B1 Passive & Reported Speech 15 min read ふつう

過去単純受動態: 完了した行為 (~された)

「過去受動態」をマスターすると、行動した人よりも「行動されたもの」に注目できるようになって、もっと自然な英語が話せるようになりますよ。「doer」から「receiver」へ「focus」を「shift」!

Grammar Rule in 30 Seconds

Use 'was' or 'were' plus a past participle to focus on what happened to something, rather than who did it.

  • Use 'was' for singular subjects and 'were' for plural subjects: 'The letter was sent.'
  • Always use the past participle (V3) of the main verb: 'The windows were broken.'
  • Add 'by' only if the person who did the action is actually important: 'It was painted by Da Vinci.'
Object + 🏛️ (was/were) + ✅ (Past Participle)

Overview

### Overview
英語を学習する上で、多くの日本人が最初に直面する大きな壁の一つが「受動態(Passive Voice)」です。特に今回学習する「過去形受動態(Past Simple Passive)」は、過去に起こった出来事を、誰がしたかではなく「何が起きたか」という視点で伝えるための非常に重要な表現です。
なぜこの文法が重要なのでしょうか。それは、英語が「誰が(主語)」を非常に重視する言語だからです。日本語では「財布を盗まれた」「昨日、新しいビルが建てられた」のように、主語を曖昧にしたまま自然に話すことができますが、英語では「誰が」を特定できない場合や、あえて特定したくない場合に、この「受動態」という形を借りて表現を成立させる必要があります。
B1レベル(中級)を目指す皆さんにとって、過去形受動態をマスターすることは、単にテストの点数を上げるためだけではありません。ニュースを理解したり、仕事で報告書を書いたり、あるいは自分の身に起きたトラブルを説明したりする際に、より客観的で、洗練された英語を話すための必須スキルなのです。このセクションでは、日本語との違いを意識しながら、自然な英語の響きを手に入れるためのポイントを詳しく解説していきます。
### How This Grammar Works
まず、英語の基本構造は「S(主語)+ V(動詞)+ O(目的語)」、つまり「誰が+する+何を」という語順です。これを「能動態(Active Voice)」と呼びます。これに対し、受動態はこの語順を逆転させ、「何が(目的語だったもの)+〜された(受動態)+誰によって」という形にします。
日本語と英語の構造を比較してみましょう。
| 構造 | 例文(英語) | 例文(日本語) |
|---|---|---|
| 能動態 (Active) | The chef prepared the meal. | シェフがその料理を準備した。 |
| 受動態 (Passive) | The meal was prepared by the chef. | その料理はシェフによって準備された。 |
ここで注目すべきは、日本語の「〜された」という表現と英語の受動態は、必ずしも1対1で対応しないという点です。日本語には「雨に降られた」や「客に来られた」のように、自動詞(目的語を取らない動詞)を使った「迷惑の受身」という独特の表現がありますが、英語の受動態は基本的に他動詞(〜を、に当たる目的語を持つ動詞)でしか作ることができません。ここが日本人が最も混乱しやすいポイントの一つです。
英語の過去形受動態の本質は、「スポットライトを当てる対象を変える」ことにあります。能動態では「シェフ」にスポットライトが当たっていますが、受動態にすることで「料理」にスポットライトが移ります。過去の出来事において、その「結果」や「対象物」の方が重要な場合、この形が選ばれます。
### Formation Pattern
過去形受動態を作るための公式は非常にシンプルですが、正確に使いこなすには「be動詞の使い分け」と「過去分詞(Past Participle)」の知識が不可欠です。
基本公式:Subject (受け手) + was / were + Past Participle (過去分詞)
