるよ。台本が、まるで生身の人間が話しているように聞こえるようになるんだ。動画のナレーションを想像してみて。「This is the view I’ve been dreaming of!(これが夢にまで見た景色だ!)」。「This is the view of which I have been dreaming」と言うよりずっといい響きでしょ。前者は旅行者みたいだけど、後者は教科書みたいだ。教科書になっちゃダメだよ。

Common Mistakes

最もよくある間違いは「二重前置詞」だね。これは緊張して、両方の場所に前置詞を置いてしまう時に起こるんだ。To who are you talking to? なんていうのが典型的な間違い。場所は一つに決めて、そこにとどまろう!もう一つの間違いは、動詞に対して間違った前置詞を選んでしまうこと。前置詞はまだ動詞とつながっていることを忘れないで。動詞が depend on なら、文末の前置詞は on でなければならない。Who does it depend of? は間違いだよ。動詞が前置詞を必要としない場合は、使っちゃダメだ。Where are you? の最後に at を付ける人もいる。Where are you at? は一部の方言では一般的だけど、多くの場合は余計だね。シンプルにいこう。あと、句動詞にも気をつけて。give upbreak down のような言葉は、実際には stranding ではないんだ。それらは単に動詞の一部だからね。もし What did you give up?up を落としたら、意味が完全に変わってしまう。自分の 'up' をなくさないでね!

Contrast With Similar Patterns

「Front-Shifting(前置詞の移動)」パターンと「Stranding(前置詞の残留)」を比べてみよう。Front-shiftingは堅苦しいお兄さんみたいなものだ。With whom did you go? はFront-shiftingされている。前置詞が代名詞と一緒に前に移動しているね。Who did you go with? はstranded(残留)だ。Front-shiftingは who の代わりに必ず whom を必要とする。カフェで whom なんて使う人はいないよ。無視されたいなら別だけど。Strandingは whowhatwhichwhere で使える。関係代名詞の that でも使えるよ。of that I was thinking とは決して言えない。that I was thinking of と言わなきゃいけないんだ。この点で、Strandingはその堅苦しい相棒(Front-shifting)よりも柔軟なんだ。窮屈なスーツと着心地の良いパーカーを比べるようなものだね。どちらにも出番はあるけど、パーカーを着ることの方がずっと多いはず。ロイヤルウェディングに出席するのでなければね。その場合は、スーツと whom を探した方がいいかも。

Quick FAQ

Q

面接でこれを使っても本当に大丈夫?

もちろん!その方が自然で話しやすい人だと思われるよ。

Q

どんな前置詞でも文末に残していいの?

ほとんどは大丈夫。Toforwithatfromabout が最も一般的だね。

Q

duringsince はどう?

それらが文末に残されることはめったにないね。Which hour was it during? はとても奇妙に聞こえる。普通に使おう。

Q

Strandingの時は whom を使う必要がある?

いや!who を使って。Who are you looking for? が標準だよ。

Q

これはアメリカ英語だけ?

ううん。イギリス人、オーストラリア人、カナダ人も使うよ。これは世界的な英語の習慣なんだ。

3. Question Structure with Stranded Prepositions

Question Word Auxiliary Subject Verb Preposition
Who
are
you
talking
to?
What
is
she
looking
at?
Where
did
they
come
from?
Which
do
you
agree
with?
Who
have
you
worked
for?

Common Conversational Short Forms

Full Question Short Form Context
Who are you with?
Who with?
Casual texting
What is it for?
What for?
Asking for a reason
Where are you from?
Where from?
Quick inquiry

Meanings

The practice of leaving a preposition at the end of a clause or sentence when its object (the noun it relates to) has moved to the beginning.

1

Interrogative Stranding

Placing the preposition at the end of a question starting with 'Who', 'What', 'Which', or 'Where'.

“Who are you going with?”

“What is this for?”

2

Relative Clause Stranding

Placing the preposition at the end of a relative clause, especially when using 'that' or omitting the relative pronoun entirely.