#### 1. be動詞の使い分け (was or were)
主語(動作の受け手)が単数か複数かによって使い分けます。これは日本語にはない感覚なので、意識的な練習が必要です。
  • 単数 (I, He, She, It, Singular nouns): was を使用
  • The window was broken. (窓が割られた。)
  • 複数 (You, We, They, Plural nouns): were を使用
  • The windows were broken. (複数の窓が割られた。)
#### 2. 過去分詞 (Past Participle)
動詞の形を過去分詞に変えます。規則動詞(-edをつけるだけ)は簡単ですが、不規則動詞は個別に覚える必要があります。
| 動詞の原形 | 過去形 | 過去分詞 (受動態で使用) |
|---|---|---|
| write | wrote | written |
| break | broke | broken |
| take | took | taken |
| build | built | built |
| sell | sold | sold |
#### 3. 動作主を表す by (任意)
「誰によって」行われたかを明示したい場合は、文末に by + 人・物 を付け加えます。しかし、日常会話やレポートでは、動作主が不明だったり重要でなかったりすることが多いため、省略されることが一般的です。
  • This house was built in 1990 (by my grandfather).
(この家は1990年に[祖父によって]建てられた。)
### When To Use It
過去形受動態は、単なる「書き換え問題」のための文法ではありません。ネイティブスピーカーがこの形を選ぶときには、明確な意図があります。以下の5つのシチュエーションでよく使われます。
#### 1. 動作主が誰だか分からない、または重要ではない時
これが最も一般的な理由です。例えば、泥棒に財布を盗まれた場合、犯人が誰だか分からないので「誰かが盗んだ」と言うよりも「財布が盗まれた」と言う方が自然です。
  • My bicycle was stolen last night. (昨夜、自転車が盗まれた。)
  • The package was delivered this morning. (今朝、荷物が届けられた。)
#### 2. 客観的事実や歴史的な出来事を述べる時
教科書やニュース、レポートなどで、個人的な感情を入れずに事実を伝えたい時に使われます。
  • The Tokyo Tower was completed in 1958. (東京タワーは1958年に完成した。)
  • The decision was made after a long discussion. (長い議論の末、その決定が下された。)
#### 3. 動作の「受け手」に強い関心がある時
例えば、ある有名な絵画について話している時、画家よりもその絵画自体が話題の中心であれば、受動態が自然です。
  • This masterpiece was painted by Hokusai. (この傑作は北斎によって描かれた。)
  • I was chosen as the team leader. (私はチームリーダーに選ばれた。)
#### 4. 責任を回避したい、または丁寧・婉曲に伝えたい時
「あなたが間違えた」と言うと攻撃的に聞こえますが、「間違いがなされた(間違いがあった)」と言うことで、角を立てずに事実を伝えることができます。ビジネスシーンでの「大人の表現」です。
  • A mistake was made in the calculation. (計算に間違いがありました。)
  • The meeting was cancelled at the last minute. (会議は直前でキャンセルされました。)
#### 5. プロセスや手順を説明する時
工場での製造工程や、イベントの運営報告などでよく使われます。
  • The raw materials were imported from Australia. (原材料はオーストラリアから輸入された。)
  • The results were analyzed by the researchers. (結果は研究者たちによって分析された。)
### Common Mistakes
日本人学習者が陥りやすいミスには、日本語の文法構造が影響しているものが多くあります。以下の3点には特に注意しましょう。
#### 1. be動詞の脱落 (The Missing was/were)
日本語では「書かれた」「壊れた」のように、動詞の語尾を変えるだけで受身の意味になります。そのため、英語でも was/were を忘れてしまうミスが非常に多いです。