“This is the book I was talking about.”

“She is the friend that I traveled with.”

3

Passive Voice Stranding

When a verb + preposition combination is turned into the passive voice, the preposition remains attached to the verb at the end.

“He likes to be listened to.”

“The bed hasn't been slept in.”

4

Infinitive Stranding

Using a preposition at the end of an infinitive phrase (to + verb).

“I need a chair to sit on.”

“She has no one to talk to.”

Reference Table

Reference table for 前置詞で終わる文:誰といるの?
状況 自然な例 フォーマルな言い換え なぜ機能するのか
質問
Who are you talking to?
To whom are you talking?
前置詞の目的語('who')が文頭に移動したため。
関係節
That's the project I'm working on.
That's the project on which I'm working.
目的語('project')が省略されているか、文頭に移動したため。
受動態
The problem needs to be dealt with.
The problem requires dealing.
前置詞が受動態の句動詞の一部であるため。
句動詞
What did you come up with?
What did you devise?
前置詞が動詞の意味に不可欠なため。
日常会話
This is the app I was looking for.
This is the app for which I was looking.
より自然で堅苦しくない響きになるため。
カジュアルなチャット
Which movie are you thinking about?
About which movie are you thinking?
カジュアルな会話や文章で一般的であるため。

フォーマル度スペクトル

フォーマル
To whom were you speaking?

To whom were you speaking? (Social interaction)

ニュートラル
Who were you speaking to?

Who were you speaking to? (Social interaction)

カジュアル
Who were you talking to?

Who were you talking to? (Social interaction)

スラング
Who you talkin' to?

Who you talkin' to? (Social interaction)

文末に前置詞が来る場合

文末の前置詞

一般的なシナリオ

  • 質問 Who are you waiting for?
  • 関係節 That's the book I was talking about.
  • 受動態 The issue was dealt with.
  • 句動詞 What did you come up with?

なぜそうなるのか

  • 目的語の移動 The object of the preposition moves to the sentence start.
  • 句動詞 Preposition is integral to the verb's meaning.
  • 自然な流れ Avoids awkward, overly formal phrasing.

避けるべき時(フォーマル)

  • 学術論文 Formal reports, papers.
  • 法律文書 Official, precise language.
  • 特定のフォーマルな句 To whom, about which.

インフォーマル vs. フォーマルな前置詞の配置

インフォーマル/自然 (前置詞が文末)
質問 Who are you talking to?
関係節 That's the app I was looking for.
受動態 He was well looked after.
句動詞 What did you come up with?
文脈 日常会話、テキスト、ソーシャルメディア。
フォーマル (前置詞が目的語の前)
質問 To whom are you talking?
関係節 That's the app for which I was looking.
受動態 (しばしば言い換えられるか、直接的な同等物がない)
句動詞 (句動詞はめったにフォーマルではない)
文脈 学術論文、法律文書、公式スピーチ。

文末に前置詞を置くべきか?

1

非常にフォーマルな文脈ですか(学術論文、法律文書など)?

YES
前置詞を目的語の前に移動させて言い換えを検討してください(例:「To whom」)。
NO
次のステップに進みます。
2

前置詞は句動詞の一部ですか(例:「look for」、「deal with」)?

YES
はい、前置詞で文を終わらせます。それは自然で正しいです。
NO
次のステップに進みます。
3

その文章は、前置詞の目的語が文頭に移動した疑問文または関係節ですか?

YES
はい、前置詞で文を終わらせます。それが最も自然な方法です。
NO
前置詞が必要かどうか、または文の構造が正しいかどうかを再評価してください。

文末の前置詞:クイックチェック

よくある質問

  • Who with?
  • What about?
  • Which one for?
  • Where from?
🗣️

句動詞

  • Look for
  • Talk about
  • Deal with
  • Come up with
🔗

関係節

  • The person I spoke to.
  • The thing I dreamt about.
  • The job I applied for.
🔄

受動態

  • He was looked after.
  • It's been waited for.
  • The matter was decided on.

レベル別の例文

1

Where are you from?

2

Who are you with?

3

What are you looking at?

4

Who is she talking to?

1

What are you waiting for?

2

Which house do you live in?

3

Who did you go to the party with?

4

This is the movie I told you about.

1

That's the guy I was arguing with.

2

I found the keys I was looking for.

3

Which company did you apply to?

4

He is someone you can rely on.

1

The results were exactly what we had hoped for.

2

It’s a difficult situation to deal with.

3

Who was the contract signed by?

4

The children need someone to look after them.

1

The sheer number of variables we had to account for was staggering.

2

He is a man whom I have the greatest respect for.

3

This is the kind of nonsense I will not put up with.

4

The city has many hidden gems to marvel at.

1

The metaphysical implications are what the author is primarily concerned with.

2

It is a principle that the entire legal system is based upon.

3

Such are the tribulations that a modern democracy must contend with.

4

The very ground they stood on seemed to shift.

間違えやすい

Ending with Prepositions: Who are you with? Phrasal Verbs vs. Prepositions

Learners often confuse a simple preposition with the particle of a phrasal verb.

Ending with Prepositions: Who are you with? Who vs. Whom

Learners think they must use 'whom' if there is a preposition involved.

よくある間違い

Where you from?

Where are you from?

Forgetting the auxiliary verb 'are'.

Who you with?

Who are you with?

Missing the verb 'to be'.

What you look at?

What are you looking at?

Incorrect tense and missing preposition.

I from Japan.

I am from Japan.

Basic sentence structure error.

Who are you waiting?

Who are you waiting for?

Dropping the preposition because the L1 doesn't require it at the end.

What are you listening?

What are you listening to?

Listening always requires 'to' in English.

The book I told you.

The book I told you about.

The relative clause is incomplete without 'about'.

To who are you talking to?

Who are you talking to?

Double prepositioning (hypercorrection).

The man who I work.

The man who I work with.

Missing the preposition that connects the person to the action.

Which room do you sleep?

Which room do you sleep in?

Forgetting the locative preposition.

To whom are you looking for?

Who are you looking for?

Using 'whom' with a stranded preposition is a register clash.

文型パターン

Who are you ___ with?

That is the ___ I was telling you about.

What are you so ___ about?

Real World Usage

Texting a friend constant

Who are you with?

Job Interview common

What kind of environment do you thrive in?

Ordering Food very common

What does this come with?

Academic Essay occasional

This is a theory that many scholars agree with.

Customer Support common

What can I help you with?

Dating common

What are you looking for in a partner?

💡

自然さを大切に

日常の英語では、文末に前置詞があっても気にしないでくださいね。ネイティブスピーカーのように、もっと自然で流暢な話し方や書き方になりますよ。「Who are you talking to?」
⚠️

場面に合わせて使い分けよう

基本的にはOKですが、とてもフォーマルな学術論文や法律文書、公式スピーチなどでは避けた方が無難です。そういう場面では、もっと伝統的な文の構造を選びましょう。「To whom are you talking?」
🎯

句動詞と相性ばっちり

「look for」や「talk about」のような句動詞の一部である前置詞が文末に来ることはよくあります。これらは切り離せないものなので、動詞とセットで文末に来ることが多いんです。「What did you come up with?」
🌍

古いルールは気にしない

文末に前置詞を置くのが「間違い」だという考えは、ラテン語の文法から来ていて、英語には当てはまりません。ほとんどのネイティブはそんなこと考えもしませんし、避けようとすると不自然になることもあります。「This is the app I was looking for.」

Smart Tips

Just use 'Who' and put the preposition at the end. It's safe, modern, and professional.

To whom should I send this? Who should I send this to?

Always put the preposition at the end. 'That' cannot follow a preposition.

The person with that I spoke. The person that I spoke with.

Drop the relative pronoun ('who' or 'that') entirely and keep the preposition at the end.

The guy that I was with. The guy I was with.

Never try to move the particle to the front; it will break the verb's meaning.