  • Incorrect: The report finished yesterday. (これでは「レポートが(自分で)昨日終わった」という能動態の意味不明な文になります。)
  • Correct: The report was finished yesterday.
#### 2. 自動詞を無理やり受動態にしてしまう (Passive of Intransitive Verbs)
日本語の「雨に降られた(迷惑の受身)」を直訳して I was rained. と言ってしまうミスです。英語の受動態は「他動詞(何かを対象にする動詞)」にしか使えません。happen, occur, arrive, die などの自動詞は受動態にできません。
  • Incorrect: The accident was happened.
  • Correct: The accident happened. (事故が起きた。)
#### 3. 過去形と過去分詞の混同 (Confusing Past Simple and Past Participle)
不規則動詞の場合、過去形と過去分詞が異なる形になるものがあります。受動態では必ず「過去分詞」を使わなければなりませんが、ついつい過去形を使ってしまうことがあります。
  • Incorrect: The letter was wrote.
  • Correct: The letter was written.
### Contrast With Similar Patterns
他の時制や能動態との違いを表で整理してみましょう。特に「現在形受動態」との違いは、時間の感覚を正しく掴むために重要です。
| 文法項目 | 構造 | ニュアンス・焦点 |
|---|---|---|
| Past Simple Active | Someone stole my bag. | 「誰か」の行動に焦点を当てている。少し生々しい。 |
| Past Simple Passive | My bag was stolen. | 「バッグ」という被害物に焦点を当てている。一般的。 |
| Present Simple Passive | Cheese is made from milk. | 過去のことではなく、現在も変わらない「事実・習慣」。 |
| Past Simple Passive | This cheese was made in France. | その特定のチーズが「過去に」フランスで作られた事実。 |
また、日常会話では was/were の代わりに get を使った過去形受動態 (got + past participle) もよく使われます。was が「状態や事実」を表すのに対し、get は「予期せぬ出来事や変化」というニュアンスが強くなります。
  • I was hired. (採用された。:事実を述べている)
  • I got hired! (採用されたよ!:動きや変化、喜びを感じさせる)
### Quick FAQ
Q1: by は必ず使わなければなりませんか?
A1: いいえ、むしろ日常会話では 80% 以上の受動態で by は省略されます。動作主が誰だか分からない時や、文脈から明らかな時(例:犯人は警察に捕まるもの)は使いません。動作主が意外な人物だったり、その人を強調したい時だけ by を使います。
Q2: どんな動詞でも受動態にできますか?
A2: いいえ。先ほども触れた通り、go, come, happen, stay などの「自動詞(目的語を持たない動詞)」は受動態にできません。また、have (持っている) や resemble (似ている) などの状態を表す他動詞も、基本的には受動態になりません。A car was had by me. とは言いません。
Q3: 「〜された」という日本語はすべて受動態で訳すべきですか?
A3: ここが一番の落とし穴です。日本語の「壊れた(自動詞)」と「壊された(受動態)」は区別が曖昧なことがありますが、英語では明確に分けます。例えば「窓が(自然に/勝手に)割れた」なら The window broke. (能動態)、「誰かに割られた」なら The window was broken. (受動態) と使い分けます。何でもかんでも受動態にするのではなく、「誰かが意図的に行ったのか」を考えるのがコツです。
Q4: ビジネスメールで受動態を使うメリットは何ですか?
A4: 主語を IWe にしすぎると、押し付けがましい印象を与えることがあります。受動態を使うことで、「客観的な状況」として情報を伝えることができ、プロフェッショナルで落ち着いたトーンになります。例えば We received your email. よりも Your email was received. の方が、事務的でフォーマルな響きになります。

Past Simple Passive Conjugation

Subject Auxiliary (to be) Past Participle (V3) Example
I / He / She / It
was
done / seen / built
It was done.
You / We / They
were
done / seen / built
They were seen.
Negative (Singular)
was not (wasn't)
taken
He wasn't taken.
Negative (Plural)
were not (weren't)
taken
We weren't taken.
Question (Singular)
Was [subject]
invited?
Was she invited?
Question (Plural)
Were [subject]
invited?
Were they invited?

Contractions

Full Form Contraction
was not
wasn't
were not
weren't

Meanings

The Past Simple Passive is used to describe completed actions in the past where the object of the action becomes the subject of the sentence. It is used when the 'doer' is unknown, obvious, or less important than the action itself.

1

Historical Facts

Describing events in history where the focus is on the discovery, invention, or event.

“The Pyramids were built thousands of years ago.”

“America was reached by Columbus in 1492.”

2

Crime and Accidents

Reporting incidents where the perpetrator might be unknown or the victim/object is the news.

“My bike was stolen last night.”

“The shop was robbed at 4 AM.”

3

Process and Results

Focusing on the completion of a task rather than the worker.

“The report was finished on time.”

“The emails were sent this morning.”

Reference Table

Reference table for 過去単純受動態: 完了した行為 (~された)
主語 過去受動態の形 例文
I
was + 過去分詞
I `was told` about the meeting.
You (singular)
were + 過去分詞
You `were invited` to the party.
He/She/It
was + 過去分詞
The car `was repaired` yesterday.
We
were + 過去分詞
We `were informed` of the changes.
You (plural)
were + 過去分詞
You `were offered` a discount.
They
were + 過去分詞
They `were given` clear instructions.

フォーマル度スペクトル

フォーマル
The mobile device was misappropriated.

The mobile device was misappropriated. (Theft)

ニュートラル
My phone was stolen.

My phone was stolen. (Theft)

カジュアル
My phone got nicked.

My phone got nicked. (Theft)

スラング
My blower was swiped.

My blower was swiped. (Theft)

過去単純受動態: 一目でわかる

Past Simple Passive

構造

  • was/were + Past Participle 動詞の形

いつ使うか

  • Unknown/Unimportant Agent 行動した人が重要でない時
  • Objectivity フォーマルなトーン
  • Emphasis on Action/Receiver 何が起こったか

  • The email was sent. メールが送られた
  • Houses were built. 家が建てられた

能動態 vs. 受動態: 過去単純

Active Voice
The chef cooked the meal. シェフに焦点
Someone stole my bike. 「誰か」に焦点
Passive Voice
The meal was cooked. 食事に焦点
My bike was stolen. 自転車に焦点

過去単純受動態を使うべき?

1

「行動をした人」は不明、または重要ではありませんか?

YES
過去単純受動態を使いましょう!
NO
能動態を検討しましょう。
2

行動そのもの、または行動されたものに焦点を当てたいですか?

YES
過去単純受動態を使いましょう!
NO
能動態を検討しましょう。
3

フォーマルな文章(ニュース、レポートなど)を書いていますか?

YES
過去単純受動態は良い選択肢になることが多いです。
NO
能動態の方が通常、より直接的です。

受動態のための過去分詞

規則動詞 (-ed)

  • cleaned
  • finished
  • started
  • developed
⚠️

不規則動詞 (よくあるもの)

  • broken
  • taken
  • given
  • written
  • seen
  • made
💬

例文

  • The room was cleaned.
  • The picture was taken.
  • The decision was made.

レベル別の例文

1

The window was broken.

The window was broken.

2

The car was washed.

The car was washed.

3

The books were sold.

The books were sold.

4

The food was cold.

The food was cold.

1

The house was built in 1950.

The house was built in 1950.

2

The emails were sent at 9 AM.

The emails were sent at 9 AM.

3

The movie was directed by Spielberg.

The movie was directed by Spielberg.

4

Were the tickets bought yesterday?

Were the tickets bought yesterday?

1

The missing child was found in the park.

The missing child was found in the park.

2

The bridge was closed for repairs.

The bridge was closed for repairs.

3

My luggage was lost by the airline.

My luggage was lost by the airline.

4

The winners were chosen by a panel of experts.

The winners were chosen by a panel of experts.

1

The law was passed despite heavy opposition.

The law was passed despite heavy opposition.

2

The experiment was conducted in a controlled environment.

The experiment was conducted in a controlled environment.

3

The employees were notified of the changes via email.

The employees were notified of the changes via email.

4

The ancient ruins were discovered by accident.

The ancient ruins were discovered by accident.

1

The proposal was summarily rejected by the board.

The proposal was summarily rejected by the board.

2

The city was decimated by the earthquake of 1906.

The city was decimated by the earthquake of 1906.

3

The funds were misappropriated over a period of five years.

The funds were misappropriated over a period of five years.

4

The manuscript was painstakingly restored by conservators.

The manuscript was painstakingly restored by conservators.

1

The initiative was predicated upon the assumption of growth.

The initiative was predicated upon the assumption of growth.

2

The castle was besieged for months before it finally fell.