About what are you talking? What are you talking about?

発音

/huː ə juː ˈtɔːkɪŋ tu/

Preposition Stress

When a preposition is at the end of a sentence, it is usually unstressed and 'weak'. However, if you want to emphasize it, you can stress it.

Rising-Falling

Who are you with? ↘

A standard, neutral information-seeking question.

暗記しよう

記憶術

The preposition is like a 'tail'—it's natural for it to wag at the end of the sentence dog.

視覚的連想

Imagine a fishing hook at the end of a sentence. The preposition is the hook that catches the object at the very beginning of the sentence.

Rhyme

If a question you must send, put the 'with' or 'to' at the end.

Story

A traveler named 'Who' went on a journey. He always left his bags ('with', 'for', 'from') at the hotel (the end of the sentence) while he went to explore the city (the beginning of the sentence).

Word Web

withfortoataboutfrominon

チャレンジ

Write 5 questions you would ask your favorite celebrity, ensuring every single one ends with a preposition (e.g., 'Who do you look up to?').

文化メモ

Some older teachers or very formal institutions still cling to the 'never end with a preposition' rule, despite it being linguistically debunked.

Americans are generally very comfortable with stranded prepositions in almost all contexts, including business.

While common, some high-level British RP (Received Pronunciation) speakers might use fronted prepositions to sound more 'proper' or 'upper-class'.

Preposition stranding is a native feature of Old English and other Germanic languages like Old Norse.

会話のきっかけ

Who is the person you look up to most?

What kind of music are you into lately?

If you could travel anywhere, where would you go to?

What is a problem you've recently dealt with?

日記のテーマ

Describe your best friend. What do you like about them? What do you talk about?
Write about a difficult decision you had to make. Who did you ask for advice? What were you worried about?
Discuss a social issue you are concerned with. Why is it important? What should be done about it?

よくある間違い

Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解

Test Yourself

質問を完成させる正しい前置詞を選びましょう。

Which movie are you talking ___?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: about
動詞「talk」は、あるトピックについて話すときに、しばしば前置詞「about」を伴います。ここでは、「about」が自然に質問の最後に置かれています。
文章の間違いを見つけて訂正しましょう。 Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

Whom did you go to the concert with?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Who did you go to the concert with?
前置詞('with')が文末にある場合、代名詞は 'who'(主格)であるべきで、'whom'(目的格)ではありません。「With whom...」は文法的に正しいですが、非常にフォーマルです。
単語を並べ替えて自然な疑問文を作りましょう。 Sentence Reorder

Arrange the words in the correct order:

All words placed

Click words above to build the sentence

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: What are you looking for?
これは句動詞「look for」を使ったよくある質問で、前置詞「for」が自然に文末に来ています。

Score: /3

練習問題

8 exercises
Complete the question with the correct preposition.

Who are you waiting ___?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: for
We 'wait for' someone.
Correct the formal sentence to make it sound natural. Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

To whom are you talking?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Who are you talking to?
Moving the preposition to the end and using 'who' is the natural form.
Which sentence is correct? 選択問題

Select the natural-sounding sentence.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The house which I live in is small.
Stranding the preposition 'in' at the end of the relative clause is correct.
Put the words in the correct order. Sentence Reorder

you / looking / what / at / are / ?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: What are you looking at?
Wh-word + Aux + Subject + Verb + Preposition.
Translate '¿Con quién estás?' into natural English. 翻訳

¿Con quién estás?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Who are you with?
This is the most natural way to ask this in English.
Match the verb to its common ending preposition. Match Pairs

Listen, Wait, Look, Talk

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: to, for, at, to
Listen to, Wait for, Look at, Talk to.
Create a sentence using: 'The man', 'I', 'work', 'with'. Sentence Building

The man / I / work / with

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The man I work with.
This is a relative clause with a stranded preposition.
Is the following statement true or false? True False Rule

It is grammatically incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition in modern English.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: False
It is a common myth, but it is actually correct and natural.