The castle was besieged for months before it finally fell.

3

The silence was broken only by the occasional cry of a gull.

The silence was broken only by the occasional cry of a gull.

4

The verdict was overturned on the grounds of insufficient evidence.

The verdict was overturned on the grounds of insufficient evidence.

間違えやすい

Past Simple Passive: Completed Actions (was/were done) Past Simple Active

Learners use the active when they mean the passive, making it sound like objects performed actions.

Past Simple Passive: Completed Actions (was/were done) Present Simple Passive

Mixing up 'is/are' with 'was/were'.

Past Simple Passive: Completed Actions (was/were done) Past Continuous Passive

Confusing 'was done' with 'was being done'.

よくある間違い

The car fixed yesterday.

The car was fixed yesterday.

You missed the auxiliary verb 'was'. Passive needs 'to be'.

The books was sold.

The books were sold.

Use 'were' for plural subjects (books).

I was borned in 1990.

I was born in 1990.

'Born' is already the participle; don't add '-ed'.

The window broken.

The window was broken.

Missing 'was'.

The letter was wrote.

The letter was written.

You used the Past Simple (V2) instead of the Past Participle (V3).

The dinner was cook by my mom.

The dinner was cooked by my mom.

Regular verbs need '-ed' in the passive.

Was the work finish?

Was the work finished?

Questions still need the past participle.

The thief was arrest.

The thief was arrested.

Incomplete verb form.

He was bit by a dog.

He was bitten by a dog.

Irregular verb error (bit vs bitten).

The house was build in 2000.

The house was built in 2000.

Irregular verb error (build vs built).

The data was analyzed (when referring to multiple sets).

The data were analyzed.

In formal/academic English, 'data' is often treated as plural.

文型パターン

The ___ was ___ by ___.

When was the ___ ___?

I wasn't ___ that ___.

Real World Usage

News Reporting constant

The suspect was arrested late last night.

History Books very common

The city was destroyed by fire in 1666.

Customer Service common

Your order was shipped yesterday.

Social Media occasional

This video was made by my best friend!

Office Communication very common

The meeting was moved to Room 4.

Crime/Police constant

The evidence was collected at the scene.

💡

Spot the Receiver! (行動されたものに注目!)

文の中で「行動を受けているのは誰か、何か」をいつも確認しましょう。それが文の主語なら、受動態を使う可能性が高いですよ。これで「was」か「were」を正しく選べます。「The report was written by Sarah.」
⚠️

Don't Overuse It! (使いすぎは注意!)

とても便利な受動態ですが、使いすぎると文章がぎこちなく聞こえたり、遠回しな印象になることもあります。誰が行動したか分かっていて、それが重要なら能動態を使いましょう。自然な表現を心がけてくださいね!「My brother washed the car.」
🎯

Master Irregular Verbs (不規則動詞をマスター!)

よく使う動詞の中には、不規則な過去分詞が多いんです(例: go-gone, see-seen, break-broken)。これらを覚えておくと、受動態をスムーズに作れるようになりますよ。練習あるのみです!「The window was broken.」
🌍

News & Formal Reports (ニュースや公式レポートで)

ニュース記事や公式レポートで、受動態がよく使われていることに気づきましたか?客観性を加え、行動した人よりも出来事そのものに焦点を当てるのに役立ちます。プロのように聞こえる魔法ですよ!「The new policy was announced by the CEO.」

Smart Tips

Use the passive to sound professional and avoid pointing fingers.

You didn't send the attachment. The attachment was not sent.

Check if the verb before it is a past participle; if so, it's a passive sentence.

The book wrote by him. The book was written by him.

Use 'was taken' to describe the location or photographer.

I took this photo in Rome. This photo was taken in Rome.

If you don't know the V3, try adding -ed, but always double-check a dictionary for common verbs like 'see', 'give', and 'take'.

The gift was gived. The gift was given.

発音

/wəz/ and /wə/

Was/Were Stress

In passive sentences, 'was' and 'were' are usually unstressed (weak forms). The stress falls on the past participle.

fixed /fɪkst/, cleaned /kliːnd/, painted /peɪntɪd/

-ed endings

Remember the three sounds of '-ed': /t/, /d/, and /ɪd/. 'Fixed' (/t/), 'Cleaned' (/d/), 'Painted' (/ɪd/).

Falling intonation for statements

The house was ↘built.

Conveys a completed fact.

暗記しよう

記憶術

W.W.P.P. -> Was/Were + Past Participle. Remember: 'What was performed?'

視覚的連想

Imagine a factory conveyor belt. The product (the subject) is at the front, and the worker (the agent) is hidden behind a curtain. The focus is entirely on the finished product being 'was made'.

Rhyme

If the doer is unknown or just doesn't matter, use was or were to make the object flatter!

Story

A detective walks into a room. He doesn't say 'Someone stole the diamond.' He says, 'The diamond was stolen!' He focuses on the crime (the object) because he doesn't know the thief yet.

Word Web

waswerebystolenbuiltbornmadediscovered

チャレンジ

Look around your room. Find three things and say when they were made or where they were bought. (e.g., 'This lamp was bought in IKEA.')

文化メモ

The passive is very common in British English to sound polite or indirect. Instead of saying 'You broke this,' a Brit might say 'This was broken,' to avoid blaming you directly.

In scientific papers globally, the passive is the standard to show objectivity. It suggests the results are true regardless of who did the experiment.

News headlines often drop the 'was/were' to save space, but the meaning remains passive.

The passive voice in English evolved from Old English, which used the verbs 'weorthan' (to become) and 'beon' (to be) with a past participle.

会話のきっかけ

Where were you born and raised?

Tell me about a famous historical event in your country.

Have you ever had something stolen?

What's the best gift you were ever given?

日記のテーマ

Describe the history of your favorite object (e.g., your phone, a piece of jewelry). Where was it made? How was it designed?
Write a short news report about a fictional crime. What was taken? How was the building entered?
Reflect on your childhood. What rules were you given? How were you punished or rewarded?

よくある間違い

Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解


Incorrect

正解

Test Yourself

受動態になるように、正しい動詞の形を選んでください。

The famous painting ___ last night.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: was stolen
主語の「painting」は単数なので、「was」を使います。「steal」の過去分詞は「stolen」です。
文中の間違いを見つけて直してください。 Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

The books was delivered yesterday.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The books were delivered yesterday.
主語の「books」は複数なので、「was」ではなく「were」が必要です。
正しい過去単純受動態の文を選んでください。 選択問題

Choose the correct sentence:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The project was completed on time.
主語の「project」は単数なので「was」が必要で、「completed」が正しい過去分詞です。
受動態を使って、正しい英文をタイプしてください。 翻訳

Translate into English: 'La cena fue preparada por mi hermano.'

Answer starts with: ["T...

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["The dinner was prepared by my brother.","Dinner was prepared by my brother."]
単数主語の「dinner」には「was prepared」を使って受動態にします。「By my brother」は行動した人を示します。

Score: /4

練習問題

8 exercises
Complete the sentence with the correct form of the Past Simple Passive.

The letter ___ (post) yesterday morning.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: was posted
We use 'was' for singular (letter) and the past participle 'posted'.
Choose the correct passive sentence. 選択問題

Which sentence is correct?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The pyramids were built by Egyptians.
'Pyramids' is plural (were) and 'built' is the correct V3.
Find the mistake in this sentence: 'The windows was cleaned last week.' Error Correction

Find and fix the mistake:

The windows was cleaned last week.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Change 'was' to 'were'
'Windows' is plural, so it requires 'were'.
Change this active sentence to passive: 'The chef prepared the meal.' Sentence Transformation

The chef prepared the meal.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The meal was prepared by the chef.
The object 'the meal' becomes the subject.
Is the following rule true or false? True False Rule

We use 'was' for the subjects 'I, he, she, it' in the past passive.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: True
'Was' is the singular past form of 'to be'.
Complete the dialogue. Dialogue Completion

A: Did you see the news? B: Yes, the bank ___ (rob) again!