Score: /8

Practice Bank

12 exercises
最も自然な前置詞で文章を完成させましょう。 穴埋め問題

That's the problem we need to deal ___.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: with
日常会話でより自然な文章はどれでしょう? 選択問題

正しい文章を選びましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: What are you thinking about?
不自然な言い回しを見つけて訂正しましょう。 Error Correction

This is the person to whom I spoke with.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: This is the person I spoke with.
「Com quem você está saindo?」を英語に翻訳しましょう。 翻訳

Translate into English: 'Com quem você está saindo?'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["Who are you going out with?","Who are you dating?"]
単語を並べ替えて文法的に正しい文章を作りましょう。 Sentence Reorder

単語を並べ替えて文章を作りましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: That's the movie everyone's talking about.
インフォーマルな質問を、そのフォーマルな言い換えと一致させましょう。 Match Pairs

インフォーマルな質問を、そのフォーマルな言い換えと一致させましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: matched
適切な前置詞で文章を完成させましょう。 穴埋め問題

The meeting was cancelled. I don't know why, but it was decided ___.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: on
カジュアルな会話で正しく自然な文章はどれでしょう? 選択問題

正しい文章を選びましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: This is the game I'm excited about.
文章をより自然に聞こえるように訂正しましょう。 Error Correction

The project with which I am involved is very complex.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The project I am involved with is very complex.
「Isso é algo em que você pode confiar.」を英語に翻訳しましょう。 翻訳

Translate into English: 'Isso é algo em que você pode confiar.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["That's something you can rely on.","That's something you can count on."]
単語を並べ替えて質問を作りましょう。 Sentence Reorder

単語を並べ替えて疑問文を作りましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: What are you worried about?
これらの前置詞でよく終わる動詞句を一致させましょう。 Match Pairs

動詞を、よく文末に来る前置詞と一致させましょう。

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: matched

Score: /12

よくある質問 (8)

Yes, absolutely! It is a natural part of English. The 'rule' against it was made up in the 1600s to make English more like Latin, but it doesn't fit how English actually works.

In extremely formal documents, like a legal contract or a very traditional academic paper, you might choose to 'front' the preposition (e.g., 'The person to whom...'). However, even then, if it sounds awkward, stranding is fine.

It's the linguistic term for leaving a preposition at the end of a clause when its object has moved to the front, like in 'Who are you with?'.

It's grammatically possible but sounds very strange. It's a 'register clash'—'whom' is very formal, but stranding is more informal. Stick to 'Who... to' or 'To whom...'.

Phrasal verbs *must* keep their particles. You can't move the 'up' in 'What did you give up?' to the front. 'Up what did you give?' is nonsense.

Most common ones like 'to', 'for', 'with', 'at', and 'from' are frequently stranded. Longer prepositions like 'concerning' or 'despite' are rarely stranded because they sound awkward at the end.

It's a 'zombie rule'—a rule that is dead but still haunts classrooms. Many people were taught this in school by teachers who were following outdated textbooks.

Technically no, but more than two usually sounds confusing. For example: 'What did you bring that book I don't like being read to out of up for?' is a famous (but silly) example of too many.

Scaffolded Practice

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

Mastery Progress

Needs Practice

Improving

Strong

Mastered

In Other Languages

Spanish low

Preposition + Relative Pronoun

The preposition must always precede the pronoun in Spanish.

French low

Preposition + Qui/Lequel

Ending a sentence with 'à' or 'de' is grammatically impossible in French.

German moderate

Da-compounds or fronting

German uses 'W-compounds' for questions (e.g., Womit) rather than stranding.

Japanese none

Postpositions

Japanese particles are always attached to the noun they modify.

Arabic low

Resumptive Pronouns

Arabic requires a pronoun to 'fill the gap' left by the moved object.

Chinese low

Pre-verbal prepositional phrases

Word order is strictly Preposition + Object + Verb.

Learning Path

Prerequisites

Was this helpful?
まだコメントがありません。最初に考えをシェアしましょう!