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: was robbed
The bank is singular and the action is finished.
Which of these verbs are IRREGULAR in their past participle form? Grammar Sorting

Select the irregular one:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Written
Write -> Wrote -> Written (Irregular).
Match the active sentence to its passive equivalent. Match Pairs

Active: 'They invited us.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: We were invited.
'Us' becomes 'We' when it moves to the subject position.

Score: /8

Practice Bank

11 exercises
正しい受動態の形で文を完成させてください。 穴埋め問題

Many mistakes ___ during the first trial.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: were made
文法上の誤りを見つけて訂正してください。 Error Correction

The secret code was broke by hackers.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The secret code was broken by hackers.
過去単純受動態を正しく使っている文を選んでください。 選択問題

Which sentence is grammatically correct?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The old castle was built in the 15th century.
受動態を使って英語に翻訳してください。 翻訳

Translate: 'Los resultados fueron publicados anoche.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["The results were published last night.","Results were published last night."]
これらの単語を並べ替えて、受動態の文を作成してください。 Sentence Reorder

Arrange these words into a sentence:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The new planet was discovered by the telescope.
主語と正しい受動態の形を一致させてください。 Match Pairs

Match the subjects with the correct form:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: matched
最も適切な動詞の形を選んでください。 穴埋め問題

The ancient city ___ by an earthquake.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: was destroyed
受動態の文の誤りを修正してください。 Error Correction

Many valuable items was lost in the fire.

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: Many valuable items were lost in the fire.
正しく構成された受動態の文を特定してください。 選択問題

Which of these sentences is correct?

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The new software was installed last week.
その文を受動態の英語に翻訳してください。 翻訳

Translate: 'Los documentos fueron firmados esta mañana.'

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: ["The documents were signed this morning.","Documents were signed this morning."]
単語を並べ替えて、一貫性のある受動態の文を作成してください。 Sentence Reorder

Arrange these words into a sentence:

✓ Correct! ✗ Not quite. Correct answer: The match was cancelled by bad weather last night.

Score: /11

よくある質問 (8)

Use `by` only when the person or thing doing the action is important to the meaning. For example: 'The song was written by John Lennon.' If you say 'The room was cleaned by a cleaner,' it's usually better to just say 'The room was cleaned.'

No. You can only use it with 'transitive' verbs (verbs that take an object). You cannot use it with verbs like `go`, `sleep`, `happen`, or `arrive`.

Not at all! In fact, it's often more polite because it avoids blaming people. Saying 'The mistake was made' is softer than 'You made a mistake.'

We almost always use `was born` because being born is a finished action in the past. We only use 'is born' in very specific literary or religious contexts.

Move `was` or `were` to the start of the sentence. Example: 'Was the car stolen?'

In informal English, yes. 'I got fired' is the same as 'I was fired.' However, 'was' is better for writing and formal exams.

Yes, always. The passive voice cannot exist without the past participle (V3).

Because journalists often don't know who did the action (e.g., 'A man was killed') or they want to focus on the victim/event.

Scaffolded Practice

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

Mastery Progress

Needs Practice

Improving

Strong

Mastered

In Other Languages

Spanish moderate

Voz pasiva (ser + participio) or Pasiva refleja (se)

English lacks the 'se' reflexive passive.

French high

La voix passive (être + participe passé)

French participles must agree in gender and number with the subject.

German moderate

Vorgangspassiv (werden + Partizip II)

The auxiliary verb is 'to become' in German, not 'to be'.

Japanese low

受身 (ukemi)

Japanese changes the verb ending rather than adding an auxiliary verb like 'was'.

Arabic low

المبني للمجهول (al-mabni lil-majhul)

Arabic does not use an auxiliary verb like 'was' to form the passive.

Chinese partial

被字句 (bèi zì jù)

Chinese verbs do not change form (no participles).

Learning Path

Prerequisites

Was this helpful?
まだコメントがありません。最初に考えをシェアしましょう